Grant A Mackenzie1,2,3,4, Isaac Osei5,6, Rasheed Salaudeen5, Ilias Hossain5, Benjamin Young5, Ousman Secka5, Umberto D'Alessandro5,6, Arto A Palmu7, Jukka Jokinen7, Jason Hinds8,9, Stefan Flasche10, Kim Mulholland11,12,10, Cattram Nguyen11, Brian Greenwood6. 1. Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Fajara, Gambia. gmackenzie@mrc.gm. 2. Faculty of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. gmackenzie@mrc.gm. 3. Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia. gmackenzie@mrc.gm. 4. Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. gmackenzie@mrc.gm. 5. Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Fajara, Gambia. 6. Faculty of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 7. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland. 8. Institute for Infection and Immunity St George's University of London, London, UK. 9. BUGS Bioscience, London Bioscience Innovation Centre, London, UK. 10. Faculty of Epidemiology and Public Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 11. Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia. 12. Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) effectively prevent pneumococcal disease but the global impact of pneumococcal vaccination is hampered by the cost of PCV. The relevance and feasibility of trials of reduced dose schedules is greatest in middle- and low-income countries, such as The Gambia, where PCV has been introduced with good disease control but where transmission of vaccine-type pneumococci persists. We are conducting a large cluster-randomised, non-inferiority, field trial of an alternative reduced dose schedule of PCV compared to the standard schedule, the PVS trial. METHODS: PVS is a prospective, cluster-randomised, non-inferiority, real-world field trial of an alternative schedule of one dose of PCV scheduled at age 6 weeks with a booster dose at age 9 months (i.e. the alternative '1 + 1' schedule) compared to the standard schedule of three primary doses scheduled at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age (i.e. the standard '3 + 0' schedule). The intervention will be delivered for 4 years. The primary endpoint is the population-level prevalence of nasopharyngeal vaccine-type pneumococcal carriage in children aged 2 weeks to 59 months with clinical pneumonia in year 4 of the trial. Participants and field staff are not masked to group allocation while measurement of the laboratory endpoint will be masked. Sixty-eight geographic population clusters have been randomly allocated, in a 1:1 ratio, to each schedule and all resident infants are eligible for enrolment. All resident children less than 5 years of age are under continuous surveillance for clinical safety endpoints measured at 11 health facilities; invasive pneumococcal disease, radiological pneumonia, clinical pneumonia, and hospitalisations. Secondary endpoints include the population-level prevalence of nasopharyngeal vaccine-type pneumococcal carriage in years 2 and 4 and vaccine-type carriage prevalence in unimmunised infants aged 6-12 weeks in year 4. The trial includes components of mathematical modelling, health economics, and health systems research. DISCUSSION: Analysis will account for potential non-independence of measurements by cluster, comparing the population-level impact of the two schedules with interpretation at the individual level. The non-inferiority margin is informed by the 'acceptable loss of effect' of the alternative compared to the standard schedule. The secondary endpoints will provide substantial evidence to support the interpretation of the primary endpoint. PVS will evaluate the effect of transition from a standard 3+ 0 schedule to an alternative 1 + 1 schedule in a setting of high pneumococcal transmission. The results of PVS will inform global decision-making concerning the use of reduced-dose PCV schedules. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number 15056916 . Registered on 15 November 2018.
BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) effectively prevent pneumococcal disease but the global impact of pneumococcal vaccination is hampered by the cost of PCV. The relevance and feasibility of trials of reduced dose schedules is greatest in middle- and low-income countries, such as The Gambia, where PCV has been introduced with good disease control but where transmission of vaccine-type pneumococci persists. We are conducting a large cluster-randomised, non-inferiority, field trial of an alternative reduced dose schedule of PCV compared to the standard schedule, the PVS trial. METHODS: PVS is a prospective, cluster-randomised, non-inferiority, real-world field trial of an alternative schedule of one dose of PCV scheduled at age 6 weeks with a booster dose at age 9 months (i.e. the alternative '1 + 1' schedule) compared to the standard schedule of three primary doses scheduled at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age (i.e. the standard '3 + 0' schedule). The intervention will be delivered for 4 years. The primary endpoint is the population-level prevalence of nasopharyngeal vaccine-type pneumococcal carriage in children aged 2 weeks to 59 months with clinical pneumonia in year 4 of the trial. Participants and field staff are not masked to group allocation while measurement of the laboratory endpoint will be masked. Sixty-eight geographic population clusters have been randomly allocated, in a 1:1 ratio, to each schedule and all resident infants are eligible for enrolment. All resident children less than 5 years of age are under continuous surveillance for clinical safety endpoints measured at 11 health facilities; invasive pneumococcal disease, radiological pneumonia, clinical pneumonia, and hospitalisations. Secondary endpoints include the population-level prevalence of nasopharyngeal vaccine-type pneumococcal carriage in years 2 and 4 and vaccine-type carriage prevalence in unimmunised infants aged 6-12 weeks in year 4. The trial includes components of mathematical modelling, health economics, and health systems research. DISCUSSION: Analysis will account for potential non-independence of measurements by cluster, comparing the population-level impact of the two schedules with interpretation at the individual level. The non-inferiority margin is informed by the 'acceptable loss of effect' of the alternative compared to the standard schedule. The secondary endpoints will provide substantial evidence to support the interpretation of the primary endpoint. PVS will evaluate the effect of transition from a standard 3+ 0 schedule to an alternative 1 + 1 schedule in a setting of high pneumococcal transmission. The results of PVS will inform global decision-making concerning the use of reduced-dose PCV schedules. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number 15056916 . Registered on 15 November 2018.
Authors: Catherine Satzke; Paul Turner; Anni Virolainen-Julkunen; Peter V Adrian; Martin Antonio; Kim M Hare; Ana Maria Henao-Restrepo; Amanda J Leach; Keith P Klugman; Barbara D Porter; Raquel Sá-Leão; J Anthony Scott; Hanna Nohynek; Katherine L O'Brien Journal: Vaccine Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Sylvia H Yeh; Alejandra Gurtman; David C Hurley; Stan L Block; Richard H Schwartz; Scott Patterson; Kathrin U Jansen; Jack Love; William C Gruber; Emilio A Emini; Daniel A Scott Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-08-23 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Nick J Andrews; Pauline A Waight; Polly Burbidge; Emma Pearce; Lucy Roalfe; Marta Zancolli; Mary Slack; Shamez N Ladhani; Elizabeth Miller; David Goldblatt Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: B M Althouse; L L Hammitt; L Grant; B G Wagner; R Reid; F Larzelere-Hinton; R Weatherholtz; K P Klugman; G L Rodgers; K L O'Brien; H Hu Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: Daniel M Weinberger; Virginia E Pitzer; Gili Regev-Yochay; Noga Givon-Lavi; Ron Dagan Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Eleanor F G Neal; Stefan Flasche; Cattram D Nguyen; F Tupou Ratu; Eileen M Dunne; Lanieta Koyamaibole; Rita Reyburn; Eric Rafai; Mike Kama; Belinda D Ortika; Laura K Boelsen; Joseph Kado; Lisi Tikoduadua; Rachel Devi; Evelyn Tuivaga; Catherine Satzke; E Kim Mulholland; W John Edmunds; Fiona M Russell Journal: Vaccine Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 3.641