| Literature DB >> 35073968 |
Patrice Rosengrave1,2, Emma Spencer1, Jonathan Williman3, Jan Mehrtens4, Stacey Morgan4, Tara Doyle4, Kymbalee Van Der Heyden4, Anna Morris4, Geoff Shaw4, Anitra C Carr5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intravenous vitamin C administration in septic shock may have a sparing effect on vasopressor requirements, and vitamin C's enzyme cofactor functions provide a mechanistic rationale. Our study aimed to determine the effect of intravenous vitamin C administration on vasopressor requirements and other outcomes in patients with septic shock.Entities:
Keywords: ICU length of stay; Noradrenaline; Sepsis; Septic shock; Vasopressor; Vitamin C
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35073968 PMCID: PMC8786621 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03900-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Care ISSN: 1364-8535 Impact factor: 9.097
Fig. 1CONSORT flow diagram
Participant characteristics at baseline
| Total (n = 40) | Intervention (n = 20) | Placebo (n = 20) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male) | 27 (67) | 16 (80) | 11 (55) |
| Age (years) | 68 (61, 75) | 69 (64, 76) | 66 (57, 71) |
| Weight (kg) | 80 (72, 98) | 80 (72, 86) | 86 (70, 98) |
| Abdominal | 14 (35) | 8 (40) | 6 (30) |
| Pulmonary | 9 (23) | 3 (15) | 6 (30) |
| Skin/soft tissue | 7 (18) | 4 (20) | 3 (15) |
| Blood | 7 (18) | 3 (15) | 4 (20) |
| Urinary tract | 3 (8) | 2 (10) | 1 (5) |
| Other/unknown | 3 (8) | 1 (5) | 2 (10) |
| SAPS 2 | 50 (41, 58) | 50 (41, 59) | 49 (42, 58) |
| APACHE-III | 84 (73, 97) | 85 (76, 98) | 81 (70, 95) |
| SOFA Score | 9.0 (7.0, 10) | 8.5 (6.8, 11) | 9.0 (7.8, 10) |
| Vasopressor dose (units/min) a | 1.4 (0.7, 2.4) | 1.4 (0.7, 2.8) | 1.2 (0.8, 2.3) |
| Core temperature (°C) | 37 (37, 38) | 37 (37, 38) | 37 (37, 38) |
| Heart rate (beats/min) | 98 (80, 116) | 100 (89, 116) | 94 (80, 113) |
| Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) | 73 (68, 86) | 73 (69, 86) | 77 (76, 86) |
| PaO2 | 76 (65, 105) | 77 (65, 109) | 76 (65, 102) |
| FiO2 | 0.4 (0.3, 0.6) | 0.4 (0.3, 0.6) | 0.4 (0.3, 0.6) |
| PaO2/FiO2 | 195 (142, 309) | 223 (141, 308) | 188 (144, 302) |
| Lactate (mmol/L) | 2.0 (1.2, 3.4) | 2.2 (1.2, 3.1) | 1.9 (1.3, 3.4) |
| Creatinine (µmol/L) | 203 (108, 295) | 222 (114, 308) | 193 (97, 268) |
| White cell count (× 109/L) | 13 (7.2, 21) | 8.4 (5.1, 18) | 15 (12, 22) |
| Any comorbidity | 6 (15) | 3 (15) | 3 (15) |
Data represent n (%) or median (Q1, Q3)
APACHE acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, SOFA sequential organ failure assessment, SAPS simplified acute physiology score, FiO fraction of inspired oxygen, PaO arterial partial pressure of oxygen
aVasopressor comprises a combination of noradrenaline, adrenaline, and vasopressin
Fig. 2Plasma vitamin C concentrations for patients with septic shock who received intravenous vitamin C relative to placebo. Intravenous vitamin C was administered at a dose of 25 mg/kg six-hourly, and blood samples were collected daily to analyse vitamin C concentrations by HPLC. Box plots show median values with 25th and 75th percentiles as boundaries and whiskers indicate range; circles indicate mean values and 95% CI
Fig. 3Dose and duration of intravenous vasopressors delivered to patients with septic shock by treatment group. a Dot plot of mean vasopressor dose (units/min) delivered over the four-day study period (96 h) or until death by treatment group. Filled circles represent mean dose for each individual patient, black diamond with vertical line represent group means with 95% CIs. b Kaplan Meier plot of time from randomisation until cessation of vasopressor therapy by treatment groups. There was no significant difference between the patients who received intravenous vitamin C and those who received the placebo in mean dose (p = 0.35) nor duration (p = 0.64) of vasopressor administration. See Additional file 1: Figure S1 for the individual data
Fig. 4Kaplan–Meier plot for ICU length of stay of the study participants. Lines (bands) indicate the percentage of patients (95% CIs) still in ICU by time in days since study randomisation. Crosses indicate participants censored for death. There was no significant difference between the intervention and placebo groups (p = 0.12, log rank test)