Brant Walkley1,2, Daniel A Geddes1, Taku Matsuda3, John L Provis1. 1. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK. 2. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK. 3. Construction Material Group and Geotechnical Technology Department, Sumitomo Mitsui Construction Co., Ltd., Nagareyama-Shi, Chiba 270-0132, Japan.
Abstract
Polycarboxylate-based superplasticizers are essential for production of ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC), facilitating particle dispersion through electrostatic repulsion and steric hindrance. This study examines for the first time the effect of changes in pH, ionic strength, and charge on the adsorption/desorption behavior of a polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer on silica fume in aqueous chemistries common in low-CO2 UHPC. Data from total organic carbon measurements, Fourier transform infrared and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and zeta potential measurements reveal the silica surface chemistry and electrokinetic properties in simulated UHPC. Addition of divalent cations (Ca2+) results in polycarboxylate adsorption on silica fume via (i) adsorption of Ca2+ ions on the silica surface and a negative zeta potential of lower magnitude on the silica surface and (ii) reduction of polycarboxylate anionic charge density due to complexation with Ca2+ ions and counter-ion condensation. Addition of OH- ions results in polycarboxylate desorption via deprotonation of silanol groups and a negative zeta potential of greater magnitude on the silica surface. Simultaneous addition of both Ca2+ and OH- results in rapid polycarboxylate desorption via (i) formation of an electric double layer and negative zeta potential on the silica surface and (ii) an increase in polycarboxylate anionic charge density due to deprotonation of the carboxylate groups in the polymer backbone, complexation with Ca2+ ions, and counter-ion condensation. This provides an explanation for the remarkable fluidizing effect observed upon addition of small amounts (1.0 wt %) of a solid, powdered Ca source to fresh, low-CO2, UHPC, which exhibits significantly higher fresh state pH (>13) than those based on Portland cement (pH 11).
Polycarboxylate-based superplasticizers are essential for production of ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC), facilitating particle dispersion through electrostatic repulsion and steric hindrance. This study examines for the first time the effect of changes in pH, ionic strength, and charge on the adsorption/desorption behavior of a polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer on silica fume in aqueous chemistries common in low-CO2 UHPC. Data from total organic carbon measurements, Fourier transform infrared and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and zeta potential measurements reveal the silica surface chemistry and electrokinetic properties in simulated UHPC. Addition of divalent cations (Ca2+) results in polycarboxylate adsorption on silica fume via (i) adsorption of Ca2+ ions on the silica surface and a negative zeta potential of lower magnitude on the silica surface and (ii) reduction of polycarboxylate anionic charge density due to complexation with Ca2+ ions and counter-ion condensation. Addition of OH- ions results in polycarboxylate desorption via deprotonation of silanol groups and a negative zeta potential of greater magnitude on the silica surface. Simultaneous addition of both Ca2+ and OH- results in rapid polycarboxylate desorption via (i) formation of an electric double layer and negative zeta potential on the silica surface and (ii) an increase in polycarboxylate anionic charge density due to deprotonation of the carboxylate groups in the polymer backbone, complexation with Ca2+ ions, and counter-ion condensation. This provides an explanation for the remarkable fluidizing effect observed upon addition of small amounts (1.0 wt %) of a solid, powdered Ca source to fresh, low-CO2, UHPC, which exhibits significantly higher fresh state pH (>13) than those based on Portland cement (pH 11).
Ultrahigh-performance
concrete (UHPC) is produced with a low water/cement
(w/c) ratio, which provides the low porosity required for outstanding
strength and durability. Reducing the w/c ratio has a negative effect
on the workability, and the inclusion of a superplasticizer within
the fresh mixture allows for improved workability and flow.[1,2] Modern UHPCs comprise significant quantities of supplementary cementitious
materials (SCM) such as silica fume, blast furnace slag, and coal
fly ash, which enhance and control physical properties, e.g., strength,
durability, and reduce-associated CO2 emissions.[3] To produce UHPC with satisfactory workability
and flow characteristics, a detailed understanding of the interactions
between an organic superplasticizer and inorganic cement and SCM particles
is essential.Silica fume is a reactive, amorphous form of SiO2 produced
as a byproduct of semiconductor Si manufacture, comprising spherical
particles with an extremely small (tens of nm) particle size.[4] It is commonly blended with Portland cement at
relatively low levels (up to 10 wt %) to enhance performance, improving
paste cohesion and rheological properties in the fresh state while
promoting strength development and durability in the hardened state
via pozzolanic reactivity.[5] Silica fume
has a very high surface area of between 15 and 30 m2/g
due to its small particle size.[6] Within
modern blended Portland cement formulations, with typical specific
surface areas of between 0.3 and 0.5 m2/g,[6] even this modest dose of silica fume can account for as
much as 85% of the particle surface area in the cementitious powders.
Consequently, inclusion of silica fume within blended cement formulations
dramatically increases the w/c ratio required to achieve suitable
flowability. Superplasticizing dispersants are therefore required
to achieve satisfactory flow at the low w/c ratios that are needed
to achieve the low porosity and high strength and durability in UHPC.Polycarboxylate-based superplasticizers have been shown to be the
most effective dispersants for cementitious formulations containing
silica fume.[7] Polycarboxylate-based superplasticizers
interact with cement and silica fume particles via surface adsorption
through hydrogen bonding between terminal hydroxyl groups on polyethylene
glycol graft chains and silanol groups on the silica surface.[8] This facilitates particle dispersion through
both electrostatic repulsion and steric hindrance.[9−12]Novel, high-strength alkaline-earth-activated
concretes with a
very low w/c ratio of 0.16 and a very low embodied CO2 have
recently been produced from silica fume, fly ash, and blast furnace
slag, without inclusion of Portland cement.[13] The cements used in these concretes comprise a minimum of 96 wt
% (dry basis) industrial byproducts and yield concretes with very
high performance (strength and durability) at an exceptionally low
water content, with compressive strengths of 90 and 150 MPa after
28 days and 2 years of curing, respectively.[13] These concretes initially exhibit very low fluidity and flowability
(Figure A), despite
containing a high dose of polycarboxylate superplasticizer intended
to give high flowability at such a low water content. However, a remarkable
fluidizing effect is observed upon addition of a very small amount
(1.0 wt %) of a solid, powdered Ca source during mixing[13,14] (primarily calcium oxide and other calcium salts, obtained in that
study via a commercially available “expansive additive”)
(Figure B). The addition
of this powdered Ca source (containing calcium oxide and other calcium
salts) also instigates the pozzolanic/latent hydraulic reaction of
the inorganic SCM particles.[14] We hypothesize
that the superplasticizer is initially sorbed onto the very high surface
area of the silica fume particles, and then, the increase in pH induced
by the addition of Ca2+ provided by the soluble calcium
oxide causes rapid desorption of the superplasticizer from the silica
fume particles, with a dramatic fluidizing effect. Such a mechanism
has not previously been documented in the discussion of this type
of high-performance concrete and could provide a new pathway to the
production of durable, low-CO2 concretes, which are readily
usable at a very low water content.
Figure 1
Images taken from the video (Video S1), showing the effect of addition of
the powdered Ca source (primarily
CaO and other calcium salts, sourced commercially as an “expansive
additive”) on a high-strength alkaline-earth-activated concrete
produced from silica fume, fly ash, and blast furnace slag, without
inclusion of Portland cement, and with a very low water/cement ratio
(w/c = 0.16).[13] Panel (A) represents the
state before addition of the powdered Ca source (where the paste is
not fluid at all), and panel (B) represents the state approximately
1 min after addition of the powdered Ca source (where the paste is
very fluid).
Images taken from the video (Video S1), showing the effect of addition of
the powdered Ca source (primarily
CaO and other calcium salts, sourced commercially as an “expansive
additive”) on a high-strength alkaline-earth-activated concrete
produced from silica fume, fly ash, and blast furnace slag, without
inclusion of Portland cement, and with a very low water/cement ratio
(w/c = 0.16).[13] Panel (A) represents the
state before addition of the powdered Ca source (where the paste is
not fluid at all), and panel (B) represents the state approximately
1 min after addition of the powdered Ca source (where the paste is
very fluid).However, due to significant differences
between the aqueous and
solid state chemistry of Portland cement and alkali/alkaline-earth-activated
cement systems, the behavior of dispersants in each case differs significantly,
so the hypothesis described in the preceding paragraph requires fundamental
examination to be validated. In particular, the reversibility of adsorption
of superplasticizing dispersants on high surface area silica particles,
in the high pH and high ionic strength environments common in fresh
alkali/alkaline-earth-activated cement pastes, remains poorly understood.While many studies have examined adsorption phenomena of polycarboxylate-based
superplasticizers in Portland cement and Portland cement blended with
silica fume,[6,11,12,15−17] few have examined this
in alkali-activated cement systems, and to our knowledge, none have
done so for polycarboxylate-based superplasticizers in novel alkaline-earth-activated
cement systems. It is therefore crucial to understand the surface
chemistry and adsorption phenomena of polycarboxylate-based superplasticizers
on silica surfaces in conditions simulating the aqueous phase in fresh
state alkaline-earth-activated cements.In this study, we examine
the effect of changes in pH, ionic strength,
and charge on the reversibility of adsorption of a polycarboxylate-based
superplasticizer on silica fume. Through quantification of data from
total organic carbon measurements, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy,
solution state 1H, 13C, and 29Si
nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and solid state 29Si MAS magic angle spinning (MAS) NMR, and zeta potential
measurements, we reveal the silica surface chemistry and electrokinetic
properties in these simulated pore solutions. We also propose a model
for the mechanism by which the aqueous chemistry controls the adsorption/desorption
phenomena of these organic molecules, which causes the dramatic fluidization
observed in Figure during mixing of fresh alkaline-earth-activated cement pastes.
Materials and Methods
Overview of Methodology
The adsorbed
amounts of a polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer on silica fume
were measured using the depletion method based on the principle that
the interaction between the polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer
and silica fume is due only to surface adsorption. This hypothesis
was validated by solution state 29Si NMR and solid state 29Si MAS NMR measurements of silica fume before and after adsorption
(details discussed in Section ). The amount of non-adsorbed superplasticizer remaining
in solution after each adsorption experiment was determined by analyzing
the total organic carbon (TOC) content of the solution. This was independently
confirmed by quantification of solution state 1H and 13C NMR measurements for each colloidal dispersion and by Fourier
transform infrared spectroscopy measurements for the solids before
and after adsorption. The mechanism of sorption/desorption of the
polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer on silica fume was determined
using zeta potential measurements of each colloidal dispersion. Details
of all characterization experiments are provided below.
Sample Preparation
The silica fume
used in this study was obtained from Efaco, Japan, and exhibited a
chemical composition, particle size distribution, and morphology,
as shown in Table and Figure , respectively.
The un-agglomerated silica fume particles exhibit diameters on the
order of tens of nm (smallest particles visible in Figure ), although laser particle
size distribution analysis data (not shown) identify a large number
of particles with apparent diameters on the order of tens of μm
and a modal particle size of 40 μm due to particle agglomeration.
Table 1
Chemical Composition and Loss on Ignition
at 1000 °C of Silica Fume
component
oxide, mass
% by XRF
SiO2
93.98
Al2O3
0.54
Fe2O3
1.52
CaO
0.31
MgO
0.52
Na2O
0.36
K2O
0.61
loss on ignition
2.16
Figure 2
Scanning
electron microscopy (secondary electron) image, collected
at 1000× magnification, showing the particulate and agglomerated
nature of the silica fume.
Scanning
electron microscopy (secondary electron) image, collected
at 1000× magnification, showing the particulate and agglomerated
nature of the silica fume.Colloidal dispersions containing 5 wt % silica
were produced by
addition of silica fume to solutions of 15, 9, and 6 g/L polycarboxylate-based
superplasticizers (Sikament 1200 N, Sika Ltd., Japan; Mw = 18 kDa,
Mn = 12 kDa, Mw/Mn = 1.5) in milliQ water. Control solutions comprising
15, 9, and 6 g/L superplasticizers in milliQ water (positive control)
and milliQ water with no addition of superplasticizer (negative control)
were produced for comparison. As expected, the data for negative control
samples showed negligible TOC (within the error of the measurement)
and were omitted from subsequent figures for clarity. Further information
about the polycarboxylate chain structure of the superplasticizer
used in this work, or any ancillary compounds in the formulated superplasticizer
product, is not available due to confidentiality restrictions in the
use of this commercial product. However, as the same superplasticizer
is used for all tests, the amount of superplasticizer remaining in
solution after filtration can be quantified relative to the control
samples.The effect of aqueous chemistry on sorption/desorption
phenomena
within these dispersions was investigated by separately raising the
pH to 12.3 by addition of NaOH (Sigma Aldrich) to a concentration
of 20 mmol/L and by addition of Ca2+ (as Ca(NO3)2, Sigma Aldrich) to a concentration of 440 mmol/L (chosen
to achieve a Ca/Si molar ratio equivalent to typical values in fresh
low-CO2 alkaline-earth-activated concrete[13,14]). This was done to determine whether the dispersion of the solid
particles and rapid fluidization of the fresh cement paste were a
result of (i) the high pH environment or (ii) the change in ionic
strength induced by the addition of divalent cations provided by dissolution
of the CaO-rich additive in the fresh cementitious mixture.To quantify the effect of addition of hydroxyl ions on the sorption/desorption
phenomena in these colloidal dispersions, NaOH was added to a concentration
of 440 mmol per gram of polycarboxylate (i.e., holding the [OH–]/mass polycarboxylate ratio constant) in separate
colloidal dispersions containing 5 wt % silica in solutions of 15,
9, and 6 g/L polycarboxylate-based superplasticizers in milliQ water.
This results in solution pH values of 13.5, 13.3, and 13.1 for samples
containing 15, 9, and 6 g/L superplasticizers in milliQ water, respectively,
and allows quantification of the effect of addition of hydroxyl ions
per gram of superplasticizer. After addition of all constituents,
each colloidal dispersion was left to stand for 1 min prior to separation
of solid and aqueous components using a polymer vacuum filter (pore
size 0.22 μm). Both the solid and aqueous components were collected
and stored in sealed containers prior to analysis.
Characterization
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was performed using a Hitachi TM3030
using a sample that is coated in carbon to prevent charging, an accelerating
voltage of 15 kV, and a working distance of approximately 8 mm.
Total Organic Carbon Measurements
Total
organic carbon (TOC) data were acquired by combustion over
an oxidation catalyst at 680 °C using a Shimadzu total organic
carbon VCPH/CPN analyzer, with 150 mL/min zero
grade air as the carrier gas. The amount of polycarboxylate superplasticizer
adsorbed on particles was calculated from the difference between the
TOC content of the control solutions and the respective colloidal
dispersions.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Spectroscopy
Solution state NMR data were acquired using
a Bruker AVANCE III
400 spectrometer, using an observe configuration (1H on
outer coil) multinuclear two-channel probe, yielding a Larmor frequency
of 400.2 MHz for 1H, 100.58 MHz for 13C, and
79.47 MHz for 29Si. Sample suspensions in D2O containing 0.65 M dimethyl sulfoxide-d6 (DMSO) as the internal
standard were brought to a total volume of 0.6 mL and loaded into
5 mm NMR tubes. Quantitative 1H NMR spectra (using the
DMSO internal standard) were acquired using a π/2 pulse (Bruker
sequence: zg), using 64 k acquisition points over an 8.2 kHz acquisition
window using 16 transients and a relaxation delay of 120 s. This relaxation
delay was chosen as sufficient for complete relaxation following a
T1 determination of the components in the solution. Solvent (water)-suppressed
spectra were acquired using a NOESY presaturation sequence (Bruker
sequence: noesygppr1d), using 64 k acquisition points over an 8.2
kHz acquisition window using 128 transients, a mixing time of 10 ms,
and a relaxation delay of 2 s. 13C spectra were acquired
in a pseudo-quantitative way using the uniform driven equilibrium
Fourier transform (UDEFT) technique to minimize relaxation delay and
NOE (Bruker sequence: udeft), using 21.4 k acquisition points over
a 23.8 kHz acquisition window, using 1600 transients. 29Si spectra were acquired using inverse gated decoupling and a π/6
flip angle (Bruker sequence: zgig30), using 64 k acquisition points
over a 32.1 kHz acquisition window using 344–1024 transients
and a relaxation delay of 10 s.The solid state 29Si MAS NMR spectrum of anhydrous silica fume was acquired on a Bruker
Avance III HD 500 spectrometer at 11.7 T (B0) using a 4.0 mm dual
resonance CP/MAS probe, yielding a Larmor frequency of 99.35 MHz. 29Si MAS NMR data were acquired using a 4 μs non-selective
(π/2) excitation pulse, a 15 s relaxation delay, a total of
512 transients, and spinning at 12.5 kHz.
Fourier
Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
Samples for FTIR spectroscopy
analysis were prepared by mixing
2 mg of the sample with 200 mg of KBr and pressing the mixture into
a pellet. FTIR spectra were measured using a Perkin Elmer Frontier
Mid FT-IR spectrometer equipped with a deuterated triglycine sulfate
(DTGS) detector and KBr beam splitter optical system, scanning 16
times at a resolution of 4 cm–1.
Zeta Potential Measurements
Zeta
potential measurements were performed using a Malvern Instruments
Zetasizer Nano series instrument. Zeta potentials were determined
via the Henry equation using the Smoluchowski approximation.[18]
Results
and Discussion
UHPC formulations have a very low water content
to provide low
porosity required for very high strength. The low water content, however,
reduces the workability and flow characteristics of fresh UHPC. It
is therefore essential that UHPC mixtures are formulated correctly
to achieve the desired workability, flow, and water content. This
is typically achieved by inclusion of a superplasticizer within the
fresh mixture that allows for improved workability and flow.[1,2]In recently reported novel, high-strength alkaline-earth-activated
concretes produced from silica fume, fly ash, and blast furnace slag,
without inclusion of Portland cement,[13] the desired workability, flow, and water content (w/c = 0.16) were
achieved by preparation of the fresh mixture containing a polycarboxylate-based
superplasticizer and subsequent addition of a solid, powdered Ca source
(during mixing[13,14] (primarily calcium oxide and
other calcium salts, obtained in that study via a commercially available
“expansive additive”). These concretes initially exhibited
very low fluidity and flowability (Figure A), despite containing a high dose of polycarboxylate
superplasticizer intended to give high flowability at such a low water
content. After addition of a very small amount (1.0 wt %) of the solid,
a powdered Ca source during mixing[13,14] a remarkable
fluidizing effect is observed (Figure B).The work in the study presented here reveals
the silica surface
chemistry and electrokinetic properties in chemically simplified environments
that represent the various states observed in fresh alkaline-earth-activated
cement pastes, as discussed above. In particular, we have replicated
the order of addition of constituents (i.e., silica fume, superplasticizer,
Ca2+ ions, and OH– ions) to provide an
understanding of the effect of each constituent on adsorption/desorption
of the superplasticizer during the initial stages of mixing. This
reveals the mechanism by which the aqueous chemistry controls the
adsorption/desorption phenomena of the polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer,
which causes the dramatic fluidization observed in Figure during mixing of fresh alkaline-earth-activated
cement pastes through the control of pH and ionic strength.
Effect of pH and Ionic Strength on Adsorption/Desorption
of Polycarboxylate on Silica Fume
Total
Organic Carbon (TOC)
The
mass of total organic carbon remaining in the polycarboxylate solution
(relative to the control samples) after sorption onto silica fume
under different aqueous solution environments is shown in Figure . Without adjustment
of the aqueous chemistry (i.e., mimicking the case in which no CaO-rich
additive is added to the concrete mixture) between 28 and 36 wt %
of the superplasticizer was adsorbed to the surface of silica fume.
This will reduce the effectiveness of the polycarboxylate in dispersing
solid particles in the fresh concrete mixture and corresponds to the
state shown in Figure A where the paste is not fluid at all. The solid and aqueous components
were separated using a polymer vacuum filter (pore size 0.22 μm);
however it is possible that very small solid particles remained in
solution after filtration. These very small particles will have a
larger surface area, relative to the larger particles that will have
been removed, which may explain the relatively modest drop in TOC
upon sorption compared to the very dramatic changes in fluidity discussed
above.
Figure 3
Mass of total organic carbon remaining in the polycarboxylate solution
(relative to the respective control samples) after addition of 5 wt
% silica fume (P + S), addition of 5 wt % silica fume and adjustment
of ionic strength by addition of Ca2+ (P + S + Ca2+), and addition of 5 wt % silica fume and adjustment of pH by addition
of OH– (P + S + OH–). Data are
shown for polycarboxylate concentrations of (A) 15 g/L, (B) 9 g/L,
and (C) 6 g/L as marked. Data obtained from total organic carbon content
measurements.
Mass of total organic carbon remaining in the polycarboxylate solution
(relative to the respective control samples) after addition of 5 wt
% silica fume (P + S), addition of 5 wt % silica fume and adjustment
of ionic strength by addition of Ca2+ (P + S + Ca2+), and addition of 5 wt % silica fume and adjustment of pH by addition
of OH– (P + S + OH–). Data are
shown for polycarboxylate concentrations of (A) 15 g/L, (B) 9 g/L,
and (C) 6 g/L as marked. Data obtained from total organic carbon content
measurements.At high superplasticizer concentrations
(15 g/L; Figure A),
addition of Ca2+ as Ca(NO3)2 does
not result in an increase
in adsorption compared with the control dispersions comprising only
the superplasticizer and silica fume. This contrasts with Figure B,C, where addition
of Ca2+ as Ca(NO3)2 results in a
further increase in adsorption (compared with the control dispersions
comprising only the superplasticizer and silica fume, in the absence
of any Ca2+ additive). The magnitude of this increased
adsorption is greater at lower superplasticizer concentrations (e.g.,
at 6 g/L c.f. 9 g/L). This indicates that silica fume surface sites
for adsorption may be saturated at higher superplasticizer concentrations.
Conversely, addition of OH– to raise the pH to 12.3
results in rapid desorption of the superplasticizer from silica fume,
with complete desorption observed for superplasticizer concentrations
of 6 and 9 g/L (Figure B,C). This shows that it is the high pH environment provided by dissolution
of the CaO-rich additive in the fresh cementitious mixture, rather
than just the change in ionic strength induced by the addition of
divalent cations, that enables dispersion of the solid particles and
rapid fluidization of the paste.
Fourier
Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy
FTIR data can be used
to confirm the presence of polycarboxylate
adsorbed on the surface of silica. The FTIR spectrum for silica fume
(Figure ) exhibits
a high intensity band spanning from approximately 1020 to 1220 cm–1 that is assigned to asymmetric stretching of Si–O–Si
bonds,[19] a lower intensity band at 805
cm–1 that is assigned to symmetric stretching of
Si–O–Si bonds,[19] a high intensity
band at 480 cm–1 assigned to O–Si–O
bending (deformation) vibrations,[20] a band
at 3400 cm–1 due to stretching vibrations of O–H
bonds in H2O physisorbed to the surface of silica fume,
and a band at 3700 cm–1 due to stretching of Si–O–H
linkages.[20]
Figure 4
FTIR spectra of the solid
phase (silica fume plus any adsorbed
polycarboxylate) remaining after filtration of silica fume suspensions
after addition of 5 wt % silica fume (P + S), addition of 5 wt % silica
fume and adjustment of ionic strength by addition of Ca2+ (P + S + Ca2+), and addition of 5 wt % silica fume and
adjustment of pH by addition of OH– (P + S + OH–), as marked. Data are shown for polycarboxylate concentrations
of (A) 15 g/L, (B) 9 g/L, and (C) 6 g/L as marked and (D) untreated
silica fume and the polycarboxylate superplasticizer.
FTIR spectra of the solid
phase (silica fume plus any adsorbed
polycarboxylate) remaining after filtration of silica fume suspensions
after addition of 5 wt % silica fume (P + S), addition of 5 wt % silica
fume and adjustment of ionic strength by addition of Ca2+ (P + S + Ca2+), and addition of 5 wt % silica fume and
adjustment of pH by addition of OH– (P + S + OH–), as marked. Data are shown for polycarboxylate concentrations
of (A) 15 g/L, (B) 9 g/L, and (C) 6 g/L as marked and (D) untreated
silica fume and the polycarboxylate superplasticizer.The FTIR spectrum of the polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer
(Figure ) exhibits
a band at 1140 cm–1 that is assigned to asymmetric
stretching vibrations of C–O–C linkages, bands at 1415
and 1595 cm–1 that are assigned to symmetric and
asymmetric stretching vibrations of C=O bonds, respectively,
a band at 2900 cm–1 assigned to C–H stretching
vibrations, and a band at 3400 cm–1 due to stretching
vibrations of hydroxyl groups.[15]The FTIR spectra of the solid phases separated from each colloidal
dispersion after adsorption, modification of aqueous chemistry, and
filtration are shown in Figure . All spectra are dominated by bands attributed to the aforementioned
sites in silica fume and the superplasticizer. An additional band
at 1385 cm–1 is observed in all solid phases from
filtered colloidal dispersions containing Ca2+ ions, resulting
from symmetric stretching vibrations of C=O bonds within Ca2+-carboxylate complexes.[21]Comparing the spectra for each sample, the bands due to stretching
vibrations of hydroxyl groups,[15] asymmetric
stretching vibrations of C=O bonds in carboxylate groups (including
those complexed with Ca2+), and symmetric stretching vibrations
of C=O bonds in carboxylate groups within the superplasticizer
exhibit higher intensities in the spectra for solid phases from filtered
colloidal dispersions containing Ca2+ ions. The intensities
of these bands are similar in spectra for the solid phases from colloidal
dispersions without adjustment of the aqueous chemistry and with addition
of OH– ions.These trends indicate greater
adsorption of the polycarboxylate-based
superplasticizer to the silica surface in solid phases from filtered
colloidal dispersions containing Ca2+ ions and no increase
in adsorption to the silica surface in solid phases from filtered
colloidal dispersions with added NaOH when compared to that of colloids
without modification of the aqueous chemistry. These observations
confirm the TOC results discussed above, where addition of Ca2+ to the colloidal dispersions is driving increased adsorption
of the polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer, and addition of OH– ions causes desorption of the polycarboxylate-based
superplasticizer from the surface of silica.
Nuclear
Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy
The solid state 29Si MAS NMR spectrum of anhydrous silica
fume (Figure A) exhibits
a single broad resonance at δiso = −110 ppm,
indicating that it comprises a distribution of tetrahedral (predominantly
Q4) Si sites.[22] The line shape
of both the solid state 29Si MAS NMR spectrum for the solid
phase obtained by filtering the colloidal dispersion (Figure A) and the solution state 29Si NMR spectra for the colloidal dispersions after adsorption
of polycarboxylate in each of the test environments considered (Figure B) are almost identical
to those of untreated silica fume obtained in each respective experiment.
This shows that the test methods applied for adsorption/desorption
of the polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer and modification of
aqueous chemistry do not alter the structure of silica fume within
the timeframe that the experiments were performed. There is no significant
formation of surface-bound calcium silicate hydrates during these
experiments where calcium was added, and any dissolution induced by
the elevated pH of the NaOH addition test did not significantly alter
the structure of the remaining solid silica fume particles. This supports
the hypothesis that the interaction between the polycarboxylate-based
superplasticizer and silica fume in the aqueous environments tested
here is due only to surface adsorption and validates the depletion
methodology used for the adsorption experiments in this work. The
significant line width of the Q4 Si species in the solution
state NMR is expected for silica fume and other similarly sized (colloidal)
silica particles[23] and shows that minimal
or no hydration and dissolution reactions have occurred in the silica
fume during testing.[24]
Figure 5
(A) Comparison of solid
state 29Si MAS NMR data (B0 = 11.7 T, νR = 12.5 kHz)
for anhydrous silica fume (solid line, labeled S) and the solid phase
(dotted line, labeled P + S) obtained after filtration of the colloidal
dispersion with a polycarboxylate concentration of 15 g/L. (B) Solution-state 29Si NMR data for the colloidal dispersions after addition
of 5 wt % silica fume (P + S), addition of 5 wt % silica fume and
adjustment of ionic strength by addition of Ca2+ (P + S
+ Ca2+), and addition of 5 wt % silica fume and adjustment
of pH by addition of OH– (P + S + OH–). Solution-state (C) 1H and (D) 13C NMR data
for the aqueous components obtained after filtration of the colloidal
dispersions, after addition of 5 wt % silica fume (P + S), addition
of 5 wt % silica fume and adjustment of ionic strength by addition
of Ca2+ (P + S + Ca2+), and addition of 5 wt
% silica fume and adjustment of pH by addition of OH– (P + S + OH–). Data are shown for a polycarboxylate
concentration of 15 g/L.
(A) Comparison of solid
state 29Si MAS NMR data (B0 = 11.7 T, νR = 12.5 kHz)
for anhydrous silica fume (solid line, labeled S) and the solid phase
(dotted line, labeled P + S) obtained after filtration of the colloidal
dispersion with a polycarboxylate concentration of 15 g/L. (B) Solution-state 29Si NMR data for the colloidal dispersions after addition
of 5 wt % silica fume (P + S), addition of 5 wt % silica fume and
adjustment of ionic strength by addition of Ca2+ (P + S
+ Ca2+), and addition of 5 wt % silica fume and adjustment
of pH by addition of OH– (P + S + OH–). Solution-state (C) 1H and (D) 13C NMR data
for the aqueous components obtained after filtration of the colloidal
dispersions, after addition of 5 wt % silica fume (P + S), addition
of 5 wt % silica fume and adjustment of ionic strength by addition
of Ca2+ (P + S + Ca2+), and addition of 5 wt
% silica fume and adjustment of pH by addition of OH– (P + S + OH–). Data are shown for a polycarboxylate
concentration of 15 g/L.1H NMR data
for the aqueous components of each sample
(Figure C) were acquired
in the solution state. As discussed above, the aqueous and solid components
of each colloidal dispersion were separated using a polymer vacuum
filter (pore size of 0.22 μm). It is therefore possible that
very small solid particles remained in solution after filtration,
to which polycarboxylate may sorb. It is assumed, however, that polycarboxylate
sorbed to the surface of these small solid particles will have very
low mobility and will therefore be unobservable in the 1H NMR data in Figure .Each 1H NMR spectrum exhibits a resonance at 3.20
ppm,
assigned to hydroxyl group protons in the carboxylic acid terminus
in the polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer.[25] Although detailed information about the polycarboxylate
chain length in the superplasticizer used in this work is not available
due to confidentiality in the use of this commercial product, as the
same superplasticizer is used for all tests, the amount of superplasticizer
remaining in solution after filtration can be quantified relative
to the control sample. 13C NMR data for all colloidal dispersions
(Figure D) exhibit
a resonance at 69.2 ppm, assigned to carbon atoms in −CH2(OH) groups in the polycarboxylate backbone in the superplasticizer.[15]Calculation of the relative integral area
for the resonance at
δiso = 3.20 ppm (attributed to CH2 groups
in the polycarboxylate superplasticizer) for the 1H NMR
data for each sample enables comparison of the relative amounts of
the adsorbed superplasticizer in each case. Comparing these results
(Figure ) with the
total organic carbon measurements (Figure A) shows the same overall trend, with addition
of Ca2+ resulting in increased adsorption and addition
of OH– to raise the pH to 12.3 resulting in extensive
desorption of the superplasticizer from silica fume.
Figure 6
Relative integral area
(proportional to amount) of polycarboxylate
remaining in solution (relative to the control samples), with a starting
concentration of 15 g/L, as determined by 1H NMR measured
in the solution state. Data are shown for the aqueous component obtained
after filtration of colloidal dispersions, after addition of 5 wt
% silica fume (P + S), addition of 5 wt % silica fume and adjustment
of ionic strength by addition of Ca2+ (P + S + Ca2+), and addition of 5 wt % silica fume and adjustment of pH by addition
of OH– (P + S + OH–).
Relative integral area
(proportional to amount) of polycarboxylate
remaining in solution (relative to the control samples), with a starting
concentration of 15 g/L, as determined by 1H NMR measured
in the solution state. Data are shown for the aqueous component obtained
after filtration of colloidal dispersions, after addition of 5 wt
% silica fume (P + S), addition of 5 wt % silica fume and adjustment
of ionic strength by addition of Ca2+ (P + S + Ca2+), and addition of 5 wt % silica fume and adjustment of pH by addition
of OH– (P + S + OH–).Strong agreement between the experimental data obtained via
total
organic carbon and quantitative 1H NMR measurements was
observed. The magnitude of the measured adsorption/desorption in each
case shows a high degree of correlation. It has been shown for polycarboxylate
ether (PCE) superplasticizers that the critical micelle concentration
(CMC) is approximately 3 g/L in simulated cement pore solutions.[26] This shows that micelle formation (to at least
some extent) is likely to have occurred in each of the colloidal dispersions
(and therefore the aqueous component obtained after separation from
the solid component) and will result in low proton mobility and broad
resonances, which may be unobservable in the 1H NMR data.
This suggests that the very small differences in the magnitude of
measured adsorption/desorption in Figure are likely to be a result of the measurement
technique used and rather than actual differences in adsorption/desorption.Comparison of the mass of total organic carbon remaining in the
polycarboxylate solution after addition of 5 wt % silica fume and
adjustment of pH by addition of OH– (P + S + OH–), with a fixed concentration of NaOH of 440 mmol/g
polycarboxylate in each solution and varying concentrations of the
polycarboxylate superplasticizer, is shown in Figure . This allows quantification of the effect
of addition of hydroxyl ions on the sorption/desorption phenomena
in these colloidal dispersions. The data show a greater amount of
polycarboxylate superplasticizer remaining in solution after filtration
(and hence less adsorption to the surface of silica) with increasing
polycarboxylate concentration, even when the concentration of OH– ions present relative to the mass of the polycarboxylate
superplasticizer is held constant. When the pH is held constant, lower
amounts of the polycarboxylate superplasticizer remain in solution
after filtration with increasing polycarboxylate concentration. This
is attributed to the change in anionic charge density on the polycarboxylate-based
superplasticizer with adjustment of the concentration of OH– ions[27] due to deprotonation of the carboxylate
groups in the polymer backbone.[28] Increased
anionic charge density results in increased electrostatic repulsion
and hence desorption of the polycarboxylate from the silica surface.
Figure 7
Comparison
of the mass of total organic carbon remaining in the
polycarboxylate solution after addition of 5 wt % silica fume and
adjustment of pH by addition of OH– (P + S + OH–), with (A) a concentration of NaOH of 440 mmol/g polycarboxylate
in each solution and (B) a pH of 12.3 in each solution. Data are shown
for polycarboxylate concentrations of 15, 9, and 6 g/L as marked.
The relationship between the hydroxide ion concentration and the amount
of polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer remaining in solution after
filtration is shown in panel (C). The experiments were performed with
a fixed concentration of NaOH of 440 mmol per gram of polycarboxylate
in each solution and varying concentrations of the polycarboxylate
superplasticizer (i.e., 15, 9, and 6 g/L). Consequently, the 15 g/L
polycarboxylate solution will contain a higher concentration of NaOH
than the 9 g/L polycarboxylate solution, which will in turn contain
a higher concentration of NaOH than the 6 g/L polycarboxylate solution.
In plot (C), the data points therefore represent the OH– concentration in each polycarboxylate solution (e.g., for the 15
g/L polycarboxylate solution, [OH–] = 440 mmoL/g
SP × 15 g SP/L H2O = 6.6 mol OH– per L H2O). So, in plot (C), from left to right, the
data points represent the OH– concentration in the
6, 9, and 15 g/L polycarboxylate solutions.
Comparison
of the mass of total organic carbon remaining in the
polycarboxylate solution after addition of 5 wt % silica fume and
adjustment of pH by addition of OH– (P + S + OH–), with (A) a concentration of NaOH of 440 mmol/g polycarboxylate
in each solution and (B) a pH of 12.3 in each solution. Data are shown
for polycarboxylate concentrations of 15, 9, and 6 g/L as marked.
The relationship between the hydroxide ion concentration and the amount
of polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer remaining in solution after
filtration is shown in panel (C). The experiments were performed with
a fixed concentration of NaOH of 440 mmol per gram of polycarboxylate
in each solution and varying concentrations of the polycarboxylate
superplasticizer (i.e., 15, 9, and 6 g/L). Consequently, the 15 g/L
polycarboxylate solution will contain a higher concentration of NaOH
than the 9 g/L polycarboxylate solution, which will in turn contain
a higher concentration of NaOH than the 6 g/L polycarboxylate solution.
In plot (C), the data points therefore represent the OH– concentration in each polycarboxylate solution (e.g., for the 15
g/L polycarboxylate solution, [OH–] = 440 mmoL/g
SP × 15 g SP/L H2O = 6.6 mol OH– per L H2O). So, in plot (C), from left to right, the
data points represent the OH– concentration in the
6, 9, and 15 g/L polycarboxylate solutions.
Mechanism of Adsorption/Desorption of Polycarboxylate
on Silica Fume
Zeta potential measurements shown in Figure A show that, at neutral
pH, silica fume possesses a negative surface charge due to deprotonation
of silanol groups when in solution.[6] Addition
of divalent cations (Ca2+) results in negative zeta potential
of lower magnitude on the surface of the silica fume particles due
to the adsorption of Ca2+ ions on the silica surface. This
will drive further adsorption of the negatively charged polycarboxylate
superplasticizer onto the silica surface via the electrostatic interaction
with the positively charged Ca2+ ions. This adsorption
mechanism is broadly analogous with previous works from Heinz et al.[29,30] who used molecular dynamics simulations to show that the binding
mechanism of PCEs containing ionic side groups on the surface of calcium
silicate hydrate involves the initial migration of Ca2+ ions (present in the ionic side groups of the PCE) to the C–S–H
surface followed by the anionic polymer backbone and subsequent conformation
adjustments on the surface (e.g., tilted and partially upright conformations)
resulting from local detachment from the surface due to electrostatic
repulsion and steric effects arising from the common occurrence of
more than two successive carboxylate groups in the PCE backbone. In
the work presented here, adsorption is also promoted by a reduction
of anionic charge density of the polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer
due to complexation with Ca2+ ions and counter-ion condensation.[27,28]
Figure 8
(A)
Zeta potential of colloids formed after addition to the polycarboxylate
solution of 5 wt % silica fume (P + S), addition of 5 wt % silica
fume and adjustment of ionic strength by addition of Ca2+ (P + S + Ca2+), and addition of 5 wt % silica fume and
adjustment of pH by addition of OH– (P + S + OH–). Data are shown for a polycarboxylate concentration
of 9 g/L. Zeta potential of silica fume in water (S) is shown for
comparison. (B) Relationship between the difference in zeta potential
of the colloid and mass of polycarboxylate desorbed from silica fume
after adjustment of ionic strength by addition of Ca2+ (P
+ S + Ca2+) and adjustment of pH by addition of OH– (P + S + OH–).
(A)
Zeta potential of colloids formed after addition to the polycarboxylate
solution of 5 wt % silica fume (P + S), addition of 5 wt % silica
fume and adjustment of ionic strength by addition of Ca2+ (P + S + Ca2+), and addition of 5 wt % silica fume and
adjustment of pH by addition of OH– (P + S + OH–). Data are shown for a polycarboxylate concentration
of 9 g/L. Zeta potential of silica fume in water (S) is shown for
comparison. (B) Relationship between the difference in zeta potential
of the colloid and mass of polycarboxylate desorbed from silica fume
after adjustment of ionic strength by addition of Ca2+ (P
+ S + Ca2+) and adjustment of pH by addition of OH– (P + S + OH–).Addition of OH– ions results in a negative zeta
potential of greater magnitude on the surface of the silica fume particles
due to further deprotonation of silanol groups.[6] The magnitude of the change in zeta potential after addition
of OH– ions is ∼6 times that after addition
of Ca2+ ions. This indicates that, when both Ca2+ and OH– ions are present (as occurs in the concrete
mixes being simulated here, upon addition of the CaO-rich additive
during mixing), an electric double layer will form on the surface
of silica, with negatively charged hydroxyl groups forming on the
surface of the adsorbed Ca2+ ions. This will result in
a negative zeta potential on the surface of the silica fume particles,
which will drive extensive desorption of the negatively charged polycarboxylate
superplasticizer.[12] Desorption is also
promoted by an increase in the anionic charge density of the polycarboxylate-based
superplasticizer due to deprotonation of the carboxylate groups in
the polymer backbone[28] and complexation
with Ca2+ ions and counter-ion condensation.[27] From the data obtained, there is a linear relationship
between the change in zeta potential resulting from changes in aqueous
chemistry and the amount of superplasticizer adsorbed to the silica
fume surface (Figure B).Together, the data obtained from the adsorption tests shows
that
dissolution of the CaO-rich additive in the cementitious mixture provides
Ca2+ ions that shift the zeta potential to negative values
of lower magnitude via adsorption of Ca2+ ions on the silica
surface, and OH– ions shift the zeta potential to
negative values of greater magnitude via formation of an electric
double layer and further deprotonation of surface silanol groups.
Due to the greater magnitude of the shift in zeta potential due to
OH– ions, the net effect is a significantly greater
negative charge on the silica surface. This mechanism is shown in Figure . This results in
extensive desorption of the superplasticizer from silica fume. In
fresh UHPC formulations containing particles of silica fume, blast
furnace slag, and fly ash, this will allow a more even distribution
of the superplasticizer across the inorganic SCM particles, allowing
adsorption and dispersion of the solid particles. These findings provide
an explanation for the rapid and extensive increase in fluidization
with increasing Ca additive dose in fresh alkaline-earth-activated
concretes,[13] as shown in Figure .
Figure 9
Schematic of surface
charges on the silica surface at (A) pH 7
and after adjustment of (B) ionic strength by addition of Ca2+ (P + S + Ca2+), (C) adjustment of pH by addition of OH– (P + S + OH–), and (D) adjustment
of both ionic strength and pH by addition of Ca2+and OH– ions. It should be noted that the polycarboxylate-based
superplasticizer possesses a single negative valence in panel (B);
this is purely for demonstrative purposes, and the charge on the polycarboxylate-based
superplasticizer was not directly measured.
Schematic of surface
charges on the silica surface at (A) pH 7
and after adjustment of (B) ionic strength by addition of Ca2+ (P + S + Ca2+), (C) adjustment of pH by addition of OH– (P + S + OH–), and (D) adjustment
of both ionic strength and pH by addition of Ca2+and OH– ions. It should be noted that the polycarboxylate-based
superplasticizer possesses a single negative valence in panel (B);
this is purely for demonstrative purposes, and the charge on the polycarboxylate-based
superplasticizer was not directly measured.The mechanism presented above extends previous works that demonstrated
Ca2+-mediated adsorption of anionic polycarboxylate ether
graft polymers (particularly allylether-based polycarboxylates) onto
silica fume in alkaline media (pH = 12.8),[6,16] with
the findings presented here showing that the reversibility of polycarboxylate
adsorption on silica fume is controlled by pH and results from the
significantly greater effect of addition of OH– ions
on the magnitude of the zeta potential on the silica surface, compared
with addition of Ca2+ ions. This is particularly important
when using allylether-based polycarboxylate superplasticizers as these
show strong preference for adsorption to silica fume over other inorganic
cement or SCM particles[16] (due to the carboxylate
groups aligning more closely with the steric position of calcium ions
situated at the surfaces of silica compared with cement or SCM particles).
To counter this effect and allow adsorption to and dispersion of all
solid particles in fresh UHPC, it has been suggested that a mixture
of methacrylic acid ester-based polycarboxylate and allylether-based
polycarboxylate superplasticizers should be used.[11] In this work, we have presented a new mechanism that shows
that, in alkaline-earth-activated UHPC, which exhibits significantly
higher fresh state pH (>13) than those based on Portland cement
(pH
= 11), the adsorption polycarboxylate superplasticizers are more evenly
distributed across the inorganic SCM particles due to the high concentration
of OH– ions. Chemical modeling will in the future
enable further elucidation and confirmation of the chemical interactions
demonstrated in this work, with important theoretical and practical
implications for the use of very high-performing flowable concretes
with a greatly reduced water content.
Conclusions
This study presents a new mechanism showing the effect of changes
in pH, ionic strength, and charge on the reversibility of adsorption
of a polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer on silica fume. The systems
investigated were chemically simplified analogues of low-CO2, ultrahigh-performance concretes that exhibit significantly higher
fresh state pH than those based on Portland cement.The adsorbed
amounts of the polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer
on silica fume were measured using the depletion method. The amount
of non-adsorbed superplasticizer remaining in solution after each
adsorption experiment was determined by analyzing the total organic
carbon content of the solution. This was independently confirmed by
quantification of solution state 1H and 13C
NMR measurements for each colloidal dispersion and by Fourier transform
infrared spectroscopy measurements for the solids after adsorption. 29Si NMR and solid state 29Si MAS NMR measurements
of silica fume before and after adsorption confirmed that the interaction
between the polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer and silica fume
is due only to surface adsorption. The mechanism of sorption/desorption
of the polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer on silica fume was determined
using zeta potential measurements of each colloidal dispersion.Zeta potential measurements show that, at neutral pH, silica fume
possesses a negative surface charge due to deprotonation of the silanol
group. Addition of divalent cations (Ca2+) results in adsorption
of the polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer on silica fume via (i)
adsorption of Ca2+ ions on the silica surface and a negative
zeta potential of lower magnitude on the surface of the silica fume
particles and (ii) a reduction of anionic charge density of the polycarboxylate-based
superplasticizer due to complexation with Ca2+ ions and
counter-ion condensation. Addition of OH– ions results
in polycarboxylate desorption via deprotonation of silanol groups
and a negative zeta potential of greater magnitude on the surface
of the silica fume particles. The magnitude of the change in zeta
potential after addition of OH– ions is ∼6
times that after addition of Ca2+ ions.Simultaneous
addition of both Ca2+ and OH– ions results
in extensive desorption of the negatively charged polycarboxylate
superplasticizer via (i) formation of an electric double layer on
the surface of silica and hence a negative zeta potential on the surface
of the silica fume particles and (ii) an increase in the anionic charge
density of the polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer due to deprotonation
of the carboxylate groups in the polymer backbone, complexation with
Ca2+ ions, and counter-ion condensation. A linear relationship
between the change in zeta potential resulting from changes in aqueous
chemistry and the amount of superplasticizer adsorbed to the silica
fume surface is observed.These findings provide an explanation
for the remarkable fluidizing
effect that is observed upon addition of a very small amount (1.0
wt %) of a solid, powdered Ca source to fresh, low-CO2,
ultrahigh-performance concretes that exhibit significantly higher
fresh state pH (>13) than those based on Portland cement (pH 11).
Authors: Colan E Hughes; Brant Walkley; Laura J Gardner; Samuel A Walling; Susan A Bernal; Dinu Iuga; John L Provis; Kenneth D M Harris Journal: Solid State Nucl Magn Reson Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 2.293