Literature DB >> 35087341

Trends in Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair and Reconstruction From 2007 to 2016: A Population-Based Study of a Large Private Insurance Database.

Jacqueline E Baron1, Robert W Westermann1, David E DeMik1, Qiang An1, Brian R Wolf1.   

Abstract

Background: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction and UCL repair of the elbow are commonly performed procedures, resulting in high return-to-play rates. Whether the incidence rate of UCL reconstruction vs UCL repair has changed over time is not currently known. Purpose/Questions: We sought to assess temporal trends in the incidence rates of UCL repair and UCL reconstruction and to identify factors associated with UCL reconstruction. We hypothesized that UCL repair would demonstrate an increased incidence overall in recent years with an associated decline in UCL reconstruction rates.
Methods: Using the PearlDiver Research Program to query the Humana administrative claims database, we identified patients who had undergone UCL repair and/or reconstruction from 2007 to 2016. Patients were stratified by age (15-19; 20-29; 30-49 years), sex, and year (2007-2011 vs 2012-2016). Poisson regression analysis (continuous variables) was used to calculate the incidence risk ratio (IRR); chi-square tests were performed for categorical variables, and odds ratios were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: The incidence rate of UCL repair was greater in 2012-2016 than in 2007-2011 (IRR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.16-2.96). The incidence rate of UCL reconstruction vs UCL repair was greater for patients aged 15 to 19 years (IRR: 3.37, 95% CI: 1.97-5.77) but not patients aged 20 to 29 years (IRR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.49-1.59) as compared with patients aged 30 to 49. Males aged 19 years were more likely than females to undergo UCL reconstruction (IRR: 10.09, 95% CI: 1.37-3.45).
Conclusion: While UCL procedures are becoming more popular, our retrospective analysis showed that young males are preferentially treated with UCL reconstruction, warranting further investigation into these trends.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  UCL; UCL reconstruction; UCL repair; adolescent; return to play; return to sport; ulnar collateral ligament

Year:  2021        PMID: 35087341      PMCID: PMC8753544          DOI: 10.1177/1556331621997810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  31 in total

1.  Outcome of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow in 1281 athletes: Results in 743 athletes with minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  E Lyle Cain; James R Andrews; Jeffrey R Dugas; Kevin E Wilk; Christopher S McMichael; James C Walter; Reneé S Riley; Scott T Arthur
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Media perceptions of Tommy John surgery.

Authors:  Stan A Conte; Justin L Hodgins; Neal S ElAttrache; Nancy Patterson-Flynn; Christopher S Ahmad
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  Medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow in throwing athletes.

Authors:  Christopher C Dodson; Adrian Thomas; Joshua S Dines; Shane J Nho; Riley J Williams; David W Altchek
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Rate of return to pitching and performance after Tommy John surgery in Major League Baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Anil K Gupta; Joshua D Harris; Charles Bush-Joseph; Bernard R Bach; Geoffrey D Abrams; Angielyn M San Juan; Brian J Cole; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Relative individual workload changes may be a risk factor for rerupture of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert A Keller; Nima Mehran; Lafi S Khalil; Christopher S Ahmad; Neal ElAttrache
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament in athletes.

Authors:  F W Jobe; H Stark; S J Lombardo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  The success of return to sport after ulnar collateral ligament injury in baseball: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Scott D Peters; Garrett S Bullock; Adam P Goode; Grant E Garrigues; David S Ruch; Michael P Reiman
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 8.  Prevention of arm injury in youth baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Edmund Kenneth Kerut; Denise Goodfellow Kerut; Glenn S Fleisig; James R Andrews
Journal:  J La State Med Soc       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

9.  Long-term Outcomes After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Competitive Baseball Players: Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Daryl C Osbahr; E Lyle Cain; B Todd Raines; Dave Fortenbaugh; Jeffrey R Dugas; James R Andrews
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Repair With Internal Bracing: Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Mechanics.

Authors:  Christopher M Jones; David P Beason; Jeffrey R Dugas
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.