Literature DB >> 35091440

Tumor Genomic Testing for >4,000 Men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in the Phase III Trial PROfound (Olaparib).

Maha Hussain1, Claire Corcoran2, Caroline Sibilla2, Karim Fizazi3, Fred Saad4, Neal Shore5, Shahneen Sandhu6, Joaquin Mateo7, David Olmos8,9, Niven Mehra10, Michael P Kolinsky11, Guilhem Roubaud12, Mustafa Özgüroǧlu13, Nobuaki Matsubara14, Craig Gedye15, Young Deuk Choi16, Charles Padua17, Alexander Kohlmann18, Robert Huisden2, Julia A Elvin19, Jinyu Kang18, Carrie A Adelman2, Allison Allen2, Christian Poehlein20, Johann de Bono21.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Successful implementation of genomic testing in clinical practice is critical for identification of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) eligible for olaparib and future molecularly targeted therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An investigational clinical trial assay, based on the FoundationOneCDx tissue test, was used to prospectively identify patients with qualifying homologous recombination repair gene alterations in the phase III PROfound study. Evaluation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) tissue test outcome against preanalytic parameters was performed to identify key factors influencing NGS result generation.
RESULTS: A total of 4,858 tissue samples from 4,047 patients were tested and reported centrally. NGS results were obtained in 58% (2,792/4,858) of samples (69% of patients). Of samples submitted, 83% were primary tumor samples (96% were archival and 4% newly obtained). Almost 17% were metastatic tumor samples (60% were archival and 33% newly obtained). NGS results were generated more frequently from newly obtained compared with archival samples (63.9% vs. 56.9%) and metastatic compared with primary samples (63.9% vs. 56.2%). Although generation of an NGS result declined with increasing sample age, approximately 50% of samples ages >10 years generated results. While higher tumor content and DNA yield resulted in greater success in obtaining NGS results, other factors, including selection and preservation of samples, may also have had an impact.
CONCLUSIONS: The PROfound study shows that tissue testing to identify homologous recombination repair alterations is feasible and that high-quality tumor tissue samples are key to obtaining NGS results and identifying patients with mCRPC who may benefit from olaparib treatment. ©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35091440     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  2 in total

1.  Genetic Testing and Its Clinical Application in Prostate Cancer Management: Consensus Statements from the Hong Kong Urological Association and Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology.

Authors:  Peter K F Chiu; Eric K C Lee; Marco T Y Chan; Wilson H C Chan; M H Cheung; Martin H C Lam; Edmond S K Ma; Darren M C Poon
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 2.  PARP Inhibitors as Monotherapy in Daily Practice for Advanced Prostate Cancers.

Authors:  Diego Teyssonneau; Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin; Charles Dariane; Eric Barret; Jean-Baptiste Beauval; Laurent Brureau; Gilles Créhange; Gaëlle Fiard; Gaëlle Fromont; Mathieu Gauthé; Alain Ruffion; Raphaële Renard-Penna; Romain Mathieu; Paul Sargos; Morgan Rouprêt; Guillaume Ploussard; Guilhem Roubaud
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.