| Literature DB >> 35081687 |
Joanna S Yi1, Tiffany M Chambers2, Kelly D Getz3, Tamara P Miller4, Evanette Burrows3, Marla H Daves2, Philip J Lupo2, Michael E Scheurer2, Richard Aplenc3, Karen R Rabin2, Maria M Gramatges2.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35081687 PMCID: PMC9052928 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2021.279805
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Haematologica ISSN: 0390-6078 Impact factor: 11.047
Demographics and disease characteristics of the study cohort.
Figure 1.Trends in hepatic laboratory values, including treatment-associated hepatotoxicity, during acute lymphoblastic leukemia therapy by treatment intensity. (A-D) The normed median hepatic laboratory value (HL) of subjects by each HL are represented by box and whisker plots, with outliers shown in the dots, subjects given standard intensity treatment in blue, and those given high intensity treatment in red. (A) Normed median alanine aminotransaminase (ALT, SGPT). (B) Normed median aspartate aminotransaminase (AST, SGOT). (C) Normed median total bilirubin (TBIL). (D) Normed median conjugated bilirubin (CBIL). Dashed lines indicate thresholds of CTCAE v5.0 grading for grade 3 or grade 4 ALT, AST, or TBIL as follows: ALT/AST: Grd 3= 5-20x upper limit of normal (ULN), Grd 4= >20x ULN. TBIL: Grd 3= 3-10x ULN, Grd 4= >10x ULN. (E) Percentage of patients with treatment-associated hepatotoxicity (TAH) by treatment intensity over all courses of therapy. *P<0.05, **P=0.001-<0.01, ***P<0.001, comparing standard vs. high intensity groups. For (E), comparisons were made between TAHALT/ AST of each intensity group (hashed bars) and between TAH-TBIL/CBIL of each intensity group (open bars) for each treatment phase. Consol: consolidation; IM1: interim maintenance 1; DI: delayed intensification; IM2i: interim maintenance 2.
Multiple logistic regression model for variables associated with treatment-associated hepatotoxicity.