Literature DB >> 35075070

The temporal correlation between positive testing and death in Italy: from the first phase to the later evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Vincenzo D'Alessandro1, Nicole Balasco2, Pietro Ferrara3, Luigi Vitagliano4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: After the global spread of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), research has concentrated its efforts on several aspects of the epidemiological burden of pandemic. In this frame, the presented study follows a previous analysis of the temporal link between cases and deaths during the first epidemic wave (Phase 1) in Italy (March-June 2020).
METHODS: We here analyze the COVID-19 epidemic in the time span from March 2020 to June 2021.
RESULTS: The elaboration of the curves of cases and deaths allows identifying the temporal shift between the positive testing and the fatal event, which corresponds to one week from W2 to W33, two weeks from W34 to W41, and three weeks from W42 to W67. Based on this finding, we calculate the Weekly Lethality Rate (WLR). The WLR was grossly overestimated (~13.5%) in Phase 1, while a mean value of 2.6% was observed in most of Phase 2 (starting from October 2020), with a drop to 1.4% in the last investigated weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these findings offer an interesting insight into the magnitude and time evolution of the lethality burden attributable to COVID-19 during the entire pandemic period in Italy. In particular, the analysis highlighted the impact of the effectiveness of public health and social measures, of changes in disease management, and of preventive strategies over time.  (www.actabiomedica.it).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35075070      PMCID: PMC8823554          DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92i6.12030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomed        ISSN: 0392-4203


Appendix Supplementary files Click here for additional data file. Daily evolutions of (A) cases (positive tests) and (B) deaths in the time interval March 2nd, 2020 - June 13th, 2021. Sum of squared residuals (SSR) as a function of day shift of the curves in Phase 2 (W32-W67). The normalized curve of the daily cases is shifted ahead with respect to the normalized curve of the daily deaths. Modeling of the lockdown-driven fall of Phase 1 and the rise of Subphase 2.1 of the curve of deaths with a decreasing exponential (time constant 3.8) and a sigmoidal (exponent 2.5 and time constant 4.1) function, respectively. Daily cases, deaths, and tests in the time interval March 2nd, 2020 - June 13th, 2021 collected from the Reports of the Italian National Institute of Health (ISS) Week definition with starting and ending date Cases and deaths per week of Phase 1 (blue, W1-W17) and Phase 2 (green, W32-W67). Average daily values were obtained dividing the total weekly number of cases/deaths by seven Weekly lethality rate (WLR) values with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). The WLR values were calculated applying a 1-week, 2-week, and 3-week shift between positive test and death in the time intervals W1-W33, W34-W41, and W42-W67, respectively. WLR values were calculated by dividing the average daily number of deaths of a given week (Wi) by the average daily number of cases of one week (Wi-1), two weeks (Wi-2), or three weeks (Wi-3) before

Introduction

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that started in China in the last months of 2019 is causing a global health emergency, the solution of which seems yet far to be achieved despite the enormous efforts made to mitigate its spread, and the development of therapeutic and effective preventive strategies (1-3). Currently, the official number of cases (i.e., infected subjects) is approaching 200 million with nearly four million deaths (4,5). The pandemic has non-uniformly affected almost all continents and countries (4), often with a fast and intricate evolution resulting from the combination of many factors, namely (a) the use of personal protective equipment, (b) restrictions to the people mobility applied by public authorities that were periodically released in a difficult attempt to prevent or limit the infections without destroying local economies, (c) the seasonality of viral respiratory diseases, (d) the progressive appearance of SARS-CoV-2 variants endowed with increased infection rates, and (e) the recent implementation of vaccination campaigns (2,3,6,7). In this scenario, the gathering of information on the burden of the disease is of utmost importance for better understanding the origin and evolution of the pandemic spreading, as well as the effectiveness of public health interventions (3). By analyzing the evolution of the pandemic outbreak in Italy, the center of the first main outbreak among Western countries, we have recently examined the temporal correlation between the positive COVID-19 testing and deaths in the first phase, i.e., the period March-June 2020 (8,9). In particular, we found, on average, a one-week delay between the positive test and the fatal event. Despite the straightforwardness of the approach and the heterogeneity of the available data, we exploited this finding to propose a lethality measure denoted as Weekly Lethality Rate (WLR), which is based on the ratio between the number of deaths occurring in a certain week and the number of positive tests detected in the previous weeks (8). In order to further investigate the lethality impact of the infection in Italy, we have extended this analysis to the entire pandemic, by monitoring the temporal link between positive testing and death from the summer 2020 to June 2021. As for the initial phase, we quantified the temporal correlation between these events, and found a progressively increasing time gap. On this basis, we conceived an approach to generalize the WLR. The implications of these findings on the evolution of the Italian outbreak will be discussed, considering the impact and effectiveness of political interventions, changes in disease management, and preventive strategies.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Data Source

We performed a longitudinal retrospective analysis on the time-trend of the lethality due to COVID-19 in Italy through the data from the freely accessible national integrated surveillance system (10). More specifically, we gathered the daily number of diagnostic tests, confirmed cases, and deceased related to SARS-CoV-2 (Table S1). We traced data over 67 weeks (denoted as W1, W2, . . ., W67) covering the period from March 2nd, 2020 to June 13th, 2021 (Table S2).
Table S1.

Daily cases, deaths, and tests in the time interval March 2nd, 2020 - June 13th, 2021 collected from the Reports of the Italian National Institute of Health (ISS)

DateDaily casesDaily deathsDaily tests
02-Mar335112218
03-Mar466272511
04-Mar587283981
05-Mar769412525
06-Mar778493997
07-Mar1247365703
08-Mar14921337875
09-Mar1797973889
10-Mar15771686935
11-Mar171319612393
12-Mar265118912857
13-Mar254725011477
14-Mar349717511682
15-Mar359036815729
16-Mar338534913063
17-Mar337434510695
18-Mar420747516884
19-Mar532242717236
20-Mar598662724109
21-Mar655779326336
22-Mar556065125180
23-Mar479060117066
24-Mar524974321496
25-Mar521068327481
26-Mar615371236615
27-Mar590991933019
28-Mar597488935447
29-Mar521775624504
30-Mar405081223329
31-Mar405383729609
01-Apr478272734455
02-Apr466876039809
03-Apr458576638617
04-Apr480568137375
05-Apr431652534237
06-Apr359963630271
07-Apr303960433713
08-Apr383654251680
09-Apr420461046244
10-Apr395157053495
11-Apr469461956609
12-Apr409243146720
13-Apr315356636717
14-Apr297260226779
15-Apr266757843715
16-Apr378652560999
17-Apr349357565705
18-Apr349148261725
19-Apr304743350708
20-Apr225645441483
21-Apr272957052126
22-Apr337040163101
23-Apr264646466658
24-Apr302142062447
25-Apr235741565387
26-Apr232426049916
27-Apr173933332003
28-Apr201938257272
29-Apr208632363827
30-Apr187228568456
01-May196526974208
02-May190047455412
03-May138917444935
04-May122119537631
05-May107523655263
06-May144436964263
07-May140127470359
08-May132724363775
09-May108319469171
10-May80216551678
11-May74417940740
12-May140217267003
13-May88819561973
14-May99226271876
15-May78924268176
16-May87515369179
17-May67514560101
18-May4519936406
19-May81316263158
20-May66516167195
21-May64215671679
22-May65213075380
23-May66911972410
24-May5315055824
25-May3009235241
26-May3977857674
27-May58411767324
28-May5937075893
29-May5168772135
30-May41611169342
31-May3337554118
01-Jun2006031394
02-Jun3195552159
03-Jun3227137299
04-Jun1778849953
05-Jun5198565028
06-Jun2707272485
07-Jun1975349478
08-Jun2806527112
09-Jun2837955003
10-Jun2027162699
11-Jun3805362472
12-Jun1635670620
13-Jun3477849750
14-Jun3374456527
15-Jun3012628107
16-Jun2103446882
17-Jun3294377701
18-Jun3326658154
19-Jun2514757541
20-Jun2644954722
21-Jun2242440545
22-Jun2212328972
23-Jun1131840485
24-Jun1903053266
25-Jun2963456061
26-Jun2553052768
27-Jun175861351
28-Jun1742237346
29-Jun126627218
30-Jun1422348273
01-Jul1822155366
02-Jul2013053243
03-Jul2231550096
04-Jul2352152011
05-Jul192737462
06-Jul208822166
07-Jul1373043219
08-Jul1931550443
09-Jul2141252552
10-Jul2761247953
11-Jul188745931
12-Jul234938259
13-Jul1691323933
14-Jul1141741867
15-Jul1621348449
16-Jul2302050432
17-Jul2311150767
18-Jul2491448265
19-Jul218335525
20-Jul1901324253
21-Jul1281543110
22-Jul280949318
23-Jul3061060311
24-Jul252553334
25-Jul273551671
26-Jul252540526
27-Jul170525551
28-Jul1811148170
29-Jul289656018
30-Jul382361858
31-Jul379960944
01-Aug295560383
02-Aug238843269
03-Aug1591224036
04-Aug190543788
05-Aug3841056451
06-Aug401658673
07-Aug552359196
08-Aug3471353298
09-Aug463237637
10-Aug259426432
11-Aug412640642
12-Aug4761052658
13-Aug522651188
14-Aug574346723
15-Aug627453123
16-Aug479436807
17-Aug320430666
18-Aug401553976
19-Aug642771095
20-Aug840677442
21-Aug947971996
22-Aug1071377674
23-Aug1209767371
24-Aug952445914
25-Aug876472341
26-Aug13651393529
27-Aug1409594024
28-Aug1462997065
29-Aug1444199108
30-Aug1365481723
31-Aug999658518
01-Sep984881050
02-Sep13326102959
03-Sep14021092790
04-Sep173811113085
05-Sep170016107658
06-Sep1303776856
07-Sep11071252553
08-Sep13661092403
09-Sep14341495990
10-Sep15971094186
11-Sep16161098880
12-Sep1499692706
13-Sep1458772143
14-Sep10081445309
15-Sep1229980517
16-Sep145012100607
17-Sep158513101773
18-Sep19061099839
19-Sep163824103223
20-Sep15871583428
21-Sep13491755862
22-Sep13921487303
23-Sep164020103696
24-Sep178623108019
25-Sep191220107269
26-Sep186917104387
27-Sep17661787714
28-Sep14931651109
29-Sep16472490185
30-Sep185119105236
01-Oct254824118236
02-Oct249823120301
03-Oct284427118932
04-Oct25781892714
05-Oct22571660241
06-Oct26762899742
07-Oct367831125314
08-Oct445822128098
09-Oct537228129471
10-Oct572429133084
11-Oct545626104658
12-Oct46163985442
13-Oct590141112544
14-Oct733143152196
15-Oct880383162932
16-Oct1001055150377
17-Oct1092547165837
18-Oct1170469146541
19-Oct93357398862
20-Oct1087489144737
21-Oct15198127177848
22-Oct16079136170392
23-Oct1913991182032
24-Oct19644151177669
25-Oct21268128161880
26-Oct17007141124686
27-Oct21991221174398
28-Oct24989205198952
29-Oct26826217201452
30-Oct31082199215085
31-Oct31756297215886
01-Nov29907208183457
02-Nov22250233135731
03-Nov28242353182287
04-Nov30547352211831
05-Nov34498428219884
06-Nov37807446234245
07-Nov39809425231673
08-Nov32614331191144
09-Nov25263356147725
10-Nov35098580217758
11-Nov32960623225640
12-Nov37978636234672
13-Nov40896550254908
14-Nov37253544227695
15-Nov33977546195275
16-Nov27354504152663
17-Nov32188731208458
18-Nov34283753234834
19-Nov36173653250186
20-Nov37239699238077
21-Nov34767692237225
22-Nov28334562188747
23-Nov22925630148945
24-Nov23231853188659
25-Nov25851722230007
26-Nov28993822232711
27-Nov28344827222803
28-Nov26321686225940
29-Nov20647541130524
30-Nov16374672130524
01-Dec19350785182100
02-Dec20703684207143
03-Dec23236993220047
04-Dec24099814212741
05-Dec21052662194984
06-Dec18846564163550
07-Dec13612528111217
08-Dec14733634149232
09-Dec12652499118475
10-Dec16887887171586
11-Dec18550761190416
12-Dec19738649196439
13-Dec17818484152697
14-Dec11965491103584
15-Dec14714846164431
16-Dec17431680199489
17-Dec18136683185320
18-Dec17989674179800
19-Dec16306553176185
20-Dec15104352137420
21-Dec1086041587889
22-Dec13294628157705
23-Dec14521553183864
24-Dec18040505193777
25-Dec19037459152334
26-Dec1042926181564
27-Dec890930559879
28-Dec858344568681
29-Dec11212659128740
30-Dec16202575169045
31-Dec23476555186004
01-Jan22205462157524
02-Jan1183136467174
03-Jan14243347102974
04-Jan1079734877993
05-Jan15373649135106
06-Jan20331548121275
07-Jan18016414140267
08-Jan17531620172119
09-Jan19976483139758
10-Jan18625361139758
11-Jan1253244891656
12-Jan14241616141641
13-Jan15771507175429
14-Jan17244522160585
15-Jan16146477273506
16-Jan16309475261404
17-Jan12545377211078
18-Jan8824377158674
19-Jan10494603254070
20-Jan13548524279762
21-Jan14078521267567
22-Jan13633472264728
23-Jan13330488286331
24-Jan11627299216211
25-Jan8552420126931
26-Jan10580541256287
27-Jan15192467293770
28-Jan14361492275579
29-Jan13572477268750
30-Jan12712421298010
31-Jan11252237213364
01-Feb7916329142419
02-Feb9653499244429
03-Feb13186476279307
04-Feb13654421270142
05-Feb14215377270507
06-Feb13441385282407
07-Feb11640270206789
08-Feb7952307144270
09-Feb10621422274263
10-Feb12947336310994
11-Feb15131391292533
12-Feb13899316287619
13-Feb13524311290534
14-Feb11061221205642
15-Feb7333258179278
16-Feb10378336274019
17-Feb12067369294411
18-Feb13753347288458
19-Feb15462348297128
20-Feb14929251306078
21-Feb13439232250986
22-Feb9615274170672
23-Feb13292356303850
24-Feb16409318340247
25-Feb19875308353704
26-Feb20485253325404
27-Feb18901280323047
28-Feb17447192257024
01-Mar13094246170633
02-Mar17039343335983
03-Mar20864347358884
04-Mar22839339339635
05-Mar24028297378463
06-Mar23600307355024
07-Mar20745207271336
08-Mar13878318184684
09-Mar19615376345972
10-Mar22385332361040
11-Mar25639373372217
12-Mar26793380369636
13-Mar26051317372944
14-Mar21300264273966
15-Mar15247354179015
16-Mar20377502369375
17-Mar23025431369084
18-Mar24907423353737
19-Mar25816386364822
20-Mar23718401354480
21-Mar20149300277086
22-Mar13820386169196
23-Mar18744551335189
24-Mar21239460363767
25-Mar23798460349472
26-Mar23982457354982
27-Mar23839380357154
28-Mar19611297272630
29-Mar12954417156692
30-Mar16000529301451
31-Mar22439467351221
01-Apr23634501356085
02-Apr21918481331154
03-Apr21253376359214
04-Apr18025326250933
05-Apr10676296102795
06-Apr7745421112962
07-Apr13696627339939
08-Apr17207487362162
09-Apr18922718349003
10-Apr17558344334862
11-Apr15737331253100
12-Apr9781358190635
13-Apr13439476304990
14-Apr16157469334766
15-Apr16954380319633
16-Apr15937429327704
17-Apr15364310331734
18-Apr12693251230116
19-Apr8859317146728
20-Apr12066392294045
21-Apr13658365350034
22-Apr16229361364804
23-Apr14758344315700
24-Apr13816324320780
25-Apr13154218239482
26-Apr8438303145819
27-Apr10401374302734
28-Apr13379345336336
29-Apr14319289330075
30-Apr13445264338771
01-May12962226378202
02-May9146144156872
03-May5945256121829
04-May9110305315506
05-May10576267327169
06-May11802258324640
07-May10552207328612
08-May10173224338436
09-May8289139226006
10-May5077198130000
11-May6942251286428
12-May7849262306744
13-May8080201287026
14-May7560182298186
15-May6654136294686
16-May575293202573
17-May3452140118924
18-May4446201262864
19-May5501149287256
20-May5738164251037
21-May5215133269744
22-May4715125286603
23-May399472179391
24-May2486110107481
25-May3222166252646
26-May3933121260962
27-May4146171243967
28-May3738126249911
29-May335083247330
30-May294744164495
31-May18208286977
01-Jun248293221818
02-Jun289262226272
03-Jun19675997633
04-Jun255573220939
05-Jun243657238632
06-Jun227251149958
07-Jun12716584567
08-Jun1895102220917
09-Jun219877218738
10-Jun207088188120
11-Jun190069217610
12-Jun172352212966
13-Jun139026134136
Table S2.

Week definition with starting and ending date

WeekStarting DateEnding Date
W102/03/202008/03/2020
W209/03/202015/03/2020
W316/03/202022/03/2020
W423/03/202029/03/2020
W530/03/202005/04/2020
W606/04/202012/04/2020
W713/04/202019/04/2020
W820/04/202026/04/2020
W927/04/202003/05/2020
W1004/05/202010/05/2020
W1111/05/202017/05/2020
W1218/05/202024/05/2020
W1325/05/202031/05/2020
W1401/06/202007/06/2020
W1508/06/202014/06/2020
W1615/06/202021/06/2020
W1722/06/202028/06/2020
W1829/06/202005/07/2020
W1906/07/202012/07/2020
W2013/07/202019/07/2020
W2120/07/202026/07/2020
W2227/07/202002/08/2020
W2303/08/202009/08/2020
W2410/08/202016/08/2020
W2517/08/202023/08/2020
W2624/08/202030/08/2020
W2731/08/202006/09/2020
W2807/09/202013/09/2020
W2914/09/202020/09/2020
W3021/09/202027/09/2020
W3128/09/202004/10/2020
W3205/10/202011/10/2020
W3312/10/202018/10/2020
W3419/10/202025/10/2020
W3526/10/202001/11/2020
W3602/11/202008/11/2020
W3709/11/202015/11/2020
W3816/11/202022/11/2020
W3923/11/202029/11/2020
W4030/11/202006/12/2020
W4107/12/202013/12/2020
W4214/12/202020/12/2020
W4321/12/202027/12/2020
W4428/12/202003/01/2021
W4504/01/202110/01/2021
W4611/01/202117/01/2021
W4718/01/202124/01/2021
W4825/01/202131/01/2021
W4901/02/202107/02/2021
W5008/02/202114/02/2021
W5115/02/202121/02/2021
W5222/02/202128/02/2021
W5301/03/202107/03/2021
W5408/03/202114/03/2021
W5515/03/202121/03/2021
W5622/03/202128/03/2021
W5729/03/202104/04/2021
W5805/04/202111/04/2021
W5912/04/202118/04/2021
W6019/04/202125/04/2021
W6126/04/202102/05/2021
W6203/05/202109/05/2021
W6310/05/202116/05/2021
W6417/05/202123/05/2021
W6524/05/202130/05/2021
W6631/05/202106/06/2021
W6707/06/202113/06/2021

Statistical Analysis

Numbers of cases, deaths, and tests were grouped in a week-based manner (Table S3). The average daily values (also denoted as weekly-averaged values) of cases and deaths were obtained by dividing the total weekly number by seven.
Table S3.

Cases and deaths per week of Phase 1 (blue, W1-W17) and Phase 2 (green, W32-W67). Average daily values were obtained dividing the total weekly number of cases/deaths by seven

WeekAverage number of casesAverage number of deaths
W181146
W22482206
W34913524
W45500758
W54466730
W63916573
W73230537
W82672426
W91853320
W101193239
W11909193
W12632125
W1344890
W1428669
W1528564
W1627341
W1720324
W1818618
W1920713
W2019613
W212409
W222767
W233577
W244785
W257766
W2612686
W2713519
W28144010
W29148614
W30167318
W31220822
W32423226
W33847054
W3415934114
W3526223213
W3632252367
W3734775548
W3832905656
W3925187726
W4020523739
W4116284635
W4215949611
W4313584447
W4415393487
W4517236489
W4614970489
W4712219469
W4812317436
W4911958394
W5012162329
W5112480306
W5216575283
W5320316298
W5422237337
W5521891400
W5620719427
W5719460442
W5814506461
W5914332382
W6013220332
W6111727278
W629492237
W636845189
W644723141
W653403117
W66234668
W67177868
Following our previous study of the time evolution of COVID-19 lethality during the first wave (8,9), our analysis included: Identification of the different phases of the epidemic. On the basis of the inspection of the cases and deaths curves, we conventionally set the end of the first phase on June 28th, 2020, latest day of week 17 (W17); hence, the first phase (also referred to as Phase 1) lasted 17 weeks (119 days). Similarly, the beginning of the second phase (Phase 2) was set on October 5th, 2020, first day of W32; thus, the second phase has lasted 36 weeks so far (252 days). Dissection of the data and analytical modeling of the detected cases/deaths: we first described the lockdown-driven fall of Phase 1 and the initial rise of Phase 2 with a decreasing exponential and a sigmoidal function, respectively. Exponential and sigmoidal functions with calibrated parameters were then used for the falls and rises of all other curves. The temporal shift of the cases/deaths curves was obtained by examining the derived functions. In addition, we performed a sensitivity analysis relying on the sum of squared residuals (SSR) in order to evaluate the quality of the fitting between the aforementioned curves upon specific shifts. Depending on the detected shift at different phases/subphases of the pandemic, the WLR values were calculated by dividing the average daily number of deaths of a given week (Wi) by the average daily number of cases of one week (Wi-1), two weeks (Wi-2), or three weeks (Wi-3) before. In detail, the WLR values were computed applying a 1-week, 2-week, and 3-week shift between positive test and death in the time intervals W1-W33, W34-W41, and W42-W67, respectively. In order to detect the temporal link between positive testing to the virus and death (as done for Phase 1 (8)), we partitioned Phase 2 into three distinct subphases, referred to as 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3, defined on the basis of the peaks detected in the cases/deaths curves on Nov 13th/Dec 3rd, 2020, Jan 6th/8th, 2021, and Mar 12th/Apr 9th, 2021 (Figures 1 and S1), respectively.
Figure 1.

Evolution of the weekly-averaged (A) cases (positive tests) and (B) deaths. Weeks have been numbered according to Table S2.

Figure S1.

Daily evolutions of (A) cases (positive tests) and (B) deaths in the time interval March 2nd, 2020 - June 13th, 2021.

Evolution of the weekly-averaged (A) cases (positive tests) and (B) deaths. Weeks have been numbered according to Table S2. In our post-hoc sensitivity analysis, the application of the temporal 1-week shift scheme – successfully applied to analyze Phase 1 (8) (Figure 2A) – produced a very poor fitting between the cases and deaths curves of Phase 2 (Figure 2B). Better fittings were obtained by applying shifts of two or three weeks to the curve of the cases (Figure 2C and 2D). A closer inspection of the fitting clearly indicates that a unique week shift scheme cannot account for the complexity of Phase 2.
Figure 2.

Comparison of the evolution of the weekly cases (black) and deaths (red) upon normalization of the curves in (A) Phase 1 (W1-W17) and (B-D) Phase 2 (W32-W67) of the pandemic. The normalization was performed by dividing the actual values by the maximum of each ensemble. The curve of cases is 1-week (A, B), 2-week (C), 3-week (D) shifted ahead.

Comparison of the evolution of the weekly cases (black) and deaths (red) upon normalization of the curves in (A) Phase 1 (W1-W17) and (B-D) Phase 2 (W32-W67) of the pandemic. The normalization was performed by dividing the actual values by the maximum of each ensemble. The curve of cases is 1-week (A, B), 2-week (C), 3-week (D) shifted ahead. The analytical modeling of the weekly-averaged cases/deaths in Phase 2 was performed as follows. As a first step: - the lockdown-driven fall of the deaths of Phase 1 was favorably described with a decreasing exponential (Figure S3) the time constant Wfd of which was calibrated to 3.8 weeks to obtain the best agreement between (1) and the real data.
Figure S3.

Modeling of the lockdown-driven fall of Phase 1 and the rise of Subphase 2.1 of the curve of deaths with a decreasing exponential (time constant 3.8) and a sigmoidal (exponent 2.5 and time constant 4.1) function, respectively.

- the initial deaths rise of Subphase 2.1 was described with the sigmoidal function (Figure S3) where the time constant Wr and power factor nr were adjusted to 4.1 weeks and 2.5, respectively (Figure S3); deaths(W40) represents the peak value of this subphase. Subsequently, exponential and sigmoidal functions with the same values for Wfd, Wr, and nr were adopted also to model the deaths falls of Subphases 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, as well as the rises of Subphases 2.2 and 2.3, respectively (Figure 3A). As an example, the fall of Subphase 2.1 was described with and the rise of Subphase 2.2 with Crd2.2 being a fitting parameter tuned to ensure the best matching between the overall model and real data (Figure 3B).
Figure 3.

(A) Modeling of the three subphases of the curve of deaths of Phase 2 with mathematical functions. For the rises, sigmoidal functions making use of exponent 2.5 and time constant 4.1 were exploited. The time constant 3.8 calibrated for the fall of deaths occurring in Phase 1 was also employed for the falls of the three subphases of Phase 2. (B) Model (sum of the 3 modeled subphases) of Phase 2 superimposed to the real data.

(A) Modeling of the three subphases of the curve of deaths of Phase 2 with mathematical functions. For the rises, sigmoidal functions making use of exponent 2.5 and time constant 4.1 were exploited. The time constant 3.8 calibrated for the fall of deaths occurring in Phase 1 was also employed for the falls of the three subphases of Phase 2. (B) Model (sum of the 3 modeled subphases) of Phase 2 superimposed to the real data. A similar strategy was used to model the evolution of the weekly-averaged cases. First, it was noted that the rise of Subphase 2.1 was accurately described by the same sigmoidal function (and same parameters) exploited for the deaths (Figure 4A), i.e., cases(W37) being the peak reached during this subphase. Equation (2) was also used to model the rises of cases of Subphases 2.2 and 2.3 (Figure 4A); as an example, was employed for Subphase 2.2, Crc2.2 being a fitting parameter.
Figure 4.

(A) Modeling of the three subphases of Phase 2 of the curve of cases with mathematical functions. For the rises, sigmoidal functions making use of exponent 2.5 and time constant 4.1 were exploited. The time constant 3.2 was employed for the falls of the three Phase 2 subphases. (B) Model (sum of the 3 modeled subphases) superimposed to the real data.

(A) Modeling of the three subphases of Phase 2 of the curve of cases with mathematical functions. For the rises, sigmoidal functions making use of exponent 2.5 and time constant 4.1 were exploited. The time constant 3.2 was employed for the falls of the three Phase 2 subphases. (B) Model (sum of the 3 modeled subphases) superimposed to the real data. A reasonably faster time constant Wfc=3.2 weeks was adopted in the decreasing exponentials used to describe the falls of cases in Subphases 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 (Figure 4A); as far as Subphase 2.1 is concerned, the exponential function is The deconvolution of the deaths/cases curves also provides a measure of the temporal shift between the positive testing and the fatal event. A comparison of the equations used to fit the experimental data indicates that the rise of the deaths in Subphase 2.1 is shifted two weeks ahead with respect to the corresponding testing: weeks W32 and W30 are indeed used to identify the rise onsets of deaths and cases, respectively. On the other hand, for the subsequent subphases the equations suggest a 3-week shift; as far as Subphase 2.2 is concerned, weeks W38 and W41 are adopted for cases and deaths. These results are in line with those obtained through a comparative analysis performed by shifting the normalized curve of daily cases with respect to the deaths counterpart and calculating the SSR between them; this approach was also exploited to examine Phase 1 in (8). Based on the variable shifts between the curves of deaths/cases detected throughout the pandemic, we adapted the definition of the WLR previously introduced (8) by alternatively considering a 1-week, a 2-week, or a 3-week shift. A regression analysis was performed on the WLR values in the weeks W50-W67 to quantify its decrease. 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed according to a Poisson approximation. The significance level (0.05) of the decrease was assessed by calculating the p-value. Data were analyzed with MATLAB R2014b and R statistical software v. 4.0.0 (11,12). The study did not involve participants and information were gathered from freely accessible public databases, and data were analyzed in aggregated form and without any identifier. Therefore, no ethical approval was required for this research. The analyses adhere to the Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting (GATHER) (13).

Results

Comparative analysis of the evolution of cases and deaths

The inspection of the daily deaths/cases curves (Figures 1 and S1) clearly indicates that the country suffered from two main outbreaks (here denoted as Phase 1 and Phase 2). The first started at the end of February 2020 and ended in the summer of the same year. Moreover, starting from the fall 2020 a second remarkable increase of both cases and deaths was experienced. Although this second phase is progressively regressing, it is still ongoing (June 2021). Notably, the maxima of the deaths curve are pretty similar in the two phases while the maximum of the cases is significantly higher in the second phase compared to the first one. As previously explained, the application of the temporal 1-week shift scheme that was successfully exploited to analyze Phase 1 (8) (Figure 2A) produced a very poor fitting of the curves of Phase 2 (Figure 2B). Better fittings are obtained by using shifts of two or three weeks to the curve of the cases (Figure 2C and 2D). A closer inspection of the fitting clearly indicates that a unique shift scheme cannot account for the complexity of Phase 2. This observation is not surprising considering the remarkable time span of Phase 2 (~9 months). A similar conclusion is reached when the SSR between the normalized daily cases/deaths is calculated upon the systematic shifts of the curve of the cases of Phase 2. As shown in Figure S2, the SSR values present a marked weekly periodicity due to the daily dependence of testing and death registrations. Interestingly, two nearly identical global minima corresponding to shifts of either 13 or 20 days are evident. In this scenario, considering the complexity of Phase 2, we deconvolute the global cases/deaths curves by identifying the underlying curves corresponding to the three subphases (2.1, 2.2., and 2.3) (Figure 3A and Figure 4A). This was done by noticing that the ascending parts of the curves can be described by sigmoidal increases whereas the descending regions are characterized by exponential decreases (see Methods for details). In this framework, the main parameter for the exponential function was derived from the fitting of deaths of the descendent region of Phase 1.
Figure S2.

Sum of squared residuals (SSR) as a function of day shift of the curves in Phase 2 (W32-W67). The normalized curve of the daily cases is shifted ahead with respect to the normalized curve of the daily deaths.

The superposition of the deconvoluted curves (Figure 3B and Figure 4B) shows a remarkable agreement with the real cases/deaths. The only significant discrepancies are observed in the time interval W42-W45 that corresponds to mid-December – mid-January when, due to the holiday season, the recording of cases and deaths was occasionally postponed. Such a deconvolution also provides a measure of the temporal shift between the positive testing and the fatal event. An inspection of the equations used to fit the experimental data indicates that the rise of the deaths in Subphase 2.1 is shifted by two weeks from the corresponding positive testing; in the fitting curve, the parameter W32 or W30 is indeed present for deaths and cases, respectively. On the other hand, for the subsequent weeks the equations suggest a 3-week shift since the parameter in the equations is either W41 (deaths) or W38 (cases). These observations are confirmed by the indications provided by the SSR analysis described above.

Weekly Lethality Rate

Based on the variable shifts between the curves of deaths/cases detected throughout Phase 2, we adapted the definition of the WLR previously introduced (8) by alternatively considering a single week (from W2 to W33) shift, a 2-week shift (from W34 to W41), or a 3-week (from W42 to W67) shift. As shown in Figure 5 and Table S4, we observed significant changes of this parameter in the different stages of the pandemic. In particular, the value of WLR was grossly overestimated (~13.5%) in Phase 1 (8). This is likely due to the severe underestimation of the cases at that time. A WLR value of about 2.6% was observed in most of Phase 2. Interestingly, a slow but significant reduction of this parameter has taken place in the last weeks (W50-W67; February 8th – June 13th, 2021). In particular, at W67 the WLR assumes a value (1.4%) that is almost halved when compared to the nearly constant one detected in the period W34-W49.
Figure 5.

Weekly lethality rate (WLR) evolution in the overall pandemic. The WLR values were calculated applying a 1-week (black and grey), 2-week (red), and 3-week (green) shift between positive test and death in the time intervals W2-W33, W34-W41, and W42-W67, respectively. Values computed for the weeks (W14-W33, W66-W67) with less than 70 weekly-averaged deaths are in light grey. The average WLR value (2.56%) detected in the time interval W34-W49 is shown as a dashed line. The linear regression analysis of the WLR values in the weeks W50-W67 provides a correlation coefficient R=-0.95 (p-value<10-5). The regression line (y = 7.4091 - 0.093675 x) is shown in red.

Table S4.

Weekly lethality rate (WLR) values with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). The WLR values were calculated applying a 1-week, 2-week, and 3-week shift between positive test and death in the time intervals W1-W33, W34-W41, and W42-W67, respectively. WLR values were calculated by dividing the average daily number of deaths of a given week (Wi) by the average daily number of cases of one week (Wi-1), two weeks (Wi-2), or three weeks (Wi-3) before

WeekWLR 1-week shiftWeekWLR 2-week shiftWeekWLR 3-week shift
95% CI 95% CI 95% CI
W225.43(24.1 – 26.8)W342.68(2.5 – 2.9)W422.43(2.4 – 2.5)
W321.10(20.4 – 21.8)W352.51(2.4 – 2.6)W432.18(2.1 – 2.3)
W415.42(15.0 – 15.8)W362.30(2.2 – 2.4)W442.99(2.9 – 3.1)
W513.27(12.9 – 13.6)W372.09(2.0 – 2.2)W453.07(3.0 – 3.2)
W612.83(12.4 – 13.2)W382.03(2.0 – 2.1)W463.60(3.5 – 3.7)
W713.72(13.3 – 14.1)W392.09(2.0 – 2.1)W473.05(2.9 – 3.2)
W813.20(12.7 – 13.7)W402.25(2.2 – 2.3)W482.53(2.4 – 2.6)
W911.98(11.5 – 12.5)W412.52(2.4 – 2.6)W492.63(2.5 – 2.7)
W1012.92(12.3 – 13.6)W502.69(2.6 – 2.8)
W1116.14(15.3 – 17.0)W512.48(2.4 – 2.6)
W1213.78(12.9 – 14.7)W522.37(2.3 – 2.5)
W1314.24(13.2 – 15.4)W532.45(2.3 – 2.6)
W1415.42(14.1 – 16.9)W542.70(2.6 – 2.8)
W1522.25(20.2 – 24.4)W552.41(2.3 – 2.5)
W1614.51(12.9 – 16.3)W562.10(2.0 – 2.2)
W178.63(7.4 – 10.1)W571.99(1.9 – 2.1)
W188.64(7.2 – 10.3)W582.10(2.0 – 2.2)
W197.15(5.8 – 8.8)W591.84(1.8 – 1.9)
W206.28(5.1 – 7.7)W601.70(1.6 – 1.8)
W214.52(3.5 – 5.8)W611.92(1.8 – 2.0)
W222.80(2.1 – 3.7)W621.65(1.6 – 1.7)
W232.64(2.0 – 3.5)W631.43(1.4 – 1.5)
W241.48(1.0 – 2.0)W641.20(1.1 – 1.3)
W251.22(0.9 – 1.7)W651.24(1.2 – 1.3)
W260.74(0.5 – 1.0)W661.00(0.9 – 1.1)
W270.72(0.6 – 0.9)W671.45(1.3 – 1.6)
W280.73(0.6 – 0.9)
W290.96(0.8 – 1.2)
W301.23(1.0 – 1.5)
W311.29(1.1 – 1.5)
W321.16(1.0 – 1.3)
W331.27(1.1 – 1.4)
Weekly lethality rate (WLR) evolution in the overall pandemic. The WLR values were calculated applying a 1-week (black and grey), 2-week (red), and 3-week (green) shift between positive test and death in the time intervals W2-W33, W34-W41, and W42-W67, respectively. Values computed for the weeks (W14-W33, W66-W67) with less than 70 weekly-averaged deaths are in light grey. The average WLR value (2.56%) detected in the time interval W34-W49 is shown as a dashed line. The linear regression analysis of the WLR values in the weeks W50-W67 provides a correlation coefficient R=-0.95 (p-value<10-5). The regression line (y = 7.4091 - 0.093675 x) is shown in red.

Discussion

One of the most striking and worrying features of the COVID-19 pandemic is its unpredictable evolution: with the exception of an extremely limited number of nations that have been able to control the infections, the vast majority of the countries have suffered from phases characterized by a high COVID-19 burden that was alternated with time periods in which the pandemic was essentially under control. This articulated evolution has also been experienced in Italy, the center of the first main outbreak across Western countries. In the initial stage of the pandemic (February – June 2020), quite strong measures were taken by the governmental authorities to severely limit the mobility of people and therefore the diffusion of the infection (2,8). Despite the gross underestimation of cases in the early months of the outbreak (due to the emergency phase and a low capacity of case detecting), the enforcement of severe lockdown restrictions contributed to the clear-cut shape of the curves, with an ascending curve followed by a monotonic descending one (Figure 1). The analogous trends displayed by the curves reporting cases and deaths prompted us to search for a temporal link between them. A remarkable good fitting between these two profiles was obtained when the curve of the cases was shifted by one week (8). The well-defined quantification of this temporal link provided us the opportunity to define a time-dependent WLR that was nearly constant in the first months of the pandemic. The inspection of the WLR profile indicates that, after assuming rather large values (~13.5%) in Phase 1 due to the underestimation of cases, it decreased to very low values (below 1%) during the summer of 2020 (Figure 5). Although the marked reduction in the number of cases/deaths observed in this period makes the calculated WLR less reliable, its drop may be ascribed to different factors including the lockdown measures, the seasonality of viral respiratory diseases, and an increased virus circulation amongst young people who are less susceptible to severe and fatal COVID-19 outcomes (14,15). Therefore, after the initial outbreak and the summer months, when the infections were essentially under control, from fall 2020 Italy suffered a second phase (Phase 2) of the pandemic that is still ongoing. Differently from the first, Phase 2 has been characterized by an intricate evolution with multiple rises and decreases of the infections. On the basis of the peaks that we observed in the curves of both cases and deaths, we were able to identify and model three distinct subphases. As a whole, the shape of the Phase 2 curve mirrored the differences in virus circulation and type of restrictive public health measures compared to Phase 1. From an epidemiological standpoint, in the first half of 2020, the major spread of SARS-CoV-2 was limited to northern regions of the country, which registered the biggest COVID-19 outbreak in terms of both cases and death toll (16); from September 2020, the virus has been circulating across the entire country (14). Again, in order to reduce the social and economic consequences of protracted lockdown restrictions, governmental authorities adopted less-stringent limiting measures, the impact of which was reflected in the curves. A system of region-based risk levels was implemented, which allowed the easing of measures according to a set of indicators (for instance, number of cases and deaths, number of intensive care unit [ICU] admissions, percentage of occupied ICU beds, etc.), with different extents of SARS-CoV-2 circulation across regions and weeks (14). Interestingly, despite the heterogeneity of the data that are separately collected in the twenty-one regions/territories of the country and the complexity of Phase 2, we could quantify the temporal link between cases and deaths. Notably, the shift between the positive testing and the fatal event is longer than that observed in Phase 1 (one week) and is progressively increasing during Phase 2 (two or three weeks). This difference can be ascribed to the improved timeliness of the testing, which was only reserved to people displaying symptoms in Phase 1 and, possibly, to some improvement in the therapeutic interventions that delayed the death in Phase 2. Moreover, the identification of this temporal link gave us the opportunity to evaluate the lethality attributable to COVID-19 in Italy during the whole epidemic period, from March 2020 to June 2021, using complete epidemiological data of SARS-CoV-2 spread in the country. A significant increase of the WLR took place in October 2020, concurrently with a new increase of the virus spread and its following circulation in susceptible populations, like elder individuals or people in fragile states (14,15). From the beginning of Phase 2 to the beginning of February 2021 the WLR assumed a rather constant value (~2.6%) (Figure 5). Starting from mid-February 2021 (W51), the WLR is significantly decreasing. It is important to note in this time interval the WLR practically halved from 2.6 to 1.3%, the value detected at the beginning of June 2021. Notably, this period also coincides with the progressive increase of the vaccination coverage in Italy, primarily in at-risk and susceptible subjects, with a consequent positive impact on COVID-19 burden and lethality reduction (7). Further research is needed to better investigate the impact of vaccines and vaccination campaign on SARS-CoV-2 diffusion and lethality. Some limitations of our study should be acknowledged. First, as for our previous analysis of lethality during the first epidemic wave (8), the research included information measured through surveillance systems where data were provided in aggregated form and without any case stratification; thus, it was not possible to evaluate uncertainty sources and adjust results for potential independent predictors of death, but this research was intended as a straightforward strategy to assess the time-trend of the proportion of cases who died from the disease. Second, the WLR uses the number of subjects that tested positive as population (denominator), thus being influenced by the number of tests performed on a certain time-point. However, the combination of data on a weekly-aggregated manner greatly reduced possible differences across different week-days. Lastly, even if the 1- to 2-week and 2- to 3-week shifts were based on static denominators, the WLR calculated a ratio representing relative rates of deaths which reflect analytical expressions of lethality proxy over time. In conclusion, our study provides interesting insights into the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy by highlighting some distinctive features, in terms of trend complexity of the lethality rate in the different phases of the pandemic. Our approach also documented the impact of the public health measures on SARS-CoV-2 spread and associated lethality, also highlighting the possible positive effect of vaccination efforts, but more studies assessing this hypothesis should be implemented in the near future. The application of the proposed approach could help examine data from other contexts, allowing comparison with the lethality associated with SARS-CoV-2 in other countries.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement.

Authors:  Gretchen A Stevens; Leontine Alkema; Robert E Black; J Ties Boerma; Gary S Collins; Majid Ezzati; John T Grove; Daniel R Hogan; Margaret C Hogan; Richard Horton; Joy E Lawn; Ana Marušić; Colin D Mathers; Christopher J L Murray; Igor Rudan; Joshua A Salomon; Paul J Simpson; Theo Vos; Vivian Welch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Analysis of the time evolution of COVID-19 lethality during the first epidemic wave in Italy.

Authors:  Nicole Balasco; Vincenzo D'Alessandro; Pietro Ferrara; Giovanni Smaldone; Luigi Vitagliano
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-05-12

3.  COVID-19 and healthcare systems: What should we do next?

Authors:  P Ferrara; L Albano
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.427

4.  Differences in the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients who died in hospital during different phases of the pandemic: national data from Italy.

Authors:  Luigi Palmieri; Katie Palmer; Cinzia Lo Noce; Paola Meli; Marina Giuliano; Marco Floridia; Manuela Tamburo de Bella; Andrea Piccioli; Silvio Brusaferro; Graziano Onder
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Response to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers in Italy: a 3-month follow-up.

Authors:  Fabiana Madotto; Sara Conti; Ippazio C Antonazzo; Domenico Ponticelli; Andrea Vitale; Giovanni Della Ragione; Maria L Romano; Mario Borrelli; Beniamino Schiavone; Riccardo Polosa; Pietro Ferrara; Lorenzo G Mantovani
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  The early phase of the COVID-19 epidemic in Lombardy, Italy.

Authors:  Danilo Cereda; Mattia Manica; Marcello Tirani; Francesca Rovida; Vittorio Demicheli; Marco Ajelli; Piero Poletti; Filippo Trentini; Giorgio Guzzetta; Valentina Marziano; Raffaella Piccarreta; Antonio Barone; Michele Magoni; Silvia Deandrea; Giulio Diurno; Massimo Lombardo; Marino Faccini; Angelo Pan; Raffaele Bruno; Elena Pariani; Giacomo Grasselli; Alessandra Piatti; Maria Gramegna; Fausto Baldanti; Alessia Melegaro; Stefano Merler
Journal:  Epidemics       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 7.  The emergence of COVID-19 as a global pandemic: Understanding the epidemiology, immune response and potential therapeutic targets of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Shibi Muralidar; Senthil Visaga Ambi; Saravanan Sekaran; Uma Maheswari Krishnan
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.079

Review 8.  Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines and Monoclonal Antibodies Facing Viral Variants.

Authors:  Ahlam Chaqroun; Cédric Hartard; Evelyne Schvoerer
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.048

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Time-Varying Effect of Hybrid Immunity on the Risk of Breakthrough Infection after Booster Dose of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine: The MOSAICO Study.

Authors:  Pietro Ferrara; Domenico Ponticelli; Roberto Magliuolo; Mario Borrelli; Beniamino Schiavone; Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.