| Literature DB >> 35079688 |
Bernd J Wintersperger1, Oscar Calvillo-Argüelles2, Stephanie Lheureux3, Christian P Houbois1, Anna Spreafico3, Philippe L Bedard3, Tomas G Neilan4, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes for many types of cancer. However, ICI therapies are associated with the development of myocarditis, an immune-mediated adverse event associated with a high mortality rate. Therefore, prompt diagnosis and early intervention are of outmost importance. There is limited data on the application of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-based modified Lake Louise Criteria (mLLC) with the use of relaxometry techniques for the diagnosis of ICI myocarditis. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Case series; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Left ventricular function; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myocarditis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35079688 PMCID: PMC8783546 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytab478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Heart J Case Rep ISSN: 2514-2119
Figure 1Initial multi-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance image panel in patient with immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis (high-sensitivity troponin I at time of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: 5 ng/L). (A) T2-weighted SPAIR, (B) T2 mapping, (C) native T1 mapping, (D, E) phase sensitive inversion recovery late gadolinium enhancement imaging, and (F) cine steady state free precession. Focal basal myocardial oedema (block arrow), focal late gadolinium enhancement (arrowheads), moderate pericardial effusion (*), and mild bilateral pleural effusion (arrows) are demonstrated.
Figure 2Repeat cardiovascular magnetic resonance of same patient as displayed in after 6 months of steroid treatment demonstrating (A) T2 mapping, (B) native T1 mapping, and (C, D) phase sensitive inversion recovery late gadolinium enhancement imaging. Pericardial effusion has resolved, residual focal late gadolinium enhancement demonstrated (arrowhead).
Summary of presence/absence of main and supportive criteria according to modified Lake Louise Criteria in presented cases.
| Main criteria | Supportive criteria | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T2-based imaging (oedema) | T1-based imaging (non-ischaemic injury) | Pericarditis | Systolic dysfunction | |||||
| Case 1 | Regional high T2 signal intensity | + | Increase in native T1 relaxation time | + | Pericardial effusion (cine images) | + | Regional wall motion abnormalities | − |
| Increase in T2 relaxation time | + | LGE with non-ischaemic distribution | + | Abnormal LGE, T2w or T1w imaging | − | Global hypokinesia | − | |
| Case 2 | Regional high T2 signal intensity | + | Increase in native T1 relaxation timeb | + | Pericardial effusion (cine images) | + | Regional wall motion abnormalities | − |
| Increase in T2 relaxation time | + | LGE with non-ischaemic distribution | + | Abnormal LGE, T2w or T1w imaging | + | Global hypokinesia | − | |
| Case 3 | Regional high T2 signal intensity | − | Increase in native T1 relaxation time and ECV | + | Pericardial effusion (cine images) | + | Regional wall motion abnormalities | − |
| Increase in T2 relaxation time | − | LGE with non-ischaemic distribution | + | Abnormal LGE, T2w or T1w imaging | + | Global hypokinesia | − | |
| Case 4 | Regional high T2 signal intensity | + | Increase in native T1 relaxation timeb | − | Pericardial effusion (cine images) | − | Regional wall motion abnormalities | − |
| Increase in T2 relaxation time | − | LGE with non-ischaemic distribution | + | Abnormal LGE, T2w or T1w imaging | − | Global hypokinesia | − | |
| Total | Cases with↑T2 SI | 3/4 | Cases with non-ischaemic LGE | 3/4 | Cases with pericardial effusion | 3/4 | Cases with abnormal regional wall motion | 0/4 |
| Cases with↑T2 time | 2/4 | Cases with↑native T1 | 4/4 | Abnormal LGE, T2w or T1w imaging | 2/4 | Cases with global hypokinesia | 0/4 | |
Performed imaging protocols did not include assessment of T2 SI ratios.
No post-contrast T1 mapping performed for ECV calculation.
Figure 3Myocarditis from anti-PD-L1 treatment with a very high-sensitivity troponin I level (12 122 ng/L at time of cardiovascular magnetic resonance). (A) T2-weighted SPAIR, (B) T2 mapping, (C) native T1 mapping, (D, E) phase sensitive inversion recovery late gadolinium enhancement imaging, and (F) cine steady state free precession. Focal mid-ventricular inferior/inferoseptal myocardial oedema (block arrows), high signal intensity focal subepicardial late gadolinium enhancement (arrowheads), and mild pericardial effusion (*) are demonstrated.
Figure 4Follow-up cardiovascular magnetic resonance of same patient as displayed in , 8.5 months after initial presentation and steroid treatment demonstrating (A, B) phase sensitive inversion recovery late gadolinium enhancement, (C) native T1 mapping, and (D) T2 mapping. Small pericardial effusion has resolved, and focal late gadolinium enhancement has improved (arrowheads). Segmental and global T1 and T2 values are within local normal ranges (Note: Follow-up performed at 3 T).
Figure 5Anti-PD-L1 antibody-induced myocarditis and pericarditis with moderate to high elevations in high-sensitivity troponin I. (855 ng/L at time of cardiovascular magnetic resonance). (A) T2-weighted SPAIR, (B) T2 mapping, (C) native T1 mapping, (D) phase sensitive inversion recovery late gadolinium enhancement imaging, and (E, F) cine steady state free precession. Very subtle subepicardial late gadolinium enhancement with additional pericardial enhancement (arrowheads), mild pericardial effusion (*), and mild pleural effusions are demonstrated.
Figure 6Anti-PD-L1 therapy-mediated myocarditis with moderate increase in high-sensitivity troponin I (4717 ng/L at time of cardiovascular magnetic resonance). (A) T2-weighted SPAIR, (B, C) T2 mapping, (D, E) native T1 mapping, and (F) phase sensitive inversion recovery late gadolinium enhancement imaging. Diffuse septal oedema (block arrows) and only subtle focal septal late gadolinium enhancement (arrowhead) visualized.
| Age/sex | Cancer diagnosis | Time post-immune checkpoint inhibitor initiation | Symptoms | hsTnI [high-sensitivity troponin I (local upper limit of normal, ULN: 26 ng/L)] | BNP [brain natrium peptide (local ULN: <99.9 pg/mL)] | Treatment | Remarks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | 52/male | Melanoma (metastatic) | Day 21 (Presentation) | Fatigue, shortness of breath on exertion | 19 ng/L | 108 pg/mL | endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) confirmation | |
| Day 23 (cardiovascular magnetic resonance, CMR) | 5 ng/L | 110 pg/mL |
2 mg/kg IV methylprednisolone (mPRED) (3 days) 150 mg prednisone (PRED)/day | |||||
| Day 37 | 99 ng/L | |||||||
|
Day 38 (repeat CMR) Day 44 (discharge) Day 100 (readmission) |
36 ng/L 109 ng/L |
1 g IV mPRED (5 days) 2 mg/kg PRED/day | Improved EF, reduced effusions | |||||
| Case 2 | 60/female | Gynecological Cancer (metastatic) | Day 13 (presentation) | Generalized weakness, muscle pain, fatigue | 168 ng/L | Not available | 1 mg/kg IV mPRED |
Coronary angiogram due to rapidly rising hsTnI EMB confirmation |
| Day 15 (CMR) | 12 122 ng/L | Not available |
1 g IV mPRED (2 days) 2 mg/kg PRED/day | |||||
| Day 26 (discharge) | 26 ng/L | |||||||
| Case 3 | 49/female | Breast cancer (metastatic) | Day 13 (presentation) | Fever, cough | 1829 ng/L | 405 pg/mL | EMB declined | |
| Day 23 (CMR) | 855 ng/L | Not available |
50 mg PRED/day 1 g mofetil mycophenolate (MMF) 2× day | |||||
| Day 25 (discharge) | ||||||||
| Case 4 | 74/female | Gynecological cancer (metastatic) | Day 17 (presentation) | General pain, progressive muscle weakness, diplopia | 3744 ng/L | 26 pg/mL |
Coronary angiogram excluded coronary artery disease No EMB | |
| Day 20 (CMR) | 4717 ng/L | Not available |
1 g IV mPRED (5 days) 50–70 mg PRED/day | |||||
| 750 mg MMF 2× day | ||||||||
| Day 30 (discharge) |