| Literature DB >> 35079922 |
Yuya Miura1, Ryo Ashida2, Teiichi Sugiura1, Katsuhisa Ohgi1, Mihoko Yamada1, Shimpei Otsuka1, Akiko Todaka3, Katsuhiko Uesaka1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conversion surgery for initially unresectable gallbladder cancer is rarely performed due to the low response rate for systemic chemotherapy, and a pathological complete response is seldom achieved. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Conversion surgery; Gallbladder cancer; Gemcitabine plus cisplatin therapy; Pathological complete response
Year: 2022 PMID: 35079922 PMCID: PMC8789988 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-022-01375-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Case Rep ISSN: 2198-7793
Fig. 1a Multidetector-row computed tomography findings, and the lower row shows the corresponding positron emission tomography. a-1 The tumor at the fundus of the gallbladder infiltrating the liver parenchyma. a-2 Bulky metastasis of the hepatoduodenal mesenteric lymph node. a-3 Bile duct stenosis due to bile duct infiltration of the metastasis lymph node, along with dilation of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. a-4 Metastasis of the para-aortic lymph node. b Positron emission tomography findings corresponding to a
Fig. 2A time series showing the course of treatment and the changes in tumor markers from the start of chemotherapy. GC gemcitabine plus cisplatin, GEM gemcitabine, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9 carbohydrate antigen 19-9, THA total hip arthroplasty
Fig. 3Multidetector-row computed tomography findings after two courses of gemcitabine plus cisplatin therapy. a The shrunken tumor at the fundus of the gallbladder. b The shrunken metastasis lymph node in the hepatoduodenal mesentery. c The shrunken para-aortic lymph node
Fig. 4Operative findings. Gallbladder bed resection and the hepatoduodenal mesenteric lymph node dissection (extrahepatic bile duct preservation). a Hypertrophic scar at the fundus of the gallbladder. b Hepatoduodenal mesenteric lymph node dissection was performed. c Gallbladder bed resection was performed. CBD common bile duct, RHA right hepatic artery, GDA gastroduodenal artery, SMA superior mesenteric artery, CHA common hepatic artery, GDA gastroduodenal artery, PV portal vein
Fig. 5a Resected specimen, macroscopic findings. No lesions of the gallbladder mucosa. b, c Resected specimen, microscopic findings. No obvious malignant findings (stain, hematoxylin and eosin; magnification × 40)
The cases diagnosed initially with an unresectable gallbladder cancer and could be performed radical resection
| No | Author reference (year) | Age (yeaears) | Reasons for unresectability | Chemotherapy | *Interval (months) | Surgery | Residual tumor status | Histological evaluation | Postoperative survival (months) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morimoto et al. [ | 69 | Liver metastasis | GEM | 12 | GBR, partial resection of the duodenum and the colon, partial liver resection of segment 8, lymphadenectomy | R0 | PR | 20 | Alive |
| 2 | Sharma et al. [ | N/A | N/A | GEM + oxaliplatin | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 3 | Takita et. al [ | 57 | Metastasis of para-aortic lymph node | GEM + S-1 | 9 | GBR, lymphadenectomy | R0 | PR | 12 | Alive |
| 4 | Kato et al. [ | 57 | Arterial infiltration portal vein infiltration | GEM | N/A | Right hemi-hepatectomy with caudal lobectomy, EBDR, lymphadenectomy | R0 | N/A | 42 | Alive |
| 5 | Kato et al. [ | 57 | Arterial infiltration | GEM | N/A | Right hemi-hepatectomy with caudal lobectomy, EBDR, lymphadenectomy | R1 | N/A | 18 | Dead |
| 6 | Kato et al. [ | 57 | Arterial infiltration | GEM | N/A | Hepatectomy of segment 4a and 5, EBDR, lymphadenectomy | R1 | N/A | 19 | Dead |
| 7 | Kato et al. [ | 61 | Arterial infiltration, duodenal infiltration | GEM | N/A | Hepatectomy of segment 4a and 5, EBDR, lymphadenectomy | R1 | N/A | 8 | Dead |
| 8 | Einama et al. [ | 60 | Arterial infiltration | S-1 | 36 | Right hemi-hepatectomy, EBDR, lymphadenectomy | R0 | PR | 30 | Alive |
| 9 | Rama et al. [ | 64 | Metastasis of para-aortic lymph node | GEM + CDDP | 6 | GBR, EBDR, lymphadenectomy | R0 | PR | 6 | Alive |
| 10 | Kato et al. [ | 62 | Arterial infiltration | GEM + CDDP | 9 | Right hepatic trisegmentectomy, with caudal lobectomy, EBDR, Lymphadenectomy | R0 | PR | N/A | Dead |
| 11 | Tsuyuki et al. [ | 76 | Metastasis of para-aortic lymph node | GEM + CDDP | 6 | GBR, lymphadenectomy | R0 | PR | 7 | Alive |
| 12 | Hashimoto et al. [ | 47 | Local advanced | GEM + CDDP | 6 | GBR, lymphadenectomy | R0 | CR | 14 | Alive |
| 13 | Kato et al. [ | 59 | Metastasis of para-aortic lymph node | GEM + CDDP | 6 | GBR, EBDR, lymphadenectomy | R0 | CR | 11 | Alive |
| 14 | Present case | 71 | Metastasis of para-aortic lymph node | GEM + CDDP | 49 | GBR, lymphadenectomy | R0 | CR | 18 | Alive |
N/A not available, GEM gemcitabine, PR partial response, S − 1, tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil, GBR gallbladder bed resection, EBDR extrahepatic bile duct resection, SD stable disease, CDDP cisplatin, CR complete response
*Interval to surgery from the first chemotherapy
The cases achieved a pathological complete response for advanced biliary tract cancer
| No | Author reference (year) | Age (years) | Sex | Disease | Preoperative chemotherapy | *Interval (months) | Postoperative Survival (months) | Adjuvant chemotherapy | Recurrence, Status | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sharma et al. [ | N/A | N/A | GBC | GEM + oxaliplatin | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A, N/A | |||||||
| 2 | Moussata et al. [ | 58 | F | GBC | GEM + oxaliplatin | 5 | 14 | None | Local recurrence (lymph node metastasis), Alive | |||||||
| 3 | Lim et al. [ | 58 | M | Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma | GEM + S − 1 | 7 | 3 | None | None, alive | |||||||
| 4 | Walker et al. [ | 64 | M | Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma | GC | 2 | 18 | None | None, alive | |||||||
| 5 | Hashimoto et al. [ | 47 | F | GBC | GC | 6 | 14 | S-1 | None, alive | |||||||
| 6 | Kato et al. [ | 59 | F | GBC | GC | 6 | 11 | None | None, alive | |||||||
| 7 | Matsubara et al. [ | 68 | F | Hilar cholangiocarcinoma | GC + S-1 | 6 | 9 | None | None, alive | |||||||
| 8 | Watanabe et al. [ | 70 | F | Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma | GEM + S − 1 | 24 | 48 | 5 courses of GC | None, alive | |||||||
| 9 | Present case | 71 | F | GBC | GC | 49 | 24 | None | None, alive | |||||||
GBC gallbladder cancer, GEM gemcitabine, GC gemcitabine plus cisplatin, S − 1 tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil
*Interval to surgery from the first chemotherapy