Literature DB >> 35086956

Olaparib-Induced Senescence Is Bypassed through G2-M Checkpoint Override in Olaparib-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Alan P Lombard1,2, Cameron M Armstrong1, Leandro S D'Abronzo1, Shu Ning1, Amy R Leslie1, Masuda Sharifi1, Wei Lou1, Christopher P Evans1,2, Marc Dall'Era1,2, Hong-Wu Chen2,3,4, Xinbin Chen2,5, Allen C Gao1,2,4.   

Abstract

PARP inhibition represents the dawn of precision medicine for treating prostate cancer. Despite this advance, questions remain regarding the use of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) for the treatment of this disease, including (i) how specifically do PARPi-sensitive tumor cells respond to treatment, and (ii) how does PARPi resistance develop? To address these questions, we characterized response to olaparib in sensitive LNCaP and C4-2B cells and developed two olaparib-resistant derivative cell line models from each, termed LN-OlapR and 2B-OlapR, respectively. OlapR cells possess distinct morphology from parental cells and display robust resistance to olaparib and other clinically relevant PARPis, including rucaparib, niraparib, and talazoparib. In LNCaP and C4-2B cells, we found that olaparib induces massive DNA damage, leading to activation of the G2-M checkpoint, activation of p53, and cell-cycle arrest. Furthermore, our data suggest that G2-M checkpoint activation leads to both cell death and senescence associated with p21 activity. In contrast, both LN-OlapR and 2B-OlapR cells do not arrest at G2-M and display a markedly blunted response to olaparib treatment. Interestingly, both OlapR cell lines harbor increased DNA damage relative to parental cells, suggesting that OlapR cells accumulate and manage persistent DNA damage during acquisition of resistance, likely through augmenting DNA repair capacity. Further impairing DNA repair through CDK1 inhibition enhances DNA damage, induces cell death, and sensitizes OlapR cells to olaparib treatment. Our data together further our understanding of PARPi treatment and provide a cellular platform system for the study of response and resistance to PARP inhibition. ©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35086956      PMCID: PMC8983570          DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-21-0604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1535-7163            Impact factor:   6.009


  32 in total

Review 1.  On PAR with PARP: cellular stress signaling through poly(ADP-ribose) and PARP-1.

Authors:  Xin Luo; W Lee Kraus
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Control of apoptosis by p53.

Authors:  Jordan S Fridman; Scott W Lowe
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-12-08       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase.

Authors:  Helen E Bryant; Niklas Schultz; Huw D Thomas; Kayan M Parker; Dan Flower; Elena Lopez; Suzanne Kyle; Mark Meuth; Nicola J Curtin; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 69.504

4.  Compromised CDK1 activity sensitizes BRCA-proficient cancers to PARP inhibition.

Authors:  Neil Johnson; Yu-Chen Li; Zandra E Walton; Katherine A Cheng; Danan Li; Scott J Rodig; Lisa A Moreau; Christine Unitt; Roderick T Bronson; Huw D Thomas; David R Newell; Alan D D'Andrea; Nicola J Curtin; Kwok-Kin Wong; Geoffrey I Shapiro
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Olaparib is effective in combination with, and as maintenance therapy after, first-line endocrine therapy in prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Gertrud E Feiersinger; Kristina Trattnig; Peter D Leitner; Fabian Guggenberger; Alexander Oberhuber; Sarah Peer; Martin Hermann; Ira Skvortsova; Jana Vrbkova; Jan Bouchal; Zoran Culig; Frédéric R Santer
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 6.603

6.  Exploiting interconnected synthetic lethal interactions between PARP inhibition and cancer cell reversible senescence.

Authors:  Hubert Fleury; Nicolas Malaquin; Véronique Tu; Sophie Gilbert; Aurélie Martinez; Marc-Alexandre Olivier; Alexandre Sauriol; Laudine Communal; Kim Leclerc-Desaulniers; Euridice Carmona; Diane Provencher; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Francis Rodier
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 7.  PARP Inhibitors in Prostate Cancer—The Preclinical Rationale and Current Clinical Development.

Authors:  Verneri Virtanen; Kreetta Paunu; Johanna K Ahlskog; Reka Varnai; Csilla Sipeky; Maria Sundvall
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 8.  Senolytics for Cancer Therapy: Is All That Glitters Really Gold?

Authors:  Valerie J Carpenter; Tareq Saleh; David A Gewirtz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy.

Authors:  Hannah Farmer; Nuala McCabe; Christopher J Lord; Andrew N J Tutt; Damian A Johnson; Tobias B Richardson; Manuela Santarosa; Krystyna J Dillon; Ian Hickson; Charlotte Knights; Niall M B Martin; Stephen P Jackson; Graeme C M Smith; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 69.504

10.  Trapping of PARP1 and PARP2 by Clinical PARP Inhibitors.

Authors:  Junko Murai; Shar-yin N Huang; Benu Brata Das; Amelie Renaud; Yiping Zhang; James H Doroshow; Jiuping Ji; Shunichi Takeda; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 13.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.