Literature DB >> 35077890

Complications from Multimodal Monitoring Do not Affect Long-Term Outcomes in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Matthew Pease1, Enyinna Nwachuku2, Ezequiel Goldschmidt3, Jonathan Elmer4, David O Okonkwo2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive neuromonitoring is a mainstay of modern management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Complication rates of neuromonitor placement are widely reported, but their effects on long-term outcomes are less studied. We evaluated the association of neuromonitor complications on long-term outcomes in a prospective severe TBI cohort.
METHODS: We reviewed 599 patients with severe TBI from November 2002 through 2018 for neuromonitor-associated hemorrhage and infection. We compared outcome differences between patients with and without neuromonitoring-associated complications using the Glasgow Outcomes Scale (GOS) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post trauma. When analyzing neuromonitoring infections, we removed all patients who expired before discharge as early mortality was associated with reduced infection rates.
RESULTS: Neuromonitor-associated hemorrhage occurred in 62 out of 534 patients with post placement imaging (11.6%) and was increased in patinets who underwent a craniotomy (24% vs. 11%, P = 0.005). Clinical outcomes did not differ in patients with neuromonitor-associated hemorrhage. Neuromonitor-associated infection occurred in 30 of 389 patients (7.7%) who survived to discharge. Infection was associated with worse outcomes at 3 months (P = 0.03), where the proportion of patients with favorable outcomes (P = 0.02) was decreased despite similar mortality (P = 0.24). Patients with an infection recovered by 6 months, at which point there were no differences in total GOS or rates of favorable outcomes then or at later time points (P > 0.26). Neuromonitor-associated infection was associated with increased length of stay (P = 0.01) and depressed skull fractures (P = 0.03) but did not affect rates of shunting (P = 0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: Complications of neuromonitoring in severe TBI are associated with delayed recovery but not long-term outcomes.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  External ventricular drain; Glasgow Outcome Scale; Intracranial pressure monitor; Neuromonitor; Traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35077890      PMCID: PMC9081234          DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.210


  10 in total

1.  The importance of aspirin, catheterization accuracy, and catheter design in external ventricular drainage-related hemorrhage: a multicenter study of 1002 procedures.

Authors:  Peter Y M Woo; Ben C F Ng; Jacob X Xiao; Daniel Wong; Andrew Seto; Sandy Lam; Carmen Yim; Hong-Yip Lo; Yin-Chung Po; Larry Y W Wong; Michael W Y Lee; Kwong-Yui Yam; Jenny K S Pu; Kwong-Yau Chan; Wai-Sang Poon
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Hemorrhagic Complications of External Ventriculostomy in the Aspirin and P2Y12 Response Assay Era.

Authors:  Neil Majmundar; Christina Sarris; Darshan Shastri; Joseph Doran; Chirag Gandhi; Rachid Assina
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Safety and Reliability of Bedside, Single Burr Hole Technique for Intracranial Multimodality Monitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Brandon Foreman; Laura B Ngwenya; Erica Stoddard; Jason M Hinzman; Norberto Andaluz; Jed A Hartings
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Meta-analysis of hemorrhagic complications from ventriculostomy placement by neurosurgeons.

Authors:  David F Bauer; Shantanu N Razdan; Alfred A Bartolucci; James M Markert
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Reduction of ventriculostomy-associated CSF infection with antibiotic-impregnated catheters in pediatric patients: a single-institution study.

Authors:  Shih-Shan Lang; Bingqing Zhang; Hugues Yver; Judy Palma; Matthew P Kirschen; Alexis A Topjian; Benjamin Kennedy; Phillip B Storm; Gregory G Heuer; Janell L Mensinger; Jimmy W Huh
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  Risk factors for hemorrhage associated with external ventricular drain placement and removal.

Authors:  Catherine Miller; Ramachandra P Tummala
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 7.  Factors and measures predicting external CSF drain-associated ventriculitis: A review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kirsten R I S Dorresteijn; Korné Jellema; Diederik van de Beek; Matthijs C Brouwer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with acute brain injury in the intensive care unit (SYNAPSE-ICU): an international, prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Chiara Robba; Francesca Graziano; Paola Rebora; Francesca Elli; Carlo Giussani; Mauro Oddo; Geert Meyfroidt; Raimund Helbok; Fabio S Taccone; Lara Prisco; Jean-Louis Vincent; Jose I Suarez; Nino Stocchetti; Giuseppe Citerio
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 44.182

9.  Hemorrhage rates after external ventricular drain placement.

Authors:  Paul A Gardner; Johnathan Engh; Dave Atteberry; John J Moossy
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Intracerebral hemorrhage after external ventricular drain placement: an evaluation of risk factors for post-procedural hemorrhagic complications.

Authors:  A Shaun Rowe; Derrick R Rinehart; Stephanie Lezatte; J Russell Langdon
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.474

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Current state of high-fidelity multimodal monitoring in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Caroline Lindblad; Rahul Raj; Frederick A Zeiler; Eric P Thelin
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.816

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.