Literature DB >> 35091987

Neuroanatomical Correlates of Perceived Stress Controllability in Adolescents and Emerging Adults.

Alyssa N Fassett-Carman1, Harry Smolker2, Benjamin L Hankin3, Hannah R Snyder4, Marie T Banich2,5.   

Abstract

Stressful life events predict changes in brain structure and increases in psychopathology, but not everyone is equally affected by life stress. The learned helplessness theory posits that perceiving life stressors as uncontrollable leads to depression. Evidence supports this theory for youth, but the impact of perceived control diverges based on stressor type: perceived lack of control over dependent (self-generated) stressors is associated with greater depression symptoms when controlling for the frequency of stress exposure, but perceived control over independent (non-self-generated) stressors is not. However, it is unknown how perceived control over these stressor types is associated with brain structure. We tested whether perceived lack of control over dependent and independent life stressors, controlling for stressor exposure, is associated with gray matter (GM) in a priori regions of interest (ROIs; mPFC, hippocampus, amygdala) and across the cortex in a sample of 108 adolescents and emerging adults ages 14-22. There were no associations across the full sample between perceived control over either stressor type and GM in the ROIs. However, less perceived control over dependent stressors was associated with greater amygdala gray matter volume in female youth and greater medial prefrontal cortex thickness in male youth. Furthermore, whole-cortex analyses revealed less perceived control over dependent stressors was associated with greater GM thickness in cortical regions involved in cognitive and emotional regulation. Thus, appraisals of control have distinct associations with brain morphology while controlling for stressor frequency, highlighting the importance of differentiating between these aspects of the stress experience in future research.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frontoparietal network; Gray matter morphometry; Life stress; Neuroanatomy; Stress controllability; Youth

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35091987      PMCID: PMC9308625          DOI: 10.3758/s13415-022-00985-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  74 in total

1.  The human cerebral cortex flattens during adolescence.

Authors:  Yasser Alemán-Gómez; Joost Janssen; Hugo Schnack; Evan Balaban; Laura Pina-Camacho; Fidel Alfaro-Almagro; Josefina Castro-Fornieles; Soraya Otero; Immaculada Baeza; Dolores Moreno; Nuria Bargalló; Mara Parellada; Celso Arango; Manuel Desco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Activation of the ventral medial prefrontal cortex during an uncontrollable stressor reproduces both the immediate and long-term protective effects of behavioral control.

Authors:  J Amat; E Paul; L R Watkins; S F Maier
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Controllable stress elicits circuit-specific patterns of prefrontal plasticity in males, but not females.

Authors:  Michael V Baratta; Tina M Gruene; Samuel D Dolzani; Lauren E Chun; Steven F Maier; Rebecca M Shansky
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  A global measure of perceived stress.

Authors:  S Cohen; T Kamarck; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1983-12

5.  Behavioural and neural sequelae of stressor exposure are not modulated by controllability in females.

Authors:  Michael V Baratta; Nathan R Leslie; Isabella P Fallon; Samuel D Dolzani; Lauren E Chun; Andrew M Tamalunas; Linda R Watkins; Steven F Maier
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Head size, age and gender adjustment in MRI studies: a necessary nuisance?

Authors:  Josephine Barnes; Gerard R Ridgway; Jonathan Bartlett; Susie M D Henley; Manja Lehmann; Nicola Hobbs; Matthew J Clarkson; David G MacManus; Sebastien Ourselin; Nick C Fox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Cognitive control mechanisms, emotion and memory: a neural perspective with implications for psychopathology.

Authors:  Marie T Banich; Kristen L Mackiewicz; Brendan E Depue; Anson J Whitmer; Gregory A Miller; Wendy Heller
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Sex differences in the persistence of the amygdala response to negative material.

Authors:  Joseph M Andreano; Bradford C Dickerson; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 9.  Stress, sensitive periods and maturational events in adolescent depression.

Authors:  Susan L Andersen; Martin H Teicher
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 10.  Neurocognitive bases of emotion regulation development in adolescence.

Authors:  Saz P Ahmed; Amanda Bittencourt-Hewitt; Catherine L Sebastian
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 6.464

View more
  1 in total

1.  Depression and anxiety of medical students at Kunming Medical University during COVID-19: A cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Ying Guo; Shunda Li; Lanchun Zhang; Qun Xuan; Liu He; Qingyan Ye; Jiaqing Ma; Li Peng; Yunxia Xiong; Jianyu Yang; Haofei Yu; Jianping Xie; Heng Shao; Yun Yuan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.