Literature DB >> 35078248

Enhancing canola breeding by editing a glucosinolate transporter gene lacking natural variation.

Yizhou He1, Zhiquan Yang2, Minqiang Tang3, Qing-Yong Yang2, Yuanyuan Zhang1, Shengyi Liu1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35078248      PMCID: PMC8968350          DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiac021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, A major challenge in current genetics study is to identify functions of genes with rare or no genetic variation through forward genetics approaches, such as quantitative trait locus mapping and association study in germplasm, and particularly in polyploid crops, it is difficult to study functional differentiation of duplicated genes. Here, we report a causal gene with rare mutation in glucosinolate transport and creation of a genotype of low seed glucosinolate for quality and resistance breeding of polyploid Brassica napus canola, the second largest global source of edible oil and protein meal. Glucosinolates are well-known secondary metabolites with important biological and economic roles in plant defense to disease and insects and human nutrition/health, such as anti-cancer effect (Sønderby et al., 2010). However, high seed meal glucosinolates can cause goiter and other harmful effects. Thus “double-low” (low seed glucosinolate and low erucic acid content) canola breeding was initiated in the mid-20th century, which has dramatically reduced seed glucosinolate content from .100 µmol·g−1 to <30 µmol·g−1 (Kondra and Stefansson, 1970). Unfortunately, glucosinolate content in vegetative tissues also decreased dramatically due to disruption of the biosynthesis pathway, which caused decreased plant disease resistance (Liu et al., 2020). Although the pathways of glucosinolate biosynthesis in vegetative tissues and subsequent transport to developing seeds have been well-characterized in Arabidopsis thaliana (Jørgensen et al., 2017) and mutation of the genes encoding glucosinolate transporters (GTRs) substantially reduced seed glucosinolates in Brassica plants (Nour-Eldin et al., 2012, 2017), low seed glucosinolate germplasms already created by gene-editing in B. napus cannot be applied for breeding because of their negative effects on other traits (Tan et al., 2022), probably due to involvement of edited genes in other trait formation. To address the above problems, first we comprehensively identified all homologs of A. thaliana GTRs from 12 de novo assembled B. napus genomes (Chalhoub et al., 2014; Zou et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2020; Song et al., 2020; Supplemental Figure S1) and those from one high glucosinolate cultivar ZY821 were divided into three subclades showing sequence differentiation of GTR1, GTR2, and GTR3 (Figure 1A). Then we detected expression patterns of all 20 BnaGTRs in 20 stages/tissues by RNA-seq from the representative B. napus accessions with high (cv. ZY821) and low (cv. ZS11) seed glucosinolate content. The expression patterns of these BnaGTRs are very complicated and there was no clear cue to judge their contribution to glucosinolates except for BnaA06.GTR2 and BnaA02.GTR2 showing higher expression in some tissues (Figure 1B; Supplemental Table S1). Subsequently, we performed a genome-wide association study on seed glucosinolate content of 312 diverse B. napus germplasm accessions collected worldwide (Supplemental Table S2). Based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms genotyped by whole-genome resequencing and aligned on ZY821 genome, three loci harboring five BnaGTR2s on chromosomes A02, A09, and C02 were significantly associated with seed glucosinolate content (Figure 1C). Surprisingly, four BnaGTRs located in significantly associated loci lowly or moderately expressed, while BnaA06.GTR2 and BnaC03.GTR2, whose genomic regions did not show significant association, exhibited high expression in silique wall of late development stages (Figure 1B) and BnaA06.GTR2 showed higher expression levels than those of BnaC03.GTR2.
Figure 1

Identification of a glucosinolate transporter gene with rare natural mutation in B. napus. A, Neighbor-joining tree of GTRs homologs in A. thaliana and B. napus. MANIHOT ESCULENTA CYANOGENIC GLUCOSIDE TRANSPORTER-1 (MeCGTR1) was used as an out-group. Bootstrap values above 75% were given at branch nodes. The scale bar indicates the number of amino acid residue substitutions per site. B, Expression patterns of BnaGTR2s in the low (ZS11) and high (ZY821) seed glucosinolate accessions in the different tissues at the different growth stages. C, Manhattan plot of genome-wide association study on seed glucosinolate content. Horizontal dashed line represents the significant threshold (−log10(P) = 6.35). Red dots indicated the significantly associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms with seed glucosinolate content. D, Schematic of the constructed genome-editing vector with two gRNAs to target BnaA06.GTR2 sequence. RB/LB, right/left border of T-DNA; U6-26p and U6-29p, two A. thaliana U6 gene promoters; 35Sp, cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter; U6-26t, A. thaliana U6 gene terminator; rbcS-E9t, rbcS-E9 gene terminator; gRNA1-Sc and gRNA2-Sc, guide RNA scaffold; zCas9, Zea mays codon-optimized Cas9; Hyg, hygromycin resistance gene. E, Characterization of edited BnaA06.GTR2 transgenic lines. The upper panel shows gene structure and CRISPR–Cas9 target sites in BnaA06.GTR2. The Open boxes indicate 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) or 3′-UTR; the black boxes indicate exons; the black lines indicate the introns; The red boxes indicate sgRNA target sites. The lower panel shows the sequences of three T0 independent transgenic lines in the target sites. Deletions are indicated as blue hyphens. F, The phenotype of BnaA06.gtr2CR-1 T2 mutant during the vegetative (left) and reproductive (right) stages. G and H, Glucosinolate content of BnaA06.GTR2 knockout mutants and the transgene-negative control (BnaA06.GTR2WT) in mature seeds (G) and developing seeds at 40 d after pollination (H). In (G) and (H), at least four plants per line were independently sampled for measurement. Each error bar is means ± sd (n ≥ 4 plants for each line). Student’s t test was used for statistical analysis, single asterisk indicates significant differences at P < 0.05, double asterisk indicates significant differences at P < 0.01, all compared to the BnaA06.GTR2WT.

Identification of a glucosinolate transporter gene with rare natural mutation in B. napus. A, Neighbor-joining tree of GTRs homologs in A. thaliana and B. napus. MANIHOT ESCULENTA CYANOGENIC GLUCOSIDE TRANSPORTER-1 (MeCGTR1) was used as an out-group. Bootstrap values above 75% were given at branch nodes. The scale bar indicates the number of amino acid residue substitutions per site. B, Expression patterns of BnaGTR2s in the low (ZS11) and high (ZY821) seed glucosinolate accessions in the different tissues at the different growth stages. C, Manhattan plot of genome-wide association study on seed glucosinolate content. Horizontal dashed line represents the significant threshold (−log10(P) = 6.35). Red dots indicated the significantly associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms with seed glucosinolate content. D, Schematic of the constructed genome-editing vector with two gRNAs to target BnaA06.GTR2 sequence. RB/LB, right/left border of T-DNA; U6-26p and U6-29p, two A. thaliana U6 gene promoters; 35Sp, cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter; U6-26t, A. thaliana U6 gene terminator; rbcS-E9t, rbcS-E9 gene terminator; gRNA1-Sc and gRNA2-Sc, guide RNA scaffold; zCas9, Zea mays codon-optimized Cas9; Hyg, hygromycin resistance gene. E, Characterization of edited BnaA06.GTR2 transgenic lines. The upper panel shows gene structure and CRISPR–Cas9 target sites in BnaA06.GTR2. The Open boxes indicate 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) or 3′-UTR; the black boxes indicate exons; the black lines indicate the introns; The red boxes indicate sgRNA target sites. The lower panel shows the sequences of three T0 independent transgenic lines in the target sites. Deletions are indicated as blue hyphens. F, The phenotype of BnaA06.gtr2CR-1 T2 mutant during the vegetative (left) and reproductive (right) stages. G and H, Glucosinolate content of BnaA06.GTR2 knockout mutants and the transgene-negative control (BnaA06.GTR2WT) in mature seeds (G) and developing seeds at 40 d after pollination (H). In (G) and (H), at least four plants per line were independently sampled for measurement. Each error bar is means ± sd (n ≥ 4 plants for each line). Student’s t test was used for statistical analysis, single asterisk indicates significant differences at P < 0.05, double asterisk indicates significant differences at P < 0.01, all compared to the BnaA06.GTR2WT. To verify BnaA06.GTR2 as a crucial player in seed glucosinolate accumulation and create variation for low seed glucosinolate breeding, we conducted clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated system 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) genome editing against BnaA06.GTR2. Two single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) were designed to specifically target the third exon of BnaA06.GTR2 (Figure 1, D and E; Supplemental Figure S2). Then the pHSE401-based vector Cas9-BnaA06.GTR2 was transformed into ZY821 through Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated hypocotyl transformation (Xing et al., 2014), and 45 independent positive T0 transgenic plants were obtained. Among them, three plants (named BnaA06.gtr2CR-1, BnaA06.gtr2CR-2, and BnaA06.gtr2CR-3) in which homozygous small deletions occurred at both target sites for gRNA1 and gRNA2 (Figure 1E), produced three putative truncated proteins with respective sizes of 174, 168, and 173 amino acids. Then the three genome-edited plants were self-pollinated, and genome editing events were successfully transmitted to the T1 generation and no additional mutation was identified in the progenies of the three transgenic plants (Supplemental Table S3). High-performance liquid chromatography measurement showed a sharp reduction (76.05% ± 0.76% reduction on average) in total seed glucosinolate content with an average content of 32.6 ± 11.9, 31.5 ± 6.8, 30.6 ± 13.4 µmol·g-1 in the three transgenic lines, respectively, while the transgene-negative control (BnaA06.GTR2WT) was 131.8 ± 8.3 µmol·g−1 in mature seeds (Figure 1G; Supplemental Table S4; “Methods”). Predominant aliphatic glucosinolates existing in seed also showed significant reductions in three edited lines. The content of the indolic glucosinolates, accounting for a relatively small proportion in the total glucosinolate content, was not affected by BnaA06.GTR2 knockout or even showed a slight increase in seeds. In developing seeds and silique walls at 40 d after pollination, the content of aliphatic, indolic, and total glucosinolates showed similar results as those in mature seeds (Figure 1H; Supplemental Figure S3 and Supplemental Table S4) although relative amount of aliphatic and indolic glucosinolates showed a slight difference from that of mature seeds. Furthermore, the loss-of-function mutants of BnaA06.GTR2 showed no apparent alteration in morphological and yield-related traits (Figure 1F; Supplemental Figure S4 and Supplemental Table S5) in normal growth condition, and could serve as a good low seed glucosinolate germplasm. These results contrast with published data (Tan et al., 2022) that showed a ∼33.96% decline in seed glucosinolate content in a line (only one line) of CRISPR/Cas9-edited BnaA06.GTR2 which was accompanied by seed weight decrease. The reason for the difference is probably due to the mutation difference: that line harbors one degenerate base of synonymous substitution at the 3′-end of coding sequence (CDS) of BnaA06.GTR2, but the three lines in the present study have small deletions resulting in three putative truncated proteins; unlike editing of multiple BnaGTR2 genes (Tan et al. 2022), mutation of the major player of aliphatic glucosinolate transporter BnaA06.GTR2 did not have negative effect on yield-related traits, suggesting that BnaA06.GTR2 may not be responsible for other trait formation. In summary, we provided a method to identify functions of genes with rare or no genetic variation in natural populations, we used genome-editing to create a low seed glucosinolate resource that is rare in the germplasm, and we proved BnaA06.GTR2 with rare natural mutation is crucial in seed glucosinolate accumulation in polyploid B. napus. The combination of our results and the published ones (Tan et al. 202) suggests that, probably due to subfunctionalization or neofunctionalization of these duplicated genes, simultaneous editing of polyploidy multiple duplicated genes or a gene family may not be an effective strategy for mutation of a target trait.

Supplemental data

The following materials are available in the online version of this article.

Neighbor-joining tree of all GTRs homologs in A. thaliana and 12 B. napus genomes. Nucleotide sequence of BnaA06.GTR2 in ZY821 genome. Glucosinolate content of BnaA06.GTR2 knockout mutants and BnaA06.GTR2WT control in developing silique walls at 40 d after pollination. Thousand-seed weight (g) in BnaA06.GTR2 knockout mutants and BnaA06.GTR2WT control. Gene expression level of all BnaGTRs in 20 stages/tissues from ZY821 and ZS11. The list of 312 B. napus germplasm accessions used for genome-wide association studies in this study. Detection of mutations at potential CRISPR/Cas9 off-target sites in the T1 generation. Glucosinolate content (μmol/g) in different tissues between BnaA06.gtr2 mutants and their control in the T2 generation. Thousand seed weight (g) of BnaA06.gtr2 mutants and their control in the T2 generation. Primers used in this study. Click here for additional data file.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Biosynthesis of glucosinolates--gene discovery and beyond.

Authors:  Ida E Sønderby; Fernando Geu-Flores; Barbara A Halkier
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 18.313

2.  NRT/PTR transporters are essential for translocation of glucosinolate defence compounds to seeds.

Authors:  Hussam Hassan Nour-Eldin; Tonni Grube Andersen; Meike Burow; Svend Roesen Madsen; Morten Egevang Jørgensen; Carl Erik Olsen; Ingo Dreyer; Rainer Hedrich; Dietmar Geiger; Barbara Ann Halkier
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Plant genetics. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome.

Authors:  Boulos Chalhoub; France Denoeud; Shengyi Liu; Isobel A P Parkin; Haibao Tang; Xiyin Wang; Julien Chiquet; Harry Belcram; Chaobo Tong; Birgit Samans; Margot Corréa; Corinne Da Silva; Jérémy Just; Cyril Falentin; Chu Shin Koh; Isabelle Le Clainche; Maria Bernard; Pascal Bento; Benjamin Noel; Karine Labadie; Adriana Alberti; Mathieu Charles; Dominique Arnaud; Hui Guo; Christian Daviaud; Salman Alamery; Kamel Jabbari; Meixia Zhao; Patrick P Edger; Houda Chelaifa; David Tack; Gilles Lassalle; Imen Mestiri; Nicolas Schnel; Marie-Christine Le Paslier; Guangyi Fan; Victor Renault; Philippe E Bayer; Agnieszka A Golicz; Sahana Manoli; Tae-Ho Lee; Vinh Ha Dinh Thi; Smahane Chalabi; Qiong Hu; Chuchuan Fan; Reece Tollenaere; Yunhai Lu; Christophe Battail; Jinxiong Shen; Christine H D Sidebottom; Xinfa Wang; Aurélie Canaguier; Aurélie Chauveau; Aurélie Bérard; Gwenaëlle Deniot; Mei Guan; Zhongsong Liu; Fengming Sun; Yong Pyo Lim; Eric Lyons; Christopher D Town; Ian Bancroft; Xiaowu Wang; Jinling Meng; Jianxin Ma; J Chris Pires; Graham J King; Dominique Brunel; Régine Delourme; Michel Renard; Jean-Marc Aury; Keith L Adams; Jacqueline Batley; Rod J Snowdon; Jorg Tost; David Edwards; Yongming Zhou; Wei Hua; Andrew G Sharpe; Andrew H Paterson; Chunyun Guan; Patrick Wincker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants.

Authors:  Hui-Li Xing; Li Dong; Zhi-Ping Wang; Hai-Yan Zhang; Chun-Yan Han; Bing Liu; Xue-Chen Wang; Qi-Jun Chen
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 4.215

5.  Origin and evolution of transporter substrate specificity within the NPF family.

Authors:  Morten Egevang Jørgensen; Deyang Xu; Christoph Crocoll; Heidi Asschenfeldt Ernst; David Ramírez; Mohammed Saddik Motawia; Carl Erik Olsen; Osman Mirza; Hussam Hassan Nour-Eldin; Barbara Ann Halkier
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Genome-wide selection footprints and deleterious variations in young Asian allotetraploid rapeseed.

Authors:  Jun Zou; Lingfeng Mao; Jie Qiu; Meng Wang; Lei Jia; Dongya Wu; Zhesi He; Meihong Chen; Yifei Shen; Enhui Shen; Yongji Huang; Ruiyuan Li; Dandan Hu; Lei Shi; Kai Wang; Qianhao Zhu; Chuyu Ye; Ian Bancroft; Graham J King; Jinling Meng; Longjiang Fan
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 9.803

7.  Eight high-quality genomes reveal pan-genome architecture and ecotype differentiation of Brassica napus.

Authors:  Jia-Ming Song; Zhilin Guan; Jianlin Hu; Chaocheng Guo; Zhiquan Yang; Shuo Wang; Dongxu Liu; Bo Wang; Shaoping Lu; Run Zhou; Wen-Zhao Xie; Yuanfang Cheng; Yuting Zhang; Kede Liu; Qing-Yong Yang; Ling-Ling Chen; Liang Guo
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 15.793

8.  Chromosome-Scale Assembly of Winter Oilseed Rape Brassica napus.

Authors:  HueyTyng Lee; Harmeet Singh Chawla; Christian Obermeier; Felix Dreyer; Amine Abbadi; Rod Snowdon
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Dissection of genetic architecture for glucosinolate accumulations in leaves and seeds of Brassica napus by genome-wide association study.

Authors:  Sheng Liu; Huibin Huang; Xinqi Yi; Yuanyuan Zhang; Qingyong Yang; Chunyu Zhang; Chuchuan Fan; Yongming Zhou
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 9.803

10.  Genome- and transcriptome-wide association studies reveal the genetic basis and the breeding history of seed glucosinolate content in Brassica napus.

Authors:  Zengdong Tan; Zhaoqi Xie; Lihong Dai; Yuting Zhang; Hu Zhao; Shan Tang; Lili Wan; Xuan Yao; Liang Guo; Dengfeng Hong
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 9.803

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Plant Hormones, Metal Ions, Salinity, Sugar, and Chemicals Pollution on Glucosinolate Biosynthesis in Cruciferous Plant.

Authors:  Zeci Liu; Huiping Wang; Jian Lv; Shilei Luo; Linli Hu; Jie Wang; Lushan Li; Guobin Zhang; Jianming Xie; Jihua Yu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of cupin_1 domain-containing members involved in the responses to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and abiotic stress in Brassica napus.

Authors:  Yizhou He; Yan Li; Zetao Bai; Meili Xie; Rong Zuo; Jie Liu; Jing Xia; Xiaohui Cheng; Yueying Liu; Chaobo Tong; Yuanyuan Zhang; Shengyi Liu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 6.627

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.