| Literature DB >> 35084525 |
Viktoria Weixler1,2, Peter Kramer3, Judith Lindner4, Peter Murin1, Mi-Young Cho1, Pedro Del Nido2, Joachim Photiadis1, Ingeborg Friehs5.
Abstract
Double-chambered right ventricle (DCRV) is a progressive division of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) often associated with a subaortic ventricular defect (VSD). The septation is caused by a mixture of hypertrophied muscle bundles and fibrous tissue, whereof the latter is of unclear pathogenesis. Our group has previously reported that flow disturbances lead to formation of fibroelastic tissue through a process called endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT) but it is unclear whether the same mechanism exists in the RV. Tissue from patients undergoing repair of DCRV was examined to identify the histomorphological substrate of this tissue. Demographic and pre-/post-operative echocardiographic data were collected from nine patients undergoing surgery for DCRV. RVOTO tissue samples were histologically analyzed for myocardial hypertrophy, fibrosis, elastin content, and active EndMT (immunohistochemical double-staining for endothelial and mesenchymal markers and transcription factors Slug/Snail) and compared to four healthy controls. Indication for surgery were symptoms and progressive RVOT gradients. A highly turbulent flow jet through the RVOTO and VSD was observed in all patients with a preoperative median RVOT peak gradient of 77 mmHg (IQR 55.0-91.5), improved to 6 mmHg (IQR 4.5-17) postoperatively. Histological analysis revealed muscle and thick infiltratively growing fibroelastic tissue. EndMT was confirmed as underlying patho-mechanism of this fibroelastic tissue but the degree of myocardial hypertrophy was not different compared to controls (P = 0.08). This study shows for the first time that an invasive fibroelastic remodeling processes of the endocardium into the underlying myocardium through activation of EndMT contributes to the septation of the RVOT.Entities:
Keywords: Double-chambered right ventricle; Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35084525 PMCID: PMC9098603 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-022-02828-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Cardiol ISSN: 0172-0643 Impact factor: 1.655
Baseline characteristics and demographics of the patient cohort
| Patient | Gender (m/f) | Age (years) | BSA at surgery (m2) | Preop. saturation (%) | Diagnosis | Additional anomalies | Current procedure | Previous surgeries/interventions | Symptoms/indication for surgery | First diagnosed | Prior medication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | m | 1.4 | 0.5 | 99 | DCRV, VSD, RVOTO | LVOTO | RVOTO/LVOTO resection, VSD closure | None | Exertional dyspnea, perspiration | 5 months of age | Diuretics |
| 2 | m | 0.6 | 0.3 | 85–97 | DCRV, VSD | Right sided aortic arch | RVOTO resection, VSD closure | None | Desaturation, tachypnea, rapid progression of RVOTO gradient | Neonatally | Beta-blocker |
| 3 | f | 29.3 | 1.7 | 100 | DCRV, spontaneous closure of former VSD | None | RVOTO resection | Surgical PDA closure | Exertional dyspnea | 14 years of age | None |
| 4 | m | 2.9 | 0.7 | 98 | DCRV, VSD | None | RVOTO resection, VSD closure | None | Recurrent respiratory infections | Neonatally | Diuretics |
| 5 | f | 0.4 | 0.3 | 96 | DCRV, VSD | ASD II | RVOTO resection, VSD closure | None | None | Neonatally | Diuretics Beta-blocker |
| 6 | f | 0.8 | 0.4 | 98 | DCRV, VSD | None | RVOTO resection, VSD closure | None | Recurrent respiratory infections | Neonatally | None |
| 7 | m | 7.5 | 1.1 | 99 | DCRV, VSD | None | RVOTO resection, VSD closure | None | Perspiration, rapid progression of RVOTO gradient | Neonatally | None |
| 8 | m | 0.3 | 0.3 | 99 | DCRV, VSD | None | RVOTO resection, VSD closure | None | None | Neonatally | Beta-blocker |
| 9 | m | 0.5 | 0.4 | 99 | DCRV, VSD | PFO | RVOTO resection VSD closure | None | Asymptomatic, rapid progression of RVOTO gradient | Neonatally | None |
ASD atrial septal defect, BSA body surface area (Du Bois method), DCRV double-chambered right ventricle, m/f male/female, LAD left anterior descending artery, L/RVOTO left/right ventricular outflow tract obstruction, RCA right coronary artery, PFO patent foramen ovale, VSD ventricular septal defect
Preoperative and postoperative echocardiography of the patient cohort
| Patient | VSD morphology | Preop. max. gradient across VSD | Shunt direction across VSD | Preop. Vmax across RVOT | Preop. peak gradient across RVOTO | Preop. PV pathology | Postop. peak gradient across RVOT | Residual VSD shunt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Subaortic (∅ 8 mm), malalignment | 45 | L–R | 1.2 | 77 | None | 12 | None |
| 2 | Subaortic (∅ 7 mm), malalignment | 3 | R–L | 4.5 | 82 | None | 5 | None |
| 3 | Subaortic (almost closed) no malalignment | – | No shunt | 1.2 | 88 | None | 30 | None |
| 4 | Inlet (∅ 1.5 cm, partly covered) | 75 | L–R | 4.3 | 75 | None | 10 | None |
| 5 | Subaortic (∅ 8 mm, partly covered) no malalignment | 35 | L–R | 3.3 | 44 | None | 22 | None |
| 6 | Subaortic (∅ 8 mm, partly covered), malalignment | 65 | L–R | 4.2 | 65 | None | 5 | None |
| 7 | Subaortic (∅ 3 mm), no malalignment | 4 | L–R | 4.9 | 95 | None | 3 | None |
| 8 | Subaortic (∅ 5 mm), malalignment | 92 | L–R | 2.6 | 45 | None | 4 | None |
| 9 | Subaortic (∅ 8 mm) malalignment | 17 | L–R | 4.9 | 97 | None | 6 | Insignificant residual defect |
max. gradient (in mmHg) systolic gradient across VSD/RVOT/PV, RVOTO sight ventricular outflow tract obstruction, shunt direction: L-R/R-L left-to-right/right-to-left shunt, postop. postoperative, preop. preoperative, PR pulmonary valve regurgitation, PV pulmonary valve, Vmax maximum flow velocity (in m/s), VSD ventricular septal defect
Fig. 1A Representative preoperative color-Doppler echocardiogram from a parasternal short-axis view. Diagnosis of DCRV is established via identification of key components (double-chambered RVOTO and VSD with significant flow disturbances) by echocardiography. A representative image is provided. B Sketch of (A): The associated graphical display of the DCRV pathology indicates the flow turbulence across the anomalous muscle bundles and the associated high-velocity turbulent flow jet. EFE endocardial fibroelastosis, VSD ventricular septal defect, RVOT right ventricular outflow tract, PV pulmonary valve, AoV aortic valve, LA left atrium, RA right atrium
Fig. 2A representative RV tissue sample is shown which is comprised of muscle and fibrotic tissue (A). Histological analysis was performed through staining with hematoxylin and eosin (B) for assessment of overall tissue texture; with Masson’s Trichrome (C) for determination of fibrosis and Van Giesson (D) staining for visualization of elastin content. Collagen and elastin are prominently displayed subendocardially in organized layers and are also found infiltrating into the underlying myocardium (white arrows)
Fig. 3A Representative immunohistochemical stainings are shown. EndMT was verified by double-staining of endocardial endothelial cells with CD31 (in red) and αSMA (in green). Yellow colored cells are indicative of active EndMT as pointed out by white arrows. Nuclei appear in blue. As indicated, layers on top of the myocardium as well as areas of infiltrative growth into the myocardium are positive for EndMT (see white arrows) but the underlying myocardium is free from EndMT, except for one patient where the subendocardial myocardium shows a small number of EndMT positive endothelial cells. B Nuclei in CD31 positive cells double-stained for Slug/Snail are indicative of active EndMT (white arrows). CD31 is shown in red, nuclei stained with DAPI in blue and Slug/Snail in green. C Intramyocardial EndMT through double-staining of CD31 and αSMA (white arrow) as identified in one patient
Fig. 4A Myocardial hypertrophy was determined by comparing the ratio of myocardium to number of nuclei per field of vision between DCRV tissue and non-hypertrophied human histological sections. B Summary statistics shows that there was no difference in the myocardial area/number nuclei ratio between the two groups. Data are expressed as mean ± SD