| Literature DB >> 35087317 |
Mitsuyo Kawasaki1,2, Takayoshi Ohara3, Masahiko Ishida3, Yoshihito Takahata4,5, Katsunori Hatakeyama4.
Abstract
Clubroot is an important disease infectible to cruciferous plants and a major threat to rapeseed production in Japan. However, no clubroot resistant rapeseed cultivars have been released. We surveyed pathotype variation of six isolates collected from rapeseed fields and found they were classified as pathotype groups 2 and 4 using Japanese F1 Chinese cabbage cultivars. We produced the resynthesized clubroot resistant Brassica napus harboring two resistant loci, Crr1 and Crr2, by interspecific crossing and developed resistant rapeseed lines for southern and northern regions by marker-assisted selection and backcrossing. We improved the DNA marker for erucic acid content to remove linkage drag between Crr1 and high erucic acid content and successfully selected lines with clubroot resistance and zero erucic acid for northern regions. A novel line, 'Tohoku No. 106', suitable for southern regions showed stable resistance against all six isolates and high performance in infested fields. We conclude that Crr1 and Crr2 are important genes for CR rapeseed breeding and marker-assisted selection is effective in improving clubroot resistance.Entities:
Keywords: Brassica napus; clubroot; disease resistance; erucic acid; rapeseed
Year: 2021 PMID: 35087317 PMCID: PMC8784349 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.21014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Fig. 1.Clubroot at infested field at Chikujo. Root symptom of susceptible rapeseed cultivar ‘Nanashikibu’ and CR rapeseed line ‘Tohoku No. 106’.
Fig. 2.Schematic process of development of CR rapeseed lines.
Pathogen classification using resistance response of Chinese cabbage F1 cultivars against six Japanese field isolates of Plasmodiphora brassicae
| Field isolate | Pathogen classification | Chinese cabbage F1 varieties | CR Chinese cabbage | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Super CR Hiroki | CR Ryutoku | Muso | PL9 | |||||||||
| Mean DI | Susceptibility | Mean DI | Susceptibility | Mean DI | Susceptibility | Mean DI | Susceptibility | |||||
| Yokohama | Group 4 | 0.1 | R | 0.1 | R | 3.0 | S | 0.3 | R | |||
| Yurihonjo | Group 4 | 0.1 | R | 0.0 | R | 3.0 | S | 0.0 | R | |||
| Misatomachi | Group 4 | 0.0 | R | 0.1 | R | 3.0 | S | 0.0 | R | |||
| Yamagata1 | Group 4 | 0.0 | R | 0.1 | R | 3.0 | S | 0.0 | R | |||
| Yamagata2 | Group 2 | 0.0 | R | 2.9 | S | 2.9 | S | 0.0 | R | |||
| Chikujo | Group 4 | 0.1 | R | 0.0 | R | 3.0 | S | 0.0 | R | |||
DI denotes disease index.
Fig. 3.Gel electrophoresis images of selection using SSR markers linked to Crr1 and Crr2. Genotypes of Chinese cabbage line ‘PL9’, rapeseed cultivar ‘Kizakinonatane’, and five BC7S1 plants are shown above the gel. RR, homozygous resistant; RS, heterozygous; SS, homozygous susceptible. (A) Selection of individuals harboring Crr1. (B) Selection of individuals harboring Crr2.
CR testing of CR rapeseed line ‘Tohoku No. 106’ against six Japanese field isolates of Plasmodiphora brassicae
| Field isolate | Tohoku No. 106 | Nanashikibu | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of plants | IC | Mean DI | No. of plants | IC | Mean DI | ||
| Yokohama | 29 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 29 | 100.0 | 3.0 | |
| Yurihonjo | 32 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 27 | 100.0 | 3.0 | |
| Misatomachi | 31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 35 | 100.0 | 3.0 | |
| Yamagata1 | 37 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 36 | 100.0 | 3.0 | |
| Yamagata2 | 30 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 36 | 100.0 | 3.0 | |
| Chikujo | 21 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 20 | 100.0 | 3.0 | |
IC refers to disease incidence (%).
DI denotes disease index.
CR testing of CR rapeseed line ‘Tohoku No. 106’ at infested field in Chikujo
| Cultivar | Year | No. of plants | DI | IC | Mean DI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||
| Tohoku No. 106 | 2017–2018 | 60 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2018–2019 | 84 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Average | 72 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Nanashikibu | 2017–2018 | 66 | 42 | 1 | 6 | 17 | 34.8 | 1.0 |
| 2018–2019 | 86 | 5 | 7 | 34 | 40 | 86.0 | 2.3 | |
| Average | 76 | 24 | 4 | 20 | 29 | 60.4 | 1.6 | |
| Nanaharuka | 2017–2018 | 63 | 47 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 25.4 | 0.7 |
| 2018–2019 | 86 | 0 | 2 | 38 | 46 | 97.7 | 2.5 | |
| Average | 75 | 24 | 1 | 22 | 29 | 61.5 | 1.6 | |
DI denotes disease index.
IC refers to disease incidence (%).
Agronomic traits of CR rapeseed line ‘Tohoku No. 106’ at healthy field in Chikujo
| Cultivar | Year | Days to flowering | Days to maturity | Plant height (cm) | Yield (kg/a) | 1000 seeds weight (kg/a) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tohoku No. 106 | 2017–2018 | 153 | 211 | 141 | 19.6 | 4.2 |
| 2018–2019 | 149 | 215 | 137 | 20.4 | 3.8 | |
| Average | 151 | 213 | 139 | 20.0 | 4.0 | |
| Nanashikibu | 2017–2018 | 153 | 211 | 146 | 20.9 | 4.2 |
| 2018–2019 | 147 | 214 | 136 | 23.0 | 4.0 | |
| Average | 150 | 213 | 141 | 21.9 | 4.1 | |
| Nanaharuka | 2017–2018 | 151 | 208 | 145 | 17.4 | 4.3 |
| 2018–2019 | 142 | 208 | 139 | 26.9 | 4.0 | |
| Average | 147 | 208 | 142 | 22.2 | 4.2 |
Agronomic traits of CR rapeseed line ‘Tohoku No. 106’ at infested field in Chikujo
| Cultivar | Year | Days to flowering | Days to maturity | Plant height (cm) | Yield (kg/a) | 1000 seeds weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tohoku No. 106 | 2017–2018 | 155 | 211 | 129 | 17.5 | 5.0 |
| 2018–2019 | 148 | 215 | 142 | 20.4 | 3.9 | |
| Average | 152 | 213 | 136 | 19.0 | 4.5 | |
| Nanashikibu | 2017–2018 | 155 | 211 | 128 | 16.2 | 4.9 |
| 2018–2019 | 147 | 213 | 129 | 13.2 | 4.1 | |
| Average | 151 | 212 | 129 | 14.7 | 4.5 | |
| Nanaharuka | 2017–2018 | 152 | 207 | 133 | 11.8 | 4.5 |
| 2018–2019 | 142 | 209 | 135 | 12.5 | 4.3 | |
| Average | 147 | 208 | 134 | 12.2 | 4.4 |
Fig. 4.Gel electrophoresis images of the allele-specific markers for BnFAE1.1. The left and right lanes of each sample indicate HEA and LEA markers, respectively. Genotypes of ‘PL9’, ‘Kizakinonatane’, and four BC7 plants are shown above the gel. HH, homozygous HEA; HL, heterozygous; LL, homozygous LEA.
Relationship between genotypes of BC7 plants categorized by allele-specific markers of BnFAE1.1 and erucic acid contents in BC7S1 seeds
| No. of BC7 plants | ||
|---|---|---|
| Plants with both HEA and LEA seeds | Plants with only LEA seeds | |
| HL | 19 (0–32.4%) | 0 |
| LL | 0 | 13 (0%) |
Values in parenthesis are erucic acid content in BC7S1 seeds.
H denotes the allele of ‘PL9’ and L denotes that of ‘Kizakinonatane’.
HEA is the seed having erucic acid content more than 2% and LEA no more than 2%.
Clubroot resistance of developed lines for northern regions against Yokohama field isolate of Plasmodiophora brassicae
| Line | No. of plants | IC | Mean DI |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRB1-1 | 9 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| CRB1-2 | 7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| CRB1-3 | 9 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| CRB1-4 | 8 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| CRB1-5 | 7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| CRB1-6 | 9 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Kizakinonatane | 8 | 100.0 | 3.0 |
IC refers to disease incidence (%).
DI denotes disease index.