| Literature DB >> 35075826 |
Jaehun Jung1,2, Ho Seok Seo3, Ki Bum Park4, Jinwook Hong1, Jong Youn Moon1,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Advances in medicine and changes in the medical environment can affect the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. The main purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the difference in accessibility to diagnosis and treatment facilities influenced the occurrence of appendectomy in Korea.Entities:
Keywords: Appendectomy; Computed Tomography; Epidemiology; Medical Accessibility; Nationwide
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35075826 PMCID: PMC8787806 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e27
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Med Sci ISSN: 1011-8934 Impact factor: 2.153
Demography of appendectomy in Korea by year
| Year | No. | CR | ASR | Male (%) | Perforated appendicitis (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 30,164 | 62.3 | 59.5 | 50.8 | 14.5 |
| 2004 | 28,990 | 59.7 | 57.1 | 52.2 | 15.7 |
| 2005 | 28,957 | 59.4 | 57.1 | 51.7 | 14.7 |
| 2006 | 18,819 | 38.4 | 37.1 | 52.0 | 15.8 |
| 2007 | 12,433 | 25.2 | 24.5 | 51.3 | 16.0 |
| 2008 | 8,333 | 16.8 | 16.4 | 52.7 | 19.7 |
| 2009 | 8,289 | 16.7 | 16.3 | 53.6 | 18.1 |
| 2010 | 8,370 | 16.6 | 16.5 | 52.7 | 18.8 |
| 2011 | 4,936 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 54.0 | 20.5 |
| 2012 | 5,882 | 11.6 | 11.6 | 53.2 | 21.8 |
| 2013 | 6,083 | 11.9 | 12.0 | 53.2 | 22.9 |
| 2014 | 6,332 | 12.4 | 12.5 | 53.9 | 27.0 |
| 2015 | 4,932 | 9.6 | 9.7 | 52.3 | 26.0 |
| 2016 | 3,656 | 7.1 | 7.2 | 52.9 | 27.5 |
| 2017 | 7,355 | 14.3 | 14.5 | 53.8 | 21.7 |
| Total or Average | 183,531 | 24.8 | 24.1 | 52.7 | 17.5 |
ASR = age-standardized rate, CR = crude rate.
Fig. 1Incidence of appendectomy with CT. Coefficient of correlation between incidence of CT and CT rate was 0.8029 (P value < 0.001).
CT = computerized tomography.
Fig. 2Alterations of ASR of simple and perforated appendectomy.
ASR = age-standardized rate, AU = appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis, AC = appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.
Fig. 3Alterations of ASR based on (A) age and (B) income.
ASR = age standardized rate.
Fig. 4Trend of total hospital admission days.