| Literature DB >> 35090534 |
Akihiro Fujino1, Yasushi Fuchimoto2,3, Yoshiyuki Baba4, Nobutaka Isogawa4, Takanori Iwata5, Katsuhiro Arai6, Makoto Abe7, Nobuo Kanai8, Ryo Takagi9,10, Masanori Maeda11, Akihiro Umezawa10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Congenital esophageal atresia postoperative anastomotic stricture occurs in 30-50% of cases. Patients with severe dysphagia are treated with endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) and/or local injection of steroids, but many patients continue to experience frequent stricture. In this study, we investigated the transplantation of autologous oral mucosa-derived cell sheets (epithelial cell sheets) as a prophylactic treatment for congenital esophageal atresia postoperative anastomotic stricture.Entities:
Keywords: Anastomotic stenosis; Cell sheet transplantation; Congenital esophageal atresia; Epithelial cell sheet; Regenerative therapy; Somatic stem cells
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35090534 PMCID: PMC8796492 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-022-02710-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther ISSN: 1757-6512 Impact factor: 6.832
Fig. 3Pediatric cell sheet transplantation device. A Diagram of the main components. (1) The carrier consisted of a plastic body and latex balloon (0.13 mm thick), which were glued together. (2) The air tube consisted of a steel wire and polyurethane tube with an outer diameter (OD) of 2.0 mm, male screw connector and hub. The air tube was connected to the carrier throughout the endoscopic cannel. B Delivery mode. A cell sheet was placed inside of the device by suction because the balloon with the cell sheet adhered to the inside wall of the device. By maintaining suction, the cell sheet could easily be delivered to the transplantation site in the esophagus. C Transplantation mode. The cell sheet is expanded and attached to a transplantation site by balloon inflation
Fig. 1Procedure for transplantation of an autologous cultivated oral mucosal epithelial cell sheet to the anastomotic stenosis in postoperative congenital esophageal atresia. The patient’s oral mucosal tissue and blood were collected at the National Center for Child Health and Development (NCCHD) and transported to the CPF of Tokyo Women's Medical University (TWMU) while maintaining them at low temperature. The harvested oral mucosal epithelial cells were isolated and seeded onto temperature-responsive cell culture inserts. The cells were cultured for 14 days to produce cell sheets. In-process quality control tests were performed at each stage of the cell sheet fabrication process. In addition, a pre-shipment test (quality assessment) was performed. The products that passed the tests were transported to the NCCHD, maintaining the temperature around 37 °C. The cell sheets were then transplanted into the patient
Fig. 2Fabrication and quality control tests for cultured autologous oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets. A Collection of oral mucosal tissue from the patient. B Buccal mucosal tissue harvested from the oral cavity of this patient. The superficial area of the mucosal tissue was approximately 0.8 cm2. C Cellular morphology of oral mucosal cells before seeding onto temperature-responsive culture inserts. Cells marked with white arrows were terminally differentiated epithelial cells which were not counted as viable cells for determining seeding density of the cells. Scale bar is 200 µm. D Cellular morphology of the oral mucosal cells 8 days after seeding. Scale bar is 200 µm. E Cultured autologous oral mucosal epithelial cell sheet for quality control testing for quantification of cellular density, viability, and percentage of epithelial cells. F Histogram of flow cytometry results for determining percentage of epithelial cells in the cell sheet by detection of cytokeratin-positive cells. Percentage of cytokeratin-positive cells determined to be epithelial cells was 99.1% in the epithelial cell sheet. G Cellular morphology of the oral mucosal cells before transportation to the hospital. Scale bar is 200 µm
Preparation of oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets
| Results | |
|---|---|
| Size of mucosal tissue | 0.818 cm2 |
| Total cells/tissue | 1.29 × 106 cells |
| cells/cm2 of tissue | 1.57 × 106 cells/cm2 |
| Viability | 91.0% |
| Seeding density | 7.50 × 104 cells/cm2 |
| Number of cell sheets | 4 |
Quality control tests for oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets
| Criteria | Results | |
|---|---|---|
| Aerobic bacteria | (–) | (–) |
| Anaerobic bacteria | (–) | (–) |
| Fungi | (–) | (–) |
| Endotoxin test | < 1.0 EU/mL | 0.260 EU/mL |
| Cultivation | (–) | (–) |
| DNA of | (–) | (–) |
| Total cells | > 1.0 × 105 cells/sheet | 2.14 × 105 cells/sheet |
| Cellular density | > 2.38 × 104 cell/cm2 | 5.09 × 104 cell/cm2 |
| Viability | > 70% | 98.1% |
| Percentage of epithelial cells | > 70% | 99.1% |
Fig. 4Transplantation of epithelial cell sheets onto anastomotic stenosis using a dedicated device. A Contrast study findings of the patient's esophagus before EBD. The area indicated by the arrows is anastomotic stenosis. B Endoscopic image of the anastomotic stenosis before EBD. C Contrast study findings of the esophagus during EBD. The area indicated by the arrows was thought to be anastomotic stenosis, which could not be fully expanded due to scar contracture. D Endoscopic image of the esophagus dilated by balloon and lacerations therein. E–G Transplantation of cell sheets onto laceration areas caused by EBD using a dedicated device. A cell sheet was set on the surface of the balloon (arrowhead) at the tip of the device (F), and by expanding this balloon, the cell sheet was attached to the lacerated area on the esophageal mucosa. The area surrounded by the white dashed line shows the transplanted cell sheet (G)
Fig. 5Number of days between EBDs before and after cell sheet transplantation. A Graph of the number of days between EBDs performed one year before and after epithelial cell sheet transplantation. The horizontal axis shows the number of EBDs performed before and after transplantation, and the vertical axis shows the number of days between EBDs. B Comparison of EBD intervals between one year before and one year after cell sheet transplantation. Statistical analysis was performed using the unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test. C Comparison of EBD intervals between early (1st to 9th times, 6 months after transplantation) and late (10–19th times, 7–12 months after transplantation) periods after cell sheet transplantation. Statistical analysis was performed using the unpaired two-tailed Student's t test. **P < 0.01. D Comparison of EBD intervals between one year before and early after cell sheet transplantation (1st to 9th times). Statistical analysis was performed using the unpaired two-tailed Student's t test. *P < 0.05. E Comparison of EBD intervals between one year before and late after cell sheet transplantation (10–19th times). Statistical analysis was performed using the unpaired two-tailed Student's t test