| Literature DB >> 35085256 |
Muhammad Tariq1, Bilal Ahmad1, Muhammad Adnan2, Ishaq Ahmad Mian1, Shadman Khan1, Shah Fahad3, Muhammad Hamzah Saleem4, Mukhtiar Ali5, Maria Mussarat1, Manzoor Ahmad6, Muhammad Romman7, Muhammad Sohaib Chattha8, Mohamed A El-Sheikh9, Shafaqat Ali10,11.
Abstract
Boron (B) deficiency is a widespread problem in alkaline soils which affects yield and quality of potato but is often ignored by the growers. That's why, we compared the impact of different methods of boron application (foliar spray, fertigation and soil dressing) along with control on boron use efficiency (BUE), quality and yield of potato in alkaline soils. Boron (0.5 kg ha-1) applied as a foliar spray had significantly increased plant height, tuber per plant, tuber volume and enhanced the quality in terms of vitamin C, starch and B content of potato compared to other methods. Moreover, foliar applied B significantly improved B uptake and it use efficiency over other application methods. B concentration in tubers were strongly correlated with vitamin C and starch contents. The application methods were ranked as foliar spray>fertigation>soil dressing in term of their effectiveness towards potato yield and quality improvement. Thus, for optimum production of good quality potato, B should be applied as foliar spray at the rate of 0.5 kg B ha-1 in existing agro-climatic conditions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35085256 PMCID: PMC8794085 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259403
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Physico-chemical properties of the experimental soil.
| Property | Unit | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Soil Texture | - | Silt loam |
| pH | - | 8.25 |
| E.C | dSm-1 | 0.62 |
| CaCO3 | % | 13.3 |
| Organic matter | % | 1.05 |
| HWS-boron | mg kg-1 | 0.24 |
Effect of different application methods of boron on plant height (cm), number of tubers, biological yield (kg ha-1) and tuber volume of potato crop.
| Application Methods | B (kg ha-1) | Mean | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant height (cm) | Number of tuber (plant-1) | Biological yield (kg ha-1) | Tuber volume (cm3) | ||
| Control | 0 | 48.92± 3.66b | 5.00 ± 0.34 c | 315.3 ± 36.96 | 81.11± 2.34 c |
| Foliar | 0.5 | 56.67±5.47a | 7.06 ± 0.64 a | 391.0 ± 42.56 | 98.33± 1.67 a |
| Fertigation | 1 | 55.08±2.88a | 6.11 ±0.39 b | 388.7 ± 15.53 | 90.22 ± 2.87 b |
| Soil | 1 | 52.0±4.72ab | 5.66 ± 0.34 bc | 332.3 ± 22.48 | 88.88± 5.09 b |
| LSD (P<0.05) | 9.62 | 1.17 | 109.35 | 10.86 | |
| CV (%) | 5.74 | 5.67 | 8.85 | 3.50 | |
Means followed by similar letter’s within the same category are statistically similar using LSD at P <0.05. The ± values represent standard error for mean (n = 3).
Effects of boron application methods on starch and vitamin C contents and boron use efficiency of potato crop.
| Application methods | B (kg ha-1) | Mean | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starch (mg g-1) | Vitamin C (mg 100g-1) | Moisture loss (%) | |||
| Control | 0 | 448.30±76.50 b | 15.00 ± 0.29 c | 34.40± 1.29a | |
| Foliar | 0.5 | 656.53±112.50a | 17.50 ± 0.90 a | 21.65±2.13 c | |
| Fertigation | 1 | 600.48± 85.80a | 16.68 ±0.55 ab | 25.18±1.26 c | |
| Soil | 1 | 570.27±3.16 a | 15.92 ± 0.25 bc | 29.88±2.87 b | |
| LSD (P<0.05) | 178.53 | 2.24 | 7.76 | ||
| CV (%) | 9.07 | 3.97 | 8.07 | ||
Means followed by similar letter’s within the same column are statistically similar using LSD at P <0.05. The ± values represent standard error (n = 3).
Fig 1Comparative effect of boron application methods on the boron use efficiency of potato crop.
Effects boron application methods on boron concentration in leaves, stem, tuber and its uptake by potato crop.
| Application methods | B (kg ha-1) | Mean | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B conc. in leaves | B conc. in stem | B conc. in tuber | B uptake (g ha-1) | ||
| Control | 0 | 46.67±10.00 b | 45.00±3.51c | 30.00 ±2.88c | 103.03±14.03c |
| Foliar | 0.5 | 75.00±21.79a | 62.67±6.80a | 46.67±5.77a | 231.13±16.86a |
| Fertigation | 1 | 65.00±8.66ab | 55.56 ±6.03ab | 38.33 ±7.64b | 170.33±28.84b |
| Soil | 1 | 55.00±5.03b | 51.42± 2.64bc | 36.67±5.00b | 144.13±15.28b |
| LSD (P<0.05) | 32.15 | 12.19 | 9.56 | 54.67 | |
| CV (%) | 15.38 | 6.56 | 7.29 | 3.50 | |
Means followed by similar letter’s within the same column are statistically similar using LSD at P <0.05. The ± values represent standard error (n = 3).
Fig 2Relationship of vitamin C (mg 100g-1) and B concentration in potato tuber.
Fig 4Relationship of starch concentration (mg g-1) and B concentration in potato tuber.