| Literature DB >> 35082781 |
Junqiu Jia1, Lixuan Yang1, Yan Chen1, Lili Zheng1, Yanting Chen1, Yun Xu1,2,3,4, Meijuan Zhang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Microglia are the resident immune cells of the central nervous system that exert diverse roles in the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke. During the past decades, microglial polarization and chemotactic properties have been well-studied, whereas less attention has been paid to phagocytic phenotypes of microglia in stroke. Generally, whether phagocytosis mediated by microglia plays a beneficial or detrimental role in stroke remains controversial, which calls for further investigations. Most researchers are in favor of the former proposal currently since efficient clearance of tissue debris promotes tissue reconstruction and neuronal network reorganization in part. Other scholars propose that excessively activated microglia engulf live or stressed neuronal cells, which results in neurological deficits and brain atrophy. Upon ischemia challenge, the microglia infiltrate injured brain tissue and engulf live/dead neurons, myelin debris, apoptotic cell debris, endothelial cells, and leukocytes. Cell phagocytosis is provoked by the exposure of "eat-me" signals or the loss of "don't eat-me" signals. We supposed that microglial phagocytosis could be initiated by the specific "eat-me" signal and its corresponding receptor on the specific cell type under pathological circumstances. In this review, we will summarize phagocytic characterizations of microglia after stroke and the potential receptors responsible for this programmed biological progress. Understanding these questions precisely may help to develop appropriate phagocytic regulatory molecules, which are promoting self-limiting inflammation without damaging functional cells.Entities:
Keywords: ischemic stroke; microglia; phagocytosis; prognosis; signaling receptors
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35082781 PMCID: PMC8784388 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.790201
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Different techniques available to assess microglial phagocytosis.
| Techniques | Concrete experiment content | Advantages/Limitations | Literature |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Immunofluorescence (IF): Co-staining with microglial biomarkers, e.g., Iba1 | Phagocytosis function: CD68, Lamp1, Phalloidin, Clathrin | The most common method and is suitable for all kinds of phagocytosis, but difficult to show the general view of brain | ( |
| Hemocytes: CFSE | ( | ||
| Neutrophil: NIMP-R14, Ly6G | ( | ||
| Neuronal cell debris: NeuN, MAP2 | ( | ||
| Endothelial cells: CD31 | ( | ||
| Myelin debris: MBP | ( | ||
| Confocal microscopy and three-dimensional reconstruction | Multiple-immunostaining of Iba1 and other markers followed by orthogonal optical sectioning | Intuitive to show the microglial phagocytosis although the view is small | ( |
| Immunohistochemistry | Oil red O staining for myelin debris phagocytosis | Simple and efficient but indirect and non-specific | ( |
| Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FCAS) | CD68 expression | A quantitative and overall analysis while nonintuitive | ( |
| Double-positive cells (CD11b and other markers) expression | ( | ||
| Two-photon microscopy | Use transgenic mice visualizing microglia and other cells | Display dynamic phagocytosis process | ( |
| Morphological phenotype: combined with IF | Ball-and-chain microglial buds in developing brain | Only indicating phagocytic activity without definitive evidence | ( |
|
| |||
| Immunofluorescence (IF) | Use different kinds of fluorescent microbeads to assess phagocytic activity | Might be the “gold standard” but is restricted to | ( |
| Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FCAS) | DiO-labeled myelin debris and microglia coculture | Easy to quantify but the experimental conditions are not unified | ( |
| Time-lapse video microscopy | PMN–microglia coculture | Display the phagocytosis procedure in a video but only | ( |
| Neuron–microglia coculture | ( | ||
CD11b, cluster of differentiation molecule 11b; CD31, Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule; CD68, Cluster of Differentiation 68; CFSE, Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester; Iba1, Ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1; Lamp1, Lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1; MAP2, Microtubule Associated Protein 2; MBP, Myelin Basic Protein; NeuN, neuronal nuclei; NIMP-R14, a Ly-6G/Ly-6C antibody; Ly6G, Lymphocyte antigen 6 complex locus G6D.
Figure 1The engulfment properties of microglia and its potential pathological outcome after ischemic stroke. (A) Microglia have the constant ability to clear cell debris, which attenuates the detrimental effects of inflammation and facilitates neurogenesis. (B) Microglia engulf dead and also stressed but viable neurons after stroke through different signal pathways, which is controversial to the stroke outcome. (C) Microglia swallow not only living but also dying PMNs and relieves inflammatory response and neuronal damage from every aspect. (D) Microglia swallow myelin debris in MCAO mice which may be protective for ischemic stroke in a way of accelerating remyelination and restoring white matter damage. (E) Perivascular microglia eat up endothelial cells after cerebral ischemic injury which breaks down blood–brain barrier and enlarged infarct volume.
Figure 2The emergent eat-me/opsonins/phagocytic receptor systems in ischemic stroke. (A) Axl and Mertk of TAM receptors were widely expressed on microglia and can identify the best-known “eat-me” signal-PS. PS induces phagocytosis by activating VNR via MFG-E8 or TAM receptors via GAS6 or protein S. In addition to PS, Mertk also binds to desialylated sugar chains of stressed or dying neuronal cells through Gal-3, another opsonin which is rapidly released from activated microglia. (B) C1q mediates phagocytic recognition by means of binding to desialylated glycoproteins on targeted cell surface, and cooperatively activates LRP on microglia with the combination of calreticulin. Additionally, C1q triggers a protease cleavage and leads to the deposition of C3b, which directly activates CR3 on microglia. (C) TREM2-DAP12 signaling is involved in phagocytosis by microglia and plays a beneficial role in ischemic stroke. (D) P2Y6 receptors on microglia is activated by UDP released from damaged neurons and triggers microglial phagocytosis. (E) CD47-SIRPαsignaling can inhibit the microglia engulfment property which may aggravate ischemic injury.