| Literature DB >> 35079578 |
T M Saravanan1, K Karthiha1, R Kavinkumar1, S Gokul1, Jay Prakash Mishra1.
Abstract
Corona virus 2019 (COVID-19) erupted toward the end of 2019, and it has continued to be a source of concern for a large number of people and organizations well into 2020. Wearing a face cover has been shown in studies to reduce the risk of viral transmission while also providing a sense of security. Be that as it may, it isn't attainable to physically follow the execution of this strategy. This proposed system is built by pretrained deep learning model, Vgg16. The proposed scheme is easy to implement and use all the layers in vgg16 model and train only the last layer called fully connected layer, which reduce the training time and effort. The proposed scheme is trained and evaluated using two Face mask datasets, one having 1484 pictures and the other with 7200. For a smaller dataset, augmented pictures were utilized to enhance accuracy. The suggested model is tested on unknown pictures, and it correctly predicts whether the image is wearing a mask or not. The proposed scheme gives accuracy 96.50% during testing in small dataset. The model gives accuracy in medium dataset is 91% during testing. By using vgg16 pretrained model and image augmentation in the dataset improves performance and gives a high accuracy.Entities:
Keywords: Face mask detection; Image augmentation and machine learning scheme; Transfer learning; Vgg16
Year: 2022 PMID: 35079578 PMCID: PMC8777494 DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mater Today Proc ISSN: 2214-7853
Fig. 1Process flow.
Fig. 2Face Mask Dataset 1 (with and without mask).
Fig. 3Face Mask Dataset 2 (with and without mask).
Fig. 4Face Mask Dataset 1 with 1484 images.
Fig. 5Face Mask Dataset 2 with 7200 images.
Fig. 6VGG16 architecture.
Fig. 7Trainable parameters.
Fig. 8Training and validation accuracy for Dataset 1.
Fig. 9Training and validation loss for Dataset 1.
Fig. 10Training and validation accuracy for Dataset 2.
Fig. 11Training and validation loss for Dataset 2.
Fig. 12Output of given input image.
Result for Dataset 1.
| Dataset | Face Mask Dataset 1 |
|---|---|
| Dataset Size | 1484 |
| Testing Accuracy | |
| Testing loss | 0.0963018387556076 |
Result for Dataset 2.
| Dataset | Face Mask Dataset 2 |
|---|---|
| Dataset Size | 7200 |
| Testing Accuracy | |
| Testing Accuracy | 7.8452582359313965 |