Literature DB >> 35085255

Heuristic algorithms in evolutionary computation and modular organization of biological macromolecules: Applications to in vitro evolution.

Alexander V Spirov1,2, Ekaterina M Myasnikova3.   

Abstract

Evolutionary computing (EC) is an area of computer sciences and applied mathematics covering heuristic optimization algorithms inspired by evolution in Nature. EC extensively study all the variety of methods which were originally based on the principles of selectionism. As a result, many new algorithms and approaches, significantly more efficient than classical selectionist schemes, were found. This is especially true for some families of special problems. There are strong arguments to believe that EC approaches are quite suitable for modeling and numerical analysis of those methods of synthetic biology and biotechnology that are known as in vitro evolution. Therefore, it is natural to expect that the new algorithms and approaches developed in EC can be effectively applied in experiments on the directed evolution of biological macromolecules. According to the John Holland's Schema theorem, the effective evolutionary search in genetic algorithms (GA) is provided by identifying short schemata of high fitness which in the further search recombine into the larger building blocks (BBs) with higher and higher fitness. The multimodularity of functional biological macromolecules and the preservation of already found modules in the evolutionary search have a clear analogy with the BBs in EC. It seems reasonable to try to transfer and introduce the methods of EC, preserving BBs and essentially accelerating the search, into experiments on in vitro evolution. We extend the key instrument of the Holland's theory, the Royal Roads fitness function, to problems of the in vitro evolution (Biological Royal Staircase, BioRS, functions). The specific version of BioRS developed in this publication arises from the realities of experimental evolutionary search for (DNA-) RNA-devices (aptazymes). Our numerical tests showed that for problems with the BioRS functions, simple heuristic algorithms, which turned out to be very effective for preserving BBs in GA, can be very effective in in vitro evolution approaches. We are convinced that such algorithms can be implemented in modern methods of in vitro evolution to achieve significant savings in time and resources and a significant increase in the efficiency of evolutionary search.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35085255      PMCID: PMC8794168          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  79 in total

1.  RNA structures facilitate recombination-mediated gene swapping in HIV-1.

Authors:  Etienne Simon-Loriere; Darren P Martin; Kevin M Weeks; Matteo Negroni
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  An allosteric synthetic DNA.

Authors:  L Wu; J F Curran
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Large scale analysis of the mutational landscape in HT-SELEX improves aptamer discovery.

Authors:  Jan Hoinka; Alexey Berezhnoy; Phuong Dao; Zuben E Sauna; Eli Gilboa; Teresa M Przytycka
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Critical evaluation of random mutagenesis by error-prone polymerase chain reaction protocols, Escherichia coli mutator strain, and hydroxylamine treatment.

Authors:  Tiina S Rasila; Maria I Pajunen; Harri Savilahti
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  Structurally complex and highly active RNA ligases derived from random RNA sequences.

Authors:  E H Ekland; J W Szostak; D P Bartel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Isolation of new ribozymes from a large pool of random sequences [see comment].

Authors:  D P Bartel; J W Szostak
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Robustness, evolvability, and the logic of genetic regulation.

Authors:  Joshua L Payne; Jason H Moore; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Artif Life       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 0.667

8.  DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution.

Authors:  W P Stemmer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Multivalent Aptamers: Versatile Tools for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.

Authors:  Mariya Vorobyeva; Pavel Vorobjev; Alya Venyaminova
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Exploiting genomic knowledge in optimising molecular breeding programmes: algorithms from evolutionary computing.

Authors:  Steve O'Hagan; Joshua Knowles; Douglas B Kell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.