Literature DB >> 35083623

An optimal tracheal tube preshaping strategy for endotracheal intubation using video laryngoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Ya Cao1, Lianxiang Jiang1, Yan Zhang2, Weidong Yao1, Yongquan Chen1, Zeping Dai3.   

Abstract

Although video laryngoscopy solves the problem of glottis exposure, it is difficult to deliver the tube to the glottic opening when the tracheal tube is unevenly shaped. This study aimed to compare the effects of different tube shapes on the first-pass success (FPS) rate in patients undergoing video laryngoscopy-assisted tracheal intubation. Three hundred patients above 18 years of age who underwent general anaesthesia and required endotracheal intubation were included in the study. The participants were randomly allocated to three groups with 100 participants in each group as follows: Group A, video laryngoscopes with a self-equipped stylet are used for tube preshaping; Group B: curvature of the video laryngoscope blade is modelled for tube preshaping; Group C: tube preshaping angle is consistent with the video laryngoscope blade, and the bending point is set 1 cm above the tracheal tube cuff. The primary outcome was FPS rates. The secondary outcomes included time to tracheal intubation, haemodynamic responses and adverse events. No significant differences in patient characteristics or airway assessments were noted (P > 0.05). Compared with Groups A, Group B and Group C exhibited a higher FPS rate (68% vs. 86% vs. 92%; P < 0.001). However, there is no significant difference in FPS rate between Group B and Group C (P > 0.05). And the time to tracheal intubation in Group C was significantly less than that in Group A and Group B (22.21 ± 4.01 vs. 19.92 ± 4.11 vs. 17.71 ± 3.47; P < 0.001). The straight-to-cuff stylet preshape angulation of curvature of the blade could provide a higher FPS rate and shorter time to tracheal intubation during video laryngoscopy-assisted endotracheal intubation. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900026019.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tracheal intubation; Tube shaping; Video laryngoscope

Year:  2022        PMID: 35083623     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00806-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  4 in total

Review 1.  CHALLENGES IN THE USE OF VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPES.

Authors:  Branka Maldini; Iljaz Hodžović; Tatjana Goranović; Jasna Mesarić
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.780

2.  [Impacts of Different Nostril for Nasotracheal Intubation with Video Laryngoscopy].

Authors:  Lei Wang; Jing Hu Sui; Xiao Ming Deng; Wen Li Xu; Ke Yu Chen; Ling Xin Wei; Dong Yang
Journal:  Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao       Date:  2019-06-30

3.  Should the Glidescope video laryngoscope be used first line for all oral intubations or only in those with a difficult airway? A review of current literature.

Authors:  Terrie-Marie Russell; Anil Hormis
Journal:  J Perioper Pract       Date:  2018-07-23

4.  C-MAC© videolaryngoscopy: The anaesthetic assistant's view.

Authors:  Lydia Jones; Kathleen Mulcahy; Jeremy Fox; Tim M Cook; Fiona E Kelly
Journal:  J Perioper Pract       Date:  2018-04
  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  The mechanical power in neurocritical care patients: is it useful?

Authors:  D Chiumello; S Coppola
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 1.977

Review 2.  Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Is it so Different?

Authors:  Shaurya Taran; Sung-Min Cho; Robert D Stevens
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.532

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.