BACKGROUND AND AIM: After the global spread of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), research has concentrated its efforts on several aspects of the epidemiological burden of pandemic. In this frame, the presented study follows a previous analysis of the temporal link between cases and deaths during the first epidemic wave (Phase 1) in Italy (March-June 2020). METHODS: We here analyze the COVID-19 epidemic in the time span from March 2020 to June 2021. RESULTS: The elaboration of the curves of cases and deaths allows identifying the temporal shift between the positive testing and the fatal event, which corresponds to one week from W2 to W33, two weeks from W34 to W41, and three weeks from W42 to W67. Based on this finding, we calculate the Weekly Lethality Rate (WLR). The WLR was grossly overestimated (~13.5%) in Phase 1, while a mean value of 2.6% was observed in most of Phase 2 (starting from October 2020), with a drop to 1.4% in the last investigated weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these findings offer an interesting insight into the magnitude and time evolution of the lethality burden attributable to COVID-19 during the entire pandemic period in Italy. In particular, the analysis highlighted the impact of the effectiveness of public health and social measures, of changes in disease management, and of preventive strategies over time. (www.actabiomedica.it).
BACKGROUND AND AIM: After the global spread of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), research has concentrated its efforts on several aspects of the epidemiological burden of pandemic. In this frame, the presented study follows a previous analysis of the temporal link between cases and deaths during the first epidemic wave (Phase 1) in Italy (March-June 2020). METHODS: We here analyze the COVID-19 epidemic in the time span from March 2020 to June 2021. RESULTS: The elaboration of the curves of cases and deaths allows identifying the temporal shift between the positive testing and the fatal event, which corresponds to one week from W2 to W33, two weeks from W34 to W41, and three weeks from W42 to W67. Based on this finding, we calculate the Weekly Lethality Rate (WLR). The WLR was grossly overestimated (~13.5%) in Phase 1, while a mean value of 2.6% was observed in most of Phase 2 (starting from October 2020), with a drop to 1.4% in the last investigated weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these findings offer an interesting insight into the magnitude and time evolution of the lethality burden attributable to COVID-19 during the entire pandemic period in Italy. In particular, the analysis highlighted the impact of the effectiveness of public health and social measures, of changes in disease management, and of preventive strategies over time. (www.actabiomedica.it).
Appendix Supplementary filesClick here for additional data file.Daily evolutions of (A) cases (positive tests) and (B) deaths in the time interval March 2nd, 2020 - June 13th, 2021.Sum of squared residuals (SSR) as a function of day shift of the curves in Phase 2 (W32-W67). The normalized curve of the daily cases is shifted ahead with respect to the normalized curve of the daily deaths.Modeling of the lockdown-driven fall of Phase 1 and the rise of Subphase 2.1 of the curve of deaths with a decreasing exponential (time constant 3.8) and a sigmoidal (exponent 2.5 and time constant 4.1) function, respectively.Daily cases, deaths, and tests in the time interval March 2nd, 2020 - June 13th, 2021 collected from the Reports of the Italian National Institute of Health (ISS)Week definition with starting and ending dateCases and deaths per week of Phase 1 (blue, W1-W17) and Phase 2 (green, W32-W67). Average daily values were obtained dividing the total weekly number of cases/deaths by sevenWeekly lethality rate (WLR) values with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). The WLR values were calculated applying a 1-week, 2-week, and 3-week shift between positive test and death in the time intervals W1-W33, W34-W41, and W42-W67, respectively. WLR values were calculated by dividing the average daily number of deaths of a given week (Wi) by the average daily number of cases of one week (Wi-1), two weeks (Wi-2), or three weeks (Wi-3) before
Introduction
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that started in China in the last months of 2019 is causing a global health emergency, the solution of which seems yet far to be achieved despite the enormous efforts made to mitigate its spread, and the development of therapeutic and effective preventive strategies (1-3). Currently, the official number of cases (i.e., infected subjects) is approaching 200 million with nearly four million deaths (4,5). The pandemic has non-uniformly affected almost all continents and countries (4), often with a fast and intricate evolution resulting from the combination of many factors, namely (a) the use of personal protective equipment, (b) restrictions to the people mobility applied by public authorities that were periodically released in a difficult attempt to prevent or limit the infections without destroying local economies, (c) the seasonality of viral respiratory diseases, (d) the progressive appearance of SARS-CoV-2 variants endowed with increased infection rates, and (e) the recent implementation of vaccination campaigns (2,3,6,7).In this scenario, the gathering of information on the burden of the disease is of utmost importance for better understanding the origin and evolution of the pandemic spreading, as well as the effectiveness of public health interventions (3). By analyzing the evolution of the pandemic outbreak in Italy, the center of the first main outbreak among Western countries, we have recently examined the temporal correlation between the positive COVID-19 testing and deaths in the first phase, i.e., the period March-June 2020 (8,9). In particular, we found, on average, a one-week delay between the positive test and the fatal event. Despite the straightforwardness of the approach and the heterogeneity of the available data, we exploited this finding to propose a lethality measure denoted as Weekly Lethality Rate (WLR), which is based on the ratio between the number of deaths occurring in a certain week and the number of positive tests detected in the previous weeks (8).In order to further investigate the lethality impact of the infection in Italy, we have extended this analysis to the entire pandemic, by monitoring the temporal link between positive testing and death from the summer 2020 to June 2021. As for the initial phase, we quantified the temporal correlation between these events, and found a progressively increasing time gap. On this basis, we conceived an approach to generalize the WLR. The implications of these findings on the evolution of the Italian outbreak will be discussed, considering the impact and effectiveness of political interventions, changes in disease management, and preventive strategies.
Materials and Methods
Study Design and Data Source
We performed a longitudinal retrospective analysis on the time-trend of the lethality due to COVID-19 in Italy through the data from the freely accessible national integrated surveillance system (10). More specifically, we gathered the daily number of diagnostic tests, confirmed cases, and deceased related to SARS-CoV-2 (Table S1). We traced data over 67 weeks (denoted as W1, W2, . . ., W67) covering the period from March 2nd, 2020 to June 13th, 2021 (Table S2).
Table S1.
Daily cases, deaths, and tests in the time interval March 2nd, 2020 - June 13th, 2021 collected from the Reports of the Italian National Institute of Health (ISS)
Date
Daily cases
Daily deaths
Daily tests
02-Mar
335
11
2218
03-Mar
466
27
2511
04-Mar
587
28
3981
05-Mar
769
41
2525
06-Mar
778
49
3997
07-Mar
1247
36
5703
08-Mar
1492
133
7875
09-Mar
1797
97
3889
10-Mar
1577
168
6935
11-Mar
1713
196
12393
12-Mar
2651
189
12857
13-Mar
2547
250
11477
14-Mar
3497
175
11682
15-Mar
3590
368
15729
16-Mar
3385
349
13063
17-Mar
3374
345
10695
18-Mar
4207
475
16884
19-Mar
5322
427
17236
20-Mar
5986
627
24109
21-Mar
6557
793
26336
22-Mar
5560
651
25180
23-Mar
4790
601
17066
24-Mar
5249
743
21496
25-Mar
5210
683
27481
26-Mar
6153
712
36615
27-Mar
5909
919
33019
28-Mar
5974
889
35447
29-Mar
5217
756
24504
30-Mar
4050
812
23329
31-Mar
4053
837
29609
01-Apr
4782
727
34455
02-Apr
4668
760
39809
03-Apr
4585
766
38617
04-Apr
4805
681
37375
05-Apr
4316
525
34237
06-Apr
3599
636
30271
07-Apr
3039
604
33713
08-Apr
3836
542
51680
09-Apr
4204
610
46244
10-Apr
3951
570
53495
11-Apr
4694
619
56609
12-Apr
4092
431
46720
13-Apr
3153
566
36717
14-Apr
2972
602
26779
15-Apr
2667
578
43715
16-Apr
3786
525
60999
17-Apr
3493
575
65705
18-Apr
3491
482
61725
19-Apr
3047
433
50708
20-Apr
2256
454
41483
21-Apr
2729
570
52126
22-Apr
3370
401
63101
23-Apr
2646
464
66658
24-Apr
3021
420
62447
25-Apr
2357
415
65387
26-Apr
2324
260
49916
27-Apr
1739
333
32003
28-Apr
2019
382
57272
29-Apr
2086
323
63827
30-Apr
1872
285
68456
01-May
1965
269
74208
02-May
1900
474
55412
03-May
1389
174
44935
04-May
1221
195
37631
05-May
1075
236
55263
06-May
1444
369
64263
07-May
1401
274
70359
08-May
1327
243
63775
09-May
1083
194
69171
10-May
802
165
51678
11-May
744
179
40740
12-May
1402
172
67003
13-May
888
195
61973
14-May
992
262
71876
15-May
789
242
68176
16-May
875
153
69179
17-May
675
145
60101
18-May
451
99
36406
19-May
813
162
63158
20-May
665
161
67195
21-May
642
156
71679
22-May
652
130
75380
23-May
669
119
72410
24-May
531
50
55824
25-May
300
92
35241
26-May
397
78
57674
27-May
584
117
67324
28-May
593
70
75893
29-May
516
87
72135
30-May
416
111
69342
31-May
333
75
54118
01-Jun
200
60
31394
02-Jun
319
55
52159
03-Jun
322
71
37299
04-Jun
177
88
49953
05-Jun
519
85
65028
06-Jun
270
72
72485
07-Jun
197
53
49478
08-Jun
280
65
27112
09-Jun
283
79
55003
10-Jun
202
71
62699
11-Jun
380
53
62472
12-Jun
163
56
70620
13-Jun
347
78
49750
14-Jun
337
44
56527
15-Jun
301
26
28107
16-Jun
210
34
46882
17-Jun
329
43
77701
18-Jun
332
66
58154
19-Jun
251
47
57541
20-Jun
264
49
54722
21-Jun
224
24
40545
22-Jun
221
23
28972
23-Jun
113
18
40485
24-Jun
190
30
53266
25-Jun
296
34
56061
26-Jun
255
30
52768
27-Jun
175
8
61351
28-Jun
174
22
37346
29-Jun
126
6
27218
30-Jun
142
23
48273
01-Jul
182
21
55366
02-Jul
201
30
53243
03-Jul
223
15
50096
04-Jul
235
21
52011
05-Jul
192
7
37462
06-Jul
208
8
22166
07-Jul
137
30
43219
08-Jul
193
15
50443
09-Jul
214
12
52552
10-Jul
276
12
47953
11-Jul
188
7
45931
12-Jul
234
9
38259
13-Jul
169
13
23933
14-Jul
114
17
41867
15-Jul
162
13
48449
16-Jul
230
20
50432
17-Jul
231
11
50767
18-Jul
249
14
48265
19-Jul
218
3
35525
20-Jul
190
13
24253
21-Jul
128
15
43110
22-Jul
280
9
49318
23-Jul
306
10
60311
24-Jul
252
5
53334
25-Jul
273
5
51671
26-Jul
252
5
40526
27-Jul
170
5
25551
28-Jul
181
11
48170
29-Jul
289
6
56018
30-Jul
382
3
61858
31-Jul
379
9
60944
01-Aug
295
5
60383
02-Aug
238
8
43269
03-Aug
159
12
24036
04-Aug
190
5
43788
05-Aug
384
10
56451
06-Aug
401
6
58673
07-Aug
552
3
59196
08-Aug
347
13
53298
09-Aug
463
2
37637
10-Aug
259
4
26432
11-Aug
412
6
40642
12-Aug
476
10
52658
13-Aug
522
6
51188
14-Aug
574
3
46723
15-Aug
627
4
53123
16-Aug
479
4
36807
17-Aug
320
4
30666
18-Aug
401
5
53976
19-Aug
642
7
71095
20-Aug
840
6
77442
21-Aug
947
9
71996
22-Aug
1071
3
77674
23-Aug
1209
7
67371
24-Aug
952
4
45914
25-Aug
876
4
72341
26-Aug
1365
13
93529
27-Aug
1409
5
94024
28-Aug
1462
9
97065
29-Aug
1444
1
99108
30-Aug
1365
4
81723
31-Aug
999
6
58518
01-Sep
984
8
81050
02-Sep
1332
6
102959
03-Sep
1402
10
92790
04-Sep
1738
11
113085
05-Sep
1700
16
107658
06-Sep
1303
7
76856
07-Sep
1107
12
52553
08-Sep
1366
10
92403
09-Sep
1434
14
95990
10-Sep
1597
10
94186
11-Sep
1616
10
98880
12-Sep
1499
6
92706
13-Sep
1458
7
72143
14-Sep
1008
14
45309
15-Sep
1229
9
80517
16-Sep
1450
12
100607
17-Sep
1585
13
101773
18-Sep
1906
10
99839
19-Sep
1638
24
103223
20-Sep
1587
15
83428
21-Sep
1349
17
55862
22-Sep
1392
14
87303
23-Sep
1640
20
103696
24-Sep
1786
23
108019
25-Sep
1912
20
107269
26-Sep
1869
17
104387
27-Sep
1766
17
87714
28-Sep
1493
16
51109
29-Sep
1647
24
90185
30-Sep
1851
19
105236
01-Oct
2548
24
118236
02-Oct
2498
23
120301
03-Oct
2844
27
118932
04-Oct
2578
18
92714
05-Oct
2257
16
60241
06-Oct
2676
28
99742
07-Oct
3678
31
125314
08-Oct
4458
22
128098
09-Oct
5372
28
129471
10-Oct
5724
29
133084
11-Oct
5456
26
104658
12-Oct
4616
39
85442
13-Oct
5901
41
112544
14-Oct
7331
43
152196
15-Oct
8803
83
162932
16-Oct
10010
55
150377
17-Oct
10925
47
165837
18-Oct
11704
69
146541
19-Oct
9335
73
98862
20-Oct
10874
89
144737
21-Oct
15198
127
177848
22-Oct
16079
136
170392
23-Oct
19139
91
182032
24-Oct
19644
151
177669
25-Oct
21268
128
161880
26-Oct
17007
141
124686
27-Oct
21991
221
174398
28-Oct
24989
205
198952
29-Oct
26826
217
201452
30-Oct
31082
199
215085
31-Oct
31756
297
215886
01-Nov
29907
208
183457
02-Nov
22250
233
135731
03-Nov
28242
353
182287
04-Nov
30547
352
211831
05-Nov
34498
428
219884
06-Nov
37807
446
234245
07-Nov
39809
425
231673
08-Nov
32614
331
191144
09-Nov
25263
356
147725
10-Nov
35098
580
217758
11-Nov
32960
623
225640
12-Nov
37978
636
234672
13-Nov
40896
550
254908
14-Nov
37253
544
227695
15-Nov
33977
546
195275
16-Nov
27354
504
152663
17-Nov
32188
731
208458
18-Nov
34283
753
234834
19-Nov
36173
653
250186
20-Nov
37239
699
238077
21-Nov
34767
692
237225
22-Nov
28334
562
188747
23-Nov
22925
630
148945
24-Nov
23231
853
188659
25-Nov
25851
722
230007
26-Nov
28993
822
232711
27-Nov
28344
827
222803
28-Nov
26321
686
225940
29-Nov
20647
541
130524
30-Nov
16374
672
130524
01-Dec
19350
785
182100
02-Dec
20703
684
207143
03-Dec
23236
993
220047
04-Dec
24099
814
212741
05-Dec
21052
662
194984
06-Dec
18846
564
163550
07-Dec
13612
528
111217
08-Dec
14733
634
149232
09-Dec
12652
499
118475
10-Dec
16887
887
171586
11-Dec
18550
761
190416
12-Dec
19738
649
196439
13-Dec
17818
484
152697
14-Dec
11965
491
103584
15-Dec
14714
846
164431
16-Dec
17431
680
199489
17-Dec
18136
683
185320
18-Dec
17989
674
179800
19-Dec
16306
553
176185
20-Dec
15104
352
137420
21-Dec
10860
415
87889
22-Dec
13294
628
157705
23-Dec
14521
553
183864
24-Dec
18040
505
193777
25-Dec
19037
459
152334
26-Dec
10429
261
81564
27-Dec
8909
305
59879
28-Dec
8583
445
68681
29-Dec
11212
659
128740
30-Dec
16202
575
169045
31-Dec
23476
555
186004
01-Jan
22205
462
157524
02-Jan
11831
364
67174
03-Jan
14243
347
102974
04-Jan
10797
348
77993
05-Jan
15373
649
135106
06-Jan
20331
548
121275
07-Jan
18016
414
140267
08-Jan
17531
620
172119
09-Jan
19976
483
139758
10-Jan
18625
361
139758
11-Jan
12532
448
91656
12-Jan
14241
616
141641
13-Jan
15771
507
175429
14-Jan
17244
522
160585
15-Jan
16146
477
273506
16-Jan
16309
475
261404
17-Jan
12545
377
211078
18-Jan
8824
377
158674
19-Jan
10494
603
254070
20-Jan
13548
524
279762
21-Jan
14078
521
267567
22-Jan
13633
472
264728
23-Jan
13330
488
286331
24-Jan
11627
299
216211
25-Jan
8552
420
126931
26-Jan
10580
541
256287
27-Jan
15192
467
293770
28-Jan
14361
492
275579
29-Jan
13572
477
268750
30-Jan
12712
421
298010
31-Jan
11252
237
213364
01-Feb
7916
329
142419
02-Feb
9653
499
244429
03-Feb
13186
476
279307
04-Feb
13654
421
270142
05-Feb
14215
377
270507
06-Feb
13441
385
282407
07-Feb
11640
270
206789
08-Feb
7952
307
144270
09-Feb
10621
422
274263
10-Feb
12947
336
310994
11-Feb
15131
391
292533
12-Feb
13899
316
287619
13-Feb
13524
311
290534
14-Feb
11061
221
205642
15-Feb
7333
258
179278
16-Feb
10378
336
274019
17-Feb
12067
369
294411
18-Feb
13753
347
288458
19-Feb
15462
348
297128
20-Feb
14929
251
306078
21-Feb
13439
232
250986
22-Feb
9615
274
170672
23-Feb
13292
356
303850
24-Feb
16409
318
340247
25-Feb
19875
308
353704
26-Feb
20485
253
325404
27-Feb
18901
280
323047
28-Feb
17447
192
257024
01-Mar
13094
246
170633
02-Mar
17039
343
335983
03-Mar
20864
347
358884
04-Mar
22839
339
339635
05-Mar
24028
297
378463
06-Mar
23600
307
355024
07-Mar
20745
207
271336
08-Mar
13878
318
184684
09-Mar
19615
376
345972
10-Mar
22385
332
361040
11-Mar
25639
373
372217
12-Mar
26793
380
369636
13-Mar
26051
317
372944
14-Mar
21300
264
273966
15-Mar
15247
354
179015
16-Mar
20377
502
369375
17-Mar
23025
431
369084
18-Mar
24907
423
353737
19-Mar
25816
386
364822
20-Mar
23718
401
354480
21-Mar
20149
300
277086
22-Mar
13820
386
169196
23-Mar
18744
551
335189
24-Mar
21239
460
363767
25-Mar
23798
460
349472
26-Mar
23982
457
354982
27-Mar
23839
380
357154
28-Mar
19611
297
272630
29-Mar
12954
417
156692
30-Mar
16000
529
301451
31-Mar
22439
467
351221
01-Apr
23634
501
356085
02-Apr
21918
481
331154
03-Apr
21253
376
359214
04-Apr
18025
326
250933
05-Apr
10676
296
102795
06-Apr
7745
421
112962
07-Apr
13696
627
339939
08-Apr
17207
487
362162
09-Apr
18922
718
349003
10-Apr
17558
344
334862
11-Apr
15737
331
253100
12-Apr
9781
358
190635
13-Apr
13439
476
304990
14-Apr
16157
469
334766
15-Apr
16954
380
319633
16-Apr
15937
429
327704
17-Apr
15364
310
331734
18-Apr
12693
251
230116
19-Apr
8859
317
146728
20-Apr
12066
392
294045
21-Apr
13658
365
350034
22-Apr
16229
361
364804
23-Apr
14758
344
315700
24-Apr
13816
324
320780
25-Apr
13154
218
239482
26-Apr
8438
303
145819
27-Apr
10401
374
302734
28-Apr
13379
345
336336
29-Apr
14319
289
330075
30-Apr
13445
264
338771
01-May
12962
226
378202
02-May
9146
144
156872
03-May
5945
256
121829
04-May
9110
305
315506
05-May
10576
267
327169
06-May
11802
258
324640
07-May
10552
207
328612
08-May
10173
224
338436
09-May
8289
139
226006
10-May
5077
198
130000
11-May
6942
251
286428
12-May
7849
262
306744
13-May
8080
201
287026
14-May
7560
182
298186
15-May
6654
136
294686
16-May
5752
93
202573
17-May
3452
140
118924
18-May
4446
201
262864
19-May
5501
149
287256
20-May
5738
164
251037
21-May
5215
133
269744
22-May
4715
125
286603
23-May
3994
72
179391
24-May
2486
110
107481
25-May
3222
166
252646
26-May
3933
121
260962
27-May
4146
171
243967
28-May
3738
126
249911
29-May
3350
83
247330
30-May
2947
44
164495
31-May
1820
82
86977
01-Jun
2482
93
221818
02-Jun
2892
62
226272
03-Jun
1967
59
97633
04-Jun
2555
73
220939
05-Jun
2436
57
238632
06-Jun
2272
51
149958
07-Jun
1271
65
84567
08-Jun
1895
102
220917
09-Jun
2198
77
218738
10-Jun
2070
88
188120
11-Jun
1900
69
217610
12-Jun
1723
52
212966
13-Jun
1390
26
134136
Table S2.
Week definition with starting and ending date
Week
Starting Date
Ending Date
W1
02/03/2020
08/03/2020
W2
09/03/2020
15/03/2020
W3
16/03/2020
22/03/2020
W4
23/03/2020
29/03/2020
W5
30/03/2020
05/04/2020
W6
06/04/2020
12/04/2020
W7
13/04/2020
19/04/2020
W8
20/04/2020
26/04/2020
W9
27/04/2020
03/05/2020
W10
04/05/2020
10/05/2020
W11
11/05/2020
17/05/2020
W12
18/05/2020
24/05/2020
W13
25/05/2020
31/05/2020
W14
01/06/2020
07/06/2020
W15
08/06/2020
14/06/2020
W16
15/06/2020
21/06/2020
W17
22/06/2020
28/06/2020
W18
29/06/2020
05/07/2020
W19
06/07/2020
12/07/2020
W20
13/07/2020
19/07/2020
W21
20/07/2020
26/07/2020
W22
27/07/2020
02/08/2020
W23
03/08/2020
09/08/2020
W24
10/08/2020
16/08/2020
W25
17/08/2020
23/08/2020
W26
24/08/2020
30/08/2020
W27
31/08/2020
06/09/2020
W28
07/09/2020
13/09/2020
W29
14/09/2020
20/09/2020
W30
21/09/2020
27/09/2020
W31
28/09/2020
04/10/2020
W32
05/10/2020
11/10/2020
W33
12/10/2020
18/10/2020
W34
19/10/2020
25/10/2020
W35
26/10/2020
01/11/2020
W36
02/11/2020
08/11/2020
W37
09/11/2020
15/11/2020
W38
16/11/2020
22/11/2020
W39
23/11/2020
29/11/2020
W40
30/11/2020
06/12/2020
W41
07/12/2020
13/12/2020
W42
14/12/2020
20/12/2020
W43
21/12/2020
27/12/2020
W44
28/12/2020
03/01/2021
W45
04/01/2021
10/01/2021
W46
11/01/2021
17/01/2021
W47
18/01/2021
24/01/2021
W48
25/01/2021
31/01/2021
W49
01/02/2021
07/02/2021
W50
08/02/2021
14/02/2021
W51
15/02/2021
21/02/2021
W52
22/02/2021
28/02/2021
W53
01/03/2021
07/03/2021
W54
08/03/2021
14/03/2021
W55
15/03/2021
21/03/2021
W56
22/03/2021
28/03/2021
W57
29/03/2021
04/04/2021
W58
05/04/2021
11/04/2021
W59
12/04/2021
18/04/2021
W60
19/04/2021
25/04/2021
W61
26/04/2021
02/05/2021
W62
03/05/2021
09/05/2021
W63
10/05/2021
16/05/2021
W64
17/05/2021
23/05/2021
W65
24/05/2021
30/05/2021
W66
31/05/2021
06/06/2021
W67
07/06/2021
13/06/2021
Statistical Analysis
Numbers of cases, deaths, and tests were grouped in a week-based manner (Table S3). The average daily values (also denoted as weekly-averaged values) of cases and deaths were obtained by dividing the total weekly number by seven.
Table S3.
Cases and deaths per week of Phase 1 (blue, W1-W17) and Phase 2 (green, W32-W67). Average daily values were obtained dividing the total weekly number of cases/deaths by seven
Week
Average number of cases
Average number of deaths
W1
811
46
W2
2482
206
W3
4913
524
W4
5500
758
W5
4466
730
W6
3916
573
W7
3230
537
W8
2672
426
W9
1853
320
W10
1193
239
W11
909
193
W12
632
125
W13
448
90
W14
286
69
W15
285
64
W16
273
41
W17
203
24
W18
186
18
W19
207
13
W20
196
13
W21
240
9
W22
276
7
W23
357
7
W24
478
5
W25
776
6
W26
1268
6
W27
1351
9
W28
1440
10
W29
1486
14
W30
1673
18
W31
2208
22
W32
4232
26
W33
8470
54
W34
15934
114
W35
26223
213
W36
32252
367
W37
34775
548
W38
32905
656
W39
25187
726
W40
20523
739
W41
16284
635
W42
15949
611
W43
13584
447
W44
15393
487
W45
17236
489
W46
14970
489
W47
12219
469
W48
12317
436
W49
11958
394
W50
12162
329
W51
12480
306
W52
16575
283
W53
20316
298
W54
22237
337
W55
21891
400
W56
20719
427
W57
19460
442
W58
14506
461
W59
14332
382
W60
13220
332
W61
11727
278
W62
9492
237
W63
6845
189
W64
4723
141
W65
3403
117
W66
2346
68
W67
1778
68
Following our previous study of the time evolution of COVID-19 lethality during the first wave (8,9), our analysis included:Identification of the different phases of the epidemic. On the basis of the inspection of the cases and deaths curves, we conventionally set the end of the first phase on June 28th, 2020, latest day of week 17 (W17); hence, the first phase (also referred to as Phase 1) lasted 17 weeks (119 days). Similarly, the beginning of the second phase (Phase 2) was set on October 5th, 2020, first day of W32; thus, the second phase has lasted 36 weeks so far (252 days).Dissection of the data and analytical modeling of the detected cases/deaths: we first described the lockdown-driven fall of Phase 1 and the initial rise of Phase 2 with a decreasing exponential and a sigmoidal function, respectively. Exponential and sigmoidal functions with calibrated parameters were then used for the falls and rises of all other curves.The temporal shift of the cases/deaths curves was obtained by examining the derived functions. In addition, we performed a sensitivity analysis relying on the sum of squared residuals (SSR) in order to evaluate the quality of the fitting between the aforementioned curves upon specific shifts.Depending on the detected shift at different phases/subphases of the pandemic, the WLR values were calculated by dividing the average daily number of deaths of a given week (Wi) by the average daily number of cases of one week (Wi-1), two weeks (Wi-2), or three weeks (Wi-3) before. In detail, the WLR values were computed applying a 1-week, 2-week, and 3-week shift between positive test and death in the time intervals W1-W33, W34-W41, and W42-W67, respectively.In order to detect the temporal link between positive testing to the virus and death (as done for Phase 1 (8)), we partitioned Phase 2 into three distinct subphases, referred to as 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3, defined on the basis of the peaks detected in the cases/deaths curves on Nov 13th/Dec 3rd, 2020, Jan 6th/8th, 2021, and Mar 12th/Apr 9th, 2021 (Figures 1 and S1), respectively.
Figure 1.
Evolution of the weekly-averaged (A) cases (positive tests) and (B) deaths. Weeks have been numbered according to Table S2.
Figure S1.
Daily evolutions of (A) cases (positive tests) and (B) deaths in the time interval March 2nd, 2020 - June 13th, 2021.
Evolution of the weekly-averaged (A) cases (positive tests) and (B) deaths. Weeks have been numbered according to Table S2.In our post-hoc sensitivity analysis, the application of the temporal 1-week shift scheme – successfully applied to analyze Phase 1 (8) (Figure 2A) – produced a very poor fitting between the cases and deaths curves of Phase 2 (Figure 2B). Better fittings were obtained by applying shifts of two or three weeks to the curve of the cases (Figure 2C and 2D). A closer inspection of the fitting clearly indicates that a unique week shift scheme cannot account for the complexity of Phase 2.
Figure 2.
Comparison of the evolution of the weekly cases (black) and deaths (red) upon normalization of the curves in (A) Phase 1 (W1-W17) and (B-D) Phase 2 (W32-W67) of the pandemic. The normalization was performed by dividing the actual values by the maximum of each ensemble. The curve of cases is 1-week (A, B), 2-week (C), 3-week (D) shifted ahead.
Comparison of the evolution of the weekly cases (black) and deaths (red) upon normalization of the curves in (A) Phase 1 (W1-W17) and (B-D) Phase 2 (W32-W67) of the pandemic. The normalization was performed by dividing the actual values by the maximum of each ensemble. The curve of cases is 1-week (A, B), 2-week (C), 3-week (D) shifted ahead.The analytical modeling of the weekly-averaged cases/deaths in Phase 2 was performed as follows. As a first step:- the lockdown-driven fall of the deaths of Phase 1 was favorably described with a decreasing exponential (Figure S3)
the time constant Wfd of which was calibrated to 3.8 weeks to obtain the best agreement between (1) and the real data.
Figure S3.
Modeling of the lockdown-driven fall of Phase 1 and the rise of Subphase 2.1 of the curve of deaths with a decreasing exponential (time constant 3.8) and a sigmoidal (exponent 2.5 and time constant 4.1) function, respectively.
- the initial deaths rise of Subphase 2.1 was described with the sigmoidal function (Figure S3)
where the time constant Wr and power factor nr were adjusted to 4.1 weeks and 2.5, respectively (Figure S3); deaths(W40) represents the peak value of this subphase.Subsequently, exponential and sigmoidal functions with the same values for Wfd, Wr, and nr were adopted also to model the deaths falls of Subphases 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, as well as the rises of Subphases 2.2 and 2.3, respectively (Figure 3A). As an example, the fall of Subphase 2.1 was described with
and the rise of Subphase 2.2 with
Crd2.2 being a fitting parameter tuned to ensure the best matching between the overall model and real data (Figure 3B).
Figure 3.
(A) Modeling of the three subphases of the curve of deaths of Phase 2 with mathematical functions. For the rises, sigmoidal functions making use of exponent 2.5 and time constant 4.1 were exploited. The time constant 3.8 calibrated for the fall of deaths occurring in Phase 1 was also employed for the falls of the three subphases of Phase 2. (B) Model (sum of the 3 modeled subphases) of Phase 2 superimposed to the real data.
(A) Modeling of the three subphases of the curve of deaths of Phase 2 with mathematical functions. For the rises, sigmoidal functions making use of exponent 2.5 and time constant 4.1 were exploited. The time constant 3.8 calibrated for the fall of deaths occurring in Phase 1 was also employed for the falls of the three subphases of Phase 2. (B) Model (sum of the 3 modeled subphases) of Phase 2 superimposed to the real data.A similar strategy was used to model the evolution of the weekly-averaged cases. First, it was noted that the rise of Subphase 2.1 was accurately described by the same sigmoidal function (and same parameters) exploited for the deaths (Figure 4A), i.e.,
cases(W37) being the peak reached during this subphase. Equation (2) was also used to model the rises of cases of Subphases 2.2 and 2.3 (Figure 4A); as an example,
was employed for Subphase 2.2, Crc2.2 being a fitting parameter.
Figure 4.
(A) Modeling of the three subphases of Phase 2 of the curve of cases with mathematical functions. For the rises, sigmoidal functions making use of exponent 2.5 and time constant 4.1 were exploited. The time constant 3.2 was employed for the falls of the three Phase 2 subphases. (B) Model (sum of the 3 modeled subphases) superimposed to the real data.
(A) Modeling of the three subphases of Phase 2 of the curve of cases with mathematical functions. For the rises, sigmoidal functions making use of exponent 2.5 and time constant 4.1 were exploited. The time constant 3.2 was employed for the falls of the three Phase 2 subphases. (B) Model (sum of the 3 modeled subphases) superimposed to the real data.A reasonably faster time constant Wfc=3.2 weeks was adopted in the decreasing exponentials used to describe the falls of cases in Subphases 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 (Figure 4A); as far as Subphase 2.1 is concerned, the exponential function isThe deconvolution of the deaths/cases curves also provides a measure of the temporal shift between the positive testing and the fatal event. A comparison of the equations used to fit the experimental data indicates that the rise of the deaths in Subphase 2.1 is shifted two weeks ahead with respect to the corresponding testing: weeks W32 and W30 are indeed used to identify the rise onsets of deaths and cases, respectively. On the other hand, for the subsequent subphases the equations suggest a 3-week shift; as far as Subphase 2.2 is concerned, weeks W38 and W41 are adopted for cases and deaths. These results are in line with those obtained through a comparative analysis performed by shifting the normalized curve of daily cases with respect to the deaths counterpart and calculating the SSR between them; this approach was also exploited to examine Phase 1 in (8).Based on the variable shifts between the curves of deaths/cases detected throughout the pandemic, we adapted the definition of the WLR previously introduced (8) by alternatively considering a 1-week, a 2-week, or a 3-week shift. A regression analysis was performed on the WLR values in the weeks W50-W67 to quantify its decrease. 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed according to a Poisson approximation. The significance level (0.05) of the decrease was assessed by calculating the p-value. Data were analyzed with MATLAB R2014b and R statistical software v. 4.0.0 (11,12).The study did not involve participants and information were gathered from freely accessible public databases, and data were analyzed in aggregated form and without any identifier. Therefore, no ethical approval was required for this research. The analyses adhere to the Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting (GATHER) (13).
Results
Comparative analysis of the evolution of cases and deaths
The inspection of the daily deaths/cases curves (Figures 1 and S1) clearly indicates that the country suffered from two main outbreaks (here denoted as Phase 1 and Phase 2). The first started at the end of February 2020 and ended in the summer of the same year. Moreover, starting from the fall 2020 a second remarkable increase of both cases and deaths was experienced. Although this second phase is progressively regressing, it is still ongoing (June 2021). Notably, the maxima of the deaths curve are pretty similar in the two phases while the maximum of the cases is significantly higher in the second phase compared to the first one.As previously explained, the application of the temporal 1-week shift scheme that was successfully exploited to analyze Phase 1 (8) (Figure 2A) produced a very poor fitting of the curves of Phase 2 (Figure 2B). Better fittings are obtained by using shifts of two or three weeks to the curve of the cases (Figure 2C and 2D). A closer inspection of the fitting clearly indicates that a unique shift scheme cannot account for the complexity of Phase 2. This observation is not surprising considering the remarkable time span of Phase 2 (~9 months). A similar conclusion is reached when the SSR between the normalized daily cases/deaths is calculated upon the systematic shifts of the curve of the cases of Phase 2. As shown in Figure S2, the SSR values present a marked weekly periodicity due to the daily dependence of testing and death registrations. Interestingly, two nearly identical global minima corresponding to shifts of either 13 or 20 days are evident. In this scenario, considering the complexity of Phase 2, we deconvolute the global cases/deaths curves by identifying the underlying curves corresponding to the three subphases (2.1, 2.2., and 2.3) (Figure 3A and Figure 4A). This was done by noticing that the ascending parts of the curves can be described by sigmoidal increases whereas the descending regions are characterized by exponential decreases (see Methods for details). In this framework, the main parameter for the exponential function was derived from the fitting of deaths of the descendent region of Phase 1.
Figure S2.
Sum of squared residuals (SSR) as a function of day shift of the curves in Phase 2 (W32-W67). The normalized curve of the daily cases is shifted ahead with respect to the normalized curve of the daily deaths.
The superposition of the deconvoluted curves (Figure 3B and Figure 4B) shows a remarkable agreement with the real cases/deaths. The only significant discrepancies are observed in the time interval W42-W45 that corresponds to mid-December – mid-January when, due to the holiday season, the recording of cases and deaths was occasionally postponed. Such a deconvolution also provides a measure of the temporal shift between the positive testing and the fatal event. An inspection of the equations used to fit the experimental data indicates that the rise of the deaths in Subphase 2.1 is shifted by two weeks from the corresponding positive testing; in the fitting curve, the parameter W32 or W30 is indeed present for deaths and cases, respectively. On the other hand, for the subsequent weeks the equations suggest a 3-week shift since the parameter in the equations is either W41 (deaths) or W38 (cases). These observations are confirmed by the indications provided by the SSR analysis described above.
Weekly Lethality Rate
Based on the variable shifts between the curves of deaths/cases detected throughout Phase 2, we adapted the definition of the WLR previously introduced (8) by alternatively considering a single week (from W2 to W33) shift, a 2-week shift (from W34 to W41), or a 3-week (from W42 to W67) shift. As shown in Figure 5 and Table S4, we observed significant changes of this parameter in the different stages of the pandemic. In particular, the value of WLR was grossly overestimated (~13.5%) in Phase 1 (8). This is likely due to the severe underestimation of the cases at that time. A WLR value of about 2.6% was observed in most of Phase 2. Interestingly, a slow but significant reduction of this parameter has taken place in the last weeks (W50-W67; February 8th – June 13th, 2021). In particular, at W67 the WLR assumes a value (1.4%) that is almost halved when compared to the nearly constant one detected in the period W34-W49.
Figure 5.
Weekly lethality rate (WLR) evolution in the overall pandemic. The WLR values were calculated applying a 1-week (black and grey), 2-week (red), and 3-week (green) shift between positive test and death in the time intervals W2-W33, W34-W41, and W42-W67, respectively. Values computed for the weeks (W14-W33, W66-W67) with less than 70 weekly-averaged deaths are in light grey. The average WLR value (2.56%) detected in the time interval W34-W49 is shown as a dashed line. The linear regression analysis of the WLR values in the weeks W50-W67 provides a correlation coefficient R=-0.95 (p-value<10-5). The regression line (y = 7.4091 - 0.093675 x) is shown in red.
Table S4.
Weekly lethality rate (WLR) values with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). The WLR values were calculated applying a 1-week, 2-week, and 3-week shift between positive test and death in the time intervals W1-W33, W34-W41, and W42-W67, respectively. WLR values were calculated by dividing the average daily number of deaths of a given week (Wi) by the average daily number of cases of one week (Wi-1), two weeks (Wi-2), or three weeks (Wi-3) before
Week
WLR 1-week shift
Week
WLR 2-week shift
Week
WLR 3-week shift
95% CI
95% CI
95% CI
W2
25.43
(24.1 – 26.8)
W34
2.68
(2.5 – 2.9)
W42
2.43
(2.4 – 2.5)
W3
21.10
(20.4 – 21.8)
W35
2.51
(2.4 – 2.6)
W43
2.18
(2.1 – 2.3)
W4
15.42
(15.0 – 15.8)
W36
2.30
(2.2 – 2.4)
W44
2.99
(2.9 – 3.1)
W5
13.27
(12.9 – 13.6)
W37
2.09
(2.0 – 2.2)
W45
3.07
(3.0 – 3.2)
W6
12.83
(12.4 – 13.2)
W38
2.03
(2.0 – 2.1)
W46
3.60
(3.5 – 3.7)
W7
13.72
(13.3 – 14.1)
W39
2.09
(2.0 – 2.1)
W47
3.05
(2.9 – 3.2)
W8
13.20
(12.7 – 13.7)
W40
2.25
(2.2 – 2.3)
W48
2.53
(2.4 – 2.6)
W9
11.98
(11.5 – 12.5)
W41
2.52
(2.4 – 2.6)
W49
2.63
(2.5 – 2.7)
W10
12.92
(12.3 – 13.6)
W50
2.69
(2.6 – 2.8)
W11
16.14
(15.3 – 17.0)
W51
2.48
(2.4 – 2.6)
W12
13.78
(12.9 – 14.7)
W52
2.37
(2.3 – 2.5)
W13
14.24
(13.2 – 15.4)
W53
2.45
(2.3 – 2.6)
W14
15.42
(14.1 – 16.9)
W54
2.70
(2.6 – 2.8)
W15
22.25
(20.2 – 24.4)
W55
2.41
(2.3 – 2.5)
W16
14.51
(12.9 – 16.3)
W56
2.10
(2.0 – 2.2)
W17
8.63
(7.4 – 10.1)
W57
1.99
(1.9 – 2.1)
W18
8.64
(7.2 – 10.3)
W58
2.10
(2.0 – 2.2)
W19
7.15
(5.8 – 8.8)
W59
1.84
(1.8 – 1.9)
W20
6.28
(5.1 – 7.7)
W60
1.70
(1.6 – 1.8)
W21
4.52
(3.5 – 5.8)
W61
1.92
(1.8 – 2.0)
W22
2.80
(2.1 – 3.7)
W62
1.65
(1.6 – 1.7)
W23
2.64
(2.0 – 3.5)
W63
1.43
(1.4 – 1.5)
W24
1.48
(1.0 – 2.0)
W64
1.20
(1.1 – 1.3)
W25
1.22
(0.9 – 1.7)
W65
1.24
(1.2 – 1.3)
W26
0.74
(0.5 – 1.0)
W66
1.00
(0.9 – 1.1)
W27
0.72
(0.6 – 0.9)
W67
1.45
(1.3 – 1.6)
W28
0.73
(0.6 – 0.9)
W29
0.96
(0.8 – 1.2)
W30
1.23
(1.0 – 1.5)
W31
1.29
(1.1 – 1.5)
W32
1.16
(1.0 – 1.3)
W33
1.27
(1.1 – 1.4)
Weekly lethality rate (WLR) evolution in the overall pandemic. The WLR values were calculated applying a 1-week (black and grey), 2-week (red), and 3-week (green) shift between positive test and death in the time intervals W2-W33, W34-W41, and W42-W67, respectively. Values computed for the weeks (W14-W33, W66-W67) with less than 70 weekly-averaged deaths are in light grey. The average WLR value (2.56%) detected in the time interval W34-W49 is shown as a dashed line. The linear regression analysis of the WLR values in the weeks W50-W67 provides a correlation coefficient R=-0.95 (p-value<10-5). The regression line (y = 7.4091 - 0.093675 x) is shown in red.
Discussion
One of the most striking and worrying features of the COVID-19 pandemic is its unpredictable evolution: with the exception of an extremely limited number of nations that have been able to control the infections, the vast majority of the countries have suffered from phases characterized by a high COVID-19 burden that was alternated with time periods in which the pandemic was essentially under control. This articulated evolution has also been experienced in Italy, the center of the first main outbreak across Western countries. In the initial stage of the pandemic (February – June 2020), quite strong measures were taken by the governmental authorities to severely limit the mobility of people and therefore the diffusion of the infection (2,8). Despite the gross underestimation of cases in the early months of the outbreak (due to the emergency phase and a low capacity of case detecting), the enforcement of severe lockdown restrictions contributed to the clear-cut shape of the curves, with an ascending curve followed by a monotonic descending one (Figure 1). The analogous trends displayed by the curves reporting cases and deaths prompted us to search for a temporal link between them. A remarkable good fitting between these two profiles was obtained when the curve of the cases was shifted by one week (8). The well-defined quantification of this temporal link provided us the opportunity to define a time-dependent WLR that was nearly constant in the first months of the pandemic. The inspection of the WLR profile indicates that, after assuming rather large values (~13.5%) in Phase 1 due to the underestimation of cases, it decreased to very low values (below 1%) during the summer of 2020 (Figure 5). Although the marked reduction in the number of cases/deaths observed in this period makes the calculated WLR less reliable, its drop may be ascribed to different factors including the lockdown measures, the seasonality of viral respiratory diseases, and an increased virus circulation amongst young people who are less susceptible to severe and fatal COVID-19 outcomes (14,15). Therefore, after the initial outbreak and the summer months, when the infections were essentially under control, from fall 2020 Italy suffered a second phase (Phase 2) of the pandemic that is still ongoing. Differently from the first, Phase 2 has been characterized by an intricate evolution with multiple rises and decreases of the infections. On the basis of the peaks that we observed in the curves of both cases and deaths, we were able to identify and model three distinct subphases. As a whole, the shape of the Phase 2 curve mirrored the differences in virus circulation and type of restrictive public health measures compared to Phase 1. From an epidemiological standpoint, in the first half of 2020, the major spread of SARS-CoV-2 was limited to northern regions of the country, which registered the biggest COVID-19 outbreak in terms of both cases and death toll (16); from September 2020, the virus has been circulating across the entire country (14). Again, in order to reduce the social and economic consequences of protracted lockdown restrictions, governmental authorities adopted less-stringent limiting measures, the impact of which was reflected in the curves. A system of region-based risk levels was implemented, which allowed the easing of measures according to a set of indicators (for instance, number of cases and deaths, number of intensive care unit [ICU] admissions, percentage of occupied ICU beds, etc.), with different extents of SARS-CoV-2 circulation across regions and weeks (14).Interestingly, despite the heterogeneity of the data that are separately collected in the twenty-one regions/territories of the country and the complexity of Phase 2, we could quantify the temporal link between cases and deaths. Notably, the shift between the positive testing and the fatal event is longer than that observed in Phase 1 (one week) and is progressively increasing during Phase 2 (two or three weeks). This difference can be ascribed to the improved timeliness of the testing, which was only reserved to people displaying symptoms in Phase 1 and, possibly, to some improvement in the therapeutic interventions that delayed the death in Phase 2. Moreover, the identification of this temporal link gave us the opportunity to evaluate the lethality attributable to COVID-19 in Italy during the whole epidemic period, from March 2020 to June 2021, using complete epidemiological data of SARS-CoV-2 spread in the country.A significant increase of the WLR took place in October 2020, concurrently with a new increase of the virus spread and its following circulation in susceptible populations, like elder individuals or people in fragile states (14,15). From the beginning of Phase 2 to the beginning of February 2021 the WLR assumed a rather constant value (~2.6%) (Figure 5). Starting from mid-February 2021 (W51), the WLR is significantly decreasing. It is important to note in this time interval the WLR practically halved from 2.6 to 1.3%, the value detected at the beginning of June 2021. Notably, this period also coincides with the progressive increase of the vaccination coverage in Italy, primarily in at-risk and susceptible subjects, with a consequent positive impact on COVID-19 burden and lethality reduction (7). Further research is needed to better investigate the impact of vaccines and vaccination campaign on SARS-CoV-2 diffusion and lethality.Some limitations of our study should be acknowledged. First, as for our previous analysis of lethality during the first epidemic wave (8), the research included information measured through surveillance systems where data were provided in aggregated form and without any case stratification; thus, it was not possible to evaluate uncertainty sources and adjust results for potential independent predictors of death, but this research was intended as a straightforward strategy to assess the time-trend of the proportion of cases who died from the disease. Second, the WLR uses the number of subjects that tested positive as population (denominator), thus being influenced by the number of tests performed on a certain time-point. However, the combination of data on a weekly-aggregated manner greatly reduced possible differences across different week-days. Lastly, even if the 1- to 2-week and 2- to 3-week shifts were based on static denominators, the WLR calculated a ratio representing relative rates of deaths which reflect analytical expressions of lethality proxy over time.In conclusion, our study provides interesting insights into the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy by highlighting some distinctive features, in terms of trend complexity of the lethality rate in the different phases of the pandemic. Our approach also documented the impact of the public health measures on SARS-CoV-2 spread and associated lethality, also highlighting the possible positive effect of vaccination efforts, but more studies assessing this hypothesis should be implemented in the near future. The application of the proposed approach could help examine data from other contexts, allowing comparison with the lethality associated with SARS-CoV-2 in other countries.
Authors: Gretchen A Stevens; Leontine Alkema; Robert E Black; J Ties Boerma; Gary S Collins; Majid Ezzati; John T Grove; Daniel R Hogan; Margaret C Hogan; Richard Horton; Joy E Lawn; Ana Marušić; Colin D Mathers; Christopher J L Murray; Igor Rudan; Joshua A Salomon; Paul J Simpson; Theo Vos; Vivian Welch Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Luigi Palmieri; Katie Palmer; Cinzia Lo Noce; Paola Meli; Marina Giuliano; Marco Floridia; Manuela Tamburo de Bella; Andrea Piccioli; Silvio Brusaferro; Graziano Onder Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2020-12-21 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Fabiana Madotto; Sara Conti; Ippazio C Antonazzo; Domenico Ponticelli; Andrea Vitale; Giovanni Della Ragione; Maria L Romano; Mario Borrelli; Beniamino Schiavone; Riccardo Polosa; Pietro Ferrara; Lorenzo G Mantovani Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2021-10-12 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Pietro Ferrara; Domenico Ponticelli; Roberto Magliuolo; Mario Borrelli; Beniamino Schiavone; Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani Journal: Vaccines (Basel) Date: 2022-08-19