Amanda M Rooney1, David W Dempster2, Jeri W Nieves3, Hua Zhou4, Mathias P G Bostrom5, Felicia Cosman6. 1. Nancy E. and Peter C. Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, 101 Weill Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. Electronic address: amr427@cornell.edu. 2. Regional Bone Center, Helen Hayes Hospital, 55 N Route 9W, West Haverstraw, NY 10993, USA; Department of Pathology, Columbia University, 630 West 168th St., New York, NY 10025, USA. 3. Regional Bone Center, Helen Hayes Hospital, 55 N Route 9W, West Haverstraw, NY 10993, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, 722 West 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA; Research Division, Hospital for Special Surgery, 515 East 71st St., New York, NY 10021, USA. Electronic address: jwn5@cumc.columbia.edu. 4. Regional Bone Center, Helen Hayes Hospital, 55 N Route 9W, West Haverstraw, NY 10993, USA. 5. Research Division, Hospital for Special Surgery, 515 East 71st St., New York, NY 10021, USA. Electronic address: BostromM@hss.edu. 6. Department of Medicine, Columbia University, 622 West 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA. Electronic address: fc14@cumc.columbia.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We have previously shown that a brief course of teriparatide (TPTD) stimulates bone formation in the cancellous and endocortical envelopes of the human femoral neck, and the regions of tension and compression respond differently. The purpose of the present study was to determine how much of the new bone was formed by modeling-based formation (MBF) or remodeling-based formation (RBF). METHODS: We performed a double-blind trial of TPTD vs. placebo (PBO) in patients about to undergo a total hip replacement (THR) for osteoarthritis. Participants were randomized to receive daily TPTD 20 μg or PBO for an average of 6.1 weeks (range 4.1-11.8 weeks) prior to THR. After an average of 3 weeks of study drug, double tetracycline labels were administered per standard protocol. During the THR an intact sample of the mid-femoral neck (FN) was procured; this was fixed, embedded, and sectioned transversely. Histomorphometric analysis was performed in the cancellous, endocortical, and periosteal envelopes. Additionally, separate analyses were performed in the tensile and compressive regions of the endocortical and periosteal envelopes. Sites of new bone formation were identified by the presence of tetracycline labels and designated as MBF if the underlying cement line was smooth and as RBF if it was scalloped. New bone formation on smooth cement lines adjacent to scalloped reversal lines was designated as overflow RBF (oRBF). The referent for all indices was bone surface (BS). RESULTS: In the cancellous and endocortical envelopes, the proportion of mineralizing surface engaged in RBF and oRBF was higher in the TPTD-treated than the PBO-treated subjects. There was also a trend toward higher MBF in TPTD vs. PBO in both envelopes. In linear mixed-effects models, TPTD was predicted to increase formation differently on the tensile and compressive surfaces depending on patient-specific anatomy, including body weight, FN angle, offset, and cortical width and porosity. Eroded surface was not different between groups in either envelope and no significant differences were observed in any parameter in the periosteal envelope. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the predominant early effect of TPTD in the human femoral neck is to stimulate RBF and oRBF with a trend toward an increase in MBF in the endocortical and cancellous envelopes.
PURPOSE: We have previously shown that a brief course of teriparatide (TPTD) stimulates bone formation in the cancellous and endocortical envelopes of the human femoral neck, and the regions of tension and compression respond differently. The purpose of the present study was to determine how much of the new bone was formed by modeling-based formation (MBF) or remodeling-based formation (RBF). METHODS: We performed a double-blind trial of TPTD vs. placebo (PBO) in patients about to undergo a total hip replacement (THR) for osteoarthritis. Participants were randomized to receive daily TPTD 20 μg or PBO for an average of 6.1 weeks (range 4.1-11.8 weeks) prior to THR. After an average of 3 weeks of study drug, double tetracycline labels were administered per standard protocol. During the THR an intact sample of the mid-femoral neck (FN) was procured; this was fixed, embedded, and sectioned transversely. Histomorphometric analysis was performed in the cancellous, endocortical, and periosteal envelopes. Additionally, separate analyses were performed in the tensile and compressive regions of the endocortical and periosteal envelopes. Sites of new bone formation were identified by the presence of tetracycline labels and designated as MBF if the underlying cement line was smooth and as RBF if it was scalloped. New bone formation on smooth cement lines adjacent to scalloped reversal lines was designated as overflow RBF (oRBF). The referent for all indices was bone surface (BS). RESULTS: In the cancellous and endocortical envelopes, the proportion of mineralizing surface engaged in RBF and oRBF was higher in the TPTD-treated than the PBO-treated subjects. There was also a trend toward higher MBF in TPTD vs. PBO in both envelopes. In linear mixed-effects models, TPTD was predicted to increase formation differently on the tensile and compressive surfaces depending on patient-specific anatomy, including body weight, FN angle, offset, and cortical width and porosity. Eroded surface was not different between groups in either envelope and no significant differences were observed in any parameter in the periosteal envelope. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the predominant early effect of TPTD in the human femoral neck is to stimulate RBF and oRBF with a trend toward an increase in MBF in the endocortical and cancellous envelopes.
Authors: R M Neer; C D Arnaud; J R Zanchetta; R Prince; G A Gaich; J Y Reginster; A B Hodsman; E F Eriksen; S Ish-Shalom; H K Genant; O Wang; B H Mitlak Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-05-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amanda M Rooney; Mathias P G Bostrom; David W Dempster; Jeri W Nieves; Hua Zhou; Felicia Cosman Journal: Bone Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: David W Dempster; Hua Zhou; Robert R Recker; Jacques P Brown; Christopher P Recknor; E Michael Lewiecki; Paul D Miller; Sudhaker D Rao; David L Kendler; Robert Lindsay; John H Krege; Jahangir Alam; Kathleen A Taylor; Thomas E Melby; Valerie A Ruff Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: David W Dempster; Juliet E Compston; Marc K Drezner; Francis H Glorieux; John A Kanis; Hartmut Malluche; Pierre J Meunier; Susan M Ott; Robert R Recker; A Michael Parfitt Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: David W Dempster; Arkadi Chines; Mathias P Bostrom; Jeri W Nieves; Hua Zhou; Li Chen; Nico Pannacciulli; Rachel B Wagman; Felicia Cosman Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2020-04-02 Impact factor: 6.390