Yu Guo1, Sung-Min Cho2, Zhiliang Wei3, Qihong Wang1, Hiren R Modi1, Payam Gharibani4, Hanzhang Lu1,3, Nitish V Thakor1, Romergryko G Geocadin5. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Departments of Neurology, Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe Street, Phipps 455, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. 3. Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Departments of Neurology, Division of Neuroimmunology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 5. Departments of Neurology, Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe Street, Phipps 455, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. rgeocad1@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cerebral blood flow (CBF) plays an important role in neurological recovery after cardiac arrest (CA) resuscitation. However, the variations of CBF recovery in distinct brain regions and its correlation with neurologic recovery after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) have not been characterized. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of regional cerebral reperfusion following resuscitation in predicting neurological recovery. METHODS: Twelve adult male Wistar rats were studied, ten resuscitated from 7-min asphyxial CA and two uninjured rats, which were designated as healthy controls (HCs). Dynamic changes in CBF in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum were assessed by pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging, starting at 60 min after ROSC to 156 min (or time to spontaneous arousal). Neurologic outcomes were evaluated by the neurologic deficit scale at 24 h post-ROSC in a blinded manner. Correlations between regional CBF (rCBF) and neurological recovery were undertaken. RESULTS: All post-CA animals were found to be nonresponsive during the 60-156 min post ROSC, with reductions in rCBF by 24-42% compared with HC. Analyses of rCBF during the post-ROSC time window from 60 to 156 min showed the rCBF recovery of hippocampus and thalamus were positively associated with better neurological outcomes (rs = 0.82, p = 0.004 and rs = 0.73, p < 0.001, respectively). During 96 min before arousal, thalamic and cortical rCBF exhibited positive correlations with neurological recovery (rs = 0.80, p < 0.001 and rs = 0.65, p < 0.001, respectively); for predicting a favorable neurological outcome, the thalamic rCBF threshold was above 50.84 ml/100 g/min (34% of HC) (area under the curve of 0.96), whereas the cortical rCBF threshold was above 60.43 ml/100 g/min (38% of HC) (area under the curve of 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Early magnetic resonance imaging analyses showed early rCBF recovery in thalamus, hippocampus, and cortex post ROSC was positively correlated with neurological outcomes at 24 h. Our findings suggest new translational insights into the regional reperfusion and the time window that may be critical in neurological recovery and warrant further validation.
BACKGROUND: Cerebral blood flow (CBF) plays an important role in neurological recovery after cardiac arrest (CA) resuscitation. However, the variations of CBF recovery in distinct brain regions and its correlation with neurologic recovery after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) have not been characterized. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of regional cerebral reperfusion following resuscitation in predicting neurological recovery. METHODS: Twelve adult male Wistar rats were studied, ten resuscitated from 7-min asphyxial CA and two uninjured rats, which were designated as healthy controls (HCs). Dynamic changes in CBF in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum were assessed by pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging, starting at 60 min after ROSC to 156 min (or time to spontaneous arousal). Neurologic outcomes were evaluated by the neurologic deficit scale at 24 h post-ROSC in a blinded manner. Correlations between regional CBF (rCBF) and neurological recovery were undertaken. RESULTS: All post-CA animals were found to be nonresponsive during the 60-156 min post ROSC, with reductions in rCBF by 24-42% compared with HC. Analyses of rCBF during the post-ROSC time window from 60 to 156 min showed the rCBF recovery of hippocampus and thalamus were positively associated with better neurological outcomes (rs = 0.82, p = 0.004 and rs = 0.73, p < 0.001, respectively). During 96 min before arousal, thalamic and cortical rCBF exhibited positive correlations with neurological recovery (rs = 0.80, p < 0.001 and rs = 0.65, p < 0.001, respectively); for predicting a favorable neurological outcome, the thalamic rCBF threshold was above 50.84 ml/100 g/min (34% of HC) (area under the curve of 0.96), whereas the cortical rCBF threshold was above 60.43 ml/100 g/min (38% of HC) (area under the curve of 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Early magnetic resonance imaging analyses showed early rCBF recovery in thalamus, hippocampus, and cortex post ROSC was positively correlated with neurological outcomes at 24 h. Our findings suggest new translational insights into the regional reperfusion and the time window that may be critical in neurological recovery and warrant further validation.
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Paul Muntner; Alvaro Alonso; Marcio S Bittencourt; Clifton W Callaway; April P Carson; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Sandeep R Das; Francesca N Delling; Luc Djousse; Mitchell S V Elkind; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Sadiya S Khan; Brett M Kissela; Kristen L Knutson; Tak W Kwan; Daniel T Lackland; Tené T Lewis; Judith H Lichtman; Chris T Longenecker; Matthew Shane Loop; Pamela L Lutsey; Seth S Martin; Kunihiro Matsushita; Andrew E Moran; Michael E Mussolino; Martin O'Flaherty; Ambarish Pandey; Amanda M Perak; Wayne D Rosamond; Gregory A Roth; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Emily B Schroeder; Svati H Shah; Nicole L Spartano; Andrew Stokes; David L Tirschwell; Connie W Tsao; Mintu P Turakhia; Lisa B VanWagner; John T Wilkins; Sally S Wong; Salim S Virani Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: K Kawai; L Nitecka; C A Ruetzler; G Nagashima; F Joó; G Mies; T S Nowak; N Saito; J M Lohr; I Klatzo Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 1992-03 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Tomas Drabek; Lesley M Foley; Andreas Janata; Jason Stezoski; T Kevin Hitchens; Mioara D Manole; Patrick M Kochanek Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2014-04-12 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Jerry P Nolan; Robert W Neumar; Christophe Adrie; Mayuki Aibiki; Robert A Berg; Bernd W Böttiger; Clifton Callaway; Robert S B Clark; Romergryko G Geocadin; Edward C Jauch; Karl B Kern; Ivan Laurent; W T Longstreth; Raina M Merchant; Peter Morley; Laurie J Morrison; Vinay Nadkarni; Mary Ann Peberdy; Emanuel P Rivers; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; Frank W Sellke; Christian Spaulding; Kjetil Sunde; Terry Vanden Hoek Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2008-10-28 Impact factor: 5.262