| Literature DB >> 35084457 |
Min Chen1, Shizhao Li2, Vinodh Srinivasasainagendra3, Manvi Sharma2, Zhenhai Li4, Hemant Tiwari3, Trygve O Tollefsbol2,5,6,7, Yuanyuan Li4,8.
Abstract
Breast cancer has strong developmental origins and maternal nutrition composition may influence later-life breast cancer risk in the offspring. Our study focused on a bioactive dietary component, genistein (GE) enriched in soybean products, to investigate specific timing of maternal GE exposure that may influence preventive efficacy of GE on offspring breast cancer later in life, and to explore the potential epigenetic mechanisms. Our results indicate a time-dependent effect of maternal GE exposure on early-life breast cancer development in offspring mice. Through integrated transcriptome and methylome analyses, we identified several candidate genes showing significantly differential gene expression and DNA methylation changes. We further found maternal long-term GE treatment can induce inherited epigenetic landmark changes in a candidate tumor suppressor gene, Trp63, resulting in transcriptional activation of Trp63 and induction of the downstream target genes. Our results suggest that maternal long-term exposure to soybean GE may influence early-life epigenetic reprogramming processes, which may contribute to its temporal preventive effects on breast cancer in the offspring. This study provides important mechanistic insights into an appropriate maternal administration of soybean products on prevention of breast cancer later in offspring life.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35084457 PMCID: PMC9036993 DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgac009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Carcinogenesis ISSN: 0143-3334 Impact factor: 4.741
Figure 1.Breast tumor growth in female offspring under different exposure timings of GE administration. (A) Schematic representation of animal study for maternal GE intervention. The upper bar represents mouse life stages in the mother and female offspring. Female SV40 and Her2/neu transgenic mice were administered GE diet (250 mg/kg) under different exposure windows: 1) Control: mice were fed ad libitum with the control diet; 2) Maternal short-term GE (Ma-ST-GE): mice were administered GE diet from the first day of conception at 12 wks until weaning; 3) Maternal long-term GE (Ma-LT-GE): mice were administered GE diet from early life childhood (4 wks) until weaning; and 4) Postnatal GE (Post-GE): mice were fed GE diet postnatally from 4 wks of age until termination of the experiment. Offspring mice were weaned at 4 wks of age (PD28) and maintained on the control or GE diet throughout their lifespan until termination of the experiment. Tumor growth parameters were monitored and recorded weekly. (B-G) Breast tumor growth in female SV40 (left panel) or Her2/neu (right panel) offspring mice. B and C, tumor incidence; D and E, median tumor latency; F and G, tumor weight. Columns, mean; Bars, SD; ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, significantly different from the control group; &, significantly different from the Ma-ST-GE group; # significantly different from Ma-LT-GE group.
Figure 2.Maternal LT-GE impacted transcriptomic and methylomic profiles in offspring breast tumors. (A-C) Transcriptomic profiling by RNA-Seq analysis in SV40 offspring breast tumors with maternal LT-GE treatment. (A) Hierarchical cluster analysis demonstrated DEGs. Columns indicate individual mRNA expression values and rows correspond to different treatment groups. (B) Volcano plot showed log2 fold changes and statistical significance of the annotated DEGs between control and maternal LT-GE treatment. The green spots in oval shapes indicate the most significant DEGs with FDR < 0.01 and log2 fold change > 2. (C) Gene function and ontology analysis by DAVID. Y axis shows multiple signaling and regulatory pathways that have been significantly regulated by the maternal LT-GE treatment. Dotted line represented a threshold with significance (P < 0.05). (D-H) Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling by RRBS analysis in control and maternal LT-GE treated SV40 offspring breast tumors. (D) Heatmap result showed significantly DML with treatment (columns) and differentially methylated CpG sites (rows). Hypermethylated loci are shown in red and hypomethylated loci in green in response to maternal LT-GE. (E and F) Genome-wide distribution of DML (E) and DMRs (F): Bands from the outside to inside represent chromosomes (gray), significant DML or DML (yellow), control (green) and maternal LT-GE (orange). (G) Location distribution of DML and DMRs. (H) DMR-affiliated gene function and ontology analysis by DAVID.
Figure 3.Validation analyses of candidate gene expression and methylation changes. (A) Integrative analysis by combining RNA-Seq and RRBS results. Scatter plots showed 589 genes that have shown significantly differential expression and contained significantly methylated loci simultaneously. X axis shows log2 fold change of DEGs (positive-upregulation, negative-downregulation). Y axis shows methylation difference (positive-hypermethylation, negative-hypomethylation). Orange dots indicate Trp63 gene. (B) Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was performed to measure candidate genes. Data were in three biological repeats from three independent experiments and were normalized to GAPDH and calibrated to the levels in control samples as 1. (C) Specific DNA methylation in the regulatory gene regions was determined by tNGBS for selected target genes including Trp63, Cyclin D1, Cyclin A1, Myc, Rarb and Keratin 18. Percentage of methylation levels was calculated by dividing the number of methylated reads by the total number of reads. Columns, mean; Bars, SD; ∗, P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001, significantly different from control.
Identified key genes showed significantly differential expression and/or methylation changes in response to maternal LT-GE treatment
| Gene | Function in cancer | Epigenetic regulation | RNA-Seq | Real-time RT-PCR | RRBS | tNGBS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Tumor suppressor gene, | Modulation of | DEG, significant increase (26.3 fold) | Significant increase (8.47 fold) | DML, DMR, hypomethylation | Locus-specific demethylation in the promoter and intron 3 |
|
| Oncogene | Key transcriptional factor that frequently participates in epigenetic regulation of target gene expression ( | DEG, significant decrease (0.43 fold) | Significant decrease (0.6 fold) | No DML/DMR detected | DNA hypomethylation in the promoter (<1% methylation rate; hypermethylation in majority of tested loci in exon 3 and 3ʹ-UTR |
|
| Tumor promoting gene, regulates cell cycle ( | Epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation and histone acetylation involve in | DEG, significant decrease | Significant decrease (0.42 fold) | No DML/DMR detected | DNA hypomethylation in the promoter (<1% methylation rate) |
|
| A p53-induced tumor suppressor gene that mediates apoptosis, G2/M cell cycle arrest | DNA methylation play a role in regulation of | DEG, significant increase | Increase (NS) | No DML/DMR detected | Promoter demethylation in majority of tested loci |
|
| Tumor suppressor gene,a member of the thyroid-steroid hormone receptor superfamily ( | Aberrant DNA hypermethylation and histone modifications of | DEG, significant increase | Significant increase | No DML/DMR detected | Promoter demethylation in majority of tested loci |
|
| Tumor prognostic indicator, high expression was associated with poor prognosis ( | Aberrant | DEG, significant decrease | Significant decrease (0.45 fold) | DML, | Mixed DNA methylation changes in the promoter |
|
| Oncogene, overexpressed in many types of cancer ( | Promoter hypermethylation leads to silenced | DEG, significant increase | Decrease (NS) | DML, | ND |
|
| Important ER-regulated gene, driver of early breast cancer progression | Epigenetic mechanisms play a role in | DEG, significant increase | Decrease (NS) | No DML/DMR detected | ND |
|
| P53-regulated inhibitor of cell cycle progression, tumor suppressor gene ( | Frequent epigenetic silenced | DEG, significant increase | Significant increase (3.1-fold) | No DML/DMR detected | ND |
|
| Negative regulator of the Wnt pathway, loss of expression in breast cancer ( | Epigenetic mechanisms play a role in | DEG, significant increase | Significant increase (2.09 fold) | No DML/DMR detected | ND |
|
| Transcriptional factor, tumor promoting gene ( | Frequently participates in epigenetic regulation of target gene expression ( | DEG, significant decrease | Significant decrease (0.25 fold) | DML, | ND |
|
| Overexpression is correlated with poor clinical outcome | Epigenetic mechanisms play a role in | DEG, significant increase | Significant increase (1.51 fold) | No DML/DMR detected | ND |
DEG, differentially expressed gene; DML, differentially methylated loci; DMR, differentially methylated region; NS, not significant; ND, not detected.
Figure 4.Trp63 gene expression and its regulated signaling pathways. (A) Trp63 gene transcriptional levels were determined by real-time RT-PCR in mammary tumors and normal mammary glands from control, maternal ST-GE, maternal LT-GE and postnatal-GE treatment. (B) Protein levels including p63, cell cycle-related proteins such as Cyclin D1, pRb and p27, and apoptosis-related proteins (Bcl-2, Bak and Cleaved caspase 3) were analyzed by western blot from 3 randomly selective animals in either control or maternal LT-GE groups. (C) Histogram showed quantified protein levels in mouse tumors. (D) p63 protein levels in normal HMECs or HMECs-derived precancer cells in response to GE treatment. (E) Quantification of p63 protein in HMECs and precancer cells. (F) Trp63 mRNA expression by quantitative real-time RT-PCR in human TNBC cell lines, MDA-MB-157 and MDA-MB-231, after transient transfection with either Trp63 expression vector (Trp63) or empty plasmid (control). (G) Cell proliferation in transfected TNBC cells by MTT assay. (H) Apoptosis assay after 72 h transfection. (I) Protein expression of p63, Cyclin D1, pRb, p27 and Bcl-2 in control or Trp63-transfected TNBC cells. (J) Quantification of protein expression in transfected TNBC cells. All protein levels were normalized to β-actin as an internal control and calibrated to control or untreated group as 1. Representative photographs of the cropped blots from the experiments were repeated three times. Columns, mean; Bars, SD; ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001, significantly different from control; &, significantly different from the Ma-ST-GE group; # significantly different from Ma-LT-GE group.
Figure 5.Exposure timing-dependent epigenetic regulation of Trp63 expression. (A) Maternal LT-GE induced DNA methylation inheritance in the Trp63 gene. Methylation changes in the regulatory regions of the Trp63 gene were evaluated in breast tumors by tNGBS. Arrows point coincident loci-specific methylation loss in the promoter and intron 3 regions in response to postnatal-GE (mother) or maternal LT-GE treatment (offspring) suggesting a potential epigenetic inheritance. (B) An illustration indicates specific primers, P1, P2 and P3, target the Trp63 promoter and intron 3 regions. Circle represents CpG sites and orange box indicates CREB1 binding site, cre. TSS, transcription start site. (C) ChIP assays were performed to determine binding ability changes of CREB1 (left) and MeCP2 (middle) as well as enrichment changes of histone methylation marks (right, P2 region), trimethyl-H3K4 and trimethyl-H3K27, in the Trp63 regulatory regions in response to maternal LT-GE and postnatal-GE treatments. The histogram shows relative enrichment as the ratio of the immunoprecipitated DNA to input DNA was calibrated to the levels in control samples via real-time PCR. Results were in three biological repeats from three independent experiments. Columns, mean; Bars, SD; ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, significantly different from control. (D) Schematic illustration proposes working scenarios of epigenetic regulation of Trp63 expression under different timings of GE exposure. In control mice, DNA hypermethylation (red circles) and enriched chromatin repressor, trimethyl-H3K27, in the Trp63 promoter lead to Trp63 transcriptional suppression that contributes to breast tumor development; postnatal GE (direct exposure such as mother) can induce DNA hypomethylation (gray circles) and increased chromatin activator, trimethyl-H3K4, but decreased chromatin suppressor, trimethyl-H3K27, in the Trp63 promoter leading to Trp63 transcriptional activation and tumor inhibition; in maternal LT-GE group, inherited locus-specific hypomethylation loci (gray circles) can facilitate the binding of MeCP2 to the unmethylated CpGs, which in return increase recruitment of transcriptional activator such as CREB1 to the Trp63 promoter region leading to Trp63 transcriptional activation and tumor inhibition.