| Literature DB >> 35082778 |
Lu Cao1,2,3,4,5, Ruixue Zhang1,2,3,4,5, Yirui Wang1,2,3,4,5, Xia Hu1,2,3,4,5, Liang Yong1,2,3,4,5, Bao Li6, Huiyao Ge1,2,3,4,5, Weiwei Chen1,2,3,4,5, Qi Zhen1,2,3,4,5, Yafen Yu1,2,3,4,5, Yiwen Mao1,2,3,4,5, Zhuo Li1,2,3,4,5, Wencheng Fan1,2,3,4,5, Liangdan Sun1,2,3,4,5.
Abstract
The important role of MHC in the pathogenesis of vitiligo and SLE has been confirmed in various populations. To map the most significant MHC variants associated with the risk of vitiligo and SLE, we conducted fine mapping analysis using 1117 vitiligo cases, 1046 SLE cases and 1693 healthy control subjects in the Han-MHC reference panel and 1000 Genomes Project phase 3. rs113465897 (P=1.03×10-13, OR=1.64, 95%CI =1.44-1.87) and rs3129898 (P=4.21×10-17, OR=1.93, 95%CI=1.66-2.25) were identified as being most strongly associated with vitiligo and SLE, respectively. Stepwise conditional analysis revealed additional independent signals at rs3130969(p=1.48×10-7, OR=0.69, 95%CI=0.60-0.79), HLA-DPB1*03:01 (p=1.07×10-6, OR=1.94, 95%CI=1.49-2.53) being linked to vitiligo and HLA-DQB1*0301 (P=4.53×10-7, OR=0.62, 95%CI=0.52-0.75) to SLE. Considering that epidemiological studies have confirmed comorbidities of vitiligo and SLE, we used the GCTA tool to analyse the genetic correlation between these two diseases in the HLA region, the correlation coefficient was 0.79 (P=5.99×10-10, SE=0.07), confirming their similar genetic backgrounds. Our findings highlight the value of the MHC region in vitiligo and SLE and provide a new perspective for comorbidities among autoimmune diseases.Entities:
Keywords: MHC; fine mapping; imputation; systemic lupus erythematosus; vitiligo
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35082778 PMCID: PMC8784546 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.758652
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Results of stepwise conditional regression analysis of vitiligo.
| STEP | Variant | Variant type | Raw | Stepwise analysis after adjusting | Gene annotation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Control | OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | ||||
| 1 | rs113465897 | SNP | 0.30 | 0.21 | 1.64 | 1.03×10-13 | N/A | N/A |
|
| 2 | rs3130969 | SNP | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.65 | 1.25×10-10 | 0.69 | 1.48×10-7 |
|
| 3 | HLA-DPB1*0301 | Allele | 0.06 | 0.04 | 1.86 | 1.46×10-6 | 1.94 | 1.07×10-6 |
|
N/A, Not Available.
Figure 1Association plots of stepwise conditional analysis for HLA alleles and SNPs for vitiligo. The abscissa represents genomic loci, and the ordinate represents the -log10(p) of association analysis for each locus. The horizontal line represents the significance threshold P=1.32×10–6. The dots marked red in each panel represent the sites used for condition analysis (rs113465897, rs3130969 and HLA-DPB1*0301).
Results of stepwise conditional regression analysis of SLE.
| STEP | Variant | Variant type | Raw | Stepwise analysis after adjusting | Gene annotation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Control | OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | ||||
| 1 |
| SNP | 0.30 | 0.18 | 1.93 | 4.21×10-17 | N/A | N/A |
|
| 2 | HLA-DQB1*0301 | Allele | 0.12 | 0.20 | N/A | N/A | 0.62 | 4.53×10-7 |
|
N/A, Not Available.
Figure 2Association plots of stepwise conditional analysis for HLA alleles and SNPs with SLE. The abscissa represents genomic loci, and the ordinate represents the -log10(p) of association analysis for each locus. The horizontal line represents the significance threshold P=1.25×10–6. The dots marked red in each panel represent the points used for condition analysis (rs3129898 and HLA-DQB1*0301).