| Literature DB >> 35087733 |
Subarna Rani Das1, A S M Bazlul Karim1, Md RukonUzzaman1, Md Wahiduzzaman Mazumder1, Rubaiyat Alam1, Md Benzamin1, Parisa Marjan1, Mst Naznin Sarker1, Hazera Akther1, Mohuya Mondal1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Colonoscopy is considered the most reliable method for the diagnosis of juvenile polyps. However, colonoscopic screening is an invasive and expensive procedure. Fecal calprotectin (FCP), a marker of intestinal inflammation, has been shown to be elevated in patients with polyps. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate FCP as a screening biomarker for the diagnosis of juvenile polyps.Entities:
Keywords: Child; Juvenile polyp; Per rectal bleeding
Year: 2022 PMID: 35087733 PMCID: PMC8762599 DOI: 10.5223/pghn.2022.25.1.52
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr ISSN: 2234-8840
Characteristics of the patients (n=40)
| Age (y) | Value |
|---|---|
| ≤5 | 25 (62.5) |
| 6–10 | 14 (35.0) |
| >10 | 1 (2.5) |
| Mean±standard deviation | 5.28±2.4 |
| Range (min–max) | 2.5–12 |
Values are presented as number (%).
Distribution of the patients by polyps (n=40)
| Polyp | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| No. of polyps | ||
| Single | 31 (77.5) | |
| Multiple | 9 (22.5) | |
| Location of polyp | ||
| Rectum | 22 (55.0) | |
| Sigmoid colon | 15 (37.5) | |
| Rectum+sigmoid colon | 2 (5.0) | |
| Cecum | 1 (2.5) | |
| Type of polyp | ||
| Pedunculated polyp | 32 (80.0) | |
| Sessile polyp | 1 (2.5) | |
| Both pedunculated and sessile polyp | 7 (17.5) | |
| Histopathological types | ||
| Juvenile polyp | 40 (100) | |
| Others | 0 | |
Values are presented as number (%).
Distribution of the patients by FCP before and after polypectomy (n=40)
| FCP level (μg/g) | Before polypectomy (n=40) | After polypectomy (n=40) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤50 | 0 | 32 (80.0) | |
| >50 | 40 (100) | 8 (20.0) | |
| Mean±standard deviation | 277±247 | 48.57±38.23 | 0.001* |
| Range (min–max) | 80–1,000 | 29–140 |
Values are presented as number (%).
p-value reached using paired t-test.
FCP: fecal calprotectin.
*Significant.
FCP levels in individuals with multiple polyps before and after polypectomy
| Serial No. | No. of polyps | FCP (μg/g) before polypectomy | FCP (μg/g) after polypectomy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 966 | 87 |
| 2 | 4 | 560 | 130 |
| 3 | 2 | 310 | <30 |
| 4 | 3 | 519 | 130 |
| 5 | 2 | 115 | <30 |
| 6 | 4 | 1,000 | 132 |
| 7 | 4 | 510 | 85 |
| 8 | 2 | 569 | <30 |
| 9 | 2 | 95 | <30 |
FCP: fecal calprotectin.
Fig. 1Line chart of fecal calprotectin (FCP) levels before and after polypectomy. Patient number 3 had higher FCP levels after polypectomy. It may be due to regrowth of polyp after polypectomy. In this particular case we missed follow up.
Relation of FCP level with number of polyps (n=40)
| FCP levels in polyps | Single polyp (n=31) | Multiple polyps (n=9) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±standard deviation | 207.6±172.4 | 515.4±320.5 | 0.001* |
| Range (min–max) | 80–1,000 | 95–1,000 |
p-value reached using unpaired t-test.
FCP: fecal calprotectin.
*Significant.