| Literature DB >> 35076069 |
Amal Suresh1, Abhijit Joshi2, Anil Kumar Desai3, Uday Juturu4, Denis Jacob Kurian4, Pavithra Jain5, R D Kulkarni6, Niranjan Kumar7.
Abstract
Invasive fungal co-infections with COVID-19 are currently being reported at an alarming rate. Our study explores the importance of early identification of the disease, probable etiopathogenesis, clinical and radiological features and a treatment protocol for COVID-19 Associated Fungal Osteomyelitis of Jaws and Sinuses (CAFOJS). A one-year prospective study from June 2020 to May 2021 was conducted among CAFOJS diagnosed patients at a tertiary care center in South India. Demographic details, COVID-19 infection and treatment history, time taken for initiation of symptoms after COVID-19 diagnosis, medical history and clinical features were recorded. All patients were managed with a standard diagnostic and intervention protocol which included pre-operative and post-operative administration of Inj. Amphotericin B 50 mg (liposomal), early aggressive surgical debridement and tab. Posaconazole GR 300 mg OD for 90 days after discharge. Thirty-nine (78%) patients were diagnosed with CAFOJS out of 50 osteomyelitis patients. 35 patients (90%) were diabetic and 21 patients (54%) were known to receive steroids during the COVID-19 treatment. Sole existence of Mucorales spp. was seen in 30 patients (77%), Aspergillus fumigatus in 2 patients (5%), Curvularia spp. in 2 patients (5%). Concomitant existence of Mucorales and Aspergillus fumigatus was reported in two patients (5%) and Candida albicans in three patients (8%). Patients underwent treatment with standard protocol and no recurrence noted. CAFOJS is a clinical entity with aggressive presentation and warrants early diagnosis and treatment. LAYEntities:
Keywords: Aspergillosis; COVID-19; Curvalaria; Fungal osteomyelitis; Maxillectomy; Mucormycosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35076069 PMCID: PMC8822410 DOI: 10.1093/mmy/myab082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Mycol ISSN: 1369-3786 Impact factor: 4.076
Figure 1.(a) Clinical picture showing gingival swelling. (b) Clinical picture showing blackish discoloration of hard palate. (c) Clinical picture showing white scrapable lesion of buccal mucosa suggestive of candida co-infection.
Demographic and clinical details of the CAFOJS patients.
| Number | Age/sex | Time period from RTPCR positive to initiation of CAFOJS symptoms | Diabetic status | HBA1C | KOH | Fungal culture | Steroid received | Total amphotericin B received (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 58/female | 36 | YES | 12.2 | Positive |
| Not available | 250 |
| 2 | 58/male | 76 | YES | 13.3 | Positive |
| Dexamethasone | 250 |
| 3 | 65/male | 139 | YES | 6.6 | Positive |
| Not available | 250 |
| 4 | 44/male | 49 | NO | 7.2 | Positive |
| Not available | 250 |
| 5 | 46/male | 96 | YES | 10.1 | Positive |
| Not available | 250 |
| 6 | 70/male | 106 | YES | 8.8 | Positive |
| Not available | 250 |
| 7 | 68/male | 144 | YES | 6.7 | Positive |
| Methyl prednisolone | 250 |
| 8 | 52/male | 159 | YES | 8.8 | Negative |
| Not available | 250 |
| 9 | 50/male | 144 | NO | 7 | Positive |
| Not available | 250 |
| 10 | 56/male | 1 | YES | 10.9 | Positive |
| Not available | 250 |
| 11 | 42/male | 14 | YES | 11.1 | Positive |
| Not available | 250 |
| 12 | 48/male | 16 | YES | 6.9 | Negative |
| Not available | 250 |
| 13 | 47/male | 17 | YES | 12.1 | Positive |
| Nil | 550 |
| 14 | 48/male | 1 | YES | 10.1 | Negative |
| Methyl prednisolone | 250 |
| 15 | 34/male | 35 | YES | 4.2 | Positives |
| Dexamethasone | 700 |
| 16 | 42/male | 29 | YES | 9.3 | Negative |
| Methyl prednisolone & dexamethasone | 400 |
| 17 | 72/male | 51 | YES | 10.4 | Negative |
| Dexamethasone | 250 |
| 18 | 42/male | 45 | YES | 5.1 | Negative |
| Methyl prednisolone | 250 |
| 19 | 44/male | 37 | YES | 10.5 | Negative |
| Methyl prednisolone | 250 |
| 20 | 47/female | 35 | YES | 7.6 | PositiveS |
| Methyl prednisolone | 250 |
| 21 | 54/male | 46 | YES | 13.1 | Negative |
| NIL | 400 |
| 22 | 52/male | 33 | YES | 13.5 | Positive |
| Methyl prednisolone | 350 |
| 23 | 41/male | 41 | YES | 9.2 | Positive |
| Nil | 300 |
| 24 | 60/male | 103 | DIAGNOSED ON REPORTING | 7.1 | Positive |
| Nil | 250 |
| 25 | 57/male | 60 | YES | 14.2 | Positive |
| Methyl prednisolone | 250 |
| 26 | 43/male | 23 | YES | 11.3 | Positive |
| Methyl prednisolone | 250 |
| 27 | 52/male | 15 | YES | 11.1 | Positive |
| Methyl prednisolone | 250 |
| 28 | 60/female | 21 | YES | 9.1 | Positive |
| Methyl prednisolone | 400 |
| 29 | 57/male | 35 | YES | 11.2 | Negative |
| Dexamethasone | 250 |
| 30 | 60/male | 66 | DIAGNOSED ON REPORTING | 10.6 | Positive |
| Nil | 250 |
| 31 | 38/male | 37 | YES | 9.3 | Positive |
| Nil | 250 |
| 32 | 36/male | 27 | NO | 7 | Positive |
| Dexamethasone | 400 |
| 33 | 27/female | 35 | DIAGNOSED ON REPORTING | 11.5 | Negative |
| Methyl prednisolone | 400 |
| 34 | 45/female | 66 | YES | 13.1 | Positive |
| Methyl prednisolone | 250 |
| 35 | 64/female | 56 | YES | 9.2 | Negative |
| Methyl prednisolone | 400 |
| 36 | 46/male | 57 | YES | 11.5 | Positive |
| Nil | 400 |
| 37 | 52/male | 34 | YES | 7.9 | Positive |
| Methyl prednisolone & dexamethasone | 550 |
| 38 | 51/male | 52 | YES | 5.1 | Negative |
| Methyl prednisolone & dexamethasone | 400 |
| 39 | 49/female | 45 | NO | 6.3 | Positive |
| Nil | 250 |
Figure 2.(a) Computed tomographic images showing the extent of the lesion. (b) 6 month followup computed tomographic images.
Figure 3.(a) Intraoperative photograph showing necrotic bone. (b) Intraoperative photograph after surgical debridement and extraction of involved teeth.
Figure 4.KOH wet mount preparation showing direct evidence of presence broad sparsely septate fungal hyphae suggestive of mucormycosis.
Figure 5.Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E, 40X) staining showing broad, non-septate with irregular branching hyphae (usually at 90 degrees) suggestive of mucormycosis in tissue.
Figure 6.Lactophenol cotton blue mount showing rhizoids and sporangium of Rhizopus microspores (400× magnification).
Figure 7.Intraoperative photograph showing primary closure of the defect.
Figure 8.8 months follow-up photograph showing good healing.
Figure 9.SDM protocol for management of CAFOJS.