The triphenylphosphine-catalyzed dearomative [3 + 2] cycloaddition of benzoxazoles with 1,2-diphenylcyclopropenone is herein described. The reaction scope, mechanism, and possible future applications of this rare organocatalyzed cycloaddition are herein discussed.
The triphenylphosphine-catalyzed dearomative [3 + 2] cycloaddition of benzoxazoles with 1,2-diphenylcyclopropenone is herein described. The reaction scope, mechanism, and possible future applications of this rare organocatalyzed cycloaddition are herein discussed.
“[···]
The cyclopropenone system
must have strong resonance stabilization indeed to compensate for
its high angle strain.” So did Breslow and his team
express their surprise at the unexpected relative stability of 1,2-diphenylcyclopropenone
(1959).[1]The activation of C–C
bonds is a powerful concept for the
reorganization or coupling of organic scaffolds, yet it is a relatively
challenging process to achieve in the context of synthetic methodology
because of their inherent stability.[2] In
order to enable such methods, one can use C–C-strained, often
cyclic, building blocks that are consequently spring loaded for C–C
bond activation.[3] In this context, 1,2-diphenylcyclopropenone,
a particularly strained cyclic substance known since the late 1950s,[1] is currently witnessing a spectacular rebirth
in the context of synthetic method developments that rely on C–C
bond activation. Even though its highly strained structure makes it
an ideal building block for C–C bond activation, it usually
still requires a precious metal salt as catalyst.[4−7] Because 1,2-diphenylcyclopropenone
is a particularly versatile building block for organic coupling reactions,
yielding both open and (poly)cyclic complex skeletons (Scheme , eqs 1–4), its activation
with more trivial and less onerous (organo)catalysts would constitute
an important objective for rendering such methods sustainable and
practical.[8] We propose herein such a method
with the simple triphenylphosphine-catalyzed[9] dearomative [3 + 2] cycloaddition of benzoxazoles with 1,2-diphenylcyclopropenone.
Scheme 1
Selected Couplings with Cyclopropenones
Prescher and co-workers recently utilized a triphenylphosphine
organocatalyst in order to elegantly ring open 1,2-diphenylcyclopropenone
with amines (Scheme , eq 4).[8] We therefore reasoned that other
highly important coupling partners, such as benzoxazoles, might intercept
the cyclopropenone ring opening under simple phosphine catalysis,
leading to unprecedented fused poly-heterocyclic rings.We commenced
our study by engaging 1,2-diphenylcyclopropenone 2a in
the presence of an excess of test substrate benzoxazole 1a and triphenylphosphine (PPh3, 12.5 mol %, 1:8
ratio) in chloroform at 25 °C for 15 h. This afforded a new dearomatized
polycyclic substance 3aa in impressive 96% isolated yield
(Table , entry 1).
This particular scaffold, a benzopyrrolo-oxazolone, is relevant, as
similar structures are found at the core of several bioactive substances
of interest (Scheme ).[10] Its direct synthesis from trivial
building blocks such as presented here would therefore represent a
significant advancement for the field. No conversion was observed
in the absence of the PPh3 catalyst (Table , entry 2) nor with bulkier phosphines such
as BINAP (Table ,
entry 3). This is an important result because PPh3 is by
far the cheapest triarylphosphine available. No other solvents performed
any better than chloroform (entries 4–7), nor any other relative
ratio between the coupling partners (entries 8–10).
Table 1
Optimization Tablea
entry
variations from
standard conditionsa
yield (%)b of 3aa
1
none
97 (96)c
2
without PPh3
NR
3
BINAP instead of PPh3
NR
4
toluene instead of CHCl3
60
5
DCM instead of CHCl3
78
6
EtOAc instead of CHCl3
64
7
CDCl3 instead
of CHCl3
93
8
1 equiv of 1a
46
9
2 equiv of 1a
82
10
0.2 mmol 1a and 2
equiv of 2a
20
Unless
otherwise noted, the standard
reaction conditions were as follows: 1a (0.6 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), solvent (0.5 mL).
The yield was determined by 1H NMR analysis
of the crude reaction mixture using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene
as an internal standard.
Isolated yield.
Unless
otherwise noted, the standard
reaction conditions were as follows: 1a (0.6 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), solvent (0.5 mL).The yield was determined by 1H NMR analysis
of the crude reaction mixture using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene
as an internal standard.Isolated yield.With these
simple reaction conditions in hand, we then investigated
the reaction scope with various benzoxazoles (Scheme ). First, we tested C5-substituted benzoxazole
substrates. Electron-neutral (3ba) and electron-donating
(3aa, 3fa, 3ga, 3ha) functional groups afforded the corresponding benzopyrrolo-oxazolone
coupling products in excellent yields (88–97%). Although electron-withdrawing
substituents performed somewhat less well at 25 °C (3ca–3ea), increasing the reaction temperature to
70 °C afforded promising yields (56–60%). Next, C6-substitution
was also explored (3ja–3ma), as well
as C7 (3pa, 3qa) with promising to excellent
yields. Di- and trisubstituted benzoxazole structures (3na, 3oa, 3ra–3ua) as
well as bulky C4-substitutents were likewise well tolerated (3ga, 3ha), with 97 and 96% yields, respectively.
Interestingly, even fused or alternatively tethered dibenzoxazole substrates were found applicable, yielding the corresponding
single coupling cycloaddition products (3va–3za) in 22–60% yields. Moreover, the 1,2-diphenylcyclopropen-3-one 2a could be replaced with a different cyclopropenone 2b (product 3bb).
Scheme 2
Scope, Isolated Yields
All reactions were carried out
on a 0.2 mmol scale for 15 h under the standard conditions.
The reaction was carried out at
70 °C.
Scope, Isolated Yields
All reactions were carried out
on a 0.2 mmol scale for 15 h under the standard conditions.The reaction was carried out at
70 °C.In order to demonstrate the practicality
of our reaction, a 1 mmol
scale batch was conducted for product 3aa. This product
was thus obtained in remarkably preserved 94% isolated yield (320
mg) in moreover only 1 mL of chloroform. In addition, the X-ray diffraction
analysis of product 3ca confirmed the structural interpretation,
in particular its fused cyclic nature (Figure ).
Figure 1
X-ray structure of product 3ca (CCDC: 2093753), ORTEP view,[11] 50%
probability level.
X-ray structure of product 3ca (CCDC: 2093753), ORTEP view,[11] 50%
probability level.Based on some literature
precedents,[12] we assume that the phosphine
organocatalyst activates the strained
and electrophilic cyclopropenone to form zwitterionic intermediate I, which would then progress to ketene ylide intermediate II (Scheme ). The latter species would then undergo a nucleophilic dearomative
attack from the benzoxazole coupling partner to generate intermediate III. This would rapidly cyclize to form the second C–C
bond toward intermediate IV. Phosphine elimination would
then regenerate the organocatalyst, releasing coupling product 3.
Scheme 3
Proposed Mechanism
In order to further investigate this mechanism, we then performed
some key 31P NMR experiments (Figure ). Experiment A shows that the 31P NMR signal of PPh3 shifts at −5.4 ppm in CDCl3, a solvent which we know accommodates the reaction well (Table , entry 7). The addition
of benzoxazole 1a does not alter this signal, even in
large excess (24 equiv, experiment B). However, the addition of strained
electrophilic cyclopropenone 2a (8 equiv) leads to the
appearance of two new signals at +16.1 and +29.2 ppm, presumably corresponding
to two new species (experiment C). One or both might correspond to
intermediates I and/or II, as the observed
chemical shifts are compatible. If one adds to this 24 equiv of benzoxazole 1a, the signal at +29.1 ppm disappears (experiment D), demonstrating
that this particular species is probably a productive intermediate
of the reaction. If one stirs this mixture for another 15 h, only
the PPh3 signal remains (−5.4 ppm, experiment E),
thus demonstrating the intermediacy of the noted signals in experiments
C and D as well as the catalytic role of the phosphine.
Figure 2
Comparison
of the 31P NMR spectra of (A) only PPh3 in CDCl3; (B) PPh3 and 1a (1:24); (C) PPh3 and 2a (1:8); (D) PPh3, 1a, and 2a (1:24:8); (E) PPh3,1a and 2a (1:24:8) after the mixture
was stirred for 15 h.
Comparison
of the 31P NMR spectra of (A) only PPh3 in CDCl3; (B) PPh3 and 1a (1:24); (C) PPh3 and 2a (1:8); (D) PPh3, 1a, and 2a (1:24:8); (E) PPh3,1a and 2a (1:24:8) after the mixture
was stirred for 15 h.Finally, because of the
envisaged mechanism involving a very rigid
and covalent proximity of the catalyst to the reaction sites in intermediates II and III (Scheme ), it occurred to us that an optically active
phosphine might render the reaction enantioselective.[13] In order to explore this possibility, we screened a series
of commercially available chiral and optically active phosphines (phosphines P1–P7, Scheme ). Unfortunately, none performed with an
enantiomeric excess above 48% for product 3aa (chiral
phosphine P4) in moreover moderate yields. While we could
not improve these results so far, these at least demonstrate the feasibility
of an enantioselective version of this organocatalyzed synthetic method.
We are currently designing and synthetizing new chiral phosphines
in order to achieve this objective.
Scheme 4
Action of Optically
Active Phosphine Catalysts
For the diphosphines, a catalytic
loading of 6.25 mol % was utilized, thus giving a 1:16 ratio versus
substrate 2a.
Control run under strict argon atmosphere.
Action of Optically
Active Phosphine Catalysts
For the diphosphines, a catalytic
loading of 6.25 mol % was utilized, thus giving a 1:16 ratio versus
substrate 2a.Control run under strict argon atmosphere.In conclusion, we have developed a triphenylphosphine organocatalyzed
dearomative [3 + 2] cycloaddition of benzoxazoles with 1,2-diphenylcyclopropenone.
The cyclic and fused nature of the coupling product was confirmed
by X-ray crystallography. Moreover, a mechanistic investigation was
conducted with 31P NMR, leading to important insights regarding
the existence of phosphorus based catalytic intermediates. This contribution
should encourage the further development of organocatalyzed C–C
bond activation coupling methods.
Authors: Fanny L Cherblanc; Kathryn L Chapman; Jim Reid; Aaron J Borg; Sandeep Sundriyal; Laura Alcazar-Fuoli; Elaine Bignell; Marina Demetriades; Christopher J Schofield; Peter A DiMaggio; Robert Brown; Matthew J Fuchter Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Ashraf A Aly; Alaa A Hassan; Sara M Mostafa; Asmaa H Mohamed; Esraa M Osman; AbdElAziz A Nayl Journal: RSC Adv Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 4.036