Maira Sohail1, Dustin M Long2, D Scott Batey3, Michael J Mugavero4, Akinyemi I Ojesina1, Emily B Levitan1. 1. Department of Epidemiology, 48653The University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics, 48653The University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, USA. 3. Department of Social Work, 200297The University of Alabama at Birmingham College of Arts and Sciences, Birmingham, AL, USA. 4. 9967The University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies examining the role of partnership on HIV care outcomes have primarily focused on the men who have sex with men population in the United States, leaving a gap in the literature on this phenomenon among the heterosexual persons with HIV (PWH). This study examined association between partnership around diagnosis (married, unmarried-partnered, and un-partnered) with time to viral suppression (TVS) and sustained viral suppression (SVS) in newly diagnosed heterosexual PWH from a HIV clinic in Birmingham, Alabama. METHODS: TVS [time to first viral load (VL) <200 copies/ml] was measured using VLs from 12 months following diagnosis using Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazard model for interval censoring (n=153) to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). SVS was measured using VLs for 12 months after first VS using logistic regression model (n=137) to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Models were adjusted for confounding demographics and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: The study population comprised of 77% Black, 57% male, and 46% aged 31-49 years; 24% were married, 35% unmarried-partnered, and 41% un-partnered. The median TVS (days) was 57 for married, 73 for unmarried-partnered, and 75 for un-partnered. Compared to un-partnered individuals, unmarried-partnered had similar, whereas married had 69% higher [HR (95% CI): 1.69 (1.02, 2.78)] hazard of TVS. Compared to un-partnered, unmarried-partnered and married individuals had similar odds of achieving SVS. CONCLUSION: Married, newly diagnosed, heterosexual PWH had faster TVS than un-partnered individuals suggesting that intimate partners may help achieve HIV care goals.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies examining the role of partnership on HIV care outcomes have primarily focused on the men who have sex with men population in the United States, leaving a gap in the literature on this phenomenon among the heterosexual persons with HIV (PWH). This study examined association between partnership around diagnosis (married, unmarried-partnered, and un-partnered) with time to viral suppression (TVS) and sustained viral suppression (SVS) in newly diagnosed heterosexual PWH from a HIV clinic in Birmingham, Alabama. METHODS: TVS [time to first viral load (VL) <200 copies/ml] was measured using VLs from 12 months following diagnosis using Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazard model for interval censoring (n=153) to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). SVS was measured using VLs for 12 months after first VS using logistic regression model (n=137) to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Models were adjusted for confounding demographics and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: The study population comprised of 77% Black, 57% male, and 46% aged 31-49 years; 24% were married, 35% unmarried-partnered, and 41% un-partnered. The median TVS (days) was 57 for married, 73 for unmarried-partnered, and 75 for un-partnered. Compared to un-partnered individuals, unmarried-partnered had similar, whereas married had 69% higher [HR (95% CI): 1.69 (1.02, 2.78)] hazard of TVS. Compared to un-partnered, unmarried-partnered and married individuals had similar odds of achieving SVS. CONCLUSION: Married, newly diagnosed, heterosexual PWH had faster TVS than un-partnered individuals suggesting that intimate partners may help achieve HIV care goals.
Entities:
Keywords:
HIV; North America; diagnosis; epidemiology; heterosexual
Authors: Megan A Lewis; Colleen M McBride; Kathryn I Pollak; Elaine Puleo; Rita M Butterfield; Karen M Emmons Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2005-09-16 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Susan S Reif; Kathryn Whetten; Elena R Wilson; Carolyn McAllaster; Brian W Pence; Sara Legrand; Wenfeng Gong Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2013-08-14
Authors: J W Mellors; A Muñoz; J V Giorgi; J B Margolick; C J Tassoni; P Gupta; L A Kingsley; J A Todd; A J Saah; R Detels; J P Phair; C R Rinaldo Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1997-06-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Arthur E Blank; Jason Fletcher; Niko Verdecias; Iliana Garcia; Oni Blackstock; Chinazo Cunningham Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Bulent Turan; Whitney Smith; Mardge H Cohen; Tracey E Wilson; Adaora A Adimora; Daniel Merenstein; Adebola Adedimeji; Eryka L Wentz; Antonina G Foster; Lisa Metsch; Phyllis C Tien; Sheri D Weiser; Janet M Turan Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 3.731