Literature DB >> 35076484

Chromatin Unlimited: An Evolutionary View of Chromatin.

Yasushi Hiraoka1.   

Abstract

Chromatin is a fundamental and highly conserved structure that carries genetic and epigenetic information in eukaryotic cells [...].

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35076484      PMCID: PMC8788554          DOI: 10.3390/epigenomes6010002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epigenomes        ISSN: 2075-4655


Chromatin is a fundamental and highly conserved structure that carries genetic and epigenetic information in eukaryotic cells [1]. When claiming evolutionary conservation, we often express it in terms of “yeasts to humans”; however, yeasts and humans belong to the same taxonomic supergroup, Opisthokonta, within a narrow range of eukaryotes [2]. This Special Issue, “Chromatin Unlimited”, aims to provide insights into the essential aspects of chromatin in a wider range of eukaryotes. Chromatin is composed of DNA, histones, and other non-histone proteins. The minimum unit of canonical chromatin is the nucleosome, in which DNA is wrapped around the histone octamer [3]. Histones are among the most highly conserved proteins in eukaryotes [4]. However, several organisms have produced non-canonical forms of chromatin through evolution. A striking example is found in dinoflagellates, which express very low levels of histone proteins despite the fact that respective histone-coding genes are present in the genome and are transcribed [5,6,7,8]. In these organisms, histones are replaced by virus-derived non-histone proteins for the packing of DNA into chromatin. Another example of non-canonical chromatin stems from ciliated protozoans, which have two distinct nuclei (a somatic macronucleus and a germline micronucleus) that bear different types of chromatin, which are reorganized when the macronucleus is differentiated from the micronucleus [9,10,11]. It is possible that non-canonical forms of chromatin exist in more types of organisms than is presently known. Non-canonical chromatins have also been found in more common organisms, such as sperm chromatin in mammals and erythrocyte chromatin in non-mammalian vertebrates. Except for limited regions, mammalian sperm chromatin contains no histones [12]. Sperm chromatin is packed with protamine, which is replaced by histones in an egg upon fertilization. Erythrocyte chromatin, which is transcriptionally inactive except for the globin gene locus, contains mainly histones as well as limited non-histone proteins [13]. Such examples have raised questions about the roles of histone proteins in chromatin functionality. Additionally, it has been demonstrated through their in vitro reconstitution with purified proteins that chromosomes can be shaped with condensins and no histones [14,15]. Condensins are members of the structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein family. Because condensins are widespread in bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, chromatin with these SMC proteins may be of a more primitive form [16]. Therefore, although histones play a role in modulating the functions of chromatins, they may be dispensable in shaping the chromatin structures. Finally, I wish to emphasize that chromatins can only be understood in light of evolution. Present-day organisms have survived selection through evolution. A phylogenic tree represents the evolutionary trails of present-day organisms originating from their ancestors. Evolution has never occurred directionally toward the branches of the tree and, instead, has been driven toward all unbiased directions and biased by the survival of the fittest. Thus, a phylogenic tree is a meshwork of the species left over after extinction removed the areas between the branches. We will never know the types of chromatin that existed in organisms that failed to survive. All we can do is comprehensively analyze and compare present-day organisms and trace them back to a common ancestor [17,18,19]. A deeper understanding of the non-canonical forms of chromatin will paradoxically shed light on the essential aspects of the most common canonical ones.
  18 in total

1.  Re-evaluating the Localization of Sperm-Retained Histones Revealed the Modification-Dependent Accumulation in Specific Genome Regions.

Authors:  Kosuke Yamaguchi; Masashi Hada; Yuko Fukuda; Erina Inoue; Yoshinori Makino; Yuki Katou; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Yuki Okada
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 2.  Condensin-Based Chromosome Organization from Bacteria to Vertebrates.

Authors:  Tatsuya Hirano
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Phylogenetic analysis of the core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4.

Authors:  T H Thatcher; M A Gorovsky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Loss of nucleosomal DNA condensation coincides with appearance of a novel nuclear protein in dinoflagellates.

Authors:  Sebastian G Gornik; Kristina L Ford; Terrence D Mulhern; Antony Bacic; Geoffrey I McFadden; Ross F Waller
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes.

Authors:  Sina M Adl; David Bass; Christopher E Lane; Julius Lukeš; Conrad L Schoch; Alexey Smirnov; Sabine Agatha; Cedric Berney; Matthew W Brown; Fabien Burki; Paco Cárdenas; Ivan Čepička; Lyudmila Chistyakova; Javier Del Campo; Micah Dunthorn; Bente Edvardsen; Yana Eglit; Laure Guillou; Vladimír Hampl; Aaron A Heiss; Mona Hoppenrath; Timothy Y James; Anna Karnkowska; Sergey Karpov; Eunsoo Kim; Martin Kolisko; Alexander Kudryavtsev; Daniel J G Lahr; Enrique Lara; Line Le Gall; Denis H Lynn; David G Mann; Ramon Massana; Edward A D Mitchell; Christine Morrow; Jong Soo Park; Jan W Pawlowski; Martha J Powell; Daniel J Richter; Sonja Rueckert; Lora Shadwick; Satoshi Shimano; Frederick W Spiegel; Guifré Torruella; Noha Youssef; Vasily Zlatogursky; Qianqian Zhang
Journal:  J Eukaryot Microbiol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  A full suite of histone and histone modifying genes are transcribed in the dinoflagellate Lingulodinium.

Authors:  Sougata Roy; David Morse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Distinctive Nuclear Features of Dinoflagellates with A Particular Focus on Histone and Histone-Replacement Proteins.

Authors:  Sadaf Riaz; Zhenghong Sui; Zeeshan Niaz; Sohrab Khan; Yuan Liu; Haoxin Liu
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2018-12-14

Review 8.  The Biochemistry and Evolution of the Dinoflagellate Nucleus.

Authors:  Sebastian G Gornik; Ian Hu; Imen Lassadi; Ross F Waller
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-08-08

Review 9.  Transcriptionally Active Chromatin-Lessons Learned from the Chicken Erythrocyte Chromatin Fractionation.

Authors:  Tasnim H Beacon; James R Davie
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.