Literature DB >> 35071928

Plasmonic-Based Biosensor for the Early Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.

Thakshila Liyanage1, Bayan Alharbi1, Linh Quan2, Aurora Esquela-Kerscher2, Gymama Slaughter1.   

Abstract

A tapered optical fiber (TOF) plasmonic biosensor was fabricated and used for the sensitive detection of a panel of microRNAs (miRNAs) in human serum obtained from noncancer and prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Oncogenic and tumor suppressor miRNAs let-7a, let-7c, miR-200b, miR-141, and miR-21 were tested as predictive cancer biomarkers since multianalyte detection minimizes false-positive and false-negative rates and establishes a strong foundation for early PCa diagnosis. The biosensing platform integrates metallic gold triangular nanoprisms (AuTNPs) laminated on the TOF to excite surface plasmon waves in the supporting metallic layer and enhance the evanescent mode of the fiber surface. This sensitive TOF plasmonic biosensor as a point-of-care (POC) cancer diagnostic tool enabled the detection of the panel of miRNAs in seven patient serums without any RNA extraction or sample amplification. The TOF plasmonic biosensor could detect miRNAs in human serum with a limit of detection between 179 and 580 aM and excellent selectivity. Statistical studies were obtained to differentiate cancerous from noncancerous samples with a p-value <0.0001. This high-throughput TOF plasmonic biosensor has the potential to expand and advance POC diagnostics for the early diagnosis of cancer.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35071928      PMCID: PMC8771705          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c06479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally, and it costs our nation too many lives and consumes resources. In 2018, 9.6 million people died from this disease.[1] Among all of the cancers, breast cancer and prostate cancer (PCa) are the two most diagnosed cancers in women and men, respectively. PCa is the second most frequent malignancy in men with over 1.3 million new cases and 358 989 deaths worldwide, thereby representing 3.8% of all deaths caused by cancer in men in 2018.[2] The majority of PCa is adenocarcinoma, which appears in the secretory epithelial cells of prostatic ducts.[3] Currently, a symptom-based approach is used to diagnose PCa followed by an identification blood test to detect the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration level in the serum. When the PSA level exceeds the threshold concentration of 4 ng/mL, further investigation is necessitated via a digital rectal examination and tissue biopsy. These approaches are invasive, increase discomfort levels for patients, and can carry procedural risks.[4] However, the biggest burden associated with PSA screening is that two-thirds of positive PSA tests are in fact false positives due to the low specificity of the PSA biomarker for PCa and one-fifth of PSA testing results in false negatives, missing men with significant PCa disease. Although biomarker-based diagnostics continue to play an important role in the detection of cancer, biomarkers with high specificity to PCa have not been explored. Therefore, there is an unmet need for a noninvasive PCa test that can distinguish healthy vs. cancerous cells more specifically than PSA. Early diagnosis using biomarkers specific to PCa can greatly enhance the PCa survival rate and minimize the cost associated with the overall treatment.[5,6] MicroRNAs (MiRNAs) as biomarkers have garnered significant attention because of the critical role they play in various physiological and pathological progresses, including carcinogenesis.[7−13] MiRNAs are small noncoding RNAs of ∼19 to 22 nucleotides in length, which are capable of modulating gene activity at the post-transcriptional level. MiRNAs are commonly dysregulated in tissues and fluids (i.e., serum) of cancer patients compared to normal populations, and these expression profiles closely correlate with disease aggressiveness, disease prognosis, and therapy response.[14] Functional studies indicate that aberrant miRNA expression directly impacts prostate tumorigenesis by targeting factors that control cell cycle progression, apoptosis, DNA repair, differentiation, androgen signaling, angiogenesis, hypoxia, and chromatin remodeling. Oncogenic miRNAs are commonly overexpressed in PCa patients and promote cancer development by blocking tumor suppressor genes (i.e., TP53, PTEN). Similarly, prostate tumor suppressor miRNAs are underexpressed in cancer patients and act to inhibit malignant growth by targeting oncogenic factors and regulate cancer cell differentiation or apoptosis.[15,16] Mass-spectrometry imaging has gained significant attention for the development of label-free chemical imaging approaches in biological samples.[17−19] Laser desorption/ionization mass-spectrometry (LDI-MS)-based metabolic fingerprinting was recently explored for the diagnosis medulloblastoma, wherein the machine learning algorithm implemented correctly differentiated medulloblastoma patients from healthy controls using a panel of serum metabolite biomarkers.[18] Pei et al. demonstrated LDI-MS-based metabolic fingerprinting in successfully diagnosing gynecological cancers.[19] However, these techniques require sophisticated instrumentation and sample pretreatment prior to imaging and thus further limit point-of-care testing. Different from LDI-MS, optical biosensors have been demonstrated to simplify the assay and enable the direct detection of nucleic acids.[20,21] Quantitative measurement of miRNAs has been achieved with microarrays and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) technologies; however, these techniques are expensive and labor-intensive, requiring sample preparation and amplification steps.[22] Consequently, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) continues to garner significant attention as a powerful tool for measuring metabolites in biological fluids.[23,24] To enhance the performance of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)-based immunoassay, a linear support vector machine algorithm was demonstrated to successfully classify PCa, benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), and healthy subjects using SERS-based immunoassay with an accuracy rate of 50% using serum PSA, and the classification performance increased to 70% when multiple tumor markers were used,[23] thereby illustrating the effectiveness of machine learning in analyzing multiple tumor biomarkers in serum and its potential application in point-of-care testing. In our previous work, we reported on the successful fabrication of a tapered optical fiber (TOF) plasmonic biosensors for detection of a panel of prostate tumor suppressor and oncogenic miRNAs (let-7a, let-7c, miR-141, miR-21, miR-200b) diluted in standard buffered solution. Since TOFs are very sensitive to changes in the surrounding refractive index and the input light wavelength, we employed highly sensitive metallic nanostructure laminated on the TOF region to enhance the evanescent field to make the biosensor more sensitive to the local surface plasmon waves.[25] Herein, we report the improved use of TOF plasmonic biosensors to achieve highly sensitive and specific detection of miRNAs in PCa patient biological fluids (serum) while mitigating nonspecific binding for surface-based biosensors. Poly(ethylene glycol)-thiol (PEG-SH) was used as a spacer molecule to minimize nonspecific adsorption of endogenous biomolecules and provided excellent antifouling effects. The use of the TOF plasmonic biosensor enabled the sensitive detection of a panel of miRNAs in seven patient serums representing noncancer, low-risk, and high-risk PCa, and expression profiling did not require RNA extraction or sample amplification. Expression profiles for let-7a and let-7c obtained by qRT-PCR correlated with the biosensor data. This work implicates the possibility of using TOF plasmonic biosensors for rapid and noninvasive diagnostic screening and early PCa detection using multianalyte detection of miRNAs biomarkers to minimize false-positive and false-negative rates and establish a strong foundation for early PCa diagnosis.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Chloro(triethyl phosphine) gold (I) (Et3PAuCl, 97%), poly(methylhydrosiloxane) (PMHS, Mn = 1700–3300), and triethylamine (TEA, 98%) were procured from Sigma-Aldrich. ACS grade acetonitrile (CH3CN, 99.9%), ethanol (22 proof), and (3-mercaptopropyl)-trimethoxysilane (MPTES, 94%) were procured from Thermo Scientific and used as received. Synthesized single-stranded DNA (ssDNAs) and miRNA oligonucleotides (hsa-let-7a, hsa-let-7c, hsa-miR-141-3p, hsa-miR-21-5p, hsa-miR-200b-3p) were procured from Integrated DNA Technologies.

Spectroscopy and Microscopy Characterizations

Absorption and extinction spectra in the range of 400–1000 nm were collected with a Spectra. Max M5 microplate reader from Molecular Devices, LLC. Extinction spectra of AuNPs, in the solution phase, were measured to determine the LSPR peak position (λLSPR). For the calibration study, all transmission spectra were obtained in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for all TOF using a Superk Compact supercontinuum lasers in the range of 450–2400 nm and a compact Czerny-Turner CCD spectrometer (CCS200, Thorlabs Inc.) as the laser source and detector, respectively, at room temperature. The resulting spectra were displayed on the computer for visualization.

Fabrication and Functionalized TOF

The tapered fiber was fabricated using a tapering rig system (Aerotech PR0115SL system) to form the TOF structure. Briefly, the middle section of a 1 m length single-mode fiber (SMF) was stripped of the polymer buffer coating material and cleaned with acetone prior to stretching through flame brushing technique and placed on the tapering rig system.[25] A butane flame was used to heat the fiber while pulling the fiber in the x–y direction and oscillating the butane flame in the z-direction (5,10,15) for 30 s to achieve a constant waist diameter. The 3 cm region of the fabricated TOF was transitioned from a diameter of 125 μm to a taper waist diameter of ∼5 μm. The fabricated TOF was then carefully removed from the stage and mounted on a Teflon substrate that consisted of a 48 mm × 6 mm × 2 mm (l × w × d) cell to contain the analyte within the tapered region for surface functionalization and miRNA profiling (Scheme A). The substrate surface was sealed with poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) while exposing inlets and outlets.
Scheme 1

(A) Schematic Representation of the Fabricated Tapered Optical Fiber (TOF) Biosensing Platform. (B) Gold Triangular Nanoprisms (AuTNPs) Covalently Bonded to the TOF. (C) Immobilized Single-Stranded DNA (ssDNA) and Poly(ethylene Glycol)-Thiol (PEG-SH) as Bioreceptor and Spacer, Respectively. (D) Hybridization of Target miRNA to ssDNA in a Complex Serum Environment that Contains Other Endogenous Biomolecules

Functionalization of TOF

The TOF was separately functionalized through two steps: MPTMS derivatization and gold triangular nanoprism (AuTNP) lamination. In the former step, TOFs were cleaned in a mixture of HCl/MeOH (1:1) followed by copious washing in DI water and dried in air for 3 h. The dried TOFs were immersed in 15% MPTMS–ethanol solution for 30 min followed by an ethanol rinse to remove unbound MPTMS from the TOF surface. In the later step, we synthesized AuTNPs by following previously published methods.16. Briefly, 10 mg of Et3PAu(I)Cl was dissolved in 40 mL of CH3CN and stirred at medium speed for 5–10 min at room temperature. Then, 0.038 mL of TEA was added to the reaction mixture and heated gradually to 40 °C for 20 min. Then, 0.6 mL of PMHS was added to the solution and stirred for 3 h. The resulting solution was centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 40 min to remove the unreacted PMHS, and the obtained precipitation was redissolved in ultrapure water and analyzed using UV visible spectroscopy. The derivatized TOF was placed in 800 μL of AuTNPs for 1 h to laminate the TOF with Au nanostructures.

Biosensor Detection of miRNAs

The AuTNP-laminated TOFs were separately incubated in the respective 5 μM complementary ssDNA probe solution (ssDNA-HS-(CH2)n-X/SH (where X is the complementary base pairs for the target miRNA)) and 0.1 M tris(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP) solution for 1 h to reduce disulfide to thiol. A 1 mM poly(ethylene glycol)-thiol (PEG-SH (1:1000)) solution was added and allowed to react overnight, followed by rinsing in PBS to remove any unbound reactants. The resulting ssDNA/PEG-functionalized TOF serves as the TOF plasmonic biosensor ready for the detection of target miRNA molecules from human serum samples.

Human Serum Samples

The deidentified human serum samples were obtained from the Eastern Virginia Medical School (EVMS) Biorepository under protocols was approved by the EVMS Institutional Review Board and in accordance with NIH guidelines and HIPAA regulations. Serum was grouped based on pathological grade: noncancer (three patients), low-risk cancer group (pT2a, Gleason 6, ISUP Grade Group 1; two patients), and high-risk cancer group (pT3, Gleason 8 or Gleason 9, ISUP Grade Group 4/5; two patients). A quality control (QC) human serum specimen representing a pool of 360 noncancer individuals was used as a control. Whole blood samples were initially collected in a serum vacutainer tube, centrifuged at 3000g for 15 min, and the collected serum was aliquoted and stored at −80 °C until profiled for miRNA expression. The 40% human serum was prepared by diluting 400 μL of QC serum in 600 μL of 1× PBS.

Serum Total RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR Detection of miRNAs

Total RNA was isolated from 350 mL of human serum (NC, LR, HR, QC) using a modified protocol for the miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Specifically, 700 μL of QIAZol Lysis Reagent was added to the serum sample and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Then, 140 μL of chloroform was added and mixed briefly and centrifuged for 15 min at 12 100 RPM at 4 °C. The upper aqueous layer was extracted and 1.5 volumes (1200 μL) of 100% ethanol was added and mixed. The sample was then loaded onto the miRNeasy mini column and the remaining protocol was followed. Total RNA was eluted with 50 μL of nuclease-free water, and 9.16 μL of eluted total RNA was used for each singleplex or multiplex reverse transcription and qRT-PCR reaction. MiRNA expression was verified using individual TaqMan-based qRT-PCR assays for let-7a and let-7c (Life Technologies; TaqMan Assay ID #000377, #000379, respectively). Reverse transcription reactions were performed on 9.16 μL of eluted total RNA with the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit and miRNA-specific stem-loop primers (Life Technologies) on a Applied Biosystems Veriti 96-well thermal cycler (Life Technologies) as previously described.[26] qRT-PCR reactions were prepared in triplicate; each reaction contains 1 μL of TaqMan real-time miRNA assay, 4.5 μL of reverse-transcribed RNA, 10 μL of TaqMan 2X Universal PCR Master Mix, No AmpErase UNG, and 4.5 μL of nuclease-free water. Real-time PCR reactions were run using an Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies) under the following conditions: 95 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, and 60 °C for 1 min. MiRNA expression was normalized to the endogenous serum reference gene miR-425-5p (Life Technologies; TaqMan Assay ID#001516) to obtain ΔCt values (Ct mir—Ct miR-425-5p) as previously described.[27] Average fold differences between noncancer (NC), low-risk (LR), and high-risk (HR) cancer serum relative to QC serum (representing pooled 360 noncancer patients) miRNA expression values were obtained using the ΔΔCt method.

Results and Discussion

The potential clinical utility of miRNAs as biomarkers for cancers can provide a direct link to cancer diagnosis and prognosis as miRNAs are expressed in PCa cells and released into the surrounding biological fluids during disease progression. In biological fluids (e.g., serum), endogenous components such as proteins, cells, nucleotides, and pathogens have a propensity to strongly bind to the sensor’s surface and thereby influence the performance accuracy (false-positive and false-negative responses) of diagnostic devices. In the present study, we determined if our improved plasmonic-based biosensor could detect miRNA levels with high sensitivity in a complex human fluid such as serum collected from the whole blood of noncancer and PCa patients. We previously identified a panel of PCa miRNA biomarkers (let-7a, let-7c, miR-141, miR-21, miR-200b) for the development of our nanoplsmonic TOF biosensor for PCa detection. Our previous studies revealed successful detection of miRNAs when diluted in a standard buffered solution using the functionalized AuTNPs-TOF-immobilized ssDNA/PEG-SH for hybridization with the synthetic target miRNA.[18] To prevent biofouling of the sensor surface, PEG4-SH was grafted on AuTNPs as a spacer molecule to minimize nonspecific binding. In addition to its high water solubility and low toxicity, the combination of steric hindrance effects, chain length, grafting density, and chain conformation of PEG makes it an ideal antifouling molecule in biological environments. PEG grafting has been widely implemented as an antifouling polymer.[28] Using the experimental setup described in Scheme , we measured miR-21 in diluted human QC serum (40% in PBS), representing a serum pool collected from 360 noncancer individuals. The Δλpeak was calculated as a function of time during target miR-21 hybridization with a ssDNA21-C3-SH:PEG-SH-functionalized AuTNPs-TOF plasmonic biosensor (Figure ). An average Δλpeak red shift of 14.0 ± 0.8 nm was observed after 4 h of hybridization followed by a plateau in the Δλpeak signal (Figure ). The 4 h response time for ssDNA-miRNA hybridization enables the potential application of the TOF plasmonic biosensor in POC diagnosis. We then evaluated the linear response characteristics for a panel of PCa tumor suppressor and oncogenic miRNAs (let-7a, let-7c, miR-141, miR-21, miR-200b) using 40% human serum spiked with a predefined volume of 1 μM target miRNA to achieve a 1 fM–100 nM miRNA dilution curve in human serum. Eight hundred microliters of the miRNA-spiked serum solution was delivered to the biosensor for miRNA detection. The shift in transmission wavelength (Δλ) of the ssDNA/PEG thiol-fabricated AuTNPs laminated TOF plasmonic sensor upon hybridization of target miRNA in human serum in the range of 100 nM–1 fM was obtained. The sensor’s sensitivity and limit of detection (LOD) along with the regression coefficient for each miRNA detected were calculated (Table ).[25] The LODs obtained for miR-200b, let-7c, miR-141, and let-7a were 179, 242, 252, and 394 aM, respectively, with a sensitivity ranging from 0.9714 to 1.0141 nm/nM. A slightly higher LOD of 580 was obtained for miR-21. The Δλpeak was observed to be correlated with miRNA concentration levels with a regression coefficient ranging from 0.9761 to 0.9903. These results exhibited improved LOD and sensitivity over our previously fabricated TOF plasmonic biosensor.[25]
Figure 1

Change in transmission wavelength as a function of time during target miR-21 hybridization with ssDNA21-C3-SH:PEG-SH-functionalized AuTNPs-TOF with error bars (triplicates).

Table 1

AuTNP TOF Biosensor Regression Characteristics[25]

microRNAsensitivity (nm/nM)R2LOD (aM)
let-7a1.01410.9761394
miR-1410.90260.9903252
let-7c0.91710.9817242
miR-210.90840.9819580
miR-200b0.97140.9827179
Change in transmission wavelength as a function of time during target miR-21 hybridization with ssDNA21-C3-SH:PEG-SH-functionalized AuTNPs-TOF with error bars (triplicates). To minimize the possibility of false-positive and false-negative responses, the selectivity characterization was performed using the complementary ssDNA probe to target miR-21 in 40% human serum. The spectrum obtained for the plasmonic sensor is shown in Figure (green curve) with a λpeak of 776.8 nm. Upon functionalization with the complementary ssDNA to target miR-21, the transmission peak red-shifted by 22.2–799 nm (black curve). The exposure of the ssDNA-functionalized biosensor to a solution mixture of 100 nM equimolar of miRNAs let-7a, let-7c, miR-200b, and miR-141 resulted in no significant shift in the Δλ peak (red curve overlapping black curve). Subsequently, the biosensor was incubated in 100 nM miR-21 in 40% human serum, which resulted in a 25.3 nm red shift in the λpeak to 824.5 nm (blue curve). These results indicated high selectivity of the biosensor toward the target miRNA. We then validated the selective binding of the target miRNA to the complementary ssDNA receptor in noncancer and cancer patient serums using the TOF plasmonic biosensor and qRT-PCR.
Figure 2

Transmission spectra demonstrating the selectivity of the fabricated TOF plasmonic biosensor. Green curve—AuTNP TOF plasmonic biosensor (776.8 nm), black curve—after immobilization of ssDNA21-C3-S-H: PEG4-SH (799 nm), red curve—after incubation in a solution mixture of microRNAs let-7a, let-7c, miR-200b, miR-141, and miR-21 (100 nM equimolar, 799.2 nm), and blue curve—after miR-21 hybridization (824.5 nm) in human serum.

Transmission spectra demonstrating the selectivity of the fabricated TOF plasmonic biosensor. Green curve—AuTNP TOF plasmonic biosensor (776.8 nm), black curve—after immobilization of ssDNA21-C3-S-H: PEG4-SH (799 nm), red curve—after incubation in a solution mixture of microRNAs let-7a, let-7c, miR-200b, miR-141, and miR-21 (100 nM equimolar, 799.2 nm), and blue curve—after miR-21 hybridization (824.5 nm) in human serum.

Detection of microRNAs in PCa Patient Samples

The performance of the fabricated plasmonic biosensor was evaluated using seven human serum samples obtained from patients diagnosed with high-risk (HR), low-risk (LR) PCa and compared to noncancer (NC) patients. Two samples were obtained for each clinical PCa category, and three samples were obtained for noncancer controls. We tested if the plasmonic biosensor could be used to measure cancer-associated miRNAs in patient serums and differentiate between the clinical groups for PCa (Figure A–E). The levels of tumor suppressors miR-141, miR-200b, let-7a, and let-7c detected by the plasmonic biosensor were in the range of pM to fM in noncancer control serums and at lower concentrations in high-risk and low-risk patient samples. Figure A shows 110–290 fM, 18–28 fM, and 4–5 fM miR-141 in noncancer, low-risk, and high-risk patients, respectively. Likewise, low levels of miR-141 have been reported in the blood of PCa patients and function to block tumor growth and metastasis by targeting a cohort of pro-metastasis genes.[29,30]
Figure 3

TOF plasmonic biosensor distinguishes the various clinical groups of PCa associated with miRNA. (A) 141, (B) let-7a, (C) let-7c, (D) miR-200b, and (E) miR-21 in noncancer (NC), low-risk (LR), and high-risk (HR) patients. Offset panels represent ANOVA results for NC vs LR vs HR samples. P (ns) = 0.1013, *P < 0.0159, and ***P < 0.0001 for NC and HR vs LR patients.

TOF plasmonic biosensor distinguishes the various clinical groups of PCa associated with miRNA. (A) 141, (B) let-7a, (C) let-7c, (D) miR-200b, and (E) miR-21 in noncancer (NC), low-risk (LR), and high-risk (HR) patients. Offset panels represent ANOVA results for NC vs LR vs HR samples. P (ns) = 0.1013, *P < 0.0159, and ***P < 0.0001 for NC and HR vs LR patients. Reduction of let-7 family members such as let-7a and let-7c are commonly observed in PCa patients and in castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) cells.[31] They have been shown to inhibit PCa cell proliferation and clonal expansion in vitro and in vivo(28) by targeting cell cycle progression genes such as E2F2 and CCND2. The biosensor results revealed that let-7a is overall less abundant than let-7c and is expressed at the fM level, whereas let-7c is expressed at the pM level in human serum (Figure B,C). As expected, let-7 levels were reduced in PCa cancer patients. For let-7a, noncancer serum levels were 58–90 fM, whereas low-risk and high-risk PCa serum levels dropped to 2–5 and 5–20 fM, respectively. Similar trends were noted for let-7c, and this miRNA was expressed at 0.8–1.2 pM in noncancer patient serum compared to 0.2–0.5 pM in low-risk and 0.4–0.5 pM in high-risk PCa serum. In addition, miR-200b has also been identified as a PCa tumor suppressor miRNA that directly targets the androgen receptor and its expression is linked to decreased tumorigenicity and metastatic capacity of PCa cells.[32]Figure D shows miR-200b was expressed at 4–7, 0.1, and 0.1 pM in noncancer, low-risk, and high-risk patients, respectively. One-way ANOVA analysis showed that these tumor suppressor miRNAs (miR-141, miR-200b, let-7a, and let-7c) shown in Figure offset panels could distinguish between the patient groups with high detection selectivity and a p-value <0.0001 for high-risk vs low-risk PCa patients. Figure E indicates that miR-21 expression was elevated in low-risk (4–5 pM) and high-risk (7–8 pM) patients compared to noncancer patients (0.3 pM). These findings are consistent with the oncogenic role for miR-21 to target and inhibit tumor suppressor gene PTEN expression and promote PCa cell proliferation and invasion.[33−36] miR-21 also showed a p-value <0.0001 for identification of noncancer control and high-risk vs low-risk patient groups. Our data therefore indicated that the AuTNP-laminated TOF-based biosensor using serum expression profiles of these tumor suppressors and oncogenic-associated miRNAs could differentiate disease status. Indeed, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis shown in Figure showed that the TOF plasmonic biosensor discriminated between the noncancer control group and the PCa groups (low-risk or high-risk patients) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.0. This agreed with findings by Mitchell et al., where circulating miRNA-141 could discriminate PCa patients from noncancer patients.[37]
Figure 4

Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) for NC vs disease patient samples.

Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) for NC vs disease patient samples.

Relative Quantification of Serum miRNA Expression by qRT-PCR

We went on to examine two of the tumor suppressive miRNAs via conventional qRT-PCR methods for relative quantification analysis to compare miRNA expression profiles in noncancer, low-risk, and high-risk PCa patients from the same serum specimens used for the AuTNP-laminated TOF-based biosensor studies. Figure depicts the serum values obtained for let-7a and let-7c in the seven patients analyzed by TaqMan-based qRT-PCR. MiRNA expression for each individual patient serum was measured in triplicate relative to the miRNA expression profiled in the QC serum sample (representing pooled 360 noncancer patients), and the averaged fold differences were obtained using the comparative cycle threshold (ΔΔCt) method. Serum sample expression was normalized to the endogenous miRNA reference gene miR-425-5p.[20]Table provides the mean serum values by qRT-PCR of tumor suppressors let-7a and let-7c for noncancer (NC), low-risk (LR), and high-risk (HR) patient groups, respectively. Our qRT-PCR analysis showed higher serum let-7a expression in noncancer individuals versus low-risk and high-risk PCa patients, which correlated with the results obtained using the TOF plasmonic biosensor. let-7c expression followed similar trends by qRT-PCR when comparing noncancer and low-risk patient groups; however, the large standard deviation for the high-risk group made this data point difficult to interpret. Larger clinical cohorts of human serum comparing miRNA expression levels using our biosensor and qRT-PCR are needed for further validation as well as the use of quantitative qRT-PCR rather than relative qRT-PCR methodologies.
Figure 5

qRT-PCR of PCa-associated miRNAs. (A) let-7a and (B) let-7c in noncancer, low-risk, and high-risk patients. Offset panels represent ANOVA results for NC vs LR vs HR samples.

Table 2

Relative miRNA Expression Using qRT-PCR (Mean ± SD)

miRNANCLRHR
let-7a5.087 ± 1.5291.562 ± 1.8191.720 ± 1.982
let-7c3.964 ± 1.8462.488 ± 3.0525.477 ± 7.342
qRT-PCR of PCa-associated miRNAs. (A) let-7a and (B) let-7c in noncancer, low-risk, and high-risk patients. Offset panels represent ANOVA results for NC vs LR vs HR samples. Our study suggests that the use of miRNAs as biomarkers will provide tremendous opportunities for the development of point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tools to advance human health outcomes. To our knowledge, this study is the first to implement a TOF plasmonic biosensor for the detection of PCa miRNAs biomarkers. Furthermore, this work demonstrated that the TOF ssDNA-modified biosensor offers a highly selective receptor for the target miRNA detection for the early diagnosis of PCa directly from the patient’s serum. Despite the limitation of a small patient cohort for this study, future studies building upon this work are envisioned to enable high-throughput miRNA assays on unmodified human fluids through the advancement of a sensor platform to a fully integrated microfluidic chip with multichannels for ultrasensitive quantification of miRNAs. Therefore, fabricated TOF plasmonic biosensors may have potential use for noninvasive miRNA diagnostic purposes in a large range of human disorders.

Conclusions

The AuTNP-laminated TOF plasmonic biosensor was successfully demonstrated using chemically synthesized plasmonic AuTNPs coupled with TOF to be a highly selective and specific miRNA assay in noncancer and PCa patient serums. A panel of miRNAs was quantified in human serum with a LOD in the aM range and a good miRNA hybridization response time of 4 h. As a proof-of-concept, the panel of miRNAs was assayed directly from the unmodified serum of seven patients with PCa. The biosensor demonstrated high specificity (p-value of <0.0001, AUC = 1.0) toward detection of the panel of miRNAs for early-stage diagnosis of PCa. The high specificity of fabricated biosensors may significantly advance the biosensing field by providing a POC tool to perform early-stage diagnosis and prognosis of diseases using miRNA or other biomarkers. The flexibility of this experimental setup has the potential to enable a wide range of POC applications for early disease diagnosis using miRNA-based biosensors as a promising noninvasive tool to diagnose PCa, where higher values on oncogenic and lower values of tumor suppressor miRNAs are significantly correlating with the presence of high-risk and metastatic disease. Although the panel of miRNAs was assayed using the fabricated biosensor to demonstrate proof-of-concept early-stage PCa diagnosis toward improved health outcomes and patient survival rates, a larger cohort of PCa patients will need to be analyzed using this biosensor platform for biomarker validation.
  33 in total

1.  miR-888 is an expressed prostatic secretions-derived microRNA that promotes prostate cell growth and migration.

Authors:  Holly Lewis; Raymond Lance; Dean Troyer; Hind Beydoun; Melissa Hadley; Joseph Orians; Tiffany Benzine; Kenya Madric; O John Semmes; Richard Drake; Aurora Esquela-Kerscher
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Metabolic Fingerprinting on Synthetic Alloys for Medulloblastoma Diagnosis and Radiotherapy Evaluation.

Authors:  Jing Cao; Xuejiao Shi; Deepanjali D Gurav; Lin Huang; Haiyang Su; Keke Li; Jingyang Niu; Mengji Zhang; Qian Wang; Mawei Jiang; Kun Qian
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 30.849

3.  Classification analyses for prostate cancer, benign prostate hyperplasia and healthy subjects by SERS-based immunoassay of multiple tumour markers.

Authors:  Lu Zhou; Ye Liu; Fuyan Wang; Zhijian Jia; Jun Zhou; Tao Jiang; Lucia Petti; Yichen Chen; Qi Xiong; Xiaojun Wang
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 6.057

Review 4.  Histopathology of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 6.915

5.  Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection.

Authors:  Patrick S Mitchell; Rachael K Parkin; Evan M Kroh; Brian R Fritz; Stacia K Wyman; Era L Pogosova-Agadjanyan; Amelia Peterson; Jennifer Noteboom; Kathy C O'Briant; April Allen; Daniel W Lin; Nicole Urban; Charles W Drescher; Beatrice S Knudsen; Derek L Stirewalt; Robert Gentleman; Robert L Vessella; Peter S Nelson; Daniel B Martin; Muneesh Tewari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Bottom-Up Fabrication of Plasmonic Nanoantenna-Based High-throughput Multiplexing Biosensors for Ultrasensitive Detection of microRNAs Directly from Cancer Patients' Plasma.

Authors:  Adrianna N Masterson; Thakshila Liyanage; Hristos Kaimakliotis; Hamed Gholami Derami; Frédérique Deiss; Rajesh Sardar
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  miR-21: an androgen receptor-regulated microRNA that promotes hormone-dependent and hormone-independent prostate cancer growth.

Authors:  Judit Ribas; Xiaohua Ni; Michael Haffner; Erik A Wentzel; Amirali Hassanzadeh Salmasi; Wasim H Chowdhury; Tarana A Kudrolli; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Jun Luo; Ron Rodriguez; Joshua T Mendell; Shawn E Lupold
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  FeOOH@Metal-Organic Framework Core-Satellite Nanocomposites for the Serum Metabolic Fingerprinting of Gynecological Cancers.

Authors:  Congcong Pei; Chao Liu; You Wang; Dan Cheng; Rongxin Li; Weikang Shu; Chaoqi Zhang; Wenli Hu; Aihua Jin; Yannan Yang; Jingjing Wan
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 9.  Diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Descotes
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2019-02-14

10.  A Biomimetic Plasmonic Nanoreactor for Reliable Metabolite Detection.

Authors:  Jiangang Liu; Chenlei Cai; Yuning Wang; Yu Liu; Lin Huang; Tongtong Tian; Yuanyuan Yao; Jia Wei; Ruoping Chen; Kun Zhang; Baohong Liu; Kun Qian
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 16.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.