Literature DB >> 35076659

Screening for Atrial Fibrillation: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Karina W Davidson1, Michael J Barry2, Carol M Mangione3, Michael Cabana4, Aaron B Caughey5, Esa M Davis6, Katrina E Donahue7, Chyke A Doubeni8, John W Epling9, Martha Kubik10, Li Li11, Gbenga Ogedegbe12, Lori Pbert13, Michael Silverstein14, James Stevermer15, Chien-Wen Tseng16,17, John B Wong18.   

Abstract

Importance: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. The prevalence of AF increases with age, from less than 0.2% in adults younger than 55 years to about 10% in those 85 years or older, with a higher prevalence in men than in women. It is uncertain whether the prevalence of AF differs by race and ethnicity. Atrial fibrillation is a major risk factor for ischemic stroke and is associated with a substantial increase in the risk of stroke. Approximately 20% of patients who have a stroke associated with AF are first diagnosed with AF at the time of the stroke or shortly thereafter. Objective: To update its 2018 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review on the benefits and harms of screening for AF in older adults, the accuracy of screening tests, the effectiveness of screening tests to detect previously undiagnosed AF compared with usual care, and the benefits and harms of anticoagulant therapy for the treatment of screen-detected AF in older adults. Population: Adults 50 years or older without a diagnosis or symptoms of AF and without a history of transient ischemic attack or stroke. Evidence Assessment: The USPSTF concludes that evidence is lacking, and the balance of benefits and harms of screening for AF in asymptomatic adults cannot be determined. Recommendation: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for AF. (I statement).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35076659     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.23732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   157.335


  11 in total

Review 1.  Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Xu Gao; Rod Passman
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.955

2.  Feasible approaches and implementation challenges to atrial fibrillation screening: a qualitative study of stakeholder views in 11 European countries.

Authors:  Daniel Engler; Coral L Hanson; Lien Desteghe; Giuseppe Boriani; Søren Zöga Diederichsen; Ben Freedman; Elena Palà; Tatjana S Potpara; Henning Witt; Hein Heidbuchel; Lis Neubeck; Renate B Schnabel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 3.  Natriuretic Peptides and Troponins to Predict Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Major Non-Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Marco Alfonso Perrone; Alberto Aimo; Sergio Bernardini; Aldo Clerico
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Temporal trends and patterns in atrial fibrillation incidence: A population-based study of 3·4 million individuals.

Authors:  Jianhua Wu; Ramesh Nadarajah; Yoko M Nakao; Kazuhiro Nakao; Chris Wilkinson; Mamas A Mamas; A John Camm; Chris P Gale
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-04-25

5.  Remote Design of a Smartphone and Wearable Detected Atrial Arrhythmia in Older Adults Case Finding Study: Smart in OAC - AFNET 9.

Authors:  Larissa Fabritz; D Connolly; E Czarnecki; D Dudek; A Zlahoda-Huzior; E Guasch; D Haase; T Huebner; K Jolly; P Kirchhof; Ulrich Schotten; Antonia Zapf; Renate B Schnabel
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-21

6.  Screening for atrial fibrillation to prevent stroke: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  William F McIntyre; Søren Z Diederichsen; Ben Freedman; Renate B Schnabel; Emma Svennberg; Jeff S Healey
Journal:  Eur Heart J Open       Date:  2022-07-14

Review 7.  How should I treat patients with subclinical atrial fibrillation and atrial high-rate episodes? Current evidence and clinical importance.

Authors:  Fabienne Kreimer; Andreas Mügge; Michael Gotzmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.138

8.  Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Atrial Fibrillation Using Wearable Devices.

Authors:  Wanyi Chen; Shaan Khurshid; Daniel E Singer; Steven J Atlas; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Patrick T Ellinor; David D McManus; Steven A Lubitz; Jagpreet Chhatwal
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2022-08-05

Review 9.  How synergy between mechanistic and statistical models is impacting research in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Jieyun Bai; Yaosheng Lu; Huijin Wang; Jichao Zhao
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Quantitative acetylated proteomics on left atrial appendage tissues revealed atrial energy metabolism and contraction status in patients with valvular heart disease with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Tao Tu; Fen Qin; Fan Bai; Yichao Xiao; Yingxu Ma; Biao Li; Na Liu; Baojian Zhang; Chao Sun; Xiaobo Liao; Shenghua Zhou; Qiming Liu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.