INTRODUCTION: The interindividual variability of the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel is determined by multiple clinical and genetic factors. A lot of genotype-oriented studies have concentrated on the impact of CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms on platelet aggregation in patients receiving clopidogrel. However, the influence of this polymorphism may be only 12-20%, so other genetic markers should also be investigated. The aim of this work was to study the impact of carriage of CES1, PON1, ABCG2, CYP4F2, CYP3A4, IGTB3, P2Y12, PEAR1, and B4GALT2 polymorphisms on antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: 103 patients who underwent ACS with or without percutaneous coronary intervention and concomitant nonvalvular AF were included in an open multicenter prospective study to assess efficacy and safety of combined antithrombotic therapy. The study assessed the frequency of different primary clinical outcomes (incidence of major bleeding, hospital mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), renal mortality) and secondary outcomes (resistance to therapy - high residual platelet reactivity, excessive platelet suppression). Residual platelet reactivity was examined using the VerifyNow system (Accumetrics, Latham, NY, USA). RESULTS: None of the studied genetic markers had no statistically significant effect on the antiaggregant response to clopidogrel in patients with ACS and AF. However, CYP4F2 C(Val433Met) T, PEAR1 rs41273215 C>T were statistically significantly associated with an increased frequency of bleeding on antithrombotic therapy. B4GALT2 rs1061781 was statistically significantly associated with increased frequency of strokes and TIA. CONCLUSION: In our study, we determined that carriers of CYP4F2 gene polymorphisms C(Val433Met)T, PEAR1 rs41273215 C>T (CT+TT) were associated with lower safety of antithrombotic therapy in patients with ACS and AF. And, the B4GALT2 rs1061781 gene polymorphism was associated with a greater risk of insufficient efficacy of the therapy. The data obtained in our study may improve the understanding of the effect of less studied genetic markers on the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic therapy in patients with ACS and AF.
INTRODUCTION: The interindividual variability of the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel is determined by multiple clinical and genetic factors. A lot of genotype-oriented studies have concentrated on the impact of CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms on platelet aggregation in patients receiving clopidogrel. However, the influence of this polymorphism may be only 12-20%, so other genetic markers should also be investigated. The aim of this work was to study the impact of carriage of CES1, PON1, ABCG2, CYP4F2, CYP3A4, IGTB3, P2Y12, PEAR1, and B4GALT2 polymorphisms on antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: 103 patients who underwent ACS with or without percutaneous coronary intervention and concomitant nonvalvular AF were included in an open multicenter prospective study to assess efficacy and safety of combined antithrombotic therapy. The study assessed the frequency of different primary clinical outcomes (incidence of major bleeding, hospital mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), renal mortality) and secondary outcomes (resistance to therapy - high residual platelet reactivity, excessive platelet suppression). Residual platelet reactivity was examined using the VerifyNow system (Accumetrics, Latham, NY, USA). RESULTS: None of the studied genetic markers had no statistically significant effect on the antiaggregant response to clopidogrel in patients with ACS and AF. However, CYP4F2 C(Val433Met) T, PEAR1 rs41273215 C>T were statistically significantly associated with an increased frequency of bleeding on antithrombotic therapy. B4GALT2 rs1061781 was statistically significantly associated with increased frequency of strokes and TIA. CONCLUSION: In our study, we determined that carriers of CYP4F2 gene polymorphisms C(Val433Met)T, PEAR1 rs41273215 C>T (CT+TT) were associated with lower safety of antithrombotic therapy in patients with ACS and AF. And, the B4GALT2 rs1061781 gene polymorphism was associated with a greater risk of insufficient efficacy of the therapy. The data obtained in our study may improve the understanding of the effect of less studied genetic markers on the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic therapy in patients with ACS and AF.