Literature DB >> 35082939

Radiofrequency Ablation and Concomitant Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Varicose Veins (VV): Perspectives from a Developing Country.

Muhammad Yousuf Memon1, Ilyas Sadiq2, Safdar Ali Malik3, Muhammad Bin Zulifqar3, Muhammad Saad Malik4, Muhammad Hammad Malik4.   

Abstract

Objectives/Background: With decreased patient downtime and reduction in health expenditures, endovascular treatments have become popular for the treatment of venous insufficiency. In this study, we assessed the outcomes of using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and sclerotherapy for refluxing veins and incompetent perforators in a developing country. Materials and
Methods: Subjects were selected from an ongoing registry from October 15, 2015 to April 5, 2018. Patients were followed up until 6 months. Pre- and post-procedural Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, and Pathophysiologic (CEAP) scores were compared, and complications were documented and treated accordingly.
Results: In total, 102 limbs (n=97) with 76 great saphenous veins (GSVs) and 26 small saphenous veins (SSVs) underwent RFA, with 79% undergoing concomitant sclerotherapy. Mean follow-up time was 188 days (±33.16). Moreover, 59% were males and 41% females. At the end of follow-up, 99% of the legs had complete occlusion. Pre- and post-procedural CEAP scores were 4.21±1.5 and 3.36±1.7, respectively (p-value <0.001). Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) types 1, 2, 3, and 4 were found in 8.8%, 3.9%, 1.9%, and 0% of the legs, respectively. Most common complications were pain and tenderness (51%), bruising (18%), and paresthesia (7%).
Conclusion: RFA and sclerotherapy have proved to be safe and efficacious. Computed tomography (CT) venous mapping aids in delineating complex venous anatomy and in ruling out deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in cases with discrepancy on Doppler ultrasound. Strict compliance of procedural and post-procedural protocol can assure promising results and futuristic value.
© 2021 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ablation; developing country; endovenous heat-induced thrombosis; sclerotherapy; venous insufficiency

Year:  2021        PMID: 35082939      PMCID: PMC8752919          DOI: 10.3400/avd.oa.21-00027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis        ISSN: 1881-641X


  26 in total

1.  Evaluation of the lower extremity veins in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a retrospective comparison of helical CT venography and sonography. 2000 ARRS Executive Council Award I. American Roentgen Ray Society.

Authors:  K M Duwe; M Shiau; N E Budorick; J H Austin; Y M Berkmen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Classification of proximal endovenous closure levels and treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Peter F Lawrence; Ankur Chandra; Michael Wu; David Rigberg; Brian DeRubertis; Hugh Gelabert; Juan Carlos Jimenez; Vicki Carter
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Radiofrequency endovenous ClosureFAST versus laser ablation for the treatment of great saphenous reflux: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized study (RECOVERY study).

Authors:  Jose I Almeida; John Kaufman; Oliver Göckeritz; Paramjit Chopra; Martin T Evans; Daniel F Hoheim; Raymond G Makhoul; Tim Richards; Christian Wenzel; Jeffrey K Raines
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins.

Authors:  L H Rasmussen; M Lawaetz; L Bjoern; B Vennits; A Blemings; B Eklof
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Endovenous laser therapy and radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein: analysis of early efficacy and complications.

Authors:  Alessandra Puggioni; Manju Kalra; Michele Carmo; Geza Mozes; Peter Gloviczki
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  A prospective randomised controlled trial of VNUS closure versus surgery for the treatment of recurrent long saphenous varicose veins.

Authors:  R J Hinchliffe; J Ubhi; A Beech; J Ellison; B D Braithwaite
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 7.069

7.  Sapheno-femoral junction reflux in patients with a normal saphenous trunk.

Authors:  N Labropoulos; L Leon; C A Engelhorn; S I Amaral; H Rodriguez; S S Kang; A M Mansour; F N Littooy
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.069

8.  Endovascular obliteration of saphenous reflux: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Robert F Merchant; Ralph G DePalma; Lowell S Kabnick
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Prevalence and presentation of chronic venous disease in Pakistan: a multicentre study.

Authors:  A F A Khan; R Chaudhri; M A Ashraf; M S Mazaffar; S Zawar-ul-Imam; M Tanveer
Journal:  Phlebology       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 1.740

10.  Three-year European follow-up of endovenous radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein with or without treatment of calf varicosities.

Authors:  Thomas M Proebstle; Jens Alm; Oliver Göckeritz; Christian Wenzel; Thomas Noppeney; Christian Lebard; Olivier Pichot; Carmine Sessa; Denis Creton
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.