| Literature DB >> 35087319 |
Fang Wang1,2, Song Chen3, Kewei Cai3, Zhimin Lu2, Yuchun Yang2, Mulualem Tigabu4, Xiyang Zhao1,3.
Abstract
Cold stress is a major abiotic factor that affects plant growth and geographical distribution. Pinus sibirica is extremely frigostable tree species. To understand the molecular mechanisms of cold tolerance by P. sibirica, physiological responses were analyzed and transcriptome profiling was conducted to the plants treated by cold stress. The physiological data showed that membrane permeability relative conductivity (REC), reactive oxygen species (ROS), malonaldehyde (MDA) content, peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) activity, soluble sugar, soluble protein and proline contents were increased significantly (p < 0.05) in response to cold stress. Transcriptome analysis identified a total of 871, 1397 and 872 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) after cold treatment for 6 h, 24 h and 48 h at -20°C, respectively. The signaling pathway mediated by Ca2+ as a signaling molecule and abscisic acid pathways were the main cold signal transduction pathways in P. sibirica. The APETALA2/Ethylene-Responsive Factor (AP2/ERF) and MYB transcription factor families also play an important role in the transcriptional regulation of P. sibirica. In addition, many genes related to photosynthesis were differentially expressed under cold stress. We also validated the reliability of transcriptome data with quantitative real-time PCR. This study lays the foundation for understanding the molecular mechanisms related to cold responses in P. sibirica.Entities:
Keywords: Pinus sibirica; cold stress; differentially expressed genes; physiological responses; transcriptome profiling
Year: 2021 PMID: 35087319 PMCID: PMC8784350 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.21009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Primer sequences used in this study
| Unigenes | Forward primer | Reverse primer |
|---|---|---|
| TUBA | CCAGTTTGTTGATTGGTGTCC | ACGGCTCTCTGAACCTTGG |
| 1585055 | CGCAGCAACAACAACACAGAGTTC | GTCTTTGTCTCTGCTTGGCTTAGC |
| 1586991 | TGCAGTAAGCATGGAAGCAACC | CTTTGTGGCAGAGCAAATGCCT |
| 1606092 | AGTGCCGGACCTTGGAATAATG | GGTGATGGCACTGTTGAGAATGG |
| 1503936 | GGCGATACGCTGGAGTACAATAAG | CCTTGTATTAACTGTTGCCGTCCC |
| 1544490 | GGATTAGGCTACACATCTGCCTG | GTTGAGGGTGGTTACGTGCAT |
| 1573575 | AGGGAATGCTTCGAGTGGGAG | GGAAAGGCACCGTCTGATGGA |
| 1580119 | GCCATCTCCTACACTACCTTGTTTC | CAATGAAGGCGGTGATGTCTCT |
| 1563093 | CCAATCACAAGTTGGCTCCCATC | CAATCTGGTCTCTCTGTTCGTCCT |
| 1487288 | GCCAAAGGCACTAGAGGAAACAAG | GAGACGAGCAAGCGAGAAGCAA |
| 1591073 | AGAACGTCCTGGATCACTTCTG | GGAAGCAGCAATAGCTCAACGATC |
| 1558637 | TTAGGGCAGGTGGAAGAGTAGAAC | GCTTATGGGTCTTCTTGGGCTTTCT |
| 1601162 | ATTCGAGCATGGCATCACTTCC | GAGCCTAACCATTGACCAACCATG |
Fig. 1.Changes in physiological indices in P. sibirica under cold stress. (a) Membrane permeability; (b) Relative electric conductivity (REC); (c) Reactive oxygen species (ROS); (d) Malonaldehyde content (MDA); (e) Peroxidase activity (POD); (f) Catalase activity (CAT); (g) Soluble sugar content; (h) Soluble protein content; and (i) Proline content. Each value represents the mean ± SE, and different letters indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level according to Duncan’s multiple range test. The X-axis shows the time (hours) of the –20°C treatment.
Fig. 2.Photosynthetic characteristics of P. sibirica under cold stress. (a) Net photosynthetic rate; (b) Stomatal conductance; and (c) Transpiration rate. Each value represents the mean ± SE, and different letters indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level according to Duncan’s multiple range test. The X-axis shows the time (hours) of the –20°C treatment.
Fig. 3.Illumina sequencing of P. sibirica. (a) The length distribution of unigenes in P. sibirica. (b) The expression distribution of unigenes in P. sibirica. Purple, blue, red, and green represent the percentages of unigenes with RPKM values greater than 100, less than 1.0, between 1 and 10, and between 10 and 100 for all unigenes, respectively.
List of P. sibirica transcriptome annotations
| Public databases | Number of unigene hits | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Nr | 43,213 | 44.38 |
| Swiss-Prot | 39,006 | 40.06 |
| Pfam | 28,699 | 29.47 |
| eggNOG | 23,321 | 23.95 |
| COG | 46,972 | 48.24 |
| GO | 36,836 | 37.83 |
| KEGG | 32,958 | 33.85 |
| ALL | 56,994 | 58.53 |
Fig. 4.GO classifications of the P. sibirica transcriptome.
Fig. 5.COG functional classification of the P. sibirica transcriptome.
Fig. 6.qRT-PCR analysis of DEGs in P. sibirica under cold stress. Transcript levels of 12 randomly selected DEGs, including 6 upregulated (a) and 6 downregulated (b) DEGs. The Y-axis on the left shows the relative gene expression levels (2–ΔΔCt) analyzed by qRT-PCR (blue lines), while the Y-axis on the right shows the corresponding RNA-seq expression data (red dotted lines). The X-axis shows the time (hours) of the –20°C treatment.
DEGs involved in cold signal sensing and transduction
DEGs encoding TFs in response to cold stress in P. sibirica
DEGs involved in antioxidation mechanisms and photosynthesis under cold stress in P. sibirica