Literature DB >> 35080650

The contribution of plant spatial arrangement to bumble bee flower constancy.

Bethanne Bruninga-Socolar1, Rachael Winfree2, Elizabeth E Crone3.   

Abstract

Floral constancy of foraging bees influences plant reproduction. Constancy as observed in nature arises from at least four distinct mechanisms frequently confounded in the literature: context-independent preferences for particular plant species, preferential visitation to the same species as the previous plant visited (simple constancy), the spatial arrangement of plants, and the relative abundances of co-flowering species. To disentangle these mechanisms, we followed individual bee flight paths within patches where all flowering plants were mapped, and we used step selection models to estimate how each mechanism influences the probability of selecting any particular plant given the available plants in a multi-species community. We found that simple constancy was positive: bees preferred to visit the same species sequentially. In addition, bees preferred to travel short distances and maintain their direction of travel between plants. After accounting for distance, we found no significant effect of site-level plant relative abundances on bee foraging choices. To explore the importance of the spatial arrangement of plants for bee foraging choices, we compared our full model containing all parameters to one with spatial arrangement removed. Due to bees' tendency to select nearby plants, combined with strong intraspecific plant clumping, spatial arrangement was responsible for about 50% of the total observed constancy. Our results suggest that floral constancy may be overestimated in studies that do not account for the spatial arrangement of plants, especially in systems with intraspecific plant clumping. Plant spatial patterns at within-site scales are important for pollinator foraging behavior and pollination success.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bee foraging; Movement analysis; Pollination; Step selection

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35080650     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05114-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  13 in total

1.  Pollen and water limitation in Astragalus scaphoides, a plant that flowers in alternate years.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Crone; Peter Lesica
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Single pollinator species losses reduce floral fidelity and plant reproductive function.

Authors:  Berry J Brosi; Heather M Briggs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Bee diversity effects on pollination depend on functional complementarity and niche shifts.

Authors:  Jochen Fründ; Carsten F Dormann; Andrea Holzschuh; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Responses of social and solitary bees to pulsed floral resources.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Crone
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Variation in pollination: causes and consequences for plant reproduction.

Authors:  Shane A Richards; Neal M Williams; Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  How do plants know when other plants are flowering? Resource depletion, pollen limitation and mast-seeding in a perennial wildflower.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Crone; Elizabeth Miller; Anna Sala
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 7.  Reflections on, and visions for, the changing field of pollination ecology.

Authors:  T M Knight; T-L Ashman; J M Bennett; J H Burns; S Passonneau; J A Steets
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  The spatial distribution of nonrewarding artificial flowers affects pollinator attraction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Pollinator visitation patterns strongly influence among-flower variation in selfing rate.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karron; Karsten G Holmquist; Rebecca J Flanagan; Randall J Mitchell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Trade-off between travel distance and prioritization of high-reward sites in traplining bumblebees.

Authors:  Mathieu Lihoreau; Lars Chittka; Nigel E Raine; Gaku Kudo
Journal:  Funct Ecol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.608

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.