Literature DB >> 35084129

Computationally predicted pathogenic USP9X mutation identified in infertile men does not affect spermatogenesis in mice.

Wei Liu1, Yue-Wen Wang1, Huan Zhang1, Xue-Feng Xie1, Ao Ma1, Qumar Zaman1, Abdul Rafay Javed1, Tanveer Abbas1, Wasim Shah1, Riaz Ahmad2, Da-Ren Zhao1, Hui Ma1, Muhammad Zubair1, Ranjha Khan3, Qing-Hua Shi4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35084129      PMCID: PMC8920844          DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2021.409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zool Res        ISSN: 2095-8137


× No keyword cloud information.
Infertility is a major health issue, affecting approximately 15% of couples of child-bearing age. Although nearly half of idiopathic infertility cases are assumed to have a genetic basis, the underlying causes remain largely unknown in most infertile men. Thus, to shed light on the genetic causes of male infertility, we employed a widely utilized in silico method to annotate genetic variants from whole-exome sequencing (WES) data of a consanguineous Pakistani family comprised of two infertile men diagnosed with oligoasthenozoospermia. We identified a novel variant in USP9X (c.1920A>C, p.Gln640His), recessively segregated with the infertility phenotype in the recruited family. This variant lies within a highly conserved region of USP9X and was predicted to be deleterious based on five out of seven computational tools. We functionally examined the effects of the variant by generating mice with the same mutation as the patients. Surprisingly,Usp9x mutant mice showed normal fertility and displayed sperm parameters, testicular and epididymal histology, and meiotic prophase I progression similar to those of their control littermates. These findings indicate that the USP9X mutation is not likely to be a pathogenic variant in our patients and in vivo functional verification using a mouse model is required to identify potentially pathogenic mutations in infertile patients. Nearly 15% of couples at the age of reproduction are unable to conceive after a year of unprotected sexual intercourse (Gershoni et al, 2019). Almost 50% of infertility cases are related to male factors, which are mostly accompanied by quantitative defects in semen (Farhi & Ben-Haroush, 2011; Rimoin et al, 2007). It is inferred that mutations in more than 1000 genes showing germ cell-enriched expression may cause defective spermatogenesis (Djureinovic et al, 2014). Most familial mutations causing infertility have been identified through WES. ANNOVAR has been widely used to identify potential candidate gene mutations and to screen mutations in WES data for various genetic diseases (Wang et al, 2010). In vivo functional experiments have also identified a small number of mutations (Guerri et al, 2019; Okutman et al, 2018; Sironen et al, 2020). However, the pathogenicity of most mutations remains uncertain due to a lack of experimental evidence. Ubiquitin-specific protease 9, X chromosome (USP9X) is located on the X chromosome in humans and mammals and encodes a deubiquitylating enzyme that plays functional roles in various biological processes (Stegeman et al, 2013). Conditional disruption of Usp9x in germ cells of mice causes apoptosis of early spermatocytes and a severe reduction in spermatozoa in epididymides, and consequently male infertility (Kishi et al, 2017). Here, we utilized WES and ANNOVAR to identify the underlying genetic cause of male infertility in a consanguineous Pakistani family. We found a missense mutation in USP9X (c.1920A>C, p.Gln640His), which was predicted to be a potential pathogenic mutation byin silico analyses. Unexpectedly, mice with this mutation were fertile and showed normal spermatogenesis. Therefore, our study highlights the necessity for functional validation of potentially pathogenic mutations identified in infertile patients using mouse models. A consanguineous Pakistani family comprised of two male patients was enrolled in this study to identify the underlying genetic cause of their male infertility (Figure 1A). Semen analyses revealed that these two patients suffered from oligoasthenozoospermia (Supplementary Table S1). WES was performed on all available family members to decipher the genetic cause of this infertility. Genetic variants were filtered following a series of criteria (Supplementary Figure S1 and Table S2). The WES analysis strategy identified a novel variant in USP9X (c.1920A>C, p.Gln640His) as the only potentially pathogenic variant (Supplementary Table S3). Sanger sequencing confirmed the segregation of the identified mutation (Figure 1B, C). Moreover, phylogenetic examination indicated that the altered amino acid was highly conserved among species (Figure 1D). From SpermatogensisOnline (Zhang et al, 2013), USP9X shows a testis-enriched expression pattern. Furthermore, based on previously published human and mouse testicular single-cell RNA sequencing data, USP9X shows high expression in spermatogonia and early meiotic cells in both humans and mice (Supplementary Figure S2A, B) (Ernst et al, 2019; Guo et al, 2018). USP9X antibody staining results in human testes from the Human Protein Atlas (https://www.proteinatlas.org) also indicate strong USP9X signals in spermatogonial cells at the base of seminiferous tubules (Supplementary Figure S2C). Thus, based on the above data, we hypothesized that USP9X may play a role in spermatogonium development or early meiosis.
Figure 1

Hemizygous USP9X variant identified in a consanguineous infertile family

Hemizygous USP9X variant identified in a consanguineous infertile family A: Pedigree of a consanguineous Pakistani family comprised of two male infertile patients. Males are symbolized by squares, females by circles, with slashes indicating deceased. Diamonds indicate offspring, with inside numerals designating number of offspring. Solid squares specify patients and parallel double lines indicate consanguineous marriages. Black arrows represent members selected for WES. B: Chromatograms represent segregation of USP9X variant in available members. WT, wild-type; Hem, hemizygous; Het, heterozygous. C: Illustrative representations of USP9X gene, RNA, and protein structures showing identified variant at genomic and proteomic levels, respectively. D: Sequence alignment demonstrating conservation of altered amino acid (glutamine) in USP9X, across different organisms. Arrowheads indicate mutation site. E: Schematic of CRISPR/Cas9 strategy utilized for generating Usp9x mice. The sgRNA-targeting DNA sequence within exon 15 of Usp9x gene is displayed. F: Representative chromatogram from Usp9x mouse confirming genotype. Altered nucleotide is in red and site is in blue in the chromatogram. G: Representative images of testes from adult WT and Usp9x mice. Scale bars: 2 mm. H: Testis/body weight ratios of 8-week-old WT and Usp9x mice. Data are mean±standard deviation (SD) with at least three mice analyzed per genotype. Student’s t-test was used for statistical analyses. NS: Not significant. I: H&E staining of testes, and caput and cauda of epididymides from 8-week-old WT andUsp9xKI/Y mice. Data are representative images from at least three mice per genotype. Scale bars: 100 μm. Given that the affected amino acid is conserved in humans and mice, a Usp9x KI mouse model carrying the equivalent mutation (Usp9x) to that of our patients was produced through CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology (Figure 1E). The genotype of the resulting mutant mice was determined by Sanger sequencing of genomic DNA (Figure 1F; Supplementary Table S5). The Usp9x KI mice displayed normal growth and development as well as fertility status similar to their wild-type (WT) littermates (Supplementary Table S4). In addition, no obvious abnormalities in testis size or testis-to-body weight ratios were observed between the Usp9x KI mice and WT littermates (Figure 1G, H). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining of testis and epididymis sections revealed intact seminiferous tubule architecture and all types of germ cells, ranging from spermatogonia to mature spermatids, in both KI and WT mice (Figure 1I; Supplementary Figure S3A). The number of LIN28A+ spermatogonia did not differ between the control and KI mice (Supplementary Figure S3B, C). Furthermore, sperm count per epididymis was normal between the Usp9x KI mice and their WT littermates (Supplementary Figure S4A). Sperm morphology and abnormalities were examined, but no significant differences were found in sperm morphology between KI and control mice (Supplementary Figure S4B, C). Computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) was performed to determine the progressive and average velocity of spermatozoa; however, no significant variations were found between the control and KI mice (Supplementary Figure S4D, E). We next stained spermatocyte spreads with antibodies against SYCP3 (an axial element component) and γH2AX (a marker of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and XY body). Meiotic prophase I progression was analyzed, and spermatocytes typical for all prophase I stages were observed in the Usp9x KI and WT mice (Supplementary Figure S5A). Furthermore, we counted the cell population of each prophase I stage and found no significant differences in cell population size between the Usp9x KI and WT mice (Supplementary Figure S5B). Usp9x is reported to play an indispensable function in mouse spermatogenesis (Kishi et al, 2017). Usp9x was conditionally deleted in the germ cells of male mice through, VASA-Cre, leading to the increased apoptosis of a large number of spermatocytes, a significant reduction of sperm count in male mice, and complete male infertility (Kishi et al, 2017). In our male patients with the USP9X missense mutation, sperm count was lower than reference values, similar to the reported conditional knockout mouse phenotype, which supports the idea that the identified variant in USP9X is potentially pathogenic and may be the reason for infertility in the recruited family. Surprisingly, we found that the KI mice displayed similar fertility as WT mice. No significant differences were found between KI and WT mice in all measurements of spermatogenesis. Recent research employed an in vivo approach to functionally validate predicted disease-causing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in meiosis-specific genes such as MLH1, CDK2, SMC1B, and TEX15 (Singh & Schimenti, 2015). However, results showed that the Cdk2 KI mice were infertile, whereas the Mlh1, Smc1b, and Tex15 KI mice were completely fertile. This suggests that only the CDK2 variant was correctly predicted by in silico tools, further demonstrating the importance of functional validation of variants in KI mouse models. In addition to verification of potentially pathogenic variants, our results and methods will hopefully help clarify the molecular basis of disease-causing mutations. Moreover, as this approach can be applied to any genetic disease, it could be a powerful tool in the field of personalized genomic medicine. Supplementary data to this article can be found online. Click here for additional data file.

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

Q.H.S., R.K., and W.L. conceived and designed the experiments. R.K., W.S., M.Z., A.R.J., Q.Z., R.A., and T.A. collected samples. W.L., Y.W.W., H.Z., D.R.Z., X.F.X, A.M. and R.K. performed the experiments. W.L. and Y.W.W. analyzed the data. W.L. and R.K. wrote the paper. H.M., M.Z., and Q.H.S. modified the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
  13 in total

1.  A new MEIOB mutation is a recurrent cause for azoospermia and testicular meiotic arrest.

Authors:  Moran Gershoni; Ron Hauser; Shimi Barda; Ofer Lehavi; Eli Arama; Shmuel Pietrokovski; Sandra E Kleiman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  The human testis-specific proteome defined by transcriptomics and antibody-based profiling.

Authors:  D Djureinovic; L Fagerberg; B Hallström; A Danielsson; C Lindskog; M Uhlén; F Pontén
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  Distribution of causes of infertility in patients attending primary fertility clinics in Israel.

Authors:  Jacob Farhi; Avi Ben-Haroush
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.892

4.  ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Mingyao Li; Hakon Hakonarson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  The genetics of human infertility by functional interrogation of SNPs in mice.

Authors:  Priti Singh; John C Schimenti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Staged developmental mapping and X chromosome transcriptional dynamics during mouse spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Christina Ernst; Nils Eling; Celia P Martinez-Jimenez; John C Marioni; Duncan T Odom
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Non-syndromic monogenic male infertility.

Authors:  Giulia Guerri; Tiziana Maniscalchi; Shila Barati; Gian Maria Busetto; Francesco Del Giudice; Ettore De Berardinis; Rossella Cannarella; Aldo Eugenio Calogero; Matteo Bertelli
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2019-09-30

8.  SpermatogenesisOnline 1.0: a resource for spermatogenesis based on manual literature curation and genome-wide data mining.

Authors:  Yuanwei Zhang; Liangwen Zhong; Bo Xu; Yifan Yang; Rongjun Ban; Jun Zhu; Howard J Cooke; Qiaomei Hao; Qinghua Shi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Loss of Usp9x disrupts cortical architecture, hippocampal development and TGFβ-mediated axonogenesis.

Authors:  Shane Stegeman; Lachlan A Jolly; Susitha Premarathne; Jozef Gecz; Linda J Richards; Alan Mackay-Sim; Stephen A Wood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Sperm defects in primary ciliary dyskinesia and related causes of male infertility.

Authors:  Anu Sironen; Amelia Shoemark; Mitali Patel; Michael R Loebinger; Hannah M Mitchison
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.