| Literature DB >> 35087495 |
Dong Yan1,2, Tao Zhang1, Jing-Lin Bai1, Jing Su1, Li-Li Zhao1, Hao Wang1, Xiao-Mei Fang1, Yu-Qin Zhang1, Hong-Yu Liu1, Li-Yan Yu1.
Abstract
Particulate matter (PM) has been a threat to the environment and public health in the metropolises of developing industrial countries such as Beijing. The microorganisms associated with PM have an impact on human health if they are exposed to the respiratory tract persistently. There are few reports on the microbial resources collected from PM and their antimicrobial activities. In this study, we greatly expanded the diversity of available commensal organisms by collecting 1,258 bacterial and 456 fungal isolates from 63 PM samples. A total of 77 bacterial genera and 35 fungal genera were included in our pure cultures, with Bacillus as the most prevalent cultured bacterial genus, Aspergillus, and Penicillium as the most prevalent fungal ones. During heavy-haze days, the numbers of colony-forming units (CFUs) and isolates of bacteria and fungi were decreased. Bacillus, Paenibacillus, and Chaetomium were found to be enriched during haze days, while Kocuria, Microbacterium, and Penicillium were found to be enriched during non-haze days. Antimicrobial activity against common pathogens have been found in 40 bacterial representatives and 1 fungal representative. The collection of airborne strains will provide a basis to greatly increase our understanding of the relationship between bacteria and fungi associated with PM and human health.Entities:
Keywords: airborne bacteria and fungi; antimicrobial activity; haze; isolate collection; particulate matter
Year: 2022 PMID: 35087495 PMCID: PMC8787346 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.793037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Sample information in haze and non-haze days.
| Sample ID | Sample | PM2.5 (μg/m3) | PM10 (μg/m3) | AQI | Haze level | Haze severity |
| 1-PM2.5 | 9/16/2014 | 43 | 81 | 66 | 2 | Non |
| 1-PM10 | ||||||
| 1-TSP | ||||||
| 2-PM2.5 | 9/17/2014 | 60 | 122 | 87 | 2 | Non |
| 2-PM10 | ||||||
| 2-TSP | ||||||
| 3-PM2.5 | 9/18/2014 | 78 | 121 | 104 | 3 | Light |
| 3-PM10 | ||||||
| 3-TSP | ||||||
| 4-PM2.5 | 9/20/2014 | 131 | 204 | 173 | 4 | Light |
| 4-PM10 | ||||||
| 4-TSP | ||||||
| 5-PM2.5 | 9/21/2014 | 87 | 140 | 116 | 3 | Light |
| 5-PM10 | ||||||
| 5-TSP | ||||||
| 6-PM2.5 | 9/28/2014 | 99 | 98 | 74 | 2 | Non |
| 6-PM10 | ||||||
| 6-TSP | ||||||
| 7-PM2.5 | 9/29/2014 | 20 | 43 | 43 | 1 | Non |
| 7-PM10 | ||||||
| 7-TSP | ||||||
| 8-PM2.5 | 9/30/2014 | 53 | 96 | 74 | 2 | Non |
| 8-PM10 | ||||||
| 8-TSP | ||||||
| 9-PM2.5 | 10/8/2014 | 278 | 348 | 328 | 6 | Heavy |
| 9-PM10 | ||||||
| 9-TSP | ||||||
| 10-PM2.5 | 10/9/2014 | 301 | 331 | 352 | 6 | Heavy |
| 10-PM10 | ||||||
| 10-TSP | ||||||
| 11-PM2.5 | 10/12/2014 | 8 | 182 | 15 | 1 | Non |
| 11-PM10 | ||||||
| 11-TSP | ||||||
| 12-PM2.5 | 10/17/2014 | 115 | 176 | 151 | 4 | Light |
| 12-PM10 | ||||||
| 12-TSP | ||||||
| 13-PM2.5 | 10/18/2014 | 253 | 325 | 303 | 6 | Heavy |
| 13-PM10 | ||||||
| 13-TSP | ||||||
| 14-PM2.5 | 10/19/2014 | 160 | 218 | 211 | 5 | Heavy |
| 14-PM10 | ||||||
| 14-TSP | ||||||
| 15-PM2.5 | 10/20/2014 | 110 | 107 | 144 | 3 | Light |
| 15-PM10 | ||||||
| 15-TSP | ||||||
| 16-PM2.5 | 10/23/2014 | 153 | 199 | 204 | 5 | Heavy |
| 16-PM10 | ||||||
| 16-TSP | ||||||
| 17-PM2.5 | 10/30/2014 | 162 | 149 | 213 | 5 | Heavy |
| 17-PM10 | ||||||
| 17-TSP | ||||||
| 18-PM2.5 | 10/31/2014 | 132 | 142 | 175 | 4 | Light |
| 18-PM10 | ||||||
| 18-TSP | ||||||
| 19-PM2.5 | 11/1/2014 | 10 | 30 | 31 | 1 | Non |
| 19-PM10 | ||||||
| 19-TSP | ||||||
| 20-PM2.5 | 11/19/2014 | 266 | 322 | 316 | 6 | Heavy |
| 20-PM10 | ||||||
| 20-TSP | ||||||
| 21-PM2.5 | 11/20/2014 | 324 | 383 | 374 | 6 | Heavy |
| 21-PM10 | ||||||
| 21-TSP |
FIGURE 1Summary of PM samples and isolation numbers of microbial colonies during various haze-level days. (A) Example nutrient agar medium and sabouraud dextrose agar medium showing colony morphologies. (B) Concentrations of microbial colony forming units (CFU) in different PM samples during various haze-level days, Values shown as mean ± standard error (SEM).
FIGURE 2Numbers of microbial isolates in various media (A), PM samples (B), and haze-level samples (C,D). Values are shown as mean ± standard error (SEM) in panels (C,D).
FIGURE 3Phylogenetic tree of microbial isolates based on bacterial 16S rRNA sequences (A) and fungal ITS sequences (B) using neighbor-joining methods.
FIGURE 4Bacterial diversity and composition among various PMs during non-, light-, and heavy-haze days. (A) Bar plot indicating relative abundances of bacterial genera among PMs. (B) STAMP analysis indicated genera that were significantly different among various haze-level samples.
FIGURE 5Fungal diversity and composition among various PMs during non-, light-, and heavy-haze days. (A) Bar plot indicating relative abundances of fungal genera among PMs. (B) STAMP analysis indicated genera that were significantly different among various haze-level samples.
FIGURE 6Antimicrobial activity of microbial representatives. (A) Phylogenetic tree of microbial isolates based on bacterial 16S rRNA sequences using neighbor-joining methods and activity patterns of microbial representatives with antimicrobial activity. (B) Venn diagram indicating unique representatives during various haze-level days. (C) Bar plot indicating relative abundances of genera with antimicrobial activity.
The unique representatives with antimicrobial activity during various haze-level days.
| Non-haze | Light-haze | Heavy-haze |
| rep16 ( | rep1 ( | rep290 ( |
| rep63 ( | rep5 ( | rep316 ( |
| rep71 ( | rep49 ( | rep400 ( |
| rep82 ( | rep69 ( | |
| rep109 ( | rep97 ( | |
| rep191 ( | rep101 ( | |
| rep235 ( | rep133 ( | |
| rep337 ( | rep145 ( | |
| rep338 ( | rep177 ( | |
| rep424 ( | rep264 ( | |
| rep443 ( | rep269 ( | |
| rep454 ( | rep368 ( | |
| rep455 ( | rep437 ( |