Literature DB >> 35085864

An abbreviated 10-item, two-factor version of the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory (BIQLI-10): The U.S. Body Project I.

Vivienne M Hazzard1, Lauren M Schaefer2, J Kevin Thompson3, Rachel F Rodgers4, David A Frederick5.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to re-examine the factor structure of the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory (BIQLI), a measure that quantifies perceived effects of one's body image on various aspects of psychosocial functioning. Data on the 19-item BIQLI from a community sample of 11,620 U.S. men and women were split into cross-validation samples and underwent exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. An abbreviated 10-item, two-factor version of the BIQLI (BIQLI-10) was identified. The BIQLI-10 measures Social Relations & Psychological Well-Being with one subscale and Appearance & Body Management Activities with the other. Internal consistency was high for each subscale. The BIQLI-10 largely retained the convergent validity of the original 19-item BIQLI, as evidenced by nearly identical correlations with appearance evaluation, overweight preoccupation, body surveillance, appearance pressures, and appearance ideal internalization. Results also supported strong measurement invariance for the BIQLI-10 by age group, gender, sexual orientation, racial group, and weight status. Findings from this study suggest researchers may use this abbreviated version to increase nuance in the measurement of body image quality of life and reduce participant burden without compromising the psychometric integrity of the BIQLI. Further, results support the comparison of BIQLI-10 subscale scores across diverse groups.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body Image Quality of Life Inventory; Body image; Measurement; Psychometrics; Quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35085864      PMCID: PMC8891083          DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Body Image        ISSN: 1740-1445


  45 in total

1.  SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and velicer's MAP test.

Authors:  B P O'Connor
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2000-08

2.  Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic.

Authors:  Albert Satorra; Peter M Bentler
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Translation and validation of body image instruments: Challenges, good practice guidelines, and reporting recommendations for test adaptation.

Authors:  Viren Swami; David Barron
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2018-09-13

4.  Ethnicity and body dissatisfaction among women in the United States: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shelly Grabe; Janet Shibley Hyde
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  A bi-directional relationship between obesity and health-related quality of life: evidence from the longitudinal AusDiab study.

Authors:  A J Cameron; D J Magliano; D W Dunstan; P Z Zimmet; K Hesketh; A Peeters; J E Shaw
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Body image satisfaction in heterosexual, gay, and lesbian adults.

Authors:  Letitia Anne Peplau; David A Frederick; Curtis Yee; Natalya Maisel; Janet Lever; Negin Ghavami
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2008-08-19

7.  Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory in patients treated for infective endocarditis.

Authors:  Trine Bernholdt Rasmussen; Hanne Konradsen; Jane Dixon; Philip Moons; Ann-Dorthe Zwisler; Selina Kikkenborg Berg
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2016-01-13

8.  The swimsuit issue: Correlates of body image in a sample of 52,677 heterosexual adults.

Authors:  David A Frederick; Letitia Anne Peplau; Janet Lever
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2006-09-11

9.  Measurement invariance of the appearance schemas inventory-revised and the body image quality of life inventory across age and gender.

Authors:  Shayna A Rusticus; Anita M Hubley; Bruno D Zumbo
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2008-03

10.  Tapped out or barely tapped? Recommendations for how to harness the vast and largely unused potential of the Mechanical Turk participant pool.

Authors:  Jonathan Robinson; Cheskie Rosenzweig; Aaron J Moss; Leib Litman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Measurement invariance of body image measures by age, gender, sexual orientation, race, weight status, and age: The U.S. Body Project I.

Authors:  Vivienne M Hazzard; Lauren M Schaefer; J Kevin Thompson; Stuart B Murray; David A Frederick
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2022-03-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.