Binod Karki1, Suresh Thapa2, Dibas Khadka3, Sanjit Karki4, Roshan Shrestha4, Ajit Khanal3, Ramila Shrestha3, Bidhan Nidhi Paudel3. 1. Department of Medicine, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal. 2. Department of Medicine, Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal. 3. Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal. 4. Department of Medicine, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common presentation in patients admitted with acute abdomen. Whether Ringers lactate (RL) or Normal Saline (NS) as a resuscitation fluid is better still remains unclear. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of RL and NS in terms of control of systemic inflammation by measuring indirect markers specifically Systemic Inflammation Response Syndrome (SIRS) scores and C- Reactive Protein (CRP) level. METHODS: This was an open label randomized trial conducted in a tertiary level hospital of Nepal. Ethical approval was obtained prior to the study. Patients with acute pancreatitis were randomized to either RL or NS group for the fluid resuscitation. The fluid was given as per the study protocol for three days for hydration. Baseline SIRS and CRP were recorded on admission and subsequently as defined. All the data were analyzed using SPSS ver 20.0 software. RESULTS: Total 51 patients were enrolled, 26 in RL and 25 in NS group. The commonest etiology of AP was alcohol (84.31%). SIRS was present in 46.2% and 64.0% of patients in RL and NS group respectively (p = 0.20) on admission. At least one SIRS criteria was still present in 44.0% of patients in the NS group compared to only 15.4% in the RL group after 24 hours (p = 0.025). The baseline CRP were comparable in both the groups. However after 72 hours, the increment of CRP was more in the NS group compared to the RL group; median value of 14.2 mg/dl (12.15, 16.45) and 22.2 mg/dl (18.20, 30.60) in RL and NS group respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ringers lactate was associated with a reduction in systemic inflammation compared to normal saline in patients with acute pancreatitis. Incidence of SIRS at 72 hours and occurrence of local complications were however similar in both the groups.
BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common presentation in patients admitted with acute abdomen. Whether Ringers lactate (RL) or Normal Saline (NS) as a resuscitation fluid is better still remains unclear. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of RL and NS in terms of control of systemic inflammation by measuring indirect markers specifically Systemic Inflammation Response Syndrome (SIRS) scores and C- Reactive Protein (CRP) level. METHODS: This was an open label randomized trial conducted in a tertiary level hospital of Nepal. Ethical approval was obtained prior to the study. Patients with acute pancreatitis were randomized to either RL or NS group for the fluid resuscitation. The fluid was given as per the study protocol for three days for hydration. Baseline SIRS and CRP were recorded on admission and subsequently as defined. All the data were analyzed using SPSS ver 20.0 software. RESULTS: Total 51 patients were enrolled, 26 in RL and 25 in NS group. The commonest etiology of AP was alcohol (84.31%). SIRS was present in 46.2% and 64.0% of patients in RL and NS group respectively (p = 0.20) on admission. At least one SIRS criteria was still present in 44.0% of patients in the NS group compared to only 15.4% in the RL group after 24 hours (p = 0.025). The baseline CRP were comparable in both the groups. However after 72 hours, the increment of CRP was more in the NS group compared to the RL group; median value of 14.2 mg/dl (12.15, 16.45) and 22.2 mg/dl (18.20, 30.60) in RL and NS group respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ringers lactate was associated with a reduction in systemic inflammation compared to normal saline in patients with acute pancreatitis. Incidence of SIRS at 72 hours and occurrence of local complications were however similar in both the groups.
Acute pancreatitis is often associated with a systemic inflammatory response [1]. The inflammation can either
resolve spontaneously or can progress to local complication leading to necrosis of
the pancreas itself or the surrounding tissues. Early aggressive fluid resuscitation
is key in initial management of acute pancreatitis. Fluid resuscitation is believed
to play an important role in the prevention of complications such as pancreatic
necrosis and organ failure by preserving pancreatic micro circulation [2, 3].Crystalloids volume resuscitation with both Normal Saline (NS) and Ringer’s Lactate
(RL) is preferred for the early phase of acute pancreatitis. However, infusion of
large volume of NS can lead to development of a hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis
and the choice of initial fluid is still unclear [4, 5]. Ringers lactate is an attractive
alternative due to its pH balance. However choice of fluids among different
crystalloids so far is based upon expert opinion only. The severity of acute
pancreatitis can be measured with various markers and inflammation scores such as C-
Reactive Protein (CRP) titer and Systemic Inflammation Response Syndrome (SIRS)
parameters [6, 7].
Aim
The aim of the study is to compare the reduction of the SIRS scores and the CRP
titer in acute pancreatitis during initial resuscitation with RL compared to
NS.
Methods
This was an open label randomized study done in Bir Hospital of Nepal. Bir Hospital
is 535-bed tertiary level referral government hospital located at Kathmandu, which
is affiliated with National Academy of Medical Sciences (NAMS). The study was
conducted from October 2018 to June 2019. The trial was registered in University
hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) database as UMIN000035295. The trial was
registered after enrollment of patient started as there was no national trial
registry of Nepal at the time of commencement of research. The authors confirm that
all ongoing and related trials for this intervention are registered. Approval was
obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of National Academy of Medical
Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, (Approval reference number 709).
Inclusion criteria
A written consent was obtained from all the participants. Patients aged 18 years
or older who were admitted with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis were eligible
for study participation. Diagnosis was established by the presence of two or
more of the following criteria: (1) epigastric abdominal pain, (2) elevation in
serum amylase and/or lipase level greater than 3 times the upper limit of
normal, (3) confirmatory findings on cross-sectional imaging. Acute pancreatitis
was graded as mild, moderately severe and severe. Mild acute pancreatitis was
defined as—No organ failure, or absence of local or systemic complications.
Moderately severe acute pancreatitis was defined as organ failure that resolves
within 48 hours (transient organ failure) associated with local or systemic
complications without persistent organ failure. Severe acute pancreatitis was
defined as persistent organ failure (>48 h) associated with either single or
multiple organ failure.
Exclusion criteria
Patients were excluded from participation if they met any of the following
criteria: Age below 18 years, presenting to the hospital for more than 48 hours
of symptoms, referred after initial resuscitation in another hospital, and known
history of severe cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, hepatic, hematologic, or
immunologic disease defined as (1) greater than New York Heart Association class
II heart failure, (2) active myocardial ischemia or (3) cardiovascular
intervention within previous 60 days, (4) history of cirrhosis or (5) chronic
kidney disease with creatinine clearance < 40 mL/min, or (6) chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease with requirement for home oxygen.The primary outcome of the study was to measure the difference in CRP level and
SIRS score at the admission and subsequently. SIRS score were recorded as
present or not present and if present as score 1–4 for the following parameters:
Temperature<36°C (96.8°F) or >38°C (100.4°F); Heart rate>90/min;
Respiratory rate>20/min; WBC(<4000/mm3) or
(>12,000/mm3) or 10% bands. SIRS was diagnosed if at least two
scores were fulfilled. CRP measurement was done by turbidometry method and
expressed in quantitative CRP as mg/dl.SIRS was recorded at 24 hours and 72 hours of presentation. CRP was reassessed at
the end of 72 hours. The secondary outcomes were to measure the difference in
the occurrence of local complications, length of hospital stay and in hospital
mortality.For sample size estimation we used CRP level as the change in the systemic
inflammatory status. In a prospective cohort study by Acevedo-Piedra NG et al.
[8], patients who
received fluid resuscitation based on NS, mean blood CRP levels was 160 mg/l
(standard deviation 111). We aimed to detect a 100-mg/l difference with at least
80% power, at a two-sided alpha level of 5%. It was calculated that 25 patients
in each arm would be needed to have 95% confidence interval.
Intervention details
All the patients diagnosed as acute pancreatitis using the Atlanta classification
[9] were randomized
to fluid resuscitation using either RL or NS. The method of randomization was
using a sealed envelop technique. The fluid, to which each patient was
randomized was administered initially as a bolus of 10ml/kg in 60 minutes
followed by infusion at the rate of 1.5 ml/kg/hour till they could be started on
an oral diet. All patients received additional one liter of 5% dextrose per 24
hours. Patients who tolerated a diet orally were given intravenous fluids as per
daily was decided by the treating clinician. Additional potassium chloride was
supplemented as per daily serum biochemistry result. Adequate fluid replacement
were assessed by an improvement in vital signs (goal heart rate <120
beats/minute, mean arterial pressure between 65 to 85 mm Hg), urine output
(>0.5 to 1 ml/kg/hour) and BUN over 24 hours, particularly if they were high
at the onset. All patients were followed till the time of hospital discharge or
death. The patients who developed either peri-pancreatic fluid collection or
pancreatic necrosis were followed up to four weeks. The hospital safety board
had the authority to terminate the study if any concern of patient safety due to
the research protocol occurred.Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Continuous data were analyzed
using mean and standard deviation (SD) or median depending on the variable
distribution. Differences between the two groups with continuous data were
assessed using student-t test for normal and Mann-Whitney U test for non-normal
distributions.Quantitative data were described using percentages and compared by the chi-square
A two-sided p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
All statistical calculations were performed with SPSS ver 20.0.
Results
A total of 62 patients were assessed for the eligibility during the total study
period. Nine patients were excluded; eight had various co -morbid conditions
including COPD, renal failure or heart failure (Fig 1). These conditions were excluded as these
patients could not be managed with aggressive fluid therapy. One patient declined
the consent. A total of 51 patients were randomized, 26 patients in the RL group and
25 patients in the NS group (flow chart). Out of total 51 patients, the mean age was
41.33 ± 14.17 years. There were 46.2% and 52.0% of total patients in the age group
of 21–40 years in RL and NS group respectively. The most common etiology of the
acute pancreatitis in the study was alcohol consumption (84.3%) followed by gall
stone diseases (7.8%). The rest of the cases were idiopathic. Most patients had mild
acute pancreatitis. The baseline characteristics of the study population were
comparable in both the groups except for white blood cell counts which was higher in
the NS group compared to RL although the mean in both the groups was more than the
cut off value required for the definition of SIRS (Table 1).
Fig 1
Consort flow diagram of the participants in the trial.
Table 1
Baseline characteristics of the study population.
Variables
RL (N = 26)
NS (N = 25)
P value
Gender (Male), n (%)
25 (96.2%)
1 (3.8%)
0.024
Age group: 20 yrs or less
1 (3.8%)
1 (4.0%)
21–40 yrs
12 (46.2%)
13 (52.0%)
41–60 yrs
11 (42.3%)
8 (32.0%)
More than 60 yrs
2 (7.7%)
3 (12.0%)
Hypertension, n (%)
3 (11.5%)
2 (8.6%)
0.67
Diabetes, n (%)
2 (7.7%)
3 (12.0%)
0.61
Pulse (Mean, bpm ±SD)
88.04± 8.12
90.92± 13.46
0.35
SBP (Mean, mm Hg±SD)
116.54 ±13.54
118.80 ±25.38
0.69
DBP (Mean, mm Hg±SD)
75.85 ±8.52
74.88± 11.56
0.73
WBC (Mean, per cmm±SD)
11051± 3503
15116± 7039
0.01
Urea (Mean, mg/dl±SD)
36.23 ±11.6
51.08 ±39.41
0.07
Creatinine (Mean, mg/dl±SD)
0.95 ± 0.19
1.2 ±0.67
0.03
Amylase (Median, mg/dl, IQR)
1024 (532,1475)
1113 (362,2072)
0.89
BISAP score, Median (IQR)
1(0,1)
1(1,2)
0.12
SIRS present on admission, n (%)
12/26 (46.2)
14/25 (64.0%)
0.20
CRP baseline (mg/dl) Median (IQR)
4.6 (3.18,5.2)
4.2 (3.22,4.95)
0.47
There were 46.2% and 64.0% patients with SIRS diagnostic criteria at the time of
randomization in RL and NS group respectively (Fig 2). When the number of SIRS parameters were
evaluated for the individual patient, most of the patients in both the groups had at
least two elevated parameters. One patient (4.0%) in NS group only had all four
scores during admission (Fig
2).
Fig 2
Distribution of SIRS score in the study population.
RL: Ringers lactate, NS: Normal Saline.
Distribution of SIRS score in the study population.
RL: Ringers lactate, NS: Normal Saline.After 24 hours of randomization, two patients in NS group had SIRS compared to none
in RL group. Four (15.4%) patients in RL group had at least one score present at 24
hours compared to 11(44%) of patients in NS group (p = 0.025). After 72 hours, three
patients in NS group still had at least one SIRS score compared to none in RL group
with SIRS diagnosis even after 72 hours of admission The median SIRS on admission
and on subsequent days have been illustrated in the box plot (Fig 3).
Fig 3
Box plot presentation of SIRS score in two groups.
RL-adm: Ringer Lactate group at admission, RL-24 h: Ringer Lactate group at
24 hours, RL-72h: Ringer Lactate group at 72 hours, NS-adm: Normal Saline
group at admission, NS-24h: Normal Saline group at 24 hours, NS-72h: Normal
saline group at 72 hours.
Box plot presentation of SIRS score in two groups.
RL-adm: Ringer Lactate group at admission, RL-24 h: Ringer Lactate group at
24 hours, RL-72h: Ringer Lactate group at 72 hours, NS-adm: Normal Saline
group at admission, NS-24h: Normal Saline group at 24 hours, NS-72h: Normal
saline group at 72 hours.The median CRP at the baseline in RL and NS groups were 4.6 mg/dl (3.18, 5.2) and 4.2
mg/dl (3.22, 4.95) respectively. At 72 hours, the increment in CRP was higher in the
NS group compared with the RL group. The median value of CRP were 14.2 in RL vs 22.2
in NS respectively and the difference was statistically significant (p <0.001).
The percentage increment of CRP from baseline to the value recorded at 72 hours was
also significantly different between the two groups (Fig 4).
Fig 4
Bar diagram showing the CRP titre and its increment at 72 hours from the
baseline values in the study population.
CRP adm: CRP level at admission, CRP 72h: CRP lever after 72 hours of
admission, RL: Ringers lactate, NS: Normal Saline.
Bar diagram showing the CRP titre and its increment at 72 hours from the
baseline values in the study population.
CRP adm: CRP level at admission, CRP 72h: CRP lever after 72 hours of
admission, RL: Ringers lactate, NS: Normal Saline.The incidence of local complications, length of hospital stay and the mortality was
not significantly different in both the study groups (Table 2). The local complications were further
categorized into peri-pancreatic fluid collection, acute pancreatic necrosis, pseudo
cyst and walled off necrosis as per the defining criteria from modified Atlanta
classification.9 None of the patients in the study require
hemodialysis support. All three patients with walled off necrosis were referred to
other tertiary care centers for endoscopic therapy procedures and were lost to
follow up. One patient in NS group developed severe acute respiratory distress
syndrome and had to be kept under mechanical ventilator and subsequently died. There
was also a non-significant trend towards more frequent moderately severe/severe
pancreatitis with NS, 42.30% (11/25) versus RL, 23.07% (6/26) [p = 0.11].
Table 2
Comparison of secondary outcomes in the study populations.
Complications (local)
Ringer’s Lactate
Normal Saline
p value
N = 26
N = 25
Over all local complication, n (%)
6 (23.1%)
7/25 (28%)
0.68
Details of local complications
Peri-pancreatic fluid collection, n (%)
4 (15.38%)
4 (16%)
Acute necrotic collection, n (%)
2 (7.69%)
3 (12%)
Pseudocyst, n (%)
1 (3.84%)
1 (4%)
Walled off necrosis, n (%)
1 (3.84%)
2 (8%)
Hospital stay in days (mean) ±SD
5.15 ± 0.09
6.20 ± 2.5
0.06
In hospital mortality, n (%)
0 (0%)
1 (4%)
0.90
Discussion
The mean age of our study population was similar to other Nepalese study [10] where the mean age was
42.7±16.5. In other studies done outside Nepal in which intravenous normal saline
and Ringers lactate were compared, the median age was 51 and 51.2 years respectively
[11, 12]. The age distribution in
our study population showed that majority were in the age group of 20–60 years
indicating acute pancreatitis being the disease of young.The most common etiology of acute pancreatitis in our study was alcohol which is
different from other studies where it was predominantly gall stone pancreatitis
[13, 14]. In our hospital, patients
with acute pancreatitis could be admitted into either a medical or surgical ward.
Thus some of the patients can be lost to capture. Secondly, we did not include
patients of biliary pancreatitis who underwent Endoscopic Retrograde
Cholangiography. The pathogenesis of alcohol related pancreatitis is different from
that of gall stone pancreatitis. The expected response to intravenous fluid
administration is likely to be different. In addition, the results may not be
generalizable to a cohort of patients with AP in which higher proportion of cases
were biliary in origin.The prevalence of SIRS criteria ≥2 was higher in the NS group. The baseline SIRS
scores were not significantly different between the two groups. However at the end
of 24 hours, fewer patients in the RL group had at least one SIRS criteria compared
to the NS group. This suggests that the RL may be better in achieving the control
over the systemic inflammation.The SIRS lowering effect of RL over NS was also seen in the study by Wu B et al.
[11], where participants
who received RL had a significant reduction in SIRS at 24 hours from baseline
compared with those who received NS for initial resuscitation (84% reduction in RL
vs 0% in NS, p = .035). Choosakul S et al. [14] who followed the similar methodology in
fluid resuscitation and demonstrated that at 24 hours, the prevalence of SIRS was 2
(8.7%) vs 9 (37.5%) in RL and NS group respectively (p = 0.02). In a study by
De-Madaria et al. [15], at 24
hours of randomization, the change is SIRS was not significantly different between
the two groups (p = 0.87). However in their study, they conducted in vitro
experiment, where Lactated ringer inhibited the induction of inflammatory phenotype
of macrophages and NF-kB activation. This suggests the anti inflammatory effect of
Ringers lactate. Recently, Lee A et al. [16] showed in a similar randomized control
trial that the need of intensive care was lesser and the length of hospital stay was
shorter in the Lactated ringer’s group compared to the normal saline group although
there was no difference in the prevalence of SIRS at 24 hours from the
admission.The CRP level at baseline and at 72 hours in our study population was also
significantly different. At the end of 72 hours, it was seen that the increment of
CRP occurred in both the groups. However, the increment was comparatively higher in
the NS group. Most of the other studies also showed similar results in terms of CRP
titre. Wu B et al. [11]
showed that after 24 hours, subjects who were randomized to RL had lower CRP levels
compared with participants in the NS treatment arms (mean CRP, 51 mg/L RL vs 104
mg/L NS; ANOVA, p = 0.018). De-Madaria et al. [15] also showed lower CRP titre at 48 hours and
72 hours of admission in the RL group compared to the NS group. Choosakul S et al.
[14] showed the median
CRP change at 48 hours were +18.19 (4.43,7.83) and +31.73 (1.97,27.2) respectively
for RL and NS group though not statistically significant (p = 0.756).The beneficial effects of RL in terms of alleviation of systemic inflammation can be
explained by mainly two mechanisms; an indirect effect related to NS-associated
metabolic acidosis and a direct anti-inflammatory effect of RL. Acidosis has been
associated with inflammation and necrosis in experimental models. The evidence of
hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis induced by normal saline infusion have been showed
in a study by Scheingraber S et al. [5]. The evidence of metabolic acidosis induced by NS was also shown by
the study carried out in a group of health volunteers where serum bicarbonate
concentration was significantly lower after saline than after Hartmann’s (P = 0.008)
[17].The deleterious effect of NS over RL has been shown in other conditions besides acute
pancreatitis where statistically significant decrease in pH, excess of base and a
significant increase in serum chloride occurred in patients receiving saline during
surgery [18-20]. The harmful effect of
acidic medium has been explained by NF-kB activation and release of pro inflammatory
cytokines as well as acidosis associated pathologies such as post ischemic
inflammatory process [21,
22].Our studies have several limitations. This was an open label randomized trial and not
a blinded one. This was a single centre study and we could not collect the long term
data in terms of mortality beyond the initial hospital stay.
Conclusions
Ringer’s lactate was superior to normal saline in reduction of SIRS especially in
first 24 hours. There was also significant reduction in CRP and SIRS parameters
after 72 hours in RL group. Incidence of local complications and in hospital
outcomes were however similar in both the groups.
CONSORT 2010 checklist for article acute pancreatitis.
Authors: Bechien U Wu; James Q Hwang; Timothy H Gardner; Kathryn Repas; Ryan Delee; Song Yu; Benjamin Smith; Peter A Banks; Darwin L Conwell Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Peter A Banks; Thomas L Bollen; Christos Dervenis; Hein G Gooszen; Colin D Johnson; Michael G Sarr; Gregory G Tsiotos; Santhi Swaroop Vege Journal: Gut Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Vikesh K Singh; Bechien U Wu; Thomas L Bollen; Kathryn Repas; Rie Maurer; Koenraad J Mortele; Peter A Banks Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2009-08-15 Impact factor: 11.382