| Literature DB >> 35087803 |
Yasuhiro Matsuda1,2, Mikie Nakabayashi1,3, Tatsuya Suzuki1, Sinan Zhang1,4, Masashi Ichinose5, Yumie Ono4.
Abstract
Manipulative therapy (MT) is applied to motor organs through a therapist's hands. Although MT has been utilized in various medical treatments based on its potential role for increasing the blood flow to the local muscle, a quantitative validation of local muscle blood flow in MT remains challenging due to the lack of appropriate bedside evaluation techniques. Therefore, we investigated changes in the local blood flow to the muscle undergoing MT by employing diffuse correlation spectroscopy, a portable and emerging optical measurement technology that non-invasively measures blood flow in deep tissues. This study investigated the changes in blood flow, heart rate, blood pressure, and autonomic nervous activity in the trapezius muscle through MT application in 30 volunteers without neck and shoulder injury. Five minutes of MT significantly increased the median local blood flow relative to that of the pre-MT period (p < 0.05). The post-MT local blood flow increase was significantly higher in the MT condition than in the control condition, where participants remained still without receiving MT for the same time (p < 0.05). However, MT did not affect the heart rate, blood pressure, or cardiac autonomic nervous activity. The post-MT increase in muscle blood flow was significantly higher in the participants with muscle stiffness in the neck and shoulder regions than in those without (p < 0.05). These results suggest that MT could increase the local blood flow to the target skeletal muscle, with minimal effects on systemic circulatory function.Entities:
Keywords: diffuse correlation spectroscopy; heart rate variability; manipulative therapy; muscle blood flow; muscle stiffness; vascular conductance
Year: 2022 PMID: 35087803 PMCID: PMC8786806 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.800051
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1DCS system configuration for blood flow measurement in the muscle. The DCS system consisted of a 785-nm near-infrared light source and a single photon counter (A). Source and detector optical fibers are housed in a rubber holder (B) and attached to the skin surface using medical adhesive tapes above the right trapezius muscle (C). These optical fibers deliver near-infrared light to the skin surface (source probe) and detect the light scattered through the tissue (detector probe). The therapist applied manipulative therapy on the towel placed over the shoulder during the experiment, but the towel was removed in the photograph to indicate the arrangement of the hand and the probes during the intervention.
FIGURE 2Measurement protocol. Participants received manipulative therapy (MT) for 300 s (intervention period) in the MT condition, whereas they remained still on the measurement table during the control condition (CT). Pre-and post-rest periods were identical between conditions. Local blood flow of the trapezius muscle, systemic blood pressure, and electrocardiogram were continuously measured throughout the experiment.
FIGURE 3Time-course changes of mean normalized BFI in CT and MT conditions. The therapist performed MT for 120–420 s in the MT condition. BFI values were normalized based on the mean value during the pre-period. Relative increases in the local blood flow were compared between conditions by superimposing the normalized BFI time-courses. Solid lines show mean values, and shaded areas show standard errors. BFI: blood flow index, Red line: MT condition, Blue line: CT condition, AU: arbitrary units.
Changes in blood flow, blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac autonomic indices, and vascular conductance index before and after manipulative therapy.
| MT | CT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| BFI [× 10−9 cm2/s] | 4.8 (4.2, 5.7) | 5.8 (5.1, 7.8)*,† | 4.4 (3.5, 5.2) | 4.8 (3.9, 5.6)* |
| Normalized BFI | 1 | 1.2 (1.0, 1.6)*,† | 1 | 1.1 (1.0, 1.1)* |
| SAP [mmHg] | 111 (104, 122) | 111 (104, 120) | 114 (105, 122) | 115 (104, 121) |
| MAP [mmHg] | 80 (77, 89) | 80 (76, 87) | 83 (77, 91) | 82 (77, 88) |
| DAP [mmHg] | 67 (62, 74) | 65 (60, 72) | 68 (64, 75) | 66 (62, 73) |
| HR [bpm] | 67 (59, 71) | 65 (60, 74) | 65 (59, 73) | 65 (58, 74) |
| HF [10−3 ms2] | 3.9 (1.8, 8.5) | 3.7 (2.0, 10.9) | 2.8 (1.7, 8.6) | 3.7 (1.7, 8.7) |
| LF/HF | 0.3 (0.2, 0.8) | 0.4 (0.2, 0.7) | 0.3 (0.2, 0.6) | 0.3 (0.2, 0.7) |
| VCI [× 10−11 cm2/(s mmHg)] | 6.3 (5.5, 7.3) | 6.9 (6.1, 11.6)*,† | 5.4 (4.3, 6.8) | 6.0 (4.9, 6.8)* |
Data are presented as the median (first quartile, third quartile). Asterisks (*) indicate significant increases (p < 0.05) at the post-period relative to the pre-period. A dagger (†) indicates a significant increase (p < 0.05) relative to the CT condition in the post period. MT: manipulative therapy condition; CT: resting condition; BFI: blood flow index; normalized BFI: normalized blood flow index; SAP: systolic arterial pressure; MAP: mean arterial pressure; DAP: diastolic arterial pressure; HR: heart rate; HF: high-frequency component of heart rate variability; LF/HF: ratio of low to high-frequency components of heart rate variability; VCI: vascular conductance index.
Changes in the blood flow, mean arterial pressure, and vascular conductance index before and after MT in the subgroups with or without muscle stiffness in the neck and shoulder region.
| Muscle stiffness positive | Muscle stiffness negative | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| BFI [× 10−9 cm2/s] | 4.7 (3.8, 5.6) | 7.7 (5.9, 9.9)*,† | 4.8 (4.3, 6.0) | 5.2 (4.8, 6.4) |
| Normalized BFI | 1 | 1.7 (1.4, 2.1)*,† | 1 | 1.1 (1.0, 1.2) |
| MAP [mmHg] | 78 (75, 94) | 77 (73, 95) | 87 (80, 90) | 83 (78, 88) |
| VCI [× 10−11 cm2/(s mmHg)] | 6.2 (4.0, 7.2) | 9.9 (7.2, 12.8)* | 6.3 (5.5, 7.1) | 6.5 (5.8, 7.1) |
Data are presented as the median (first quartile, third quartile). Asterisks (*) indicate significant increases (p < 0.05) at post-relative to pre-period. A dagger (†) indicates a significant increase (p < 0.05) relative to the muscle stiffness negative group in the post-period. Muscle stiffness positive: ST (+) group; muscle stiffness negative: ST (−) group; BFI: blood flow index; normalized BFI: normalized blood flow index; MAP: mean arterial pressure; VCI: vascular conductance index.
FIGURE 4Relationships between baseline BFI and MT-related BFI increase (ΔBFI) in participants with and without muscle stiffness. (A) Scatter plot of baseline BFI and ΔBFI for all participants. Each circle and square represent a female or male participant, respectively. Participants with muscle stiffness are shown by filled circles [ST (+): female]. Participants without muscle stiffness are depicted by open circles [ST (−): female] or open squares [ST (−): male]. (B) Box plot of the baseline (pre) BFI in the ST (+) and ST (−) groups. (C) Box plot of ΔBFI in the ST (+) and ST (−) groups.