Literature DB >> 35087359

Innovative Standards in Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery: From Radical Mastectomy to Extreme Oncoplasty.

Guldeniz Karadeniz Cakmak1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OBCS), which is the current procedure of choice for eligible BC patients, describes a philosophy that prioritizes oncologic and cosmetic outcomes. However, knowledge gaps regarding training, acceptance, and practice preclude standardization and make it difficult to design algorithmic guidelines to optimize individualized management in the era of precision medicine.
SUMMARY: The harmony between patient expectations and oncologic goals creates the state of the art of OBCS. Nevertheless, to achieve these goals, multidisciplinary approach is a must. Surgical decisions require a comprehensive evaluation including patient factors, tumor biology, genetics, technical considerations, and adjunct therapies. Moreover, the quality-of-life (QOL) issues should be considered as the highest level of priority with a shared decision making instituted on realistic discussions with the patient. KEY MESSAGES: The standardization in OBCS should be initiated via defining a breast surgeon who should gain theorical and practical competence on techniques via national or international educational programs. The algorithmic patient assessment with appropriate documentation before and after surgery should be established. A simple and safe global lexicon should be designed regarding techniques to be proposed and quality metrics to be considered. Additionally, international multicenter prospective trials should be instituted to overcome knowledge gaps. It is evident that OBCS is the perfect union of science with art. Nevertheless, at the very end, the question is not the nature of the surgeon/artist who would be the extremist, the innovator, or the conservative, but the patient's satisfaction, prognosis, and QOL that conclude the cascade of state of the art of OBCS.
Copyright © 2021 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Cosmesis; Innovation; Oncoplastic surgery; Outcome; Quality of life

Year:  2021        PMID: 35087359      PMCID: PMC8740173          DOI: 10.1159/000518992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  117 in total

1.  A Consensus Definition and Classification System of Oncoplastic Surgery Developed by the American Society of Breast Surgeons.

Authors:  Abhishek Chatterjee; Jennifer Gass; Krishnabhai Patel; Dennis Holmes; Katherine Kopkash; Lashan Peiris; Anne Peled; Jessica Ryan; Mahmoud El-Tamer; Julie Reiland
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Breast Cancer and Reconstruction: Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Lily R Mundy; Karen Homa; Anne F Klassen; Andrea L Pusic; Carolyn L Kerrigan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery: Volume replacement vs. volume displacement.

Authors:  M Noguchi; M Yokoi-Noguchi; Y Ohno; E Morioka; Y Nakano; T Kosaka; T Kurita
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 4.  Multidisciplinary care of breast cancer patients: a scoping review of multidisciplinary styles, processes, and outcomes.

Authors:  J Shao; M Rodrigues; A L Corter; N N Baxter
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Extreme oncoplasty: Expanding indications for breast conservation.

Authors:  Angelena Crown; Ruby Laskin; Flavio G Rocha; Janie Grumley
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 6.  Outcomes Following Oncoplastic Reduction Mammoplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Merisa L Piper; Laura J Esserman; Hani Sbitany; Anne Warren Peled
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 7.  Update on oncoplastic breast surgery.

Authors:  G Franceschini; D Terribile; S Magno; C Fabbri; C Accetta; A Di Leone; F Moschella; R Barbarino; A Scaldaferri; S Darchi; M E Carvelli; S Bove; R Masetti
Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.507

8.  Nonoperative Management for Invasive Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: Conceptual Basis and Fundamental International Feasibility Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Henry M Kuerer; Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters; Daniel W Rea; Mark Basik; Jennifer De Los Santos; Joerg Heil
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Extreme oncoplasty: breast conservation for patients who need mastectomy.

Authors:  Melvin J Silverstein; Nirav Savalia; Sadia Khan; Jessica Ryan
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Patient satisfaction after unilateral oncoplastic volume displacement surgery for breast cancer, evaluated with the BREAST-Q™.

Authors:  Anna Gardfjell; Cecilia Dahlbäck; Kristina Åhsberg
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  2 in total

1.  Subcutaneous Quadrantectomy Is a Safe Procedure in Management of Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Eva Lieto; Annamaria Auricchio; Silvia Erario; Giovanni Del Sorbo; Francesca Cardella
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-15

2.  Pre-Pectoral One-Stage Breast Reconstruction with Anterior Coverage Using Superior Anterior Biological Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) and Inferior Anterior Dermal Sling Support.

Authors:  Andrea Sisti; Payam Sadeghi; Roberto Cuomo; Sonia M Alvarez
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.948

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.