| Literature DB >> 35089217 |
Yongqiang Ma1, Bofeng Bai1, Xihai Zhao1,2, Lixue Wang1, Benqi Zhao1, Yi Guo3, Hongfang Yin4, Xiaofei Zhang5, Zhuozhao Zheng1.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: This is a retrospective study. The aim of this study was to determine the indicators of neurological outcome after surgery in patients with intramedullary spinal ependymomas by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).A total of 106 consecutive patients (mean age: 42.4 ± 1.3 years; 52.8% male) diagnosed with intramedullary spinal ependymomas were retrospectively recruited. All patients underwent spine MRI and subsequent surgical resection for the spinal tumors. Data regarding clinical symptoms and pathological grades of tumors were collected from clinical records. The McCormick score was used for grading patients' neurological status before and after surgery at 12 months. Good outcome was defined as stable McCormick score (McC) score (no change of McC score between preoperation and post-operation at 12 months) or improvement in McC score (post-operative McC score at 12 months < preoperative McC score). Poor outcome was determined when there was an increase in McC score at 12 months after surgery. The MRI characteristics of spinal ependymomas between patients with good and poor neurological outcomes were compared. Logistic regression was performed to assess the association between MRI characteristics of tumors and post-operative neurological outcomes.Patients with poor neurological outcomes had larger longitudinal length (4.7 ± 0.5 vs 3.3 ± 0.2, P = .004) and higher enhancement signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) (102.4 ± 12.3 vs 72.8 ± 4.6, P = .022) than those with good neurological outcomes. After adjusting for confounding factors, longitudinal length (OR, 0.768; 95% CI, 0.604-0.976; P = .031) and enhancement SNR (OR, 0.988; 95% CI, 0.978-0.999; P = .026) of spinal ependymomas were significantly associated with poor neurological prognosis.The longitudinal length of tumor and enhancement SNR on T1-weighted images are independently associated with neurological outcome after surgery.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35089217 PMCID: PMC8797478 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028682
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.889
Clinical and MR imaging characteristics of study population (n = 106).
| Mean ± SD and Median or n (%) | ||||
| All patients (n = 106) | Good prognosis (n = 84) | Poor prognosis (n = 22) | ||
| Age, yr | 42.4 ± 1.3 | 43.7 ± 1.4 | 37.4 ± 2.6 | .045 |
| Sex, male | 56 (52.8) | 44 (52.4) | 12 (54.5) | .856 |
| Duration of symptoms, months | 29.5 ± 3.6 | 27.4 ± 3.3 | 37.4 ± 12.0 | |
| Median | 13.5 | 15.5 | 12 | .478† |
| Tumor location | ||||
| Cervical | 72 (67.9) | 60 (71.4) | 12 (54.5) | .252 |
| Thoracic | 23 (21.7) | 17 (20.3) | 6 (27.3) | |
| Lumbar | 11 (10.4) | 7 (8.3) | 4 (18.2) | |
| MR imaging characteristics of tumor | ||||
| longitudinal length∗ | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | |
| Median | 3 | 3 | 4.5 | .004† |
| SNR on T2WI | 32.2 ± 1.6 | 31.0 ± 1.6 | 36.6 ± 4.6 | |
| Median | 29.09 | 29.09 | 29.88 | .505† |
| Enhancement patterns | ||||
| No enhancement | 2 (1.9) | 1 (1.2) | 1 (4.6) | .572 |
| Homogenous enhancement | 37 (34.9) | 30 (35.7) | 7 (31.8) | |
| Heterogeneous enhancement | 67 (63.2) | 53 (63.1) | 14 (63.6) | |
| Enhancement SNR | 79.0 ± 4.6 | 72.8 ± 4.6 | 102.4 ± 12.3 | |
| Median | 63.2 | 60.6 | 97.6 | .022† |
| Margins | ||||
| Clear | 91 (85.8) | 74 (88.1) | 16 (72.7) | .261 |
| Unclear | 15 (14.2) | 10 (11.9) | 6 (27.3) | |
| Presence of cysts | ||||
| Central cyst | 54 (50.9) | 45 (53.6) | 9 (40.9) | .290 |
| Satellite cyst | 57 (53.8) | 46 (54.8) | 11 (50.0) | .690 |
| Presence of hemorrhage | 35 (33.0) | 29 (34.5) | 6 (27.3) | .520 |
| Peripheral edema | 61 (57.5) | 50 (59.5) | 11 (50.0) | .421 |
| Extent of resection | ||||
| Gross-total resection | 101 (95.3) | 80 (95.2) | 21 (95.5) | .966 |
| Subtotal resection | 5 (4.7) | 4 (4.8) | 1 (4.5) | |
| Tumor grade | <.001 | |||
| Ependymoma (E II) | 102 (96.2) | 84 (100.0) | 18 (81.8) | |
| Anaplastic ependymoma (AE III) | 4 (3.8) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (18.2) | |
| Tumor recurrence | 9 (8.5) | 5 (6.0) | 4 (18.2) | .067 |
| Preoperative McC score | ||||
| I | 68 (64.2) | 58 (69.0) | 10 (45.5) | .007 |
| II | 30 (28.3) | 20 (23.8) | 10 (45.5) | |
| III | 5 (4.7) | 5 (6.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| IV | 3 (2.8) | 1 (1.2) | 2 (9.0) | |
Longitudinal length of tumorwas measured by the number of vertebras that the tumor covers.
Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used because of non-normal distribution for Duration of symptoms, longitudinal length, SNR on T2WI, and Enhancement SNR.
Association between tumor characteristics and prognosis.
| Poor neurological prognosis | |||||||||
| Univariate regression | Multivariate regression∗ | Multivariate regression† | |||||||
| OR | 95% CI |
| OR | 95% CI |
| OR | 95% CI |
| |
| Tumor length | 0.735 | 0.589–0.919 | .007 | 0.774 | 0.613–0.977 | .031 | 0.768 | 0.604–0.976 | .031 |
| Enhancement SNR | 0.988 | 0.979–0.997 | .012 | 0.989 | 0.979–0.999 | .026 | 0.988 | 0.978–0.999 | .026 |
adjusted for age.
adjusted for all other factors.
Figure 1Example for ependymoma with high enhancement SNR and poor functional outcome (preoperative McC scale II vs postoperative McC scale III) after surgery in a 55-year-old male patient. Preoperative sagittal T2W images (A) demonstrated an intramedullary mass at the level of C3 to C4 (longitudinal length = 2 vertebral segments) with satellite cysts at both the rostral and caudal ends of the tumor. The tumor was slightly hyperintense on T2W images. The region of interest (ROIs) of the sagittal T2W images were taken from a 38 mm2 region (small circle) in the lesion area. The SI value was 1315.91. The ROI of the reference region was obtained from a 38 mm2 region (same small circle) in the area of surrounding air; its SI value was 39.43. The SNR on the T2W images was 33.37 (1315.91/39.43). Contrast-enhanced sagittal T1W images (B) showed strong and homogeneous enhancement with clear tumor margins. The ROIs were taken from a 38 mm2 region (small circle) on the area with enhancement; its SI value was 2065.17. The ROIs of the reference region were obtained from a 38 mm2 region (same small circle) in the area of surrounding air; the SI value was 21.76. The SNR on the contrast-enhanced T1W images was 94.91 (2065.17/21.76). Postoperative contrast-enhanced T1W images (C) demonstrated complete resection of the lesion. The histological result was ependymoma (E II). ROI = region of interest, SI = signal intensity, SNR = signal-to-noise-ratio, T1W = T1 weighted, T2W = T2 weighted.
Figure 2Example for ependymoma with low-enhancement SNR and good functional outcome (preoperative McC scale I vs. postoperative McC scale I) after surgery in a 43year-old female patient. Preoperative sagittal T2W images (A) demonstrated that the cord was stretched from C4 to C7 (longitudinal length = 4 vertebral segments) by a uniform mass lesion with syringomyelus at the caudal ends of the tumor. The tumor was heterogeneously hyperintense on T2W images. The SNR on the T2W images was 86.17 (714.31/8.29). Contrast-enhanced sagittal T1W images (B) showed slightly and inhomogeneous enhancement with unclear tumor margins. The SNR on the contrast enhanced T1W images was 48.12 (984.53/20.46). Postoperative contrast-enhanced T1W images (C) demonstrated complete resection of the lesion. The histological result was ependymoma (E II). ROI = region of interest, SI = signal intensity, SNR = signal-to-noise-ratio, T1W = T1 weighted, T2W = T2 weighted.
Figure 3Example of a long ependymoma showing high enhancement SNR and poor functional outcome (preoperative McC scale II vs postoperative McC scale III) after surgery in a 28-year-old female patient. Preoperative sagittal T2W images (A) demonstrated isointense expansion of the spinal cord from the medulla oblongata to T2 (longitudinal length = 9 vertebral segments) with satellite cyst at both the rostral and caudal ends of the tumor. There was a “cap sign” at the rostral end of the tumor. The SNR on the T2W images was 33.44 (1360.76/40.69). Preoperative T1W images with contrast enhancement (B) showed homogeneous tumor enhancement with clear tumor margins. The SNR on the contrast-enhanced T1W images was 102.37 (1810.86/17.69). Postoperative T1W images with contrast enhancement (C) demonstrated complete resection of the lesion and myelatrophy. The histological result was ependymoma (E II). ROI = region of interest, SI = signal intensity, SNR = signal-to-noise-ratio, T1W = T1 weighted, T2W = T2 weighted.