Thakshila Liyanage1, Bayan Alharbi1, Linh Quan2, Aurora Esquela-Kerscher2, Gymama Slaughter1. 1. Center for Bioelectronics, Bioelectronics Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23508, United States. 2. Leroy T. Canoles Jr. Cancer Research Center, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States.
Abstract
A tapered optical fiber (TOF) plasmonic biosensor was fabricated and used for the sensitive detection of a panel of microRNAs (miRNAs) in human serum obtained from noncancer and prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Oncogenic and tumor suppressor miRNAs let-7a, let-7c, miR-200b, miR-141, and miR-21 were tested as predictive cancer biomarkers since multianalyte detection minimizes false-positive and false-negative rates and establishes a strong foundation for early PCa diagnosis. The biosensing platform integrates metallic gold triangular nanoprisms (AuTNPs) laminated on the TOF to excite surface plasmon waves in the supporting metallic layer and enhance the evanescent mode of the fiber surface. This sensitive TOF plasmonic biosensor as a point-of-care (POC) cancer diagnostic tool enabled the detection of the panel of miRNAs in seven patient serums without any RNA extraction or sample amplification. The TOF plasmonic biosensor could detect miRNAs in human serum with a limit of detection between 179 and 580 aM and excellent selectivity. Statistical studies were obtained to differentiate cancerous from noncancerous samples with a p-value <0.0001. This high-throughput TOF plasmonic biosensor has the potential to expand and advance POC diagnostics for the early diagnosis of cancer.
A tapered optical fiber (TOF) plasmonic biosensor was fabricated and used for the sensitive detection of a panel of microRNAs (miRNAs) in human serum obtained from noncancer and prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Oncogenic and tumor suppressor miRNAs let-7a, let-7c, miR-200b, miR-141, and miR-21 were tested as predictive cancer biomarkers since multianalyte detection minimizes false-positive and false-negative rates and establishes a strong foundation for early PCa diagnosis. The biosensing platform integrates metallic gold triangular nanoprisms (AuTNPs) laminated on the TOF to excite surface plasmon waves in the supporting metallic layer and enhance the evanescent mode of the fiber surface. This sensitive TOF plasmonic biosensor as a point-of-care (POC) cancer diagnostic tool enabled the detection of the panel of miRNAs in seven patient serums without any RNA extraction or sample amplification. The TOF plasmonic biosensor could detect miRNAs in human serum with a limit of detection between 179 and 580 aM and excellent selectivity. Statistical studies were obtained to differentiate cancerous from noncancerous samples with a p-value <0.0001. This high-throughput TOF plasmonic biosensor has the potential to expand and advance POC diagnostics for the early diagnosis of cancer.
Cancer is the second leading
cause of death globally, and it costs
our nation too many lives and consumes resources. In 2018, 9.6 million
people died from this disease.[1] Among all
of the cancers, breast cancer and prostate cancer (PCa) are the two
most diagnosed cancers in women and men, respectively. PCa is the
second most frequent malignancy in men with over 1.3 million new cases
and 358 989 deaths worldwide, thereby representing 3.8% of
all deaths caused by cancer in men in 2018.[2] The majority of PCa is adenocarcinoma, which appears in the secretory
epithelial cells of prostatic ducts.[3] Currently,
a symptom-based approach is used to diagnose PCa followed by an identification
blood test to detect the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration
level in the serum. When the PSA level exceeds the threshold concentration
of 4 ng/mL, further investigation is necessitated via a digital rectal
examination and tissue biopsy. These approaches are invasive, increase
discomfort levels for patients, and can carry procedural risks.[4] However, the biggest burden associated with PSA
screening is that two-thirds of positive PSA tests are in fact false
positives due to the low specificity of the PSA biomarker for PCa
and one-fifth of PSA testing results in false negatives, missing men
with significant PCa disease. Although biomarker-based diagnostics
continue to play an important role in the detection of cancer, biomarkers
with high specificity to PCa have not been explored. Therefore, there
is an unmet need for a noninvasive PCa test that can distinguish healthy
vs. cancerous cells more specifically than PSA.Early diagnosis
using biomarkers specific to PCa can greatly enhance
the PCa survival rate and minimize the cost associated with the overall
treatment.[5,6] MicroRNAs (MiRNAs) as biomarkers have garnered
significant attention because of the critical role they play in various
physiological and pathological progresses, including carcinogenesis.[7−13] MiRNAs are small noncoding RNAs of ∼19 to 22 nucleotides
in length, which are capable of modulating gene activity at the post-transcriptional
level. MiRNAs are commonly dysregulated in tissues and fluids (i.e.,
serum) of cancer patients compared to normal populations, and these
expression profiles closely correlate with disease aggressiveness,
disease prognosis, and therapy response.[14] Functional studies indicate that aberrant miRNA expression directly
impacts prostate tumorigenesis by targeting factors that control cell
cycle progression, apoptosis, DNA repair, differentiation, androgen
signaling, angiogenesis, hypoxia, and chromatin remodeling. Oncogenic
miRNAs are commonly overexpressed in PCa patients and promote cancer
development by blocking tumor suppressor genes (i.e., TP53, PTEN).
Similarly, prostate tumor suppressor miRNAs are underexpressed in
cancer patients and act to inhibit malignant growth by targeting oncogenic
factors and regulate cancer cell differentiation or apoptosis.[15,16] Mass-spectrometry imaging has gained significant attention for the
development of label-free chemical imaging approaches in biological
samples.[17−19] Laser desorption/ionization mass-spectrometry (LDI-MS)-based
metabolic fingerprinting was recently explored for the diagnosis medulloblastoma,
wherein the machine learning algorithm implemented correctly differentiated
medulloblastoma patients from healthy controls using a panel of serum
metabolite biomarkers.[18] Pei et al. demonstrated
LDI-MS-based metabolic fingerprinting in successfully diagnosing gynecological
cancers.[19] However, these techniques require
sophisticated instrumentation and sample pretreatment prior to imaging
and thus further limit point-of-care testing.Different from
LDI-MS, optical biosensors have been demonstrated
to simplify the assay and enable the direct detection of nucleic acids.[20,21] Quantitative measurement of miRNAs has been achieved with microarrays
and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) technologies;
however, these techniques are expensive and labor-intensive, requiring
sample preparation and amplification steps.[22] Consequently, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) continues
to garner significant attention as a powerful tool for measuring metabolites
in biological fluids.[23,24] To enhance the performance of
surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)-based immunoassay, a linear
support vector machine algorithm was demonstrated to successfully
classify PCa, benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), and healthy subjects
using SERS-based immunoassay with an accuracy rate of 50% using serum
PSA, and the classification performance increased to 70% when multiple
tumor markers were used,[23] thereby illustrating
the effectiveness of machine learning in analyzing multiple tumor
biomarkers in serum and its potential application in point-of-care
testing.In our previous work, we reported on the successful
fabrication
of a tapered optical fiber (TOF) plasmonic biosensors for detection
of a panel of prostate tumor suppressor and oncogenic miRNAs (let-7a,
let-7c, miR-141, miR-21, miR-200b) diluted in standard buffered solution.
Since TOFs are very sensitive to changes in the surrounding refractive
index and the input light wavelength, we employed highly sensitive
metallic nanostructure laminated on the TOF region to enhance the
evanescent field to make the biosensor more sensitive to the local
surface plasmon waves.[25] Herein, we report
the improved use of TOF plasmonic biosensors to achieve highly sensitive
and specific detection of miRNAs in PCa patient biological fluids
(serum) while mitigating nonspecific binding for surface-based biosensors.
Poly(ethylene glycol)-thiol (PEG-SH) was used as a spacer molecule
to minimize nonspecific adsorption of endogenous biomolecules and
provided excellent antifouling effects. The use of the TOF plasmonic
biosensor enabled the sensitive detection of a panel of miRNAs in
seven patient serums representing noncancer, low-risk, and high-risk
PCa, and expression profiling did not require RNA extraction or sample
amplification. Expression profiles for let-7a and let-7c obtained
by qRT-PCR correlated with the biosensor data. This work implicates
the possibility of using TOF plasmonic biosensors for rapid and noninvasive
diagnostic screening and early PCa detection using multianalyte detection
of miRNAs biomarkers to minimize false-positive and false-negative
rates and establish a strong foundation for early PCa diagnosis.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Chloro(triethyl
phosphine)
gold (I) (Et3PAuCl, 97%), poly(methylhydrosiloxane) (PMHS, Mn = 1700–3300),
and triethylamine (TEA, 98%) were procured from Sigma-Aldrich. ACS
grade acetonitrile (CH3CN, 99.9%), ethanol (22 proof), and (3-mercaptopropyl)-trimethoxysilane
(MPTES, 94%) were procured from Thermo Scientific and used as received.
Synthesized single-stranded DNA (ssDNAs) and miRNA oligonucleotides
(hsa-let-7a, hsa-let-7c, hsa-miR-141-3p,
hsa-miR-21-5p, hsa-miR-200b-3p) were procured from Integrated DNA
Technologies.
Spectroscopy and Microscopy
Characterizations
Absorption and extinction spectra in the
range of 400–1000
nm were collected with a Spectra. Max M5 microplate reader from Molecular
Devices, LLC. Extinction spectra of AuNPs, in the solution phase,
were measured to determine the LSPR peak position (λLSPR). For the calibration study, all transmission spectra were obtained
in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for all TOF using a Superk Compact
supercontinuum lasers in the range of 450–2400 nm and a compact
Czerny-Turner CCD spectrometer (CCS200, Thorlabs Inc.) as the laser
source and detector, respectively, at room temperature. The resulting
spectra were displayed on the computer for visualization.
Fabrication and Functionalized TOF
The tapered fiber
was fabricated using a tapering rig system (Aerotech
PR0115SL system) to form the TOF structure. Briefly, the middle section
of a 1 m length single-mode fiber (SMF) was stripped of the polymer
buffer coating material and cleaned with acetone prior to stretching
through flame brushing technique and placed on the tapering rig system.[25] A butane flame was used to heat the fiber while
pulling the fiber in the x–y direction and oscillating the butane flame in the z-direction (5,10,15) for 30 s to achieve a constant waist diameter.
The 3 cm region of the fabricated TOF was transitioned from a diameter
of 125 μm to a taper waist diameter of ∼5 μm. The
fabricated TOF was then carefully removed from the stage and mounted
on a Teflon substrate that consisted of a 48 mm × 6 mm ×
2 mm (l × w × d) cell to contain the analyte within the tapered region
for surface functionalization and miRNA profiling (Scheme A). The substrate surface was
sealed with poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) while exposing inlets and
outlets.
Scheme 1
(A) Schematic Representation of the Fabricated Tapered Optical
Fiber
(TOF) Biosensing Platform. (B) Gold Triangular Nanoprisms (AuTNPs)
Covalently Bonded to the TOF. (C) Immobilized Single-Stranded DNA
(ssDNA) and Poly(ethylene Glycol)-Thiol (PEG-SH) as Bioreceptor and
Spacer, Respectively. (D) Hybridization of Target miRNA to ssDNA in
a Complex Serum Environment that Contains Other Endogenous Biomolecules
Functionalization of TOF
The TOF
was separately functionalized through two steps: MPTMS derivatization
and gold triangular nanoprism (AuTNP) lamination. In the former step,
TOFs were cleaned in a mixture of HCl/MeOH (1:1) followed by copious
washing in DI water and dried in air for 3 h. The dried TOFs were
immersed in 15% MPTMS–ethanol solution for 30 min followed
by an ethanol rinse to remove unbound MPTMS from the TOF surface.
In the later step, we synthesized AuTNPs by following previously published
methods.16. Briefly, 10 mg of Et3PAu(I)Cl was dissolved
in 40 mL of CH3CN and stirred at medium speed for 5–10
min at room temperature. Then, 0.038 mL of TEA was added to the reaction
mixture and heated gradually to 40 °C for 20 min. Then, 0.6 mL
of PMHS was added to the solution and stirred for 3 h. The resulting
solution was centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 40 min to remove the unreacted
PMHS, and the obtained precipitation was redissolved in ultrapure
water and analyzed using UV visible spectroscopy. The derivatized
TOF was placed in 800 μL of AuTNPs for 1 h to laminate the TOF
with Au nanostructures.
Biosensor Detection of
miRNAs
The
AuTNP-laminated TOFs were separately incubated in the respective 5
μM complementary ssDNA probe solution (ssDNA-HS-(CH2)n-X/SH (where X is the complementary base pairs
for the target miRNA)) and 0.1 M tris(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP)
solution for 1 h to reduce disulfide to thiol. A 1 mM poly(ethylene
glycol)-thiol (PEG-SH (1:1000)) solution was added and allowed to
react overnight, followed by rinsing in PBS to remove any unbound
reactants. The resulting ssDNA/PEG-functionalized TOF serves as the
TOF plasmonic biosensor ready for the detection of target miRNA molecules
from human serum samples.
Human Serum Samples
The deidentified
human serum samples were obtained from the Eastern Virginia Medical
School (EVMS) Biorepository under protocols was approved by the EVMS
Institutional Review Board and in accordance with NIH guidelines and
HIPAA regulations. Serum was grouped based on pathological grade:
noncancer (three patients), low-risk cancer group (pT2a, Gleason 6,
ISUP Grade Group 1; two patients), and high-risk cancer group (pT3,
Gleason 8 or Gleason 9, ISUP Grade Group 4/5; two patients). A quality
control (QC) human serum specimen representing a pool of 360 noncancer
individuals was used as a control. Whole blood samples were initially
collected in a serum vacutainer tube, centrifuged at 3000g for 15 min, and the collected serum was aliquoted and stored at
−80 °C until profiled for miRNA expression. The 40% human
serum was prepared by diluting 400 μL of QC serum in 600 μL
of 1× PBS.
Serum Total RNA Isolation
and qRT-PCR Detection
of miRNAs
Total RNA was isolated from 350 mL of human serum
(NC, LR, HR, QC) using a modified protocol for the miRNeasy Mini Kit
(Qiagen). Specifically, 700 μL of QIAZol Lysis Reagent was added
to the serum sample and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Then,
140 μL of chloroform was added and mixed briefly and centrifuged
for 15 min at 12 100 RPM at 4 °C. The upper aqueous layer
was extracted and 1.5 volumes (1200 μL) of 100% ethanol was
added and mixed. The sample was then loaded onto the miRNeasy mini
column and the remaining protocol was followed. Total RNA was eluted
with 50 μL of nuclease-free water, and 9.16 μL of eluted
total RNA was used for each singleplex or multiplex reverse transcription
and qRT-PCR reaction. MiRNA expression was verified using individual
TaqMan-based qRT-PCR assays for let-7a and let-7c (Life Technologies; TaqMan Assay ID #000377, #000379,
respectively). Reverse transcription reactions were performed on 9.16
μL of eluted total RNA with the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription
Kit and miRNA-specific stem-loop primers (Life Technologies) on a
Applied Biosystems Veriti 96-well thermal cycler (Life Technologies)
as previously described.[26] qRT-PCR reactions
were prepared in triplicate; each reaction contains 1 μL of
TaqMan real-time miRNA assay, 4.5 μL of reverse-transcribed
RNA, 10 μL of TaqMan 2X Universal PCR Master Mix, No AmpErase
UNG, and 4.5 μL of nuclease-free water. Real-time PCR reactions
were run using an Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System
(Life Technologies) under the following conditions: 95 °C for
10 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, and 60 °C for 1 min.
MiRNA expression was normalized to the endogenous serum reference
gene miR-425-5p (Life Technologies; TaqMan Assay ID#001516) to obtain
ΔCt values (Ct mir—Ct miR-425-5p) as previously described.[27] Average fold differences between noncancer (NC),
low-risk (LR), and high-risk (HR) cancer serum relative to QC serum
(representing pooled 360 noncancer patients) miRNA expression values
were obtained using the ΔΔCt method.
Results and Discussion
The potential clinical utility of
miRNAs as biomarkers for cancers
can provide a direct link to cancer diagnosis and prognosis as miRNAs
are expressed in PCa cells and released into the surrounding biological
fluids during disease progression. In biological fluids (e.g., serum),
endogenous components such as proteins, cells, nucleotides, and pathogens
have a propensity to strongly bind to the sensor’s surface
and thereby influence the performance accuracy (false-positive and
false-negative responses) of diagnostic devices. In the present study,
we determined if our improved plasmonic-based biosensor could detect
miRNA levels with high sensitivity in a complex human fluid such as
serum collected from the whole blood of noncancer and PCa patients.
We previously identified a panel of PCa miRNA biomarkers (let-7a, let-7c, miR-141, miR-21, miR-200b) for the development
of our nanoplsmonic TOF biosensor for PCa detection. Our previous
studies revealed successful detection of miRNAs when diluted in a
standard buffered solution using the functionalized AuTNPs-TOF-immobilized
ssDNA/PEG-SH for hybridization with the synthetic target miRNA.[18] To prevent biofouling of the sensor surface,
PEG4-SH was grafted on AuTNPs as a spacer molecule to minimize
nonspecific binding. In addition to its high water solubility and
low toxicity, the combination of steric hindrance effects, chain length,
grafting density, and chain conformation of PEG makes it an ideal
antifouling molecule in biological environments. PEG grafting has
been widely implemented as an antifouling polymer.[28]Using the experimental setup described in Scheme , we measured miR-21
in diluted human QC
serum (40% in PBS), representing a serum pool collected from 360 noncancer
individuals. The Δλpeak was calculated as a function of
time during target miR-21 hybridization with a ssDNA21-C3-SH:PEG-SH-functionalized
AuTNPs-TOF plasmonic biosensor (Figure ). An average Δλpeak red shift of 14.0
± 0.8 nm was observed after 4 h of hybridization followed by
a plateau in the Δλpeak signal (Figure ). The 4 h response time for ssDNA-miRNA
hybridization enables the potential application of the TOF plasmonic
biosensor in POC diagnosis. We then evaluated the linear response
characteristics for a panel of PCa tumor suppressor and oncogenic
miRNAs (let-7a, let-7c, miR-141,
miR-21, miR-200b) using 40% human serum spiked with a predefined volume
of 1 μM target miRNA to achieve a 1 fM–100 nM miRNA dilution
curve in human serum. Eight hundred microliters of the miRNA-spiked
serum solution was delivered to the biosensor for miRNA detection.
The shift in transmission wavelength (Δλ) of the ssDNA/PEG
thiol-fabricated AuTNPs laminated TOF plasmonic sensor upon hybridization
of target miRNA in human serum in the range of 100 nM–1 fM
was obtained. The sensor’s sensitivity and limit of detection
(LOD) along with the regression coefficient for each miRNA detected
were calculated (Table ).[25] The LODs obtained for miR-200b, let-7c, miR-141, and let-7a were 179, 242,
252, and 394 aM, respectively, with a sensitivity ranging from 0.9714
to 1.0141 nm/nM. A slightly higher LOD of 580 was obtained for miR-21.
The Δλpeak was observed to be correlated with
miRNA concentration levels with a regression coefficient ranging from
0.9761 to 0.9903. These results exhibited improved LOD and sensitivity
over our previously fabricated TOF plasmonic biosensor.[25]
Figure 1
Change in transmission wavelength as a function of time
during
target miR-21 hybridization with ssDNA21-C3-SH:PEG-SH-functionalized
AuTNPs-TOF with error bars (triplicates).
Change in transmission wavelength as a function of time
during
target miR-21 hybridization with ssDNA21-C3-SH:PEG-SH-functionalized
AuTNPs-TOF with error bars (triplicates).To minimize the possibility
of false-positive and false-negative
responses, the selectivity characterization was performed using the
complementary ssDNA probe to target miR-21 in 40% human serum. The
spectrum obtained for the plasmonic sensor is shown in Figure (green curve) with a λpeak of 776.8 nm. Upon functionalization with the complementary
ssDNA to target miR-21, the transmission peak red-shifted by 22.2–799
nm (black curve). The exposure of the ssDNA-functionalized biosensor
to a solution mixture of 100 nM equimolar of miRNAs let-7a, let-7c, miR-200b, and miR-141 resulted in no significant
shift in the Δλ peak (red curve overlapping
black curve). Subsequently, the biosensor was incubated in 100 nM
miR-21 in 40% human serum, which resulted in a 25.3 nm red shift in
the λpeak to 824.5 nm (blue curve). These results
indicated high selectivity of the biosensor toward the target miRNA.
We then validated the selective binding of the target miRNA to the
complementary ssDNA receptor in noncancer and cancer patient serums
using the TOF plasmonic biosensor and qRT-PCR.
Figure 2
Transmission spectra
demonstrating the selectivity of the fabricated
TOF plasmonic biosensor. Green curve—AuTNP TOF plasmonic biosensor
(776.8 nm), black curve—after immobilization of ssDNA21-C3-S-H:
PEG4-SH (799 nm), red curve—after incubation in a solution
mixture of microRNAs let-7a, let-7c, miR-200b, miR-141,
and miR-21 (100 nM equimolar, 799.2 nm), and blue curve—after
miR-21 hybridization (824.5 nm) in human serum.
Transmission spectra
demonstrating the selectivity of the fabricated
TOF plasmonic biosensor. Green curve—AuTNP TOF plasmonic biosensor
(776.8 nm), black curve—after immobilization of ssDNA21-C3-S-H:
PEG4-SH (799 nm), red curve—after incubation in a solution
mixture of microRNAs let-7a, let-7c, miR-200b, miR-141,
and miR-21 (100 nM equimolar, 799.2 nm), and blue curve—after
miR-21 hybridization (824.5 nm) in human serum.
Detection of microRNAs in PCa Patient Samples
The performance
of the fabricated plasmonic biosensor was evaluated
using seven human serum samples obtained from patients diagnosed with
high-risk (HR), low-risk (LR) PCa and compared to noncancer (NC) patients.
Two samples were obtained for each clinical PCa category, and three
samples were obtained for noncancer controls. We tested if the plasmonic
biosensor could be used to measure cancer-associated miRNAs in patient
serums and differentiate between the clinical groups for PCa (Figure A–E). The
levels of tumor suppressors miR-141, miR-200b, let-7a, and let-7c detected by the plasmonic biosensor
were in the range of pM to fM in noncancer control serums and at lower
concentrations in high-risk and low-risk patient samples. Figure A shows 110–290
fM, 18–28 fM, and 4–5 fM miR-141 in noncancer, low-risk,
and high-risk patients, respectively. Likewise, low levels of miR-141
have been reported in the blood of PCa patients and function to block
tumor growth and metastasis by targeting a cohort of pro-metastasis
genes.[29,30]
Figure 3
TOF plasmonic biosensor distinguishes the various
clinical groups
of PCa associated with miRNA. (A) 141, (B) let-7a, (C) let-7c, (D) miR-200b, and (E) miR-21 in noncancer
(NC), low-risk (LR), and high-risk (HR) patients. Offset panels represent
ANOVA results for NC vs LR vs HR samples. P (ns)
= 0.1013, *P < 0.0159, and ***P < 0.0001 for NC and HR vs LR patients.
TOF plasmonic biosensor distinguishes the various
clinical groups
of PCa associated with miRNA. (A) 141, (B) let-7a, (C) let-7c, (D) miR-200b, and (E) miR-21 in noncancer
(NC), low-risk (LR), and high-risk (HR) patients. Offset panels represent
ANOVA results for NC vs LR vs HR samples. P (ns)
= 0.1013, *P < 0.0159, and ***P < 0.0001 for NC and HR vs LR patients.Reduction of let-7 family members such as let-7a and let-7c are commonly observed
in PCa patients and in castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) cells.[31] They have been shown to inhibit PCa cell proliferation
and clonal expansion in vitro and in vivo(28) by targeting cell cycle progression
genes such as E2F2 and CCND2. The biosensor results revealed that let-7a is overall less abundant than let-7c and is expressed at the fM level, whereas let-7c is expressed at the pM level in human serum (Figure B,C). As expected, let-7 levels were reduced in PCa cancer patients. For let-7a, noncancer serum levels were 58–90 fM, whereas low-risk and
high-risk PCa serum levels dropped to 2–5 and 5–20 fM,
respectively. Similar trends were noted for let-7c, and this miRNA was expressed at 0.8–1.2 pM in noncancer
patient serum compared to 0.2–0.5 pM in low-risk and 0.4–0.5
pM in high-risk PCa serum.In addition, miR-200b has also been
identified as a PCa tumor suppressor
miRNA that directly targets the androgen receptor and its expression
is linked to decreased tumorigenicity and metastatic capacity of PCa
cells.[32]Figure D shows miR-200b was expressed at 4–7,
0.1, and 0.1 pM in noncancer, low-risk, and high-risk patients, respectively.
One-way ANOVA analysis showed that these tumor suppressor miRNAs (miR-141,
miR-200b, let-7a, and let-7c) shown
in Figure offset
panels could distinguish between the patient groups with high detection
selectivity and a p-value <0.0001 for high-risk
vs low-risk PCa patients. Figure E indicates that miR-21 expression was elevated in
low-risk (4–5 pM) and high-risk (7–8 pM) patients compared
to noncancer patients (0.3 pM). These findings are consistent with
the oncogenic role for miR-21 to target and inhibit tumor suppressor
gene PTEN expression and promote PCa cell proliferation and invasion.[33−36] miR-21 also showed a p-value <0.0001 for identification
of noncancer control and high-risk vs low-risk patient groups.Our data therefore indicated that the AuTNP-laminated TOF-based
biosensor using serum expression profiles of these tumor suppressors
and oncogenic-associated miRNAs could differentiate disease status.
Indeed, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis shown
in Figure showed
that the TOF plasmonic biosensor discriminated between the noncancer
control group and the PCa groups (low-risk or high-risk patients)
with an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.0. This agreed with findings
by Mitchell et al., where circulating miRNA-141 could discriminate
PCa patients from noncancer patients.[37]
Figure 4
Receiver
operating characteristics (ROC) for NC vs disease patient
samples.
Receiver
operating characteristics (ROC) for NC vs disease patient
samples.
Relative
Quantification of Serum miRNA Expression
by qRT-PCR
We went on to examine two of the tumor suppressive
miRNAs via conventional qRT-PCR methods for relative quantification
analysis to compare miRNA expression profiles in noncancer, low-risk,
and high-risk PCa patients from the same serum specimens used for
the AuTNP-laminated TOF-based biosensor studies. Figure depicts the serum values obtained
for let-7a and let-7c in the seven
patients analyzed by TaqMan-based qRT-PCR. MiRNA expression for each
individual patient serum was measured in triplicate relative to the
miRNA expression profiled in the QC serum sample (representing pooled
360 noncancer patients), and the averaged fold differences were obtained
using the comparative cycle threshold (ΔΔCt) method. Serum
sample expression was normalized to the endogenous miRNA reference
gene miR-425-5p.[20]Table provides the mean serum values by qRT-PCR
of tumor suppressors let-7a and let-7c for noncancer (NC), low-risk (LR), and high-risk (HR) patient groups,
respectively. Our qRT-PCR analysis showed higher serum let-7a expression in noncancer individuals versus low-risk and high-risk
PCa patients, which correlated with the results obtained using the
TOF plasmonic biosensor. let-7c expression followed
similar trends by qRT-PCR when comparing noncancer and low-risk patient
groups; however, the large standard deviation for the high-risk group
made this data point difficult to interpret. Larger clinical cohorts
of human serum comparing miRNA expression levels using our biosensor
and qRT-PCR are needed for further validation as well as the use of
quantitative qRT-PCR rather than relative qRT-PCR methodologies.
Figure 5
qRT-PCR
of PCa-associated miRNAs. (A) let-7a and
(B) let-7c in noncancer, low-risk, and high-risk
patients. Offset panels represent ANOVA results for NC vs LR vs HR
samples.
Table 2
Relative miRNA Expression
Using qRT-PCR
(Mean ± SD)
miRNA
NC
LR
HR
let-7a
5.087 ± 1.529
1.562 ± 1.819
1.720 ± 1.982
let-7c
3.964 ± 1.846
2.488 ± 3.052
5.477 ± 7.342
qRT-PCR
of PCa-associated miRNAs. (A) let-7a and
(B) let-7c in noncancer, low-risk, and high-risk
patients. Offset panels represent ANOVA results for NC vs LR vs HR
samples.Our study suggests that the use of miRNAs
as biomarkers will provide
tremendous opportunities for the development of point-of-care (POC)
diagnostic tools to advance human health outcomes. To our knowledge,
this study is the first to implement a TOF plasmonic biosensor for
the detection of PCa miRNAs biomarkers. Furthermore, this work demonstrated
that the TOF ssDNA-modified biosensor offers a highly selective receptor
for the target miRNA detection for the early diagnosis of PCa directly
from the patient’s serum. Despite the limitation of a small
patient cohort for this study, future studies building upon this work
are envisioned to enable high-throughput miRNA assays on unmodified
human fluids through the advancement of a sensor platform to a fully
integrated microfluidic chip with multichannels for ultrasensitive
quantification of miRNAs. Therefore, fabricated TOF plasmonic biosensors
may have potential use for noninvasive miRNA diagnostic purposes in
a large range of human disorders.
Conclusions
The AuTNP-laminated TOF plasmonic biosensor was successfully demonstrated
using chemically synthesized plasmonic AuTNPs coupled with TOF to
be a highly selective and specific miRNA assay in noncancer and PCa
patient serums. A panel of miRNAs was quantified in human serum with
a LOD in the aM range and a good miRNA hybridization response time
of 4 h. As a proof-of-concept, the panel of miRNAs was assayed directly
from the unmodified serum of seven patients with PCa. The biosensor
demonstrated high specificity (p-value of <0.0001,
AUC = 1.0) toward detection of the panel of miRNAs for early-stage
diagnosis of PCa. The high specificity of fabricated biosensors may
significantly advance the biosensing field by providing a POC tool
to perform early-stage diagnosis and prognosis of diseases using miRNA
or other biomarkers. The flexibility of this experimental setup has
the potential to enable a wide range of POC applications for early
disease diagnosis using miRNA-based biosensors as a promising noninvasive
tool to diagnose PCa, where higher values on oncogenic and lower values
of tumor suppressor miRNAs are significantly correlating with the
presence of high-risk and metastatic disease. Although the panel of
miRNAs was assayed using the fabricated biosensor to demonstrate proof-of-concept
early-stage PCa diagnosis toward improved health outcomes and patient
survival rates, a larger cohort of PCa patients will need to be analyzed
using this biosensor platform for biomarker validation.
Authors: Holly Lewis; Raymond Lance; Dean Troyer; Hind Beydoun; Melissa Hadley; Joseph Orians; Tiffany Benzine; Kenya Madric; O John Semmes; Richard Drake; Aurora Esquela-Kerscher Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Patrick S Mitchell; Rachael K Parkin; Evan M Kroh; Brian R Fritz; Stacia K Wyman; Era L Pogosova-Agadjanyan; Amelia Peterson; Jennifer Noteboom; Kathy C O'Briant; April Allen; Daniel W Lin; Nicole Urban; Charles W Drescher; Beatrice S Knudsen; Derek L Stirewalt; Robert Gentleman; Robert L Vessella; Peter S Nelson; Daniel B Martin; Muneesh Tewari Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-07-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Judit Ribas; Xiaohua Ni; Michael Haffner; Erik A Wentzel; Amirali Hassanzadeh Salmasi; Wasim H Chowdhury; Tarana A Kudrolli; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Jun Luo; Ron Rodriguez; Joshua T Mendell; Shawn E Lupold Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 12.701