Literature DB >> 35083357

Building on a Sequential Mixed-Mode Research Design in the Monitoring the Future Study.

Megan E Patrick, Mick P Couper, Bohyun Joy Jang, Virginia Laetz, John E Schulenberg, Patrick M O'Malley, Jerald Bachman, Lloyd D Johnston.   

Abstract

Given the promise of the web push plus e-mail survey design for providing cost-effective and high-quality data (Patrick et al. 2018, 2019) as an alternative to a paper-and-pencil mailed survey design for the longitudinal Monitoring the Future (MTF) study, the current study sought to further enhance the web push condition. The MTF sample is based on US nationally representative samples of 12th grade students surveyed annually. The MTF control group for the current study included participants who completed the in-school baseline survey in the 12th grade and were selected to participate in their first follow-up survey in 2017 via mailed surveys (N = 1,222). A supplementary sample (N = ∼2,450) was assigned to one of the two sequential mixed-mode conditions. Those in condition 1 (N = 1,198), or mail push, were invited to complete mailed surveys and later given a web survey option. Those in condition 2 (N = 1,173), or enhanced web push, were invited to complete a web survey (the same as in the 2014 study, but with the addition of text messages and quick response (QR) codes and the web survey was optimized for mobile devices) and then later given a mailed survey option. Research aims were to examine response rates across conditions, as well as how responses were distributed across mode (paper, web), devices (computer, smartphone, table), and method of accessing the web survey (hand-entered URL, QR code, e-mail link, SMS link). Response rates differed significantly: the MTF control group was 34.2 percent, mail push was 35.4 percent, and enhanced web push was 42.05 percent. The higher response rate in the enhanced web push condition suggests that the additional strategies were effective at bringing in more respondents. Key estimates produced by the enhanced web push condition did not differ from those of the MTF control group.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 35083357      PMCID: PMC8784011          DOI: 10.1093/jssam/smaa030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surv Stat Methodol        ISSN: 2325-0984


  3 in total

1.  Two-Year Follow-up of a Sequential Mixed-Mode Experiment in the U.S. National Monitoring the Future Study.

Authors:  Megan E Patrick; Mick P Couper; Bohyun Joy Jang; Virginia Laetz; John E Schulenberg; Lloyd D Johnston; Jerald Bachman; Patrick M O'Malley
Journal:  Surv Pract       Date:  2019-06-24

2.  A Sequential Mixed-Mode Experiment in the U.S. National Monitoring the Future Study.

Authors:  Megan E Patrick; Mick P Couper; Virginia B Laetz; John E Schulenberg; Patrick M O'Malley; Lloyd D Johnston; Richard A Miech
Journal:  J Surv Stat Methodol       Date:  2017-07-06

3.  Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies.

Authors:  Siân Harrison; Jane Henderson; Fiona Alderdice; Maria A Quigley
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of a web-push vs. mailed survey protocol in the Monitoring the Future panel study among adults ages 35 to 60.

Authors:  Megan E Patrick; Yuk C Pang; Yvonne M Terry-McElrath; Virginia Laetz; Mick P Couper
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend Rep       Date:  2022-08-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.