| Literature DB >> 35087808 |
Min-Chong Shen1, Yu-Zhen Zhang2, Guo-Dong Bo1, Bin Yang3, Peng Wang3, Zhi-Yong Ding3, Zhao-Bao Wang2, Jian-Ming Yang2, Peng Zhang1, Xiao-Long Yuan1.
Abstract
The overuse of chemical fertilizers has resulted in the degradation of the physicochemical properties and negative changes in the microbial profiles of agricultural soil. These changes have disequilibrated the balance in agricultural ecology, which has resulted in overloaded land with low fertility and planting obstacles. To protect the agricultural soil from the effects of unsustainable fertilization strategies, experiments of the reduction of nitrogen fertilization at 10, 20, and 30% were implemented. In this study, the bacterial responses to the reduction of nitrogen fertilizer were investigated. The bacterial communities of the fertilizer-reducing treatments (D10F, D20F, and D30F) were different from those of the control group (CK). The alpha diversity was significantly increased in D20F compared to that of the CK. The analysis of beta diversity revealed variation of the bacterial communities between fertilizer-reducing treatments and CK, when the clusters of D10F, D20F, and D30F were separated. Chemical fertilizers played dominant roles in changing the bacterial community of D20F. Meanwhile, pH, soil organic matter, and six enzymes (soil sucrase, catalase, polyphenol oxidase, urease, acid phosphatase, and nitrite reductase) were responsible for the variation of the bacterial communities in fertilizer-reducing treatments. Moreover, four of the top 20 genera (unidentified JG30-KF-AS9, JG30-KF-CM45, Streptomyces, and Elsterales) were considered as key bacteria, which contributed to the variation of bacterial communities between fertilizer-reducing treatments and CK. These findings provide a theoretical basis for a fertilizer-reducing strategy in sustainable agriculture, and potentially contribute to the utilization of agricultural resources through screening plant beneficial bacteria from native low-fertility soil.Entities:
Keywords: agricultural resource utilization; bacterial community; reduction of chemical fertilizer; sustainable agriculture; variation of bacterial community
Year: 2022 PMID: 35087808 PMCID: PMC8787768 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.812316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Fertilization strategies of field experiments.
| Treatments | Fertilization strategies |
|---|---|
| CK | Fermented soybeans (N:P:K = 6:1:2), 300 kg ha−1; Tobacco fomulated fertilizer (N:P:K = 10:10:20), 324 kg ha−1; Diammonium Phosphate (N:P:K = 18:46:0), 30 kg ha−1; Potassium sulfate (N:P:K = 0:0:50), 153 kg ha−1 |
| D10F | Fermented soybeans (N:P:K = 6:1:2), 270 kg ha−1; Tobacco fomulated fertilizer (N:P:K = 10:10:20), 291.6 kg ha−1; Diammonium Phosphate (N:P:K = 18:46:0), 27 kg ha−1; Potassium sulfate (N:P:K = 0:0:50), 167.16 kg ha−1; Calcium Superphosphate (N:P:K = 0:20:0), 24.6 kg ha−1 |
| D20F | Fermented soybeans (N:P:K = 6:1:2), 240 kg ha−1; Tobacco fomulated fertilizer (N:P:K = 10:10:20), 259.2 kg ha−1; Diammonium Phosphate (N:P:K = 18:46:0), 24 kg ha−1; Potassium sulfate (N:P:K = 0:0:50), 181.32 kg ha−1; Calcium Superphosphate (N:P:K = 0:20:0), 49.2 kg ha−1 |
| D30F | Fermented soybeans (N:P:K = 6:1:2), 210 kg ha−1; Tobacco fomulated fertilizer (N:P:K = 10:10:20), 226.8 kg ha−1; Diammonium Phosphate (N:P:K = 18:46:0), 21 kg ha−1; Potassium sulfate (N:P:K = 0:0:50), 195.48 kg ha−1; Calcium Superphosphate (N:P:K = 0:20:0), 73.8 kg ha−1 |
FIGURE 1Comparison of the bacterial communities in different treatments based on OTU numbers. (A) Venn diagram of OTU numbers for different treatments. Every circle indicates a treatment; the number of OTUs shared between different treatments was interpreted with the number in the overlapping circles, while the number in the non-overlapping area represented the number of unique OTUs for the specific treatment. (B) Rarefaction curves of bacterial communities for all treatments.
Statistic results of Alpha diversity indices of different treatments.
| Sample name | Shannon | Simpson | Ace | Chao1 | PD whole tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 5.5763 ± 0.1364 | 0.0199 ± 0.0061a | 2,261.33 ± 19.21 | 2,269.99 ± 44.07 | 130.38 ± 1.69 |
| D10F | 5.6680 ± 0.0668 | 0.0130 ± 0.0020ab | 2,265.46 ± 25.63 | 2,260.42 ± 23.13 | 129.19 ± 0.68 |
| D20F | 5.6973 ± 0.1181 | 0.0116 ± 0.0022b | 2,234.97 ± 64.75 | 2,217.07 ± 105.33 | 128.12 ± 3.98 |
| D30F | 5.7011 ± 0.1065 | 0.0147 ± 0.0029ab | 2,233.57 ± 45.20 | 2,220.84 ± 69.04 | 131.81 ± 2.27 |
All data in the table are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). Means followed by different lower-case letters are significantly different at the 5% level by DMRT (Duncan multiple range test).
FIGURE 2Composition of the bacterial communities for different treatments, based on phylum. (A) Bar plot of relative abundance of bacterial communities based on phylum. (B) Circos plot of different treatments based on phylum.
FIGURE 3Combined plot integrated with the PCA (A), PCoA (B), NMDS (C), and PLS-DA (D) plots of the bacterial communities corresponding to beta diversity.
FIGURE 4Variation of the bacterial communities in different treatments based on genus. (A) Heatmap of the top 50 genera based on logarithmic statistics of identified OTUs among different treatments. (B) LDA Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis based on the genus among different treatments. (C) Bar plot of relative abundance of the top 20 genera among different treatments based on the Kruskal-Wallis H test.
FIGURE 5Heatmap of the correlation between Top 50 genera among different treatments.
FIGURE 6Redundancy analysis (RDA) of different treatments fitting the physicochemical indicators (A) and enzyme indicators (B) to the bacterial community data. The direction and length of the blue arrow lines indicate the explanation of different indicators, which influence the bacterial communities.
Output value of tobacco leaves.
| Treatments | Yield/kg ha−1 | Ratio of first class/% | Unit price/RMB kg−1 | Value/RMB ha−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 2,242.35 ± 104.25a | 60.34 | 24.80 | 55,611.52 ± 2,584.07a |
| D10F | 2,555.85 ± 50.40b | 63.71 | 25.96 | 66,348.57 ± 1,309.14c |
| D20F | 2,448.75 ± 52.35b | 62.12 | 25.35 | 62,075.82 ± 1,325.58b |
| D30F | 2,167.65 ± 70.95a | 61.24 | 25.04 | 54,276.70 ± 1774.91a |
All data in the table are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). Means followed by different lower-case letters are significantly different at the 5% level by DMRT (Duncan multiple range test).
Mantel test analysis of correlations between key taxa and output value of tobacco leaves.
| Key taxa (D10F-CF-D20F) | ||
|---|---|---|
| R Value |
| |
| Yield | 0.3533 | 0.027 |
| Output Value | 0.4419 | 0.005 |
Key taxa refer to those are significantly different from CK based on OTU statistics.