BACKGROUND: Few investigations have focused on the predictive value of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, patient depression measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and their relationship in the setting of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). This study aims to detail the association between preoperative physical function with postoperative change in physical function and in depressive symptoms. METHODS: A prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed from March 2016 to February 2019. Inclusion criteria were primary, single-level MIS TLIF procedures. Multilevel procedures and patients without PROMIS or PHQ-9 were excluded. Patients were grouped by preoperative PROMIS score (<35.0 and ≥35.0), with higher scores indicating greater physical function. A t test analyzed differences between PROMIS subgroups for operative time (skin incision to closure), estimated blood loss, length of stay, and discharge day. A t test also assessed the difference in PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and PHQ-9. Linear regression evaluated the relationship between pre- and postoperative PROMIS and PHQ-9. RESULTS: Of 119 patients, 53.8% were male and 47.9% were obese. The mean ± SD age was 52.2 ± 10.7 years. The PROMIS <35.0 group had a larger improvement of PROMIS scores compared to the PROMIS ≥35.0 group at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months. There was a negative association between preoperative PROMIS and PROMIS score improvement at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months. For all time points, improvement in PHQ-9 was not associated with preoperative PROMIS scores. CONCLUSION: From 0 weeks to 6 months after MIS TLIF, patients with lower preoperative physical function had larger improvements in PROMIS PF scores. Preoperative function was not predictive of postoperative changes in PHQ-9. While relationships between mental and physical health cannot be discounted, the lack of PHQ-9 association with physical function demonstrates the impact that MIS TLIF can have, regardless of PROMIS PF score. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients demonstrating lower levels of preoperative physical function may be in position for greater improvements in physical function following MIS TLIF surgery. In this study, there was no clear relationship between preoperative physical function levels and postoperative improvement in mental health, suggesting that all patients may achieve similar mental health improvement following MIS TLIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
BACKGROUND: Few investigations have focused on the predictive value of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, patient depression measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and their relationship in the setting of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). This study aims to detail the association between preoperative physical function with postoperative change in physical function and in depressive symptoms. METHODS: A prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed from March 2016 to February 2019. Inclusion criteria were primary, single-level MIS TLIF procedures. Multilevel procedures and patients without PROMIS or PHQ-9 were excluded. Patients were grouped by preoperative PROMIS score (<35.0 and ≥35.0), with higher scores indicating greater physical function. A t test analyzed differences between PROMIS subgroups for operative time (skin incision to closure), estimated blood loss, length of stay, and discharge day. A t test also assessed the difference in PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and PHQ-9. Linear regression evaluated the relationship between pre- and postoperative PROMIS and PHQ-9. RESULTS: Of 119 patients, 53.8% were male and 47.9% were obese. The mean ± SD age was 52.2 ± 10.7 years. The PROMIS <35.0 group had a larger improvement of PROMIS scores compared to the PROMIS ≥35.0 group at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months. There was a negative association between preoperative PROMIS and PROMIS score improvement at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months. For all time points, improvement in PHQ-9 was not associated with preoperative PROMIS scores. CONCLUSION: From 0 weeks to 6 months after MIS TLIF, patients with lower preoperative physical function had larger improvements in PROMIS PF scores. Preoperative function was not predictive of postoperative changes in PHQ-9. While relationships between mental and physical health cannot be discounted, the lack of PHQ-9 association with physical function demonstrates the impact that MIS TLIF can have, regardless of PROMIS PF score. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients demonstrating lower levels of preoperative physical function may be in position for greater improvements in physical function following MIS TLIF surgery. In this study, there was no clear relationship between preoperative physical function levels and postoperative improvement in mental health, suggesting that all patients may achieve similar mental health improvement following MIS TLIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
Authors: Dil V Patel; Mundeep S Bawa; Brittany E Haws; Benjamin Khechen; Andrew M Block; Sailee S Karmarkar; Eric H Lamoutte; Kern Singh Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2019-02-01
Authors: Vincent J Alentado; Stephanie Caldwell; Heath P Gould; Michael P Steinmetz; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz Journal: Spine J Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Owoicho Adogwa; Aladine A Elsamadicy; Ankit I Mehta; Raul A Vasquez; Joseph Cheng; Isaac O Karikari; Carlos A Bagley Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Jacob A Miller; Adeeb Derakhshan; Daniel Lubelski; Matthew D Alvin; Matthew J McGirt; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz Journal: Spine J Date: 2014-07-04 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Vivek Nagaraja; Constance Mara; Puja P Khanna; Rajaie Namas; Amber Young; David A Fox; Timothy Laing; William J McCune; Carol Dodge; Debra Rizzo; Maha Almackenzie; Dinesh Khanna Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-10-05 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Dagmar Amtmann; Jiseon Kim; Hyewon Chung; Alyssa M Bamer; Robert L Askew; Salene Wu; Karon F Cook; Kurt L Johnson Journal: Rehabil Psychol Date: 2014-03-24
Authors: Alpesh A Patel; Shah-Nawaz M Dodwad; Barrett S Boody; Surabhi Bhatt; Jason W Savage; Wellington K Hsu; Nan E Rothrock Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 3.241