| Literature DB >> 35082686 |
Garrett M Hester1, Trisha A VanDusseldorp1, Phuong L Ha1, Kaveh Kiani2, Alex A Olmos1, Melody Jabbari2, Shania Kalladanthyil2, SooBin An2, Alyssa R Bailly1, Benjamin E Dalton1, Anton L Bryantsev2.
Abstract
Introduction: The increasingly popular microbiopsy is an appealing alternative to the more invasive Bergström biopsy given the challenges associated with harvesting skeletal muscle in older populations. Parameters of muscle fiber morphology and composition derived from the microbiopsy have not been compared between young and older adults. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine muscle fiber morphology and composition in young (YM) and older (OM) males using the microbiopsy sampling technique. A secondary aim was to determine if specific strength is associated with serum levels of C-terminal agrin fragment [CAF; an indicator of neuromuscular junction (NMJ) degradation].Entities:
Keywords: C-terminal agrin fragment (CAF); aging; atrophy; immunofluorescence; microbiopsy; muscle quality; myofiber; vastus lateralis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35082686 PMCID: PMC8784837 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.756626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Characteristics and CAF levels for young and older males.
| Variable | Young | Older |
|
| Age (years) | 20.73 ± 2.22 | 71.60 ± 3.94 | – |
| Height (cm) | 175.50 ± 8.55 | 171.08 ± 9.91 | 0.47 |
| Body mass (kg) | 71.03 ± 8.98 | 86.65 ± 16.27 | 1.18 |
| BMI (kg⋅m–2) | 23.05 ± 2.43 | 29.56 ± 4.99 | 1.66 |
| Body fat % | 24.65 ± 6.24 | 33.83 ± 6.89 | 1.39 |
| ALM (kg/BMI) | 1.06 ± 0.15 | 0.83 ± 0.15 | 1.48 |
| Whole-muscle CSA (cm2) | 36.21 ± 5.78 | 29.07 ± 4.79 | 1.34 |
| CAF (pg/ml) | 369.72 ± 86.25 | 448.83 ± 186.61 | 0.53 |
| HG strength (kg) | 47.23 ± 11.56 | 42.45 ± 10.85 | 0.02 |
BMI, body mass index; ALM, appendicular lean mass; CSA, cross-sectional area; CAF, C-terminal agrin fragment; HG, handgrip.
*Indicates significant (p < 0.05) difference between groups.
Immunofluorescence staining protocol.
| Staining stages (incubation parameters) | Staining mix, (source), [titer] |
| Step 1 (overnight at RT) | Mouse anti-slow myosin type I IgG [clone BA-F8, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB), University of Iowa, IA 52242], [1:100] |
| Step 2 (1 h at RT) | Goat anti-mouse IgG, Fab fragments, Alexa 488-labeled (115-547-003, Jackson ImmunoResearch), [1:400] |
| Step 3 (overnight at RT) | Mouse anti-fast myosin type IIA IgG (clone SC-71, DSHB) [1:100] |
| Step 4 (1 h at RT) | Goat anti-Mouse, Cy3-labeled (115-167-003, Jackson ImmunoResearch) [1:400] |
RT, room temperature.
FIGURE 1Isometric and isokinetic muscle function of the knee extensors. Absolute (A) and specific (B) peak torque (PT) in young (YM) and older (OM) males. Means and medians are represented by “+” and midlines in boxes, respectively; whiskers calculated by Tukey test. n.s., non-significant.
FIGURE 2Gross parameters of muscle tissue obtained with the microbiopsy technique. (A) Total wet weight of tissue obtained with each individual microbiopsy sample (punch) and total per biopsy protocol (sum of punches). (B) Numbers of accessible muscle fibers analyzed per subject on cross sections. YM, young males; OM, older males; Means and medians are represented by “+” and midlines in boxes, respectively; whiskers calculated by Tukey test. n.s., non-significant.
FIGURE 3Fiber type-specific composition and morphology. (A) Visualization of type I and type II muscle fibers from the same area of a transversely sectioned biopsied material via multi-colored immunofluorescence and type-specific antibodies (indicated in parentheses). (B) Fiber type composition, expressed as the percentage of each fiber type relative to the total number of analyzed fibers. (C) Average cross-sectional area (CSA) of individual muscle fibers in each sample. (D) Heterogeneity of fiber sizes expressed as coefficient of variance (CV) for all fibers of the same type measured within each sample. YM, young males; OM, old males; Means and medians are represented by “+” and midlines in boxes, respectively; whiskers calculated by Tukey test. n.s., non-significant.
FIGURE 4Associations between C-terminal agrin fragment (CAF) levels, body composition, and muscle function. Scatterplots demonstrating no relationship between CAF levels and appendicular lean mass (ALM) (A), whole-muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) (B), isometric specific peak torque (PT) (C), and Specific PT at 180°⋅s– 1 (D).