Literature DB >> 35075550

The posterior tibial slope and Insall-Salvati index in operative and nonoperative adolescent athletes with Osgood-Schlatter disease.

Tommy Pan1, Frederick Mun2, Brandon Martinazzi2, Tonya S King2, Joseph L Petfield3, William L Hennrikus3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Osgood-Schlatter disease (OSD) is a common cause of anterior knee pain in adolescent athletes due to repetitive stress on the tibial tubercle. The posterior tibial slope angle (PTSA) and the Insall-Salvati Index (ISI) play a role in knee biomechanics. However, to our knowledge, the posterior tibial slope and patellar height have not been compared in operated versus nonoperative OSD patients. The purpose of the current study is to compare the differences in the PTSA and the ISI between operative and nonoperative patients with OSD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the College of Medicine's Institutional Review Board. A retrospective review was performed on 75 adolescent athletes with OSD between 2008 and 2019. The data extracted included: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), sporting activity and type, mechanism of injury (MOI), chronicity of symptoms, PTSA, and the ISI. Descriptive and quantitative statistics were used.
RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (88 knees) with OSD were studied (28 boys, 47 girls). The average age was 12.2 years and the average BMI was 22.3. The mechanism of injury (MOI) included repetitive stress (77%) and trauma (23%). The duration of knee pain averaged 10.3 months. Sixty-six patients were included in the nonoperative cohort. Nine patients were included in the operative cohort and underwent surgery due to persistent symptoms after skeletal maturity with tubercleplasty and/or ossicle excision. The average PTSA was 12.1° ± 1.7° and average ISI was 1.05 ± 0.15. Comparing the operative and nonoperative patients, we found no significant difference in PTSA (11.2° ± 0.73° versus 12.8° ± 1.8°, p < 0.064). However, we did find that patients treated operatively had a lower ISI (0.95 ± 0.18 versus 1.14 ± 0.13, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: In patients with OSD, operative and nonoperative patients demonstrated a similar PTSA. On the other hand, the ISI was higher in nonoperative patients. In the current paper, a decreased ISI was helpful in predicting the need for operative intervention in symptomatic patients after skeletal maturity.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Insall–Salvati index; Knee; Osgood–Schlatter disease; Pediatrics; Posterior tibial slope; Sports medicine

Year:  2022        PMID: 35075550     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04314-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  19 in total

1.  Increased Posterior Tibial Slope in Patients With Osgood-Schlatter Disease: A New Association.

Authors:  Daniel W Green; Sreetha Sidharthan; Lindsay M Schlichte; Alexandra H Aitchison; Douglas N Mintz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Osgood-Schlatter Disease.

Authors:  Venkatraman Indiran; Devimeenal Jagannathan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Infrapatellar bursal injection with dextrose and saline are both effective treatments for Osgood-Schlatter disease. Letter to editor for: No superiority of dextrose injections over placebo injections for Osgood-Schlatter disease: a prospective randomized double‑blind study https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03297-2.

Authors:  David Rabago; Kenneth Dean Reeves; Gastón Andrés Topol; Leandro Ariel Podesta; An-Lin Cheng; Bradley D Fullerton
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Patellar height measurements: Insall-Salvati ratio is most reliable method.

Authors:  Fleur V Verhulst; Jordy D P van Sambeeck; Geerte S Olthuis; Jasper van der Ree; Sander Koëter
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The association between posterior-inferior tibial slope and anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency.

Authors:  Mark L Brandon; Paul T Haynes; Joel R Bonamo; MaryIrene I Flynn; Gene R Barrett; Mark F Sherman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Posterior Tibial Slope and Risk of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Authors:  Andrew S Bernhardson; Nicholas N DePhillipo; Blake T Daney; Mitchell I Kennedy; Zachary S Aman; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  No superiority of dextrose injections over placebo injections for Osgood-Schlatter disease: a prospective randomized double-blind study.

Authors:  Junsuke Nakase; Takeshi Oshima; Yasushi Takata; Kengo Shimozaki; Kazuki Asai; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 8.  Osgood-Schlatter disease: a 2020 update of a common knee condition in children.

Authors:  Hannah N Ladenhauf; Gerd Seitlinger; Daniel W Green
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.856

9.  Osgood-schlatter disease: risk of a disease deemed banal.

Authors:  Mustafa Nkaoui; El Mehdi El Alouani
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2017-09-21
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Osgood-Schlatter Disease: Appearance, Diagnosis and Treatment: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Francisco Corbi; Sergi Matas; Jesús Álvarez-Herms; Sebastian Sitko; Ernest Baiget; Joaquim Reverter-Masia; Isaac López-Laval
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30

2.  The Biomechanics Effect of Hamstring Flexibility on the Risk of Osgood-Schlatter Disease.

Authors:  Xueying Zhang; Weiyan Ren; Yijie Duan; Jie Yao; Fang Pu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.822

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.