Literature DB >> 35075649

Two-step hypothesis testing to detect gene-environment interactions in a genome-wide scan with a survival endpoint.

Eric S Kawaguchi1, Gang Li2,3, Juan Pablo Lewinger1, W James Gauderman1.   

Abstract

Defined by their genetic profile, individuals may exhibit differential clinical outcomes due to an environmental exposure. Identifying subgroups based on specific exposure-modifying genes can lead to targeted interventions and focused studies. Genome-wide interaction scans (GWIS) can be performed to identify such genes, but these scans typically suffer from low power due to the large multiple testing burden. We provide a novel framework for powerful two-step hypothesis tests for GWIS with a time-to-event endpoint under the Cox proportional hazards model. In the Cox regression setting, we develop an approach that prioritizes genes for Step-2 G × E testing based on a carefully constructed Step-1 screening procedure. Simulation results demonstrate this two-step approach can lead to substantially higher power for identifying gene-environment ( G × E ) interactions compared to the standard GWIS while preserving the family wise error rate over a range of scenarios. In a taxane-anthracycline chemotherapy study for breast cancer patients, the two-step approach identifies several gene expression by treatment interactions that would not be detected using the standard GWIS.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cox proportional hazards model; censoring; personalized medicine; survival analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35075649      PMCID: PMC9007892          DOI: 10.1002/sim.9319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  39 in total

1.  Evaluating the effective numbers of independent tests and significant p-value thresholds in commercial genotyping arrays and public imputation reference datasets.

Authors:  Miao-Xin Li; Juilian M Y Yeung; Stacey S Cherny; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  A multiple testing correction method for genetic association studies using correlated single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Gao; Joshua Starmer; Eden R Martin
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Genomewide weighted hypothesis testing in family-based association studies, with an application to a 100K scan.

Authors:  Iuliana Ionita-Laza; Matthew B McQueen; Nan M Laird; Christoph Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Increasing the power of identifying gene x gene interactions in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Charles Kooperberg; Michael Leblanc
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  A general framework for two-stage analysis of genome-wide association studies and its application to case-control studies.

Authors:  James M S Wason; Frank Dudbridge
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Interaction of Treatment and Biomarker in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Pingfu Fu; Nathan A Pennell; Neelesh Sharma; Qizhi Yi; Afshin Dowlati
Journal:  Rev Recent Clin Trials       Date:  2017

7.  Detecting Gene-Environment Interactions for a Quantitative Trait in a Genome-Wide Association Study.

Authors:  Pingye Zhang; Juan Pablo Lewinger; David Conti; John L Morrison; W James Gauderman
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Powerful cocktail methods for detecting genome-wide gene-environment interaction.

Authors:  Li Hsu; Shuo Jiao; James Y Dai; Carolyn Hutter; Ulrike Peters; Charles Kooperberg
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.135

9.  Update on the State of the Science for Analytical Methods for Gene-Environment Interactions.

Authors:  W James Gauderman; Bhramar Mukherjee; Hugues Aschard; Li Hsu; Juan Pablo Lewinger; Chirag J Patel; John S Witte; Christopher Amos; Caroline G Tai; David Conti; Dara G Torgerson; Seunggeun Lee; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 5.363

10.  A simulation study on estimating biomarker-treatment interaction effects in randomized trials with prognostic variables.

Authors:  Bernhard Haller; Kurt Ulm
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.